|
Post by truthseeker on Jun 20, 2011 8:15:18 GMT -5
first of all my qoute meant he has a long head, just to clear that up. Paul had a rounder head. Your statement was quite clear. You claim that Faul has a longer head than Paul - Faul therefore having the greater length of the two heads. Now, I refer you back to my comp, showing that the eyeballs, nostril, upper lip and bottom of the chin align - I therefore ask you again - If Faul has a longer head than Paul, how can the eyeballs and chin align in those two photos? If his head was longer, as you claim, then they wouldn't align as well as they do in my comp. Now, please explain this and support your claim with some actual evidence. Then please explain this -
|
|
thewalruswaspaul
For Sale
My mustache draws all the ladys......and the walrus....
Posts: 124
|
Post by thewalruswaspaul on Jun 20, 2011 9:33:52 GMT -5
first of all my qoute meant he has a long head, just to clear that up. Paul had a rounder head. Your statement was quite clear. You claim that Faul has a longer head than Paul - Faul therefore having the greater length of the two heads. Now, I refer you back to my comp, showing that the eyeballs, nostril, upper lip and bottom of the chin align - I therefore ask you again - If Faul has a longer head than Paul, how can the eyeballs and chin align in those two photos? If his head was longer, as you claim, then they wouldn't align as well as they do in my comp. Now, please explain this and support your claim with some actual evidence. Then please explain this - ok well the picture on the right has his mouth open, wheras the one on the right dosent, so to me it looked rather longer. See yet again the multiple faul theory comes yet again. look at the two in the attachment. they seem to be very similar. Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Jun 20, 2011 10:49:12 GMT -5
Well, I think that was a temporary temperament. But then - 'all together now (all together now) all together now (all together now) all together now (all together now) (big finish) ALL TOGETHER NOWWWWWW!! (Any songs written such as 'All To Get Her' Won All To Get Her' etc etc would be considered a copyright infringement and subject to all penalties - the gravity of encroachment dictating height of Apple above head) Take the antigravity pill, Ramone/a. To experience weightlessness, bob for the Apple all together. Starting...... NOW! Ah, so Ringo Lingo we have, we have. awaken the Macintosh Wakarimaska ?
|
|
thewalruswaspaul
For Sale
My mustache draws all the ladys......and the walrus....
Posts: 124
|
Post by thewalruswaspaul on Jun 20, 2011 11:32:45 GMT -5
can we please stay on topic. here as rather than the occult beatles thing?
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jun 20, 2011 12:59:21 GMT -5
Take the antigravity pill, Ramone/a. To experience weightlessness, bob for the Apple all together. Starting...... NOW! Ah, so Ringo Lingo we have, we have. awaken the Macintosh Wakarimaska ? Ring O Rango ( see Help! clip )
|
|
|
Post by truthseeker on Jun 20, 2011 14:44:39 GMT -5
Your statement was quite clear. You claim that Faul has a longer head than Paul - Faul therefore having the greater length of the two heads. Now, I refer you back to my comp, showing that the eyeballs, nostril, upper lip and bottom of the chin align - I therefore ask you again - If Faul has a longer head than Paul, how can the eyeballs and chin align in those two photos? If his head was longer, as you claim, then they wouldn't align as well as they do in my comp. Now, please explain this and support your claim with some actual evidence. Then please explain this - ok well the picture on the right has his mouth open, wheras the one on the right dosent, so to me it looked rather longer.So, Faul's head is only longer than Paul's when his mouth is open? Hmmmm. I hope you can appreciate what your statement suggests as to your reasoning and it's consequent absurdity? Anyway, let us continue. You have claimed - i beleive that faul had the long head You made a clear statement, as we can all see. Your statement says that Faul had a longer head than Paul - not that 'Faul has a long head when his mouth is open'. So - you need to clarify what you are claiming here, because at the moment your position is rather muddled and confused. So, thewalruswaspaul, which is it? A. Faul has a longer head than Paul did, period. Or - B. Faul only has a longer head than Paul did when he has his mouth open and Paul doesn't. Please state which it is. You claimed: I have previously presented the following comp, showing that the eyeballs and chin align, suggesting that the faces are, infact, the same length - Now, thewalruswaspaul, despite repeated requests you have failed to explain the reason as to how the heads appear to be the same length if Faul has the longer head. Do you now concede that the evidence I have presented presents a more credible case that they are the same length than your case that one head is longer than the other? If you do not, then kindly present your evidence - which so far you have not done. If you cannot do so, then your claim that Faul had a longer head than Paul can be dismissed. Let us return to your statement - The head on the right, in the photo above, looks longer and thinner than the rounder face in the photo on the left. Do you therefore claim that the pic on the right is Faul? If not, then you are contradicting your whole argument that Faul has the longer looking head and thinner looking face. So please explain yourself to the forum members, because at the moment your case is rather falling apart.
|
|
thewalruswaspaul
For Sale
My mustache draws all the ladys......and the walrus....
Posts: 124
|
Post by thewalruswaspaul on Jun 20, 2011 17:22:36 GMT -5
ok. look at the attchment. the man you have claimed multiple times in your comparison photos have to much resemblence to this Double Back charecter.
|
|
thewalruswaspaul
For Sale
My mustache draws all the ladys......and the walrus....
Posts: 124
|
Post by thewalruswaspaul on Jun 20, 2011 17:23:30 GMT -5
of course the photo on the left is zoomed in a bit and pauls head on the left is more straight that that on the right Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by truthseeker on Jun 20, 2011 17:45:57 GMT -5
You haven't scaled those two pics properly. You have deliberately made the head on the right smaller. You are trying to fool people in your desperation. You have failed. I have done it properly - Lol!! ;D And we can see that the pic on the right of Paul has the thinner looking head and face. But what did thewalruswaspaul claim? Hmmmm. Thewalruswaspaul creates comps that are not only dishonest - making one photo smaller in order to try and fit his claim - but it actually contradicts his own statements that Paul's head was rounder. We can all see that thewalrusispaul cannot answer my questions, explain himself or refute my points. He just ignores what I post and tries to change the subject. I am debating alone. He cannot beat me, and he knows it. I am too clever and I have truth on my side. This thread is a total failure. "Disproving Doubleback Fake Paul"? He couldn't even prove Faul had a longer head. Paul is dead. R.I.P
|
|
thewalruswaspaul
For Sale
My mustache draws all the ladys......and the walrus....
Posts: 124
|
Post by thewalruswaspaul on Jun 20, 2011 21:50:01 GMT -5
You haven't scaled those two pics properly. You have deliberately made the head on the right smaller. You are trying to fool people in your desperation. You have failed. I have done it properly - Lol!! ;D And we can see that the pic on the right of Paul has the thinner looking head and face. But what did thewalruswaspaul claim? Hmmmm. Thewalruswaspaul creates comps that are not only dishonest - making one photo smaller in order to try and fit his claim - but it actually contradicts his own statements that Paul's head was rounder. We can all see that thewalrusispaul cannot answer my questions, explain himself or refute my points. He just ignores what I post and tries to change the subject. I am debating alone. He cannot beat me, and he knows it. I am too clever and I have truth on my side. This thread is a total failure. "Disproving Doubleback Fake Paul"? He couldn't even prove Faul had a longer head. Paul is dead. R.I.P know this: i use paint, and i dont even know how to make fades. you keep saying i have failed but no. The magic word? Multiple The other magic word? Pauls. but as for doubleback *sigh* ima handing it over to someone else. im to tiredof it all
|
|
thewalruswaspaul
For Sale
My mustache draws all the ladys......and the walrus....
Posts: 124
|
Post by thewalruswaspaul on Jun 20, 2011 21:52:11 GMT -5
but i will say these 2 are defiently not the same....... Attachments:
|
|
thewalruswaspaul
For Sale
My mustache draws all the ladys......and the walrus....
Posts: 124
|
Post by thewalruswaspaul on Jun 20, 2011 21:54:35 GMT -5
and what about this eh.......undeniabley longer head on the Fual side Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by truthseeker on Jun 21, 2011 12:25:04 GMT -5
You haven't scaled those two pics properly. You have deliberately made the head on the right smaller. You are trying to fool people in your desperation. You have failed. I have done it properly - Lol!! ;D And we can see that the pic on the right of Paul has the thinner looking head and face. But what did thewalruswaspaul claim? Hmmmm. Thewalruswaspaul creates comps that are not only dishonest - making one photo smaller in order to try and fit his claim - but it actually contradicts his own statements that Paul's head was rounder. We can all see that thewalrusispaul cannot answer my questions, explain himself or refute my points. He just ignores what I post and tries to change the subject. I am debating alone. He cannot beat me, and he knows it. I am too clever and I have truth on my side. This thread is a total failure. "Disproving Doubleback Fake Paul"? He couldn't even prove Faul had a longer head. Paul is dead. R.I.P know this: i use paint, and i dont even know how to make fades. Well that's not my problem. Yes, you have. Let us examine your list of failures - 1. You have failed to answer my questions, prefering instead to ignore them because you have no answer. 2. You have failed to support your position with any evidence whatsoever. 3. You have failed to prove that Faul had the longer head. 4. You have failed to disprove Doubleback Fake Paul. That's one great big failure in my book. Yet you haven't provided any evidence for "multiple" impostors.
|
|
|
Post by truthseeker on Jun 21, 2011 12:26:17 GMT -5
but i will say these 2 are defiently not the same....... That's because that's Doubleback Fake Paul. (Round head) I'm glad you are slowly coming round to the truth.
|
|
|
Post by truthseeker on Jun 21, 2011 12:50:21 GMT -5
and what about this eh.......undeniabley longer head on the Fual side I think you'll find that if you scale the photos properly the eyebrows, eyeballs, ears, nostrils, upper lips, side of chins and the end of the chins line up perfectly well, thank you very much - "Undeniabley longer head"? Lol! ;D It's very 'deniable', as the comp proves. You need to accept you're mistaken. That's because they're both Paul.
|
|
thewalruswaspaul
For Sale
My mustache draws all the ladys......and the walrus....
Posts: 124
|
Post by thewalruswaspaul on Jun 21, 2011 13:52:25 GMT -5
and what about this eh.......undeniabley longer head on the Fual side I think you'll find that if you scale the photos properly the eyebrows, eyeballs, ears, nostrils, upper lips, side of chins and the end of the chins line up perfectly well, thank you very much - "Undeniabley longer head"? Lol! ;D It's very 'deniable', as the comp proves. You need to accept you're mistaken. [glow=red,2,300]That's because they're both Paul.[/glow] so your telling me paul isnt dead? ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! that picture is clearly AFTER 66........................ but as you al ways say [/quote]paul is dead[/quote] after each of your comps. now, its time for you to give justice for yourself. and throw me any o your questions. if i cant answer it, ill tell you i cant provide the correct evidence to answer. i CANT disprove your doubleback paul.....but i CAN disprove that was the only faul. now please, truthseeker, answer the following question: IS PAUL DEAD OR NOT.
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jun 21, 2011 15:02:04 GMT -5
know this: i use paint, and i dont even know how to make fades. you keep saying i have failed but no. The magic word? Multiple The other magic word? Pauls. but as for doubleback *sigh* ima handing it over to someone else. im to tiredof it all Multiple The other magic word? Pauls. exactly
|
|
thewalruswaspaul
For Sale
My mustache draws all the ladys......and the walrus....
Posts: 124
|
Post by thewalruswaspaul on Jun 21, 2011 15:32:41 GMT -5
know this: i use paint, and i dont even know how to make fades. you keep saying i have failed but no. The magic word? Multiple The other magic word? Pauls. but as for doubleback *sigh* ima handing it over to someone else. im to tiredof it all Multiple The other magic word? Pauls. exactly thank you iameye. you seem to know there were multiples
|
|
|
Post by truthseeker on Jun 21, 2011 17:00:11 GMT -5
I think you'll find that if you scale the photos properly the eyebrows, eyeballs, ears, nostrils, upper lips, side of chins and the end of the chins line up perfectly well, thank you very much - "Undeniabley longer head"? Lol! ;D It's very 'deniable', as the comp proves. You need to accept you're mistaken. [glow=red,2,300]That's because they're both Paul.[/glow] so your telling me paul isnt dead? ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! No, I'm saying they're both Paul. Paul wasn't permanently replaced until about 1967/69ish. So? This picture you posted is BEFORE 66 - but i will say these 2 are defiently not the same....... So when are you saying he was first replaced? Your claim that those aren't the same man supports my claim that Paul was first replaced before the established date of 1966. As I've said before, your arguments are quite confusing. You ridicule and argue with my evidence, yet certain things you say actually agree with what I'm trying to get across about Paul and Faul. I have already asked you questions and requested you support your claims. You have deliberately failed to respond to any of them. As a reminder, they are in the following posts - invanddis.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=6525&page=2#87796invanddis.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=6525&page=2#87815Then why start a thread titled "Disproving Doubleback Fake Paul"? invanddis.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=6525&page=1Then please provide some evidence to support such a bold claim. So far, you haven't produced anything. Yes. That is what I believe.
|
|
thewalruswaspaul
For Sale
My mustache draws all the ladys......and the walrus....
Posts: 124
|
Post by thewalruswaspaul on Jun 21, 2011 18:58:27 GMT -5
Truthseeker, Ive claimed many times i believe there wer multiple fauls, but i was wrong. The REAL magic words? Make-up and plastic surgery. The one and only faul ther is is the man we all know as...... Phil Ackrill. Ive often thought there were multiples of this man, but no. well, i believe i will be rearranging my thoerys. 1. Crossover false pual exists(this explains why some people think he cam back. and the one known as the late doubleback is crossover.) 2. Paul is dead 3.60IF is real. Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by truthseeker on Jun 22, 2011 7:51:18 GMT -5
Truthseeker, Ive claimed many times i believe there wer multiple fauls, but i was wrong. The REAL magic words? Make-up and plastic surgery. The one and only faul ther is is the man we all know as...... Phil Ackrill. Why Phil Ackril? He looked nothing like Paul and he looks nothing like Faul either - Different body shape. Phil was more gangly than Paul - No, Doubleback Fake Paul is the real impostor. Crossover False Paul is a false Faul beause he is an invention of GN who uses photos of real Paul. Therefore he can't be the real fake. Yes.
|
|
|
Post by monodrack on Jun 22, 2011 12:46:58 GMT -5
This Post is Wrong since the beggining...
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 22, 2011 16:50:29 GMT -5
Locked at the (smart) request of the thread starter..
|
|