|
Post by pauliedied on Feb 15, 2009 8:29:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Feb 15, 2009 8:54:09 GMT -5
Interesting to say the least, but wow, I've never heard that version of "Here, There and Everywhere" before, incredible, so high and falsetto but still without seeming too strained and without cracking.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Feb 15, 2009 11:20:13 GMT -5
Well, my degree isn't in Photoshop detection, but this looks pretty good to me. In the center of the boat, the light hitting Paul's cheek is very similar to the light hitting the bald man's head. In addition, I can't say that I recognize this particular head shot from anywhere else. And although I can't find a photo taken from a similar angle, I'm reasonably certain that the boat is in the East River, and that the Bridge is the Manhattan Bridge. Color me intrigued.
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Feb 15, 2009 11:56:10 GMT -5
Beatles arrived in New York on August 22nd 1966. So it could be 1966 as the poster stated.
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Feb 15, 2009 12:04:59 GMT -5
on the other hand, Paul (on the right) looks very much like he did in 1968. Paul and John did a press conference in New york in 1968: www.geocities.com/~beatleboy1/db1968.0514pc.beatles.htmlThey also had a Tv interview then. So i suposse the pic is from 1968. question is: who is the guy on the left?? he has the 1964-1965 Paul look... Photoshop or are there really 2 Pauls?
|
|
|
Post by skyward on Feb 15, 2009 14:41:23 GMT -5
The title of this forum is 'Paul Was Replaced', so I think the idea is that some are open to the idea that JPM was replaced... That was basically what Apollo C Vermouth revealed, so it shouldn't really be a surprise to anyone here if that happened to be the case. I wouldn't say that this is a hard core Paul is Dead forum, though some here do think that way. You never really know what is legit or not, but it wouldn't surprise me if this pic was legit, and it is still difficult to conclude that we're seeing JPM leaning on the railing. Looks similar, though.
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Feb 15, 2009 15:41:13 GMT -5
MMH... it looks much like Paul, but not quite... Also there is some weird blurry square on his head or something..
|
|
dark66horse
Hard Day's Night
Nobody can deny that there's something there...
Posts: 23
|
Post by dark66horse on Feb 15, 2009 16:07:36 GMT -5
same picture broader view, photo is legit, no photoshop...
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Feb 15, 2009 16:29:18 GMT -5
same picture broader view, photo is legit, no photoshop... 3 Pauls on the boat? Who is this??? So again, where did this photo come from, Dark66horse?
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Feb 15, 2009 17:33:12 GMT -5
Is that Linda sitting next to Sgt. Pepper era Paul?
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Feb 15, 2009 17:50:27 GMT -5
Yes please Dark66Horse, these photos don't pop up out of nowhere.. Book, magazine, rare book perhaps? Yeah I noticed that third Paul just a minute ago, very odd. Anyone know who any of the other people on the boat are? Or if they are Beatle related? The bald guy looks like the guy on the small private plane from that trip to Colorado with Mal in 1967. Hmm.. there was a meeting on a boat in New York in 1968.. Source: At The Apple's Core: www.amazon.co.uk/At-Apples-Core-Beatles-%2522Beatles%2522/dp/0720611164
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Feb 15, 2009 19:09:26 GMT -5
Is it just me or does Brian Jones appear to be on the boat too?
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 15, 2009 19:50:43 GMT -5
Is that Linda sitting next to Sgt. Pepper era Paul? hmmmmmm?
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Feb 15, 2009 20:07:19 GMT -5
Is it just me or does Brian Jones appear to be on the boat too? PP, I'm assuming you mean this cat? I can't get enough detail, but I'm leaning towards no.
|
|
|
Post by eyeseeyou on Feb 15, 2009 20:15:28 GMT -5
This might help some...> Apple meeting on a boat going around the Statue of Liberty 1968. The full photo: Another from the shoot:
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 15, 2009 20:49:44 GMT -5
whoa. i was waiting for a second photo to pop up. where did you get that. ive been looking all over for another.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 15, 2009 20:50:09 GMT -5
great job eyeseeyou
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Feb 15, 2009 21:40:58 GMT -5
Three "Pauls", one Linda and the guy at the back is awful familiar. The photo looks genuine to me. Astonishing!
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Feb 15, 2009 22:34:45 GMT -5
Is it just me or does Brian Jones appear to be on the boat too? PP, I'm assuming you mean this cat? I can't get enough detail, but I'm leaning towards no. Yeah, that's him, now it has been enhanced a bit you are probably right , but you never know!
|
|
|
Post by eyeseeyou on Feb 15, 2009 23:09:22 GMT -5
Just doing my part
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Feb 15, 2009 23:09:38 GMT -5
In that second color photo, Faul's head appears too small for his body. Check out his hair in comparison to the man next to him. It seems unnaturally dark. The same thing with the Faul in the original black & white photo that started this discussion. It seems to me that someone has gotten ahold of this idea, and played with it to make things appear as if Paul ( & everyone else that you mentioned ) was there too. As far as that being Linda, that is quite a stretch. All you see is the back of her head. And that 3rd Faul is at too great an angle to make that claim. It could just be a man with a mustache. If it is 1968, the mustached Faul was already out of date. It looks to me as if someone is playing a foolie on us. 1964 Paul, 1967 Faul & 1968 Faul all in the same photo. What has to be understood is that now that PID is being addressed seriously on the internet, it has gotten the attention of those whose job it is to squash the notion. What is the origin of the black & white photo of the "three Paul's". When & where was it first published ?
|
|
|
Post by B on Feb 15, 2009 23:13:33 GMT -5
Man, does he look like Elvis there!
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Feb 16, 2009 2:27:21 GMT -5
The photo is from the first Apple board meeting. Someone should consult the accompanying text to these pics from the Dennis O'Dell book if they want a better idea of the living people on the boat. The people in question could be any young man wearing his hair long. Ron Kass is probably one of them.
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Feb 16, 2009 4:32:04 GMT -5
In that second color photo, Faul's head appears too small for his body. Check out his hair in comparison to the man next to him. It seems unnaturally dark. The same thing with the Faul in the original black & white photo that started this discussion. It seems to me that someone has gotten ahold of this idea, and played with it to make things appear as if Paul ( & everyone else that you mentioned ) was there too. As far as that being Linda, that is quite a stretch. All you see is the back of her head. And that 3rd Faul is at too great an angle to make that claim. It could just be a man with a mustache. If it is 1968, the mustached Faul was already out of date. It looks to me as if someone is playing a foolie on us. 1964 Paul, 1967 Faul & 1968 Faul all in the same photo. What has to be understood is that now that PID is being addressed seriously on the internet, it has gotten the attention of those whose job it is to squash the notion. What is the origin of the black & white photo of the "three Paul's". When & where was it first published ? At first i thought that too, but now i think it's just a pic of that 1968 boat trip, and that guy on left happens to look little like 1965-Paul. But here are two more pictures from that day: great one of paul and the boat people
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Feb 16, 2009 9:18:07 GMT -5
Is that last photo the apple one that was mentioned earlier ? That is a nice photo of Faul, pauliedied. Although, I do have to wonder why in 1968 he frequently looked like he needed to wash his hair ? The photos that you & Letter B posted are much more natural looking. His hair is tossled, as you would expect since he was on a moving boat. In the original black & white photo that started this thread, everyone's hair is in place. This is NOT natural under those circumstances.
|
|