|
Post by getreal on Feb 15, 2010 19:54:41 GMT -5
www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQjcG9tXY5E&NR=1Of course Paul is alive. Please use your noggins. Subject your own photos of yourselves to your comparisons of before and after. This video, an interview in 1968, is clearly Paul. He's still clearly Paul now. Hope you all get real and find some peace. You should take responsibility that you might be really breaking hearts and frightening gullible sensitive souls. Blessings...
|
|
|
Post by B on Feb 15, 2010 20:10:46 GMT -5
Not an uncommon initial reaction among people who have possibly not heard about, or looked into, the whole Paul is Dead/Replaced issue. Why did they bother with this then? I mean, what do you think was the point of portraying The Beatles and/or Paul as possibly dead on Sgt. Pepper, in your opinion? Or as the dead guy in the procession on Abbey Road? It wasn't us who put out these albums! btw: There are some here who would disagree with your contention that it is "clearly Paul" in the video you posted, myself among them.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Feb 15, 2010 21:37:24 GMT -5
Getreal, Making an account was not necessary, you could have put this in the guest board, kinda what it's there for.. Which is where I'm moving it, but anyway..
Blessings to you too, but this is hardly the most shocking thing one might encounter on the internet, anyone who spends just an afternoon looking around is bound to see much worse, don't you think?
|
|
|
Post by novusordo666 on Feb 15, 2010 22:37:25 GMT -5
To getreal........ There has been events that have taken place in this world that anyone that isn't in the know would find it so hard to believe. This is one of the many "events" that HAS had to come to pass. Efforts will be stepped up in this year and the next.
|
|
|
Post by jarvitronics on Feb 16, 2010 1:09:47 GMT -5
The Book of Satan said: Death to the weakling,wealth to the strong! Open your eyes that you may see Satan: If you kill off the weak then you won't have anyone left to do your bitch work, and POOF!, there goes your wealth, so, really bad economic strategy you got there. -j
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Feb 16, 2010 6:15:01 GMT -5
You should take responsibility that you might be really breaking hearts and frightening gullible sensitive souls. Blessings... Jesus man, stop being so melodramatic, ya big jessie.
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Feb 16, 2010 16:39:57 GMT -5
we're all not real.
nothing is real
to answer your question.
|
|
|
Post by novusordo666 on Feb 16, 2010 23:04:25 GMT -5
The Book of Satan said: Death to the weakling,wealth to the strong! Open your eyes that you may see Satan: If you kill off the weak then you won't have anyone left to do your bitch work, and POOF!, there goes your wealth, so, really bad economic strategy you got there. -j George Bush Sr' New World Order speech Sept 11 "Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective--- a New World Order--- can emerge: a new era--- freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, EAST and WEST, NORTH and SOUTH, can prosper and live in harmony"............................................................ We live our lives by Do As You Will, if only you all really knew. There has been plenty of clues throughout history as to what we want to accomplish and STILL you all run around going about the mundane and pointless efforts through this "game" that you all call life. This year will see disclosure of some information that most of this planet will find hard to take. So carry on mocking us if you like, we WILL have the last laugh.
|
|
|
Post by jarvitronics on Feb 16, 2010 23:23:20 GMT -5
We live our lives by Do As You Will, if only you all really knew. That is how everybody lives their life, my friend, because that is the law; it is the only law of conduct that has never been, and can never be, broken. "Do as you will shall be the whole of the law" is not a proposition, it is an empirical observation. -j
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Feb 17, 2010 1:10:31 GMT -5
I don't doubt there'll be some amazing happenings. At the same time - what was that song? -
"And if I claim to be a wise man, well It surely means that I don't know"
Have I done it again - have I confused myself? I fooled myself with talk capn Byrney.
Sometimes in that roller rink of cognition, I just don't know when to take the skates off.
And when that organ grinds out another tune, it's - oh round and round and round....
while keeping perfectly still.
|
|
|
Post by getreal on Feb 17, 2010 1:12:22 GMT -5
Not an uncommon initial reaction among people who have possibly not heard about, or looked into, the whole Paul is Dead/Replaced issue. Why did they bother with this then? I mean, what do you think was the point of portraying The Beatles and/or Paul as possibly dead on Sgt. Pepper, in your opinion? Or as the dead guy in the procession on Abbey Road? It wasn't us who put out these albums! btw: There are some here who would disagree with your contention that it is "clearly Paul" in the video you posted, myself among them. Hi Letter B and Jo Jo, Thank you for your polite responses. I always thought that The Beatles were playing a game and having a laugh but it got out of hand. I've read alot about them, and they did have dark humor sometimes. I've been going through some of the pid evidence all week and it appears that many of the photo comparisons are different angles, ages, lighting etc. I thought maybe all 4 used doubles for interviews, photos etc. after the 2nd US tour. I've been listening to the remasters and looking at old original album covers I bought in the 60's. I was looking at a photo of Paul in Spitz' book, where he was sitting with Linda. It's a weird pic, and it shows his profile, sort of. I can't explain, I had a strange feeling about that pic. There's a pic of him, standing, playing guitar in Let it Be and I kept staring at it, thinking that really doesn't look like Paul. That angelic Paul look and energy wasn't there. I chalked it up to age, stress, mood, angle, lighting etc. So many pics of Paul post 66 do look like Paul. I've watched Help and Hard Days Night many many many times over the years - I do have to admit that he looks different after 66...sometimes. So, nearly every Paul song, after Help, was not Paul?? The replacement Paul played STELLAR bass on ALL those post 66 albums? If it's true, do you not think that present Paul is incredibly talented - sgt pepper to abbery rd?? It's hard to believe, that no family, friends would ever have said something about Paul dying? Everyone who loved him?? Seems so outrageous. I looked for astrology articles about Paul's progressed and natal charts for 1966. Maybe someone on this site might know a prof astrologer that could look at that. If he died, there would be indicators. So, Maharishi knew about his death? George passed away in Paul's house in LA - would he have gone there to die if it was fake Paul's house? Doesn't seem like George's way... There are no clues in George's or John's post 1979 songs about Paul dying, no grief clues. The clues are in Beatles songs, at a time when they wanted to change their musical styles, stop writing love song for teens, and to get out of the Beatle personas. Peace.
|
|
|
Post by getreal on Feb 17, 2010 1:57:01 GMT -5
we're all not real. nothing is real to answer your question. Yes, but this site is about present Paul being the real Paul. If you mean ultimately nothing is real, ok! But karma is real, when you experience happiness and sadness, it feels real. The present Paul surely seems to spread alot of happiness, and he supports great causes. Many many people love his solo albums. It seems that some people want to believe he is not real because they don't like the way his music has changed. If there are posts that say positive things about post 66 Paul, I've not seen them yet.
|
|
|
Post by novusordo666 on Feb 17, 2010 3:22:13 GMT -5
People that have high profiles have been replaced all the way back to Mesopotamia, depending on the need at that specific time, 2 prime examples that are relevant to now are Saddam Hussein and Barack Obama. 2010 was the start of "secrets" no longer becoming "secrets". This site is one of thousands that are being infultrated by the powers that be and its footsoldiers. Its up to you wether or not you take this information and clues that are being put on here in. The "GAME" is coming to a stop, at which point many souls just like yourselves will try and cling on to this world, and by doing this you will not pass through to the other side.
|
|
|
Post by miso on Feb 17, 2010 5:33:27 GMT -5
Of course Paulo is alive. this forum is total bullocks. i read it for fun, though. the whole PID story is so inconsistant and gets crazier every day. don't believe everything the internet presents.
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Feb 17, 2010 6:43:27 GMT -5
"This year will see disclosure of some information that most of this planet will find hard to take. So carry on mocking us if you like, we WILL have the last laugh."
Ah, yes, the same thing that everyone on the internet says year in, year out, day in, day out and what happens? Absolutely nothing, zip, zilch, nada.
I'd like to believe you but I don't want to get my hopes up because I always end up getting lied to.
Getreal, I'm glad you have actually gone to the effort of researching all week, as not many will even go that far before trying to rain on the parade so to speak, but please be aware that some of us have been doing it for the past decade, other's ever since the story first broke.
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Feb 17, 2010 7:17:57 GMT -5
This site is one of thousands that are being infultrated by the powers that be and its footsoldiers. So, are you in the infantry?
|
|
|
Post by Getglasses on Feb 17, 2010 9:35:47 GMT -5
Did paul die? I don't think so because he seems to appear occasionally post 67, but he was replaced, no doubt.... hence the forum name. Compare 66 Paul to 67 "paul"..focus on 66 vs 67 there are no similarities... none.. zip.. zero. You really think that tall guy on Sgt. Pepper is the real Paul? Really?? There are at least 2 Pauls.... that is clear. The power of suggestion is amazing. Get your heads out of the fog & open your eyes.... it's right in front of you.
|
|
|
Post by B on Feb 17, 2010 18:44:39 GMT -5
getreal wrote: " I looked for astrology articles about Paul's progressed and natal charts for 1966. Maybe someone on this site might know a prof astrologer that could look at that. If he died, there would be indicators." 60if.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=beatles&action=display&thread=2414(in March 2006 I wrote)"I had promised that if I ever found this article in my files, I'd post it here. I found it yesterday. Then on the internet today. This was written about PID in 1989 by Linda Goodman (now deceased), world-famous astrologer. Click on the June 1989 edition (starts at page 7) with "Sherlock Holmes Department" on this link: www.star-notes.com/Unfortunately, I cannot copy the text from the website, but perhaps in an inspired moment I can type it out, or post a synopsis. By the way, regarding this sentence from Linda: "Do you recall the furor back in 1966, when the media announced to a shocked public that Paul McCartneywas dead, killed in a car crash?"I certainly don't! The first I ever heard about the possibility was on Roby Yonge's WABC broadcast in October of 1969. Does anyone remember hearing such an announcement? Edit: (Since I posted this, we have heard of the announcement on the first "The Monkees" episode, heard in the New York city area.) Linda may not always have gotten her facts right, it would seem. There was a famous New York DJ known as "William B. Williams" on WNEW (AM), who was known for his knowledge of Frank Sinatra era music, but I don't know of any "Billy B. Williams" known as "the 5th Beatle." "----------------- Edit: again - this was written in March of 2006. The character in "Give My Regards to Broad Street" may have had that name. Here is some of the post I wrote that followed, edited for the present: "I'll point out the following statements from Linda, and comment on the poem she wrote. Linda Goodman wrote:"After a careful study of several photographs of Paul, taken before and after November, 1966, it was indisputably clear to me that the eyebrows, nose, ears, and eyelids were markedly different in the two 'Pauls'. No way, in my opinion, could the two men be the same."
"I calculated the original Paul McCartney's horoscope. With the stars strongly supporting the car crash story, I had no honest choice but to agree with Professor Glazier's claims." (that Paul had been in a car crash, and died)The poem she wrote:"The Puzzlement of 28 IF"alas and alack, alas and alack, what have we here? kiss a red carnation black - with one blue tear double, double, time-track trouble pick a strawberry four leaf clover play it backwards, play it backwards, play it over don't cry, little lass, don't cry he's still alive......he didn't die he's writing songs for the three blind mice and the farmer's wife did you ever hear such a tale in your life? step aside girl, and let him pass walkin' barefoot through the grass and Yeah, Yeah, Yeah! Oh, Hey, hey, Hey! isn't it groovy, like a Christmas day? he's still around, in London town with the farmer's wife and the three blind mice play it backwards, listen twice...three blind mice then thank a song of sixpence if you're bright enough to see bright enough to see.... And Paul oh, Paul, dear Paul, the gentle one (see how they run...see how they run?) sing your Noel songs still sweetly but do take care now, won't you, Luv? when they shove up close to hear you please take caution and beware of those flash bulbs poppin' near you for 'tis written on an ancient scroll that the eyes are the windows of the soul See how they run after Paul, the gentle one? but the eyes, ah yes! the eyes are the windows of the soul (end of poem) I don't know for certain whether Linda Goodman felt that he had been killed in the crash. She didn't believe that physical death was the end of a person's existence; however it appears she's saying that she believed he had continued his physical existance in London via Faul. The "three blind mice" would seem to be the other 3 Beatles who weren't noticing that there had been a change. "
|
|
|
Post by iGOTGLASSES on Feb 18, 2010 8:14:54 GMT -5
Did paul die? I don't think so because he seems to appear occasionally post 67, but he was replaced, no doubt.... hence the forum name. Compare 66 Paul to 67 "paul"..focus on 66 vs 67 there are no similarities... none.. zip.. zero. You really think that tall guy on Sgt. Pepper is the real Paul? Really?? There are at least 2 Pauls.... that is clear. The power of suggestion is amazing. Get your heads out of the fog & open your eyes.... it's right in front of you. "there are no similarities... none.. zip.. zero."what? no similarities? let me show you some comparisons, focussing on 1967, ok? same guy winter of 1967 an Avatar i found: 1962/1967 recording pepper: also recording pepper (no comp needed): another 1967 comp: really? "there are no similarities... none.. zip.. zero." welll... this one could be late 1967 or early 1968 NO SILMILARITIES? ? also same dude: another great schot from 1967, no comp needed: who changed most?? not Paul... and another 1967 comp: add a mustache, you got it: SAME GUY in 1967: i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb77/diabolo123/1-1.gif[/IMG
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Feb 18, 2010 8:22:41 GMT -5
Linda Goodman wrote: play it backwards, listen twice...three blind mice then thank a song of sixpence if you're bright enough to see bright enough to see....
very interesting B, thank you
|
|
|
Post by B on Feb 18, 2010 9:27:59 GMT -5
You're welcome, iameye.
iGOTGLASSES, the last set of pictures you posted in reply #18, the one with Faul smoking a cigarette, has stretched the screen image for all of us Windows Internet Explorer users; making the thread 'impossible' to read. Since you've already made your point ad nauseum, please remove it. It's the series of pics with Faul with the cigarette hanging from his mouth.
People, please, when you post series of pictures, please do so vertically, like so:
XX XX XX
rather than horizontally, like so:
XXXXX XXXXX
because horizontal posting of pictures kills the threads for people who are using Internet Explorer instead of foxfire. What happens is that whatever people have written in their posts becomes stretched, resulting in the need for readers having to shift back and forth for every sentence. It becomes very inconvenient, and for some, like myself, it actually induces motion sickness when repeated often enough. Most people can't be bothered, and they simply skip the thread.
|
|
|
Post by SS on Feb 18, 2010 12:47:15 GMT -5
Sing a song of sixpence
Sing a song of sixpence a pocket full of rye, Four and twenty blackbirds baked in a pie. When the pie was opened the birds began to sing, Oh wasn't that a dainty dish to set before the king? The king was in his counting house counting out his money, The queen was in the parlour eating bread and honey The maid was in the garden hanging out the clothes, When down came a blackbird and pecked off her nose!
The nursery rhyme Sing a song of sixpence or blackbirds baked in a pie always end with the tweaking of a child's nose!
"During the Medieval times, there were occasions when the cook in the house of a wealthy knight did indeed put live birds (often pigeons, but I'm sure it could just as easily have been blackbirds) inside a huge pastry crust, on his own initiative. This was seen as a great joke and the cook would usually have a real pie waiting to bring in when the birds had been released."
Just a interesting tidbit to follow up iameye's post. Nursery rhymes in general are interesting and strange. The origins and meanings of such rhymes are usually unusual things to say to children but handed down from generation to generation without much thought given to the reasoning whatsoever.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Feb 18, 2010 13:08:29 GMT -5
Sing a song of sixpence Sing a song of sixpence a pocket full of rye, Four and twenty blackbirds baked in a pie. When the pie was opened the birds began to sing, Oh wasn't that a dainty dish to set before the king? The king was in his counting house counting out his money, The queen was in the parlour eating bread and honey The maid was in the garden hanging out the clothes, When down came a blackbird and pecked off her nose! The nursery rhyme Sing a song of sixpence or blackbirds baked in a pie always end with the tweaking of a child's nose! "During the Medieval times, there were occasions when the cook in the house of a wealthy knight did indeed put live birds (often pigeons, but I'm sure it could just as easily have been blackbirds) inside a huge pastry crust, on his own initiative. This was seen as a great joke and the cook would usually have a real pie waiting to bring in when the birds had been released." Just a interesting tidbit to follow up iameye's post. Nursery rhymes in general are interesting and strange. The origins and meanings of such rhymes are usually unusual things to say to children but handed down from generation to generation without much thought given to the reasoning whatsoever. Not to mention that Sing A Song of Sixpence seems to have been the template for Cry Baby Cry.
|
|
|
Post by igotglasses on Feb 18, 2010 13:45:57 GMT -5
i can't edit the post, sorry! a mod maybe can. All i can do, is repost it, with out the last pic... Did paul die? I don't think so because he seems to appear occasionally post 67, but he was replaced, no doubt.... hence the forum name. Compare 66 Paul to 67 "paul"..focus on 66 vs 67 there are no similarities... none.. zip.. zero. You really think that tall guy on Sgt. Pepper is the real Paul? Really?? There are at least 2 Pauls.... that is clear. The power of suggestion is amazing. Get your heads out of the fog & open your eyes.... it's right in front of you. "there are no similarities... none.. zip.. zero."what? no similarities? let me show you some comparisons, focussing on 1967, ok? same guy winter of 1967 an Avatar i found: 1962/1967 recording pepper: also recording pepper (no comp needed): another 1967 comp: really? "there are no similarities... none.. zip.. zero." welll... this one could be late 1967 or early 1968 NO SILMILARITIES? ? also same dude: another great schot from 1967, no comp needed: who changed most?? not Paul... and another 1967 comp: add a mustache, you got it: SAME GUY in 1967:
|
|
|
Post by igotglasses on Feb 18, 2010 13:48:02 GMT -5
maybe a mod can delete my first post or something.
sorry again
|
|