|
Post by milesdeo on Apr 2, 2008 21:33:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by milesdeo on Apr 2, 2008 22:04:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by B on Apr 2, 2008 22:47:21 GMT -5
CohIMi3t / Aiwss / T3afa o h I M i 3 t --- A i was s s --- T 3 a f a
|
|
|
Post by jarvitronics on Apr 2, 2008 22:56:39 GMT -5
I am unsure why this alleged "treasure hunt" is given credence by anybody.
We know nothing about this "Manson Document," except for the picture provided by Deo, and we know nothing about Deo himself, except that he likes to play the mind-fuck game.
There appears to be no reason for him to disclose his plans to us, least of all by surrounding it with cryptic nonsense, other than to garner attention to himself.
-j
|
|
|
Post by milesdeo on Apr 2, 2008 23:35:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Apr 2, 2008 23:54:59 GMT -5
Hmm, you're right. My memory must be almost full. Still, the symbol there has three portions. So... (?)
|
|
|
Post by jarvitronics on Apr 3, 2008 0:10:40 GMT -5
If you where on a "treasure hunt," would you show anyone ALL of your "treasure map"? I wouldn't show anybody ANY of my treasure map, nor would I brag about it to a group of strangers. I started this out by saying - "FOR THOSE WHO ARE INTERESTED..." And I've said repeatedly that "I don't know if the note is authentic." That is not how you started this. You started with BS like this: "Damn the ignorance. It's not a bloody case that's the "holy grail." If it were the case, I would have gone after it and I would have gotten it without a soul knowing. It's not a bloody case! It rests on his head. Just like in the painting ... L'Ultima Cena. It rests on HIS head! If you can't see it by now it's your problem."If you're not interested, you shouldn't attempt to insult; simply ignore the thread. Isn't that fair enough? I have not insulted you. I have challenged your veracity and your motives. -j
|
|
|
Post by milesdeo on Apr 3, 2008 0:37:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by milesdeo on Apr 3, 2008 0:51:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Apr 3, 2008 0:52:33 GMT -5
Hmm, you're right. My memory must be almost full. Still, the symbol there has three portions. So... (?) Still, the symbol there has three portions. So... (?)actually, three portions plus the whole the Egyptian Book of the Dead makes numerous references to food of the soul, which allowed Mankind the opportunity to meet with the Gods. .... the Egyptians labelled this substance “the plant of life”: ankh khut. The ankh-sign is the predecessor of the Christian cross. It is the symbol of life.
Are mushrooms “stargates”? Arthur believes he has identified symbolism in the Mithras cult that depicts such “stargates” and which form a link between mushrooms and religion. archive.dailypicture.net/magic_mushrooms_spiritual_experience_effect_on_people_study.htm "liberty cap"
|
|
|
Post by milesdeo on Apr 3, 2008 1:03:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by milesdeo on Apr 3, 2008 1:04:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Apr 3, 2008 1:18:58 GMT -5
it's very important that I not remove myself until the 10th
why?
|
|
|
Post by B on Apr 3, 2008 1:21:44 GMT -5
Macca performance? Sometimes I think "I'm too old for this shit." I don't understand what you're responding to here, MilesDeo.
|
|
|
Post by jarvitronics on Apr 3, 2008 1:45:06 GMT -5
I haven't bragged about this. The "B.S." about L'Ultima Cena was posted before I acquired the note! And I was very clear on why I meantioned it -- IAAP's "holy grail" implication. I don't think you're in any position to make a challenge. You seem to forget that when this began, I wasn't looking for a "treasure" or map to "treasure." I came here to find IAAP's identity. Don't worry about it Doctor O. I'm just an ignorant fool anyway. -j P.S. Look up my number.
|
|
|
Post by milesdeo on Apr 3, 2008 2:24:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Apr 4, 2008 10:30:31 GMT -5
I made this before I decided to post an image of the note. If you can decipher it, all you'll get is what the note implies: That Manson hid something at a location in California. like what. has this been decoded? is it a mirror thing along the break line? what did it say?
|
|
|
Post by milesdeo on Apr 4, 2008 20:34:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by milesdeo on Apr 4, 2008 20:53:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Apr 4, 2008 20:57:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Apr 4, 2008 21:00:18 GMT -5
I don't know why anyone would want to decipher it. It's a good cipher, probably difficult to solve. But there's nothing in it, other than what I've already said + a few mistakes. Just for a challenge? I do enjoy ciphers as well. This one is difficult because not all of the numbers represent letters. so we can forget it then...why are you making ciphers?
|
|
|
Post by jarvitronics on Apr 4, 2008 21:17:01 GMT -5
Just for a challenge? I do enjoy ciphers as well. This one is difficult because not all of the numbers represent letters. I gave you a cipher. You should solve it - or not. -j
|
|
|
Post by milesdeo on Apr 4, 2008 21:17:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by milesdeo on Apr 4, 2008 21:22:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by jarvitronics on Apr 4, 2008 21:24:59 GMT -5
But, since that there is criticism about using ciphers, I changed my background on YouTube yesterday to something very simply -- the alchemy symbol for Silver. It's just for fun, really. I've always enjoyed cryptography. But I'm better at creating ciphers, than I am at solving them. I don't think anybody wants to criticize you for posting ciphers. The only reason I have been wary of you is because you came out of nowhere with a mysterious air, making yourself sound like an insider of sorts, and that is the hallmark of a troll. The fact that you have no history here, coupled with your secretive nature, is what made you suspect. -j
|
|