Nothing is Real: Paul was Replaced

« Faul »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 23, 2013, 12:07am

Nothing is Real: Paul was Replaced :: General PID related :: The Replacement :: Faul

Page 1 of 9 » Jump to page Go

Author

Topic: Faul (Read 13,091 times)

truthseeker
For Sale

member is offline

Joined: Mar 2011
Gender: Female

Posts: 108

Faul
« Thread Started on Mar 5, 2011, 10:59am »

lol. How can anyone think that is Paul?

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

B Bop Paul Linda
Global Moderator

member is offline

[avatar]

Bob Blue eye A

Joined: Aug 2007
Gender: Male

Posts: 9,402
Location: Wilkes-Barre, Pa. USA

Re: Faul
« Reply #1 on Mar 5, 2011, 6:22pm »

Because it is? lol.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

Do you plan to record any anti-war songs? John: All our songs are anti-war ♫
* http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYl1Y9L5g9c ♫ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCtfx2jOyJ4
Maybe I'm amazed at the way you pulled me out of time.
B http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmVd9F1fW

truthseeker
For Sale

member is offline

Joined: Mar 2011
Gender: Female

Posts: 108

Re: Faul
« Reply #2 on Mar 5, 2011, 6:37pm »

Mar 5, 2011, 6:22pm, B Bop Paul Linda wrote:

Because it is? lol.

what do you mean? That's clearly Faul. Don't you believe Paul was replaced? i can tell the difference.

« Last Edit: Mar 5, 2011, 6:51pm by truthseeker »

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

GN
Rubber Soul

member is offline

[avatar]

Up Against It, L.I.L.Y.

Joined: Aug 2007
Gender: Male

Posts: 385

Re: Faul
« Reply #3 on Mar 5, 2011, 6:53pm »

Mar 5, 2011, 10:59am, truthseeker wrote:

lol. How can anyone think that is Paul?

Where is that tampered photo from?

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

truthseeker
For Sale

member is offline

Joined: Mar 2011
Gender: Female

Posts: 108

Re: Faul
« Reply #4 on Mar 6, 2011, 6:48pm »

Mar 5, 2011, 6:53pm, GN wrote:

Where is that tampered photo from?

I don't know. Where did you find it?

That's not Paul either. Wrong head shape. Paul had a round head.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

FP
Rubber Soul

member is offline

[avatar]

Joined: Sept 2008
Gender: Male

Posts: 244

Re: Faul
« Reply #5 on Mar 6, 2011, 7:22pm »

Haha, The original poster doesn't think the original picture of Paul is Paul, and Letter B thought the pic with "Faul's" face pasted over was the original.

Even someone who believes PWR can see the humor in this.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

truthseeker
For Sale

member is offline

Joined: Mar 2011
Gender: Female

Posts: 108

Re: Faul
« Reply #6 on Mar 6, 2011, 7:27pm »

Mar 6, 2011, 7:22pm, FP wrote:

It's not funny. This is serious. And I have proof that the tampered photo is not Paul.

[image]

clearly the first 2 pictures are of Faul. The chins and eyes line up perfectly. The last photo is clearly Paul.

Not laughing now, are you?

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

FP
Rubber Soul

member is offline

[avatar]

Joined: Sept 2008
Gender: Male

Posts: 244

Re: Faul
« Reply #7 on Mar 6, 2011, 9:40pm »

Nope, I'm still laughing for two reasons:

1. Left and right pics are taken from completely different angles. This "round faced" Paul you guys keep talking about is based on pictures from the exact same angle: a straight on shot of Paul's head tilted upward. Usually if Paul's head is tilted downward or even sideways it looks like "Faul" to you guys.

2. The pic on the right of the "real" Paul is obviously stretched horizontally. Here's the original:

http://www.thebeatlesgift.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/beatles.jpg

What website did you get your version?

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

truthseeker
For Sale

member is offline

Joined: Mar 2011
Gender: Female

Posts: 108

Re: Faul
« Reply #8 on Mar 7, 2011, 6:40am »

Mar 6, 2011, 9:40pm, FP wrote:

That is just silly! it doesn't matter what angle, the heads never match up properly. here, I have used pictures where the heads are at the same angle - since you want to be picky.

[image]

They still don't match up, and i have abided by your rule. So where does that leave your theory now?

Faul has a bigger head and there is no use waffling about angles because i have proved it using forensic photo proof.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

FP
Rubber Soul

member is offline

[avatar]

Joined: Sept 2008
Gender: Male

Posts: 244

Re: Faul
« Reply #9 on Mar 7, 2011, 8:12am »

My rule's a bit more thorough than putting them side by side and drawing one pair of lines. How do you know they're scaled properly? If you made the second pic a bit smaller, and matched them up by the eyes, everything else would line up a lot better than you'd want them to.

« Last Edit: Mar 7, 2011, 5:46pm by FP »

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

GN
Rubber Soul

member is offline

[avatar]

Up Against It, L.I.L.Y.

Joined: Aug 2007
Gender: Male

Posts: 385

Re: Faul
« Reply #10 on Mar 7, 2011, 1:43pm »

Mar 6, 2011, 6:48pm, truthseeker wrote:

Mar 5, 2011, 6:53pm, GN wrote:

Where is that tampered photo from?

I don't know. Where did you find it?

That's not Paul either. Wrong head shape. Paul had a round head.

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PaulMcCartney60s.jpg

Oh well that seems to be the WIKI official image for Paul McCartney
AT LAST!
I consider myself as a winner.

« Last Edit: Mar 7, 2011, 1:48pm by GN »

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

truthseeker
For Sale

member is offline

Joined: Mar 2011
Gender: Female

Posts: 108

Re: Faul
« Reply #11 on Mar 7, 2011, 7:59pm »

Mar 7, 2011, 1:43pm, GN wrote:

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PaulMcCartney60s.jpg

Oh well that seems to be the WIKI official image for Paul McCartney
AT LAST!
I consider myself as a winner.

you're not fooling me with that doctored monstrosaty. That clearly isn't Paul, if it was why would they doctor it?

Proof

[image]

The normal photo looks reasonable i suppose to those who are easily fooled but if you solerize the photo you can see their bad photoshoping at work. his hair is all funny looking at the top, where they have had to cut off Fauls long head and they've drawn in long stringy bits like seaweed. and you can clearly see where they've drawn in his ears and missed out bits of his hair. the other parts of his face like his nose look natural, so you can see the difference between the photoshoped bits quite easily.

And I've seen that post on maccafunhouse and you think you know who i am but I'm not the original truthseeker and i only chose this name to honour her because she has had to leave because she wasnt well.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

truthseeker
For Sale

member is offline

Joined: Mar 2011
Gender: Female

Posts: 108

Re: Faul
« Reply #12 on Mar 7, 2011, 8:06pm »

Mar 7, 2011, 8:12am, FP wrote:

My rule's a bit more thorough than putting them side by side and drawing one pair of lines. How do you know they're scaled properly?

How do you know they arent?

Gotcha!

Quote:

If you made the second pic a bit smaller, and matched them up by the eyes, everything else would line up a lot better than you'd want them to.

If i made the second photo smaller and matched them up with the eyes instead then their chins wouldn't line up like they do now, would they?

Gotcha!

Line up a lot better? lol. If it was the same person they would line up perfectly wouldn't they. So you have mistakenly admitted they aren't the same person.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

FP
Rubber Soul

member is offline

[avatar]

Joined: Sept 2008
Gender: Male

Posts: 244

Re: Faul
« Reply #13 on Mar 7, 2011, 9:08pm »

Quote:

Line up a lot better? lol. If it was the same person they would line up perfectly wouldn't they. So you have mistakenly admitted they aren't the same person.

If you need two photos to match up perfectly in order for them to be the same person, I can prove that anyone was replaced.

[image]

According to your standards, these are definitely two different people.

« Last Edit: Mar 7, 2011, 9:35pm by FP »

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

GN
Rubber Soul

member is offline

[avatar]

Up Against It, L.I.L.Y.

Joined: Aug 2007
Gender: Male

Posts: 385

Re: Faul
« Reply #14 on Mar 8, 2011, 3:51am »

Mar 7, 2011, 9:08pm, FP wrote:

Quote:

Line up a lot better? lol. If it was the same person they would line up perfectly wouldn't they. So you have mistakenly admitted they aren't the same person.

If you need two photos to match up perfectly in order for them to be the same person, I can prove that anyone was replaced.

[image]

According to your standards, these are definitely two different people.

Yes they are.
Yiou mean anyone of the Beatles ... yes

[image]

Very old news FP, very old news ...

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

FP
Rubber Soul

member is offline

[avatar]

Joined: Sept 2008
Gender: Male

Posts: 244

Re: Faul
« Reply #15 on Mar 9, 2011, 9:14pm »

Yes but I don't think you pointed out how EARLY it happened:

[image]

« Last Edit: Mar 9, 2011, 9:18pm by FP »

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

michelle
Rubber Soul

member is offline

Joined: Dec 2008
Gender: Female

Posts: 376

Re: Faul
« Reply #16 on Mar 10, 2011, 1:35pm »

Mar 9, 2011, 9:14pm, FP wrote:

Yes but I don't think you pointed out how EARLY it happened:

[image]

Dunnow, seem to be the same dude.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

65if2007
Revolver

member is offline

[avatar]

"You didn't LISTEN, St. Paul" (reversal showing briefcase flying into my hand)

Joined: Nov 2007
Gender: Male

Posts: 817

Re: Faul
« Reply #17 on Mar 11, 2011, 3:11pm »

Mar 10, 2011, 1:35pm, michelle wrote:

Mar 9, 2011, 9:14pm, FP wrote:

Yes but I don't think you pointed out how EARLY it happened:

[image]

Dunnow, seem to be the same dude.

They are -- beyond any shadow of a doubt -- the same person.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

"You didn't LISTEN, St. Paul. St. PAUL. You didn't LISTEN St. Paul. You didn't LISTEN, St. Paul..."

lilyknows
Hard Day's Night

member is offline

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32

Re: Faul
« Reply #18 on Mar 11, 2011, 5:56pm »

Mar 11, 2011, 3:11pm, 65if2007 wrote:

They are -- beyond any shadow of a doubt -- the same person.

and these are not??

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

B Bop Paul Linda
Global Moderator

member is offline

[avatar]

Bob Blue eye A

Joined: Aug 2007
Gender: Male

Posts: 9,402
Location: Wilkes-Barre, Pa. USA

Re: Faul
« Reply #19 on Mar 11, 2011, 6:04pm »

Those are not.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

lilyknows
Hard Day's Night

member is offline

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32

Re: Faul
« Reply #20 on Mar 12, 2011, 10:25am »

if those are:

[image]

then those are too:

[image]

sorry

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

GN
Rubber Soul

member is offline

[avatar]

Up Against It, L.I.L.Y.

Joined: Aug 2007
Gender: Male

Posts: 385

Re: Faul
« Reply #21 on Mar 13, 2011, 7:13pm »

Mar 10, 2011, 1:35pm, michelle wrote:

Mar 9, 2011, 9:14pm, FP wrote:

Yes but I don't think you pointed out how EARLY it happened:

[image]

Dunnow, seem to be the same dude.

Yes Michelle.

George Harrison's double has just another chin shape and other different features (nose, eyebrows ...)

I can see that George's double from White Album Poster era

« Last Edit: Mar 13, 2011, 7:25pm by GN »

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

GN
Rubber Soul

member is offline

[avatar]

Up Against It, L.I.L.Y.

Joined: Aug 2007
Gender: Male

Posts: 385

Re: Faul
« Reply #22 on Mar 13, 2011, 7:22pm »

Mar 12, 2011, 10:25am, lilyknows wrote:

if those are:

[image]

then those are too:

[image]

sorry

« Last Edit: Mar 13, 2011, 7:32pm by GN »

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

truthseeker
For Sale

member is offline

Joined: Mar 2011
Gender: Female

Posts: 108

Re: Faul
« Reply #23 on Apr 20, 2011, 5:58pm »

Mar 13, 2011, 7:22pm, GN wrote:

sorry

So you should be. That first photo is NOT Paul. That's Doubleback Fake Paul. He first appeared in '65 and then Paul came back until '66. But Doubleback Fake Paul reappeared in '67.

[image]

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

Doc
Revolver

member is offline

[avatar]

We all have a roll to play.

Joined: May 2005
Gender: Male

Posts: 3,896
Location: Reasonably close to a diatribe

Re: Faul
« Reply #24 on Apr 21, 2011, 1:31am »

Apr 20, 2011, 5:58pm, truthseeker wrote:

Mar 13, 2011, 7:22pm, GN wrote:

sorry

So you should be. That first photo is NOT Paul. That's Doubleback Fake Paul. He first appeared in '65 and then Paul came back until '66. But Doubleback Fake Paul reappeared in '67.

[image]

OK so I see those pics of Paul and Faul but I just gotta say, of course, OK I am drunk I had 3 three martinis, mixed in the kitchen and they were really good, but I gotta say that Sir Paul is out there, performing his tuckuss off at all these concerts, and of course his whole band that his great; and Sir Paul is out there now, today, delivering it, really giving it, turning it out for the audience and that is really something to hear and see. I don't know if at this point he might have some dude show up and say, "Hey, I am your life coach from MI5 and Iam gonna coach you in being Fab in 2011" or crazy stauff like that, but he doesn't need it; he is on automatic, out there, on stage, really performing and sellling it to the audience, really working it and keeping the music alive, being energetic and committed to the music whether old or new, solid, really doing the music for us solid and fierce. I heard him twice in ATL and both concerts were tops. He is on top of the game and he is keeping the Beatles, Wings, the Electric Firemen, etc. et alm alive and going and it is fantastic to attend a concert. OK I have had a martini or two but really it is true and amazing so, good for Sir Paul.

Link to Post - Back to Top IP:

Logged

Gitchigoomie

Page 1 of 9 » Jump to page Go

Page Loads Since March 2005

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free