|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Dec 9, 2018 22:47:11 GMT -5
Maybe because they were being targeted and harassed and getting death threats from an anonymous swarm of people who were searching for and then zeroing in on anyone tangentially related to The Boogey Woman who used the word "pizza" in a tweet? A man showed up to a busy place of business with a loaded rifle intending to kill people because of the word: pizza. If it was making the news daily that red haired cab drivers were being targeted by homicidal lunatics and I was a red haired cab driver, I might wear a hat, you know?
You'll cede that lots of people eat pizza and because so many people eat it they also mention it? I don't know about the UK, but in the US it's not uncommon for someone to have pizza at least once a week. I just had pizza for the 3rd time in 7 days because I don't cook and I'm impatient and it takes ten minutes to cook and defrost one in the toaster oven. In compact urban areas like DC and NYC, there are pizza parlors on every other corner where people frequently "grab a slice" on their way between appointments, several times a week.
The term appears with such frequency in benign conversation that it would be fairly useless as a code word because you'd be sorting through millions of instances of the word being used to mean pizza exactly itself as a food for a possible single instance in which it might be used to mean something else. It would be like using "car" as a code word. Or "lunch". Or "traffic". This isn't a matter of hiding in plain sight when one out of three casually catered events are going to serve the supposed secret code word.
If I was going to decide upon a secret code word to refer to an abhorrent crime I was actively engaged in, I would not choose a code word so commonly used that I would put myself in a position of accidentally exposing my horrific crimes any time someone mentioned this very common thing to me. How would I know if the person I was speaking with knew that I had decided "rain" referred to my illicit activities or if they were just chatting about the weather? In that scenario, I would have to offer self-incriminating information in order to deduce if the person knew my code or not. That's a really dumb way to do crime, lol, especially when there are dozens of other ways to much more covertly and safely communicate with co-conspirators. If one wanted to use coded language that appeared superficially benign, as I'm sure many groups of people do, it would prove pragmatic to either use a term that would not be so easily mistaken for something else or to embed the message in some other way than overt diction. As an example, intelligence agencies frequently use books in publication as keys to their codes (see: every Christian Science Reading Room in the world and every single copy of Mary Baker Eddy's book Science And Health, having the exact same number of pages, the exact same text on every single page, regardless of the physical print size of the edition. Makes a good decoder, eh? And you can find a copy anywhere.)
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Dec 10, 2018 1:42:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Dec 10, 2018 6:39:56 GMT -5
Maybe because they were being targeted and harassed and getting death threats from an anonymous swarm of people who were searching for and then zeroing in on anyone tangentially related to The Boogey Woman who used the word "pizza" in a tweet? A man showed up to a busy place of business with a loaded rifle intending to kill people because of the word: pizza. If it was making the news daily that red haired cab drivers were being targeted by homicidal lunatics and I was a red haired cab driver, I might wear a hat, you know? You'll cede that lots of people eat pizza and because so many people eat it they also mention it? I don't know about the UK, but in the US it's not uncommon for someone to have pizza at least once a week. I just had pizza for the 3rd time in 7 days because I don't cook and I'm impatient and it takes ten minutes to cook and defrost one in the toaster oven. In compact urban areas like DC and NYC, there are pizza parlors on every other corner where people frequently "grab a slice" on their way between appointments, several times a week. The term appears with such frequency in benign conversation that it would be fairly useless as a code word because you'd be sorting through millions of instances of the word being used to mean pizza exactly itself as a food for a possible single instance in which it might be used to mean something else. It would be like using "car" as a code word. Or "lunch". Or "traffic". This isn't a matter of hiding in plain sight when one out of three casually catered events are going to serve the supposed secret code word. If I was going to decide upon a secret code word to refer to an abhorrent crime I was actively engaged in, I would not choose a code word so commonly used that I would put myself in a position of accidentally exposing my horrific crimes any time someone mentioned this very common thing to me. How would I know if the person I was speaking with knew that I had decided "rain" referred to my illicit activities or if they were just chatting about the weather? In that scenario, I would have to offer self-incriminating information in order to deduce if the person knew my code or not. That's a really dumb way to do crime, lol, especially when there are dozens of other ways to much more covertly and safely communicate with co-conspirators. If one wanted to use coded language that appeared superficially benign, as I'm sure many groups of people do, it would prove pragmatic to either use a term that would not be so easily mistaken for something else or to embed the message in some other way than overt diction. As an example, intelligence agencies frequently use books in publication as keys to their codes (see: every Christian Science Reading Room in the world and every single copy of Mary Baker Eddy's book Science And Health, having the exact same number of pages, the exact same text on every single page, regardless of the physical print size of the edition. Makes a good decoder, eh? And you can find a copy anywhere.) Funny how the only thing the man with the loaded rifle shot in the pizza parlour run by the 49th most influential man in Washington DC, was the computer hard drive. And that the gunman's father worked in Haiti for Beyond Borders which was directly linked to the Boogey Woman's Foundation, or that said father owned a children's charity called Protect-A-Child and a production company called Forever Young, but that's beside the point. The FBI already published a report that pizza was a codeword for sex with a minor, and that is just one codeword. You see the agencies who use social media to spy on people use complex data analysis tools that can tell if a person is talking about a slice of baked dough with tomato sauce or sex with a minor. Now that we know what these agencies have done about this phenomenon (cover it up) one can only surmise that these agencies were using child sex slaves as weapons. My own research has seen it used to bring several members of the Bernie Sanders campaign to completely scrub their twitter content prior to 2017 because it showed them organising sex with minors as they went from state to state on the campaign trail. The "conspiracy theory" that pizzagate is about Hillary Clinton running a child sex ring out of a DC pizzeria is an ad hoc one, pizzagate is far broader than that. |
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Dec 11, 2018 3:34:19 GMT -5
You have responded to exactly zero of my arguments, which leads me to believe that you spent no time considering my points.
Citation? Context? Scale of reference? C'mon, support your arguments.
Again: documentation? What hard drive? Where was this drive sitting?
Which some people, people who do not assume every organization that interacts with children exists for the purpose of raping them, might see as noble causes to be involved with.
Yes, they did. Do you know when they disclosed that and some of those other symbols? Do you think active child pornographers etc are still using symbols that they know authorities decoded? Do you think the FBI would have declassified that information if it was still relevant to ongoing investigations? You need to ask these sorts of critical questions in evaluating the information you're given, particularly when that information has such an obvious bias. It doesn't matter if you share the bias, in fact, all the more reason to turn the information upside down and inside out to find any holes.
Are you referring to any specific incident of cover-up?
...OK, I think I know what you mean here, but you might want to phrase that differently for future reference. The average person parsing what you wrote above is going to have a lot of things come to mind none of which have anything to do with blackmail. But, yes, blackmail is common and leading people into vice so you can threaten to expose them if they don't do your bidding is also very common. See: All the republican congressmen and senators suddenly resigning as the Russia probe probes on and disclosures of financial ties between Moscow and the NRA are revealed. See: Trump's piss tape & Putin. See: Michael Cohen's resume.
You may have drawn incorrect conclusions. You may have been duped into drawing those conclusions through a concentrated social engineering campaign. Bernie's team is nastily intertwined with Trump's. However, if you reread those emails and tweets and make the food references code for financial donors rather than child rape, how does that change the comprehensibility of the sentence structures, of the responses, of the context of these correspondences? Because that's what they were referring to. You can look that up, assuming you're doing a real investigation and not just trying to fix facts to a pre-conceived fiction.
What if it's actually smaller and fewer people are at risk of being exposed for their ties to this ring and that by pointing their fingers at an entire city they managed to take the heat off of themselves? How about that?
Seriously, this isn't a conversation if you don't respond to the statements in my posts. If you don't want to have a conversation about it, why bring it up to me? Just make a blog post.
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Dec 11, 2018 12:18:29 GMT -5
Maybe because they were being targeted and harassed and getting death threats from an anonymous swarm of people who were searching for and then zeroing in on anyone tangentially related to The Boogey Woman who used the word "pizza" in a tweet? A man showed up to a busy place of business with a loaded rifle intending to kill people because of the word: pizza. If it was making the news daily that red haired cab drivers were being targeted by homicidal lunatics and I was a red haired cab driver, I might wear a hat, you know? You'll cede that lots of people eat pizza and because so many people eat it they also mention it? I don't know about the UK, but in the US it's not uncommon for someone to have pizza at least once a week. I just had pizza for the 3rd time in 7 days because I don't cook and I'm impatient and it takes ten minutes to cook and defrost one in the toaster oven. In compact urban areas like DC and NYC, there are pizza parlors on every other corner where people frequently "grab a slice" on their way between appointments, several times a week. The term appears with such frequency in benign conversation that it would be fairly useless as a code word because you'd be sorting through millions of instances of the word being used to mean pizza exactly itself as a food for a possible single instance in which it might be used to mean something else. It would be like using "car" as a code word. Or "lunch". Or "traffic". This isn't a matter of hiding in plain sight when one out of three casually catered events are going to serve the supposed secret code word. If I was going to decide upon a secret code word to refer to an abhorrent crime I was actively engaged in, I would not choose a code word so commonly used that I would put myself in a position of accidentally exposing my horrific crimes any time someone mentioned this very common thing to me. How would I know if the person I was speaking with knew that I had decided "rain" referred to my illicit activities or if they were just chatting about the weather? In that scenario, I would have to offer self-incriminating information in order to deduce if the person knew my code or not. That's a really dumb way to do crime, lol, especially when there are dozens of other ways to much more covertly and safely communicate with co-conspirators. If one wanted to use coded language that appeared superficially benign, as I'm sure many groups of people do, it would prove pragmatic to either use a term that would not be so easily mistaken for something else or to embed the message in some other way than overt diction. As an example, intelligence agencies frequently use books in publication as keys to their codes (see: every Christian Science Reading Room in the world and every single copy of Mary Baker Eddy's book Science And Health, having the exact same number of pages, the exact same text on every single page, regardless of the physical print size of the edition. Makes a good decoder, eh? And you can find a copy anywhere.) Funny how the only thing the man with the loaded rifle shot in the pizza parlour run by the 49th most influential man in Washington DC, was the computer hard drive. And that the gunman's father worked in Haiti for Beyond Borders which was directly linked to the Boogey Woman's Foundation, or that said father owned a children's charity called Protect-A-Child and a production company called Forever Young, but that's beside the point. The FBI already published a report that pizza was a codeword for sex with a minor, and that is just one codeword. You see the agencies who use social media to spy on people use complex data analysis tools that can tell if a person is talking about a slice of baked dough with tomato sauce or sex with a minor. Now that we know what these agencies have done about this phenomenon (cover it up) one can only surmise that these agencies were using child sex slaves as weapons. My own research has seen it used to bring several members of the Bernie Sanders campaign to completely scrub their twitter content prior to 2017 because it showed them organising sex with minors as they went from state to state on the campaign trail. The "conspiracy theory" that pizzagate is about Hillary Clinton running a child sex ring out of a DC pizzeria is an ad hoc one, pizzagate is far broader than that. Hypothetically speaking, what if the term “Pizza” isn’t referencing a sex trafficking ring, but something more along the lines of (interms of the Steele Dossier) selling the eggs of an American Oligarch at a time where the country was in a form of distress, using codeword names for these eggs and sell them around the world. Not just for millions of babies used to torment the living hell out of the guy with the stones to produce such a feat, but figure out a way to profit off of something of extreme value. (Wouldn’t be surprised if they’re sprinkling it in pizza, tbh) ...once again, hypothetically speaking |
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Dec 12, 2018 7:49:24 GMT -5
plus free delivery!
lol
 |
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Dec 12, 2018 7:57:21 GMT -5
You have responded to exactly zero of my arguments, which leads me to believe that you spent no time considering my points. Citation? Context? Scale of reference? C'mon, support your arguments. Again: documentation? What hard drive? Where was this drive sitting? Which some people, people who do not assume every organization that interacts with children exists for the purpose of raping them, might see as noble causes to be involved with. Yes, they did. Do you know when they disclosed that and some of those other symbols? Do you think active child pornographers etc are still using symbols that they know authorities decoded? Do you think the FBI would have declassified that information if it was still relevant to ongoing investigations? You need to ask these sorts of critical questions in evaluating the information you're given, particularly when that information has such an obvious bias. It doesn't matter if you share the bias, in fact, all the more reason to turn the information upside down and inside out to find any holes. Are you referring to any specific incident of cover-up? ...OK, I think I know what you mean here, but you might want to phrase that differently for future reference. The average person parsing what you wrote above is going to have a lot of things come to mind none of which have anything to do with blackmail. But, yes, blackmail is common and leading people into vice so you can threaten to expose them if they don't do your bidding is also very common. See: All the republican congressmen and senators suddenly resigning as the Russia probe probes on and disclosures of financial ties between Moscow and the NRA are revealed. See: Trump's piss tape & Putin. See: Michael Cohen's resume. You may have drawn incorrect conclusions. You may have been duped into drawing those conclusions through a concentrated social engineering campaign. Bernie's team is nastily intertwined with Trump's. However, if you reread those emails and tweets and make the food references code for financial donors rather than child rape, how does that change the comprehensibility of the sentence structures, of the responses, of the context of these correspondences? Because that's what they were referring to. You can look that up, assuming you're doing a real investigation and not just trying to fix facts to a pre-conceived fiction.
What if it's actually smaller and fewer people are at risk of being exposed for their ties to this ring and that by pointing their fingers at an entire city they managed to take the heat off of themselves? How about that?
Seriously, this isn't a conversation if you don't respond to the statements in my posts. If you don't want to have a conversation about it, why bring it up to me? Just make a blog post.
GQ magazine Most Powerful People in Washington DC James Alefantis (scroll down to 49) www.gq.com/gallery/50-most-powerful-people-in-washington-dc"Gunman" Edgar Welch is literally an actor. Here's his imdb page: m.imdb.com/name/nm2625901/His father's dirty dealings go back to the Reagan/CIA war on drugs |
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Dec 13, 2018 21:25:41 GMT -5
You have responded to exactly zero of my arguments, which leads me to believe that you spent no time considering my points. Citation? Context? Scale of reference? C'mon, support your arguments. Again: documentation? What hard drive? Where was this drive sitting? Which some people, people who do not assume every organization that interacts with children exists for the purpose of raping them, might see as noble causes to be involved with. Yes, they did. Do you know when they disclosed that and some of those other symbols? Do you think active child pornographers etc are still using symbols that they know authorities decoded? Do you think the FBI would have declassified that information if it was still relevant to ongoing investigations? You need to ask these sorts of critical questions in evaluating the information you're given, particularly when that information has such an obvious bias. It doesn't matter if you share the bias, in fact, all the more reason to turn the information upside down and inside out to find any holes. Are you referring to any specific incident of cover-up? ...OK, I think I know what you mean here, but you might want to phrase that differently for future reference. The average person parsing what you wrote above is going to have a lot of things come to mind none of which have anything to do with blackmail. But, yes, blackmail is common and leading people into vice so you can threaten to expose them if they don't do your bidding is also very common. See: All the republican congressmen and senators suddenly resigning as the Russia probe probes on and disclosures of financial ties between Moscow and the NRA are revealed. See: Trump's piss tape & Putin. See: Michael Cohen's resume. You may have drawn incorrect conclusions. You may have been duped into drawing those conclusions through a concentrated social engineering campaign. Bernie's team is nastily intertwined with Trump's. However, if you reread those emails and tweets and make the food references code for financial donors rather than child rape, how does that change the comprehensibility of the sentence structures, of the responses, of the context of these correspondences? Because that's what they were referring to. You can look that up, assuming you're doing a real investigation and not just trying to fix facts to a pre-conceived fiction.
What if it's actually smaller and fewer people are at risk of being exposed for their ties to this ring and that by pointing their fingers at an entire city they managed to take the heat off of themselves? How about that?
Seriously, this isn't a conversation if you don't respond to the statements in my posts. If you don't want to have a conversation about it, why bring it up to me? Just make a blog post.
GQ magazine Most Powerful People in Washington DC James Alefantis (scroll down to 49) www.gq.com/gallery/50-most-powerful-people-in-washington-dc"Gunman" Edgar Welch is literally an actor. Here's his imdb page: m.imdb.com/name/nm2625901/His father's dirty dealings go back to the Reagan/CIA war on drugs Yep...just another Deep State supported and orchestrated false flag operation in order to demonize those who uncover these Satanists evil operations IMHO. They just tried it again in France to try to quell the uprisings and get authprizatiob to use force upon a populace who are tired of the disparity and corruption by labelling them as terrorists! It is always the same old playbook by these evil elites! Their crimes and time as "leaders" over the people of the world is crumbling and being exposed like never before! Their time is very short! |
|
