|
|
Post by Doc on Mar 7, 2007 0:11:19 GMT -5
I like this lady. Eunice, is it? Whoever our Doris is; she has the regal character of a true star; the dignity, character, and integrity. funkin.net/sites/dorisday/ok.htmlSo, Terry Melcher was working with EMI/Apple in '68; I did not realize that. I knew he knew them but did not know the extent of it. |
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Mar 7, 2007 1:45:35 GMT -5
I like this lady. Eunice, is it? Whoever our Doris is; she has the regal character of a true star; the dignity, character, and integrity. funkin.net/sites/dorisday/ok.htmlSo, Terry Melcher was working with EMI/Apple in '68; I did not realize that. I knew he knew them but did not know the extent of it. I've mentioned before here at NIR that Terry Melcher had been working with Apple. I'd like to see more about the Charles Manson songwriter---> Melcher (Foris Fay) ---> Beatles in London/Faul in Los Angeles connections. The dovetail(joint)ing and overlaps of Operation Gladio-linked political False Flag CIA psy-ops like the Manson "hippie/radical youth" killings, and the Faul/Featles media/culture mind control psy-ops. About Foris: I think there was more than one, maybe three Forises. "Eunice" may have been Foris 1.0 . Was Charlie Manson a Beatles song ghostwriter for Faul, Eric and Charlie Brill?! Helter Skelter, Piggies, Wild Honey Pie, Why Don't We Do It In the Road, "Me and My Monkey" (see the Manson song "Mechanical Man")? |
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Mar 7, 2007 2:13:55 GMT -5
I like this lady. Eunice, is it? Whoever our Doris is; she has the regal character of a true star; the dignity, character, and integrity. funkin.net/sites/dorisday/ok.htmlSo, Terry Melcher was working with EMI/Apple in '68; I did not realize that. I knew he knew them but did not know the extent of it. I've mentioned before here at NIR that Terry Melcher had been working with Apple. I'd like to see more about the Charles Manson songwriter---> Melcher (Foris Fay) ---> Beatles in London/Faul in Los Angeles connections. The dovetail(joint)ing and overlaps of Operation Gladio-linked political False Flag CIA psy-ops like the Manson "hippie/radical youth" killings, and the Faul/Featles media/culture mind control psy-ops. About Foris: I think there was more than one, maybe three Forises. "Eunice" may have been Foris 1.0 . Perhaps, but always remember; there have to be the two hybrid "result images" in the broad mix as well. Old vintage Doris pics reworked and reshadowed into the second Ms. Day, creating someone "in-between" visually but reasonably like the later person, close enough to cognitively agree to most eyes. So never a notice is taken. And then there are the "tossback" pictures, (in my lingo), images made later than is apparent from the picture's known origins, i.e., a facial shot made in the late 60's might be "age-reversed" and "matted" effectively onto a body shot made in 1952, perhaps. Then the whole shot is artfully "tinted" and balanced so that it reads like a smooth, vintage shot. All the shadows on the other people or objects will be made to agree. The finished product will look "overdressed", or rather, "expensively re-touched" but then, with shots older than say, 1965, this is expected by everybody anyway because so much of photography prior to 1964 running back into the 20's looks like absolute sh*t today, anyway, when unretouched or unrestored. Some shots are going to be unusual because they may be screen captures from a movie where the character being played has a pretext for extreme make-up. For instance, IMO, in the feature entitled "Love Me or Leave Me", Doris (or Eunice's) eye make-up is very specific, very heavily lined, dark, thick, and it obscures either woman's natural eye appearance. The eyebrows also.And cheeks are painted hard and hollow for that film. Doris's overall make-up in "Calamity Jane" is brighter, more lively, more flattering really. The blueness of her eyes is heavily emphasized; her cheeks made very "berries and cream", I think in an effort to minimize the freckling that Doris 2 naturally has. As far as I can see, the first Doris had milky pale skin without freckling, but pointier and more "Germanic" features than "Eunice", who has splendid, impossible symmetry to her face, but a nose with less bridge and more nostrils, rounded, sweeter, more beguiling eyes, and a picture perfect mouth when smiling. Doris was, it appears to me, more narrow and hard in her features, but only to a point. Doris had the longer face; Eunice's is curvier. Eunice seems more "scandinavian" to me than Teutonic--at least from my pre-formed sense of what that entails. Doris had a sharper jawline and more "frau"-like cheekbones; Eunice is overall more feminine. I would post comparisons but I don't want to frighten anyone with my little compilation. What thows a wrench into these little "studies" is that, while I am seeing a bit more "Doris" left over in both "Pajama Game" and "Love Me or Leave Me" images, "Calamity Jane", which predates BOTH chronologically in the sequence, seems to be fully "Eunice" and I can't see how this is possible, but either the genius editor's were working at full throttle, or perhaps both were on hand for scene filming, which is unbelievable, but so is all of this, so again I throw in the towel and turn off the computer and lay down and dream about easy, delightful things which don't strain my perplexed mind any more than it has to........... Zzzzzzzzz.................. |
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Mar 7, 2007 2:28:40 GMT -5
Yeah, a long while ago I noticed this about the Calamity Jane movie: it doesn't look like the real Doris Day but it's pre-replacemnent on the timeline ---maybe they were experimenting with a Doris double/stand-in to see who would notice, before the permanent imposter replacement in 1955/56.
Go to youtube and look at all the "Doris Day" videos ---there were "Day after Day" multiple Forises, different women imposters performing the role; mere doctoring and photo manipulation doesn't suffice in explaining all of this.
|
|
|
|
Post by fourthousandholes on Mar 7, 2007 11:34:58 GMT -5
|
|
