|
Post by superman on Jan 19, 2010 3:20:26 GMT -5
www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7AdMPmItLIAt 2:08 in the video you see a woman following behind John. She is concealing something in her jacket. LSD or a gun to murder him? Look at the special effects affecting her image. Isn't that indicative of someone who is "tripping" on acid? Is this John's "handler" or his murderer?
|
|
|
Post by B on Jan 20, 2010 11:09:55 GMT -5
The woman is indicative of someone who is tripping on acid, but the point is being made that the band is now in its psychedelic phase. She is looking at them. Note that this is after George moves from his previous location on the wall, essentially delineating a different period from the earlier one, when there were casualties at dawn. I don't think this song is about John's murder; it's about Paul being taken away by the police, among other things. I think John's tribute from George was "All Those Years Ago". I don't see the woman as representing a handler for John. There is too much of a distance between them for that visual connection to be made, imo.
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Jan 20, 2010 12:32:32 GMT -5
I really don't see anything to indicate that it's a woman. My opinion? It's Mark David Chapman. Showing his killer following him isn't too surprising, given the dark tone of the song.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Apr 16, 2010 16:15:14 GMT -5
We seem to be having alot of guests visiting - Here is a summation that might help if not familiar with the whole thing. Some things could be debated but here it is anyway. ( thanks to Beatlies over at Doppels for this)
"Some basics about Beatle Paul, to begin with a summing up:
1) From August 1966 on to the present day, Beatles member Paul McCartney (real, full name: James Paul McCartney) is markedly different in physical appearance and voice than he was at any time before. There are persistent differences that go beyond what is possible with makeup or plastic surgery, and indicate that a different individual(s) has taken his place, falsely and permanently assuming the identity of James Paul McCartney. The physical proof is in the film, video, photos and audio of McCartney before and after this key 1966 time period.
2) The "real" Paul McCartney has apparently not appeared in public since September 1966, under his real name/identity, not even for a brief appearance (some who maintain that he was imposter-replaced have differences of opinion on this issue). The reason for Paul McCartney's disappearance and replacement with one or more imposters remains, to the public, uncertain to this day.
3) There are many "clues" left by the Beatles and their managers/handlers/entourage, telling us that Paul McCartney was replaced with an imposter, in the form of messages and coded messages in post-Sep. 1966 song lyrics, visuals on album covers, illustrations, photos and cartoons, backwards audio messages, word references and encryptions, coded signals in Beatles-related movies, TV and public appearances etc.
4) These clues first appear in 1966 but it was not until May of 1969 that the general public became aware of them, when the mass media began the "Paul is Dead" discussion of clues and possible death scenarios of Paul, with PID proponents sometimes mentioning 1966 as the likely year of the event and initial cover-up. The real name of the man impostering Paul McCartney was said to be "William Campbell" or "Billy Shears." When radio shows and magazines asked questions of Beatles members and their inner circle at this time, they all denied the rumor.
5) There is circumstantial evidence for the imposter replacement of Paul McCartney as well: a strange, corresponding "Black Hole" period from September through December 1966 in the Beatles timeline when very few, if any, public appearances were made by any Beatles members. During this time, rumors circulated that Paul had been in a severe car accident, and that the Beatles were about to break up.
"Paul" surfaced in December looking and sounding quite different, and this is when all the Beatles initially transformed their look from the former "moptop" style to the Sgt. Pepper-era "psychedelic" older-looking, facial hair appearance.
The "New Paul" also had mental changes to go with his physical ones: a more dominant, assertive personality, politics that seemed to swing toward the right/political apathy from his previous stance (judging by interview statements), a promotion of LSD use on national TV, a shift in girlfriends, changes in his bass guitar playing and performance style, changes in hobbies and interests etc.
6) Paul McCartney is today perhaps the most "well-known" case of alleged celebrity imposter fraud, although most people still have heard little-to-nothing of the rumor and supporting facts, beyond the "Paul is Dead" legend and maybe a few album clues. The general possibility of celebrity doubles and imposters seems a fantastic, unlikely story to most, mainly because of the necessary collusion/collaboration on the part of governments, police, media, the press, academics, family and friends, "the powers that be" etc. that would be required for such hoaxes to go on without being exposed. In other words, it implies that the public is being lied to in an extremely large and "Orwellian" manner, on a daily basis."
Again, different aspects could be debated and thrown around - but this is a synopsis of the matter.
|
|
|
Post by B on Apr 17, 2010 18:00:25 GMT -5
ramone wrote: "These clues first appear in 1966 but it was not until May of 1969 that the general public became aware of them, when the mass media began the "Paul is Dead" discussion of clues and possible death scenarios of Paul..."I would say that in the United States, the "general public awareness" of the Paul is Dead issue occured for the most part in a 3 day period centering around October 20, 1969. It was at that time that the rumor "took the country by storm", as some radio stations broached the subject, and distraught but intrigued young people called their relatives and friends across the country, spreading the flames. It is true that the Terry Knight song "St Paul" came out in May of 1969, but people didn't make the connection, for the most part, and while there were areas of the country where the rumor was discussed in a limited fashion, it was not until October, shortly after the release of "Abbey Road", with its "funeral procession" cover, that the rumor really took hold. grave digger, corpse, funeral director, priest As wikipedia notes: "The first known printed article on the subject "Is Paul McCartney Dead?", was written by Tim Harper in the Drake University paper, the Times-Delphic, on 17 September 1969. Rumours began in earnest however, on 12 October 1969 when a caller to WKNR-FM (Detroit) radio DJ Russ Gibb who identified himself as "Tom" announced that McCartney was dead. He also asked Gibb to play "Revolution 9" backwards; Gibb thought he heard "Turn me on, dead man." Gibb also produced (with John Small and Dan Carlisle) The Beatle Plot, an hour-long radio show on the rumour which aired on WKNR on the same day."
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Apr 17, 2010 22:40:44 GMT -5
All good points LB, and I would say that the seeds were already starting to germinate in late 1966 in England, but that it didn't "go wide" until October of 1969. As for Terry Knight, he wrote that song on the airplane ride back from England after meeting the Beatles.. Strange, that.
|
|
|
Post by thepiper on Mar 28, 2011 8:14:24 GMT -5
Having lurked for years on these boards. I respectfully want to know why this is so important to so many. I respect everyone's right to their own opinion but the truth is -definitive proof either way will probably never be found. I am not a paul -or whoever he is fan as he is arrogant, cold and money mongering but the name calling amongst members bothers me. This is a guy that has nothing to directly do with the lives of his "fans" or detractors. When people talk about confronting him or that he is "laughing at us" it makes me nervous...30 years ago another nutcase said this and it nded tragically(John). The truth is Paul/Faul'Pearl whatever really has no more importance than a Japanese Tsunami victim. Also the stories of dozens of celebrities being replaced is highly unlikely...BB King is BB King! I just dont get why this is such an issue..lastly if he met manson and that gang dont u think they'd recall it in interviews...I think thats a stretch although P/F has a weird uncaring attitude abt that awful crime.. There were many artisits ..Dylan, Sandy Denny, Joni, Led Zep with far more talent than the Beatles..I hope someone here can find sandy denny still alive...
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Mar 28, 2011 11:46:58 GMT -5
thepiper mentioned these artists, Dylan,Sandy Denny,Joni,Led Zep,BB King. As so often happens when other artists are mentioned in reference to Paul/Faul it turns out they are dead/replaced too!! On this and other forums there is a LOT of evidence for the replacements of Dylan,BB King, and Joni. Sandy Denny recorded with Led Zep and she is dead. I happen to think the members of Led Zep were replaced too after Bonhams death. Post pictures on here and prove me(us) wrong.
|
|
|
Post by thepiper on Mar 28, 2011 12:25:03 GMT -5
That is insanity Really...only a joker or Chapman wanna- be would think this way...well robert Plant makes better music now that he 's apparently Fobert...c'mon u dont really believe that stuff about LZ being replaced...u must live in a very bleak world of paranoia and fear
|
|
|
Post by Silversong on May 28, 2011 0:44:50 GMT -5
Having lurked for years on these boards. I respectfully want to know why this is so important to so many. Congratulations on taking the first step towards discovering why you're on this board! What an interesting combination of feelings you have in your opening statement. You've been lurking here for years, but wonder why it's so important to 'us'. It would seem it must be important to you as well, or why would you keep coming back? I'm glad you do, and I think something within you won't allow you to let this go yet. I can only speak for myself, but just one of the many reasons it's important to me is because of the deception to the public involved in replacing celebrities. I have a certain theory, in which I think if a star doesn't want to continue with that grueling life - or if they are fired for any number of possible reasons - they must relinquish their identity because of the monetary profits involved. Perhaps they are well-compensated and perhaps it's part of their contract, but it is trickery to us the fans. Another theory is that some, or perhaps many of them, are killed in one manner or another, perhaps for political reasons, or because they won't go along with the matrix agenda. Also, if they are gone and were someone important to us, we have been denied the right to mourn their passing, and to pay our last respects. Many people get very attached to certain celebrities for a miriad of reasons, so we want to be kept informed of the truth about their life or death. What reason do you have for the need to put labels on us if we can see, and even hear in the case of their voices or musical talents, what we believe is absolute fact? This board allows anyone to debate all these issues, and it's considered bad form to use the argument of personally putting someone down because they have a different view. It shows you can't speak to the topic directly, so you try to discredit those who don't share your opinion. Here is another very important reason to keep up the search. If this is, as I do believe, a false version of Paul McCartney, isn't he desecrating the legacy and reputation of the real JPM? Well, here again and respectfully so, it seems it IS directly affecting you. And my, my, my, oh yes indeed these celebs do directly affect the lives of their fans very deeply and profoundly, and put out a great deal of influence as well. That's just another reason why they have to be kept in check or removed by TPTB. Or Fohn, as I happen to believe, and there you go with these insinuating labels again. There is a difference, however, in confronting someone for the truth, and being aggressive, beligerent and violent. What do you think would make Faul do something harmful? Maybe because he "is" harmful? Who says they aren't as important? They weren't famous to the world, nor were they replaced with their career usurped. That's the difference in this. I do wish people cared more about disaster victims, and Paul's ending was a disaster, so I wish more people cared about that. It's highly tragic is what it is. If you can show with pictures or other evidence, that they haven't been replaced, please do so. I agree it's a scarey idea, and many people are not able to accept or cope with it, BUT denial is still not a river in Egypt. ;D Then I don't get why you've been reading these boards for years. I know I don't spend my time reading message boards that aren't of interest to me, or with which I don't agree. It's Faul who has that attitude, and that's why it's critical to have these boards -- to help vindicate and correct the way the world remembers James Paul McCartney, as well as any others this has happened to.
|
|
|
Post by Silversong on May 28, 2011 0:50:12 GMT -5
That is insanity Really...only a joker or Chapman wanna- be would think this way...well robert Plant makes better music now that he 's apparently Fobert...c'mon u dont really believe that stuff about LZ being replaced...u must live in a very bleak world of paranoia and fear Well, that was very helpful and intelligent from you. I would submit you need to study more about mind-controlled killers and Manchurian Candidates. Again and again with the name-calling, which shows you have nothing substantial to contribute to the discussion, yet. Why don't you point out how it is NOT a replacement of Paul McCartney and others? We go to a lot of effort to show that it is, and plenty of people here put in a lot of effort to debate that in a rational and substantiated way. Do tell, what keeps bringing you back to read all this if you're so set in your opinion that it isn't true?
|
|
|
Post by kopenhagen on Dec 24, 2011 18:02:26 GMT -5
the truth will come out if you interview Heather Mills, she holds a "box of evidence " LOL
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Jul 22, 2012 7:45:54 GMT -5
Its time this thread was continued....i remember reading/hearing on the news that Sandy Denny had fallen down stairs and died many years ago....That JPM died and it was covered up meant the public could not mourn him: they were at the height of their fame...there would have been pandemonium...the TPTB decided...the replacement did not have the charisma of the real Paul (also different personality but he has tried to act out the role making him look "effeminate" which JPM wasn't. Note the alleged date of death September 11 '66 (9/11). Other odd things/symbolism ....in MMT why all the military uniforms when the Beatles promoted peace and love? "Paul" sat behind desk in uniform face is blank; obviously not Paul it says in front of desk "I Was You" and finger pointing (they're telling us!) Also, in closing scene with staircase at back (stairway to heaven?) More symbolism. Marching WRENS more uniforms...
|
|
ericnapster
For Sale
? We just give them a good life and I take the wool from them.?
Posts: 137
|
Post by ericnapster on Sept 27, 2012 15:41:24 GMT -5
The Piper wrote: Having lurked for years on these boards. I respectfully want to know why this is so important to so many. I respect everyone's right to their own opinion but the truth is -definitive proof either way will probably never be found. I am not a paul -or whoever he is fan as he is arrogant, cold and money mongering but the name calling amongst members bothers me. This is a guy that has nothing to directly do with the lives of his "fans" or detractors. When people talk about confronting him or that he is "laughing at us" it makes me nervous...30 years ago another nutcase said this and it nded tragically(John). The truth is Paul/Faul'Pearl whatever really has no more importance than a Japanese Tsunami victim. Also the stories of dozens of celebrities being replaced is highly unlikely...BB King is BB King! I just dont get why this is such an issue..lastly if he met manson and that gang dont u think they'd recall it in interviews...I think thats a stretch although P/F has a weird uncaring attitude abt that awful crime.. There were many artisits ..Dylan, Sandy Denny, Joni, Led Zep with far more talent than the Beatles..I hope someone here can find sandy denny still alive
Not being a sports fan, I could write a similar post on a baseball forum, however I don't think I would preface it with "Having lurked for years on these boards".
|
|
|
Post by idontknowwhy on Feb 17, 2013 19:54:30 GMT -5
The only thing that bothers me is the person who tells the story says that Paul was on his way to Liverpool but the accident took place in Lancashire. Of course that brings to mind Blackburn, of course..... However, were Paul coming up from London, Lancashire seems out of the way. It's to the north of Liverpool. It would make sense if he had driven up to his farm in Scotland and was on his way back to London via Liverpool but if he were driving up from London I can't see him taking the route through Lancashire.
|
|
|
Post by beatlesfan284 on Jul 15, 2013 9:03:12 GMT -5
You guys think the Proccess Chrurch were after Paul, chasing him, and causing a car crash? I think September 7th.
|
|
|
Post by beatlesfan284 on Jul 15, 2013 9:09:02 GMT -5
The only thing that bothers me is the person who tells the story says that Paul was on his way to Liverpool but the accident took place in Lancashire. Of course that brings to mind Blackburn, of course..... However, were Paul coming up from London, Lancashire seems out of the way. It's to the north of Liverpool. It would make sense if he had driven up to his farm in Scotland and was on his way back to London via Liverpool but if he were driving up from London I can't see him taking the route through Lancashire. You are right. Maybe he was held in Yoko's Foreland Farm. It's obvious The Members Of The Process Chrurch want to sacrife Paul, but he may have survived. According to The Passover Plot, Jesus survived the cross, Paul is Interpeted as Jesus in many PID-lore, implying he survived or escaped from the blood ritual.
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Sept 20, 2013 17:02:20 GMT -5
"Some basics about Beatle Paul, to begin with a summing up: 1) From August 1966 on to the present day, Beatles member Paul McCartney (real, full name: James Paul McCartney) is markedly different in physical appearance and voice than he was at any time before. There are persistent differences that go beyond what is possible with makeup or plastic surgery, and indicate that a different individual(s) has taken his place, falsely and permanently assuming the identity of James Paul McCartney. The physical proof is in the film, video, photos and audio of McCartney before and after this key 1966 time period. 2) The "real" Paul McCartney has apparently not appeared in public since September 1966, under his real name/identity, not even for a brief appearance (some who maintain that he was imposter-replaced have differences of opinion on this issue). The reason for Paul McCartney's disappearance and replacement with one or more imposters remains, to the public, uncertain to this day. 3) There are many "clues" left by the Beatles and their managers/handlers/entourage, telling us that Paul McCartney was replaced with an imposter, in the form of messages and coded messages in post-Sep. 1966 song lyrics, visuals on album covers, illustrations, photos and cartoons, backwards audio messages, word references and encryptions, coded signals in Beatles-related movies, TV and public appearances etc. 4) These clues first appear in 1966 but it was not until May of 1969 that the general public became aware of them, when the mass media began the "Paul is Dead" discussion of clues and possible death scenarios of Paul, with PID proponents sometimes mentioning 1966 as the likely year of the event and initial cover-up. The real name of the man impostering Paul McCartney was said to be "William Campbell" or "Billy Shears." When radio shows and magazines asked questions of Beatles members and their inner circle at this time, they all denied the rumor. 5) There is circumstantial evidence for the imposter replacement of Paul McCartney as well: a strange, corresponding "Black Hole" period from September through December 1966 in the Beatles timeline when very few, if any, public appearances were made by any Beatles members. During this time, rumors circulated that Paul had been in a severe car accident, and that the Beatles were about to break up. "Paul" surfaced in December looking and sounding quite different, and this is when all the Beatles initially transformed their look from the former "moptop" style to the Sgt. Pepper-era "psychedelic" older-looking, facial hair appearance. The "New Paul" also had mental changes to go with his physical ones: a more dominant, assertive personality, politics that seemed to swing toward the right/political apathy from his previous stance (judging by interview statements), a promotion of LSD use on national TV, a shift in girlfriends, changes in his bass guitar playing and performance style, changes in hobbies and interests etc. 6) Paul McCartney is today perhaps the most "well-known" case of alleged celebrity imposter fraud, although most people still have heard little-to-nothing of the rumor and supporting facts, beyond the "Paul is Dead" legend and maybe a few album clues. The general possibility of celebrity doubles and imposters seems a fantastic, unlikely story to most, mainly because of the necessary collusion/collaboration on the part of governments, police, media, the press, academics, family and friends, "the powers that be" etc. that would be required for such hoaxes to go on without being exposed. In other words, it implies that the public is being lied to in an extremely large and "Orwellian" manner, on a daily basis." The above is an excellent overview of the subject: changes also took place with the others. Points of interest for scrutiny: Shea Stadium 1965 singing "Help" Paul forgets words; the American press conference 1966; the Hello, Goodbye video (Paul looks "uncomfortable" and not playing usual Hofner bass);John in MMT double used, also notice in MMT finale "Your Mother Should Know" Paul with black carnation is a double and "Faul" appears in a subliminal at bottom of stairs wearing a 2 tone blue suit. John was the leader, founder and spokesman of the Beatles and Paul or imposter took over starting 1966 or earlier.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2013 8:04:20 GMT -5
What is it exactly about "Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds" that makes it the most important song on Sgt Peppers as far as telling the story of Paul's replacement? Lucy in the sky with Diamonds is a destination. And it's apparently a railway station, where a train will take you somewhere near a shore, then you will take a boat out to the island where Paul's ashes are in a glass urn. She knew someone who was planning on going to the station.. he dissapeared, and she is pretty sure as rumours at the time have it, that it's a commune where there is no government control.
|
|
|
Post by thatisgroovyman on Mar 6, 2016 15:41:00 GMT -5
Jojo, do you have the news clipping image of the Paul McCartney lookalike contest winner all bandaged up?
|
|
|
Post by uglycustard on Oct 28, 2017 16:52:58 GMT -5
the truth will come out if you interview Heather Mills, she holds a "box of evidence " LOL Wouldn't mind getting in her box
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Nov 1, 2017 22:08:45 GMT -5
The reason PID is important to me is because it reveals the levels corrupt governments and other rich elites will go too in order to keep the masses ignorant of how reality really works. Wars,Poverty,False Flags,Politics,Sports,Video Games,Sexual Addiction,Internet Addiction,Drug Addiction,etc. are used to keep the people {sheep who are asleep} distracted and divided so that these evil,satanic elites can stay in control of our world and lives so that we cannot create a truly peaceful world. That IMHO is why PID is so important and remains to be... in my eyes it is another aspect of the truth that if allowed to become public {just as UFO and alien visitation} would rock the foundation of the publics perception of reality and would transform it on a massive scale...revealing the falsehoods perpetuated upon or minds and souls by the psychopaths whom we allow to rule over us.
|
|
|
Post by Rubber Soul on Nov 21, 2017 0:15:18 GMT -5
While I find this story Interesting, I think Paul's death is much Deeper than A Car Accident. I think he was probably Murdered
|
|
NAYDON
For Sale
I believe in Jehova!
Posts: 237
|
Post by NAYDON on Jan 13, 2019 1:47:47 GMT -5
Preface: This story is the NIR's way of telling of the events of early to mid September of 1966, and what followed. Recently, a member here met a person who was living in Liverpool at the time the events of the time were unfolding. This person gave a story that was close to what we have concluded on a number of matters, and it was told in a matter of fact and straightforward manner. This is not some "insider", although the person was closely related to someone in a communications medium. What we will be presenting is based on what this person said, and on material already discussed here.
Any details about this person must be kept private, even the member involved, because the person's privacy is of absolute importance. The person was generous, and shared some facts, it wouldn't be fair to cause this person any problems.The Story: Sometime around early to mid September, Paul was on his way to Liverpool with his dog Martha in his white Astin-Martin. He was involved in a single car accident, and it would seem that Paul was missing for two, perhaps three weeks, the news of an accident didn't appear until then. The exact location is unknown, but it happened in Lancashire. The decision to find a replacement rather than simply announce that Paul was dead was made by the Crown. They were not under any circumstances going to let the Beatles die due to how much money they were making. An agreement was made to continue until the end of the decade 1970. There was then a look alike sound alike contest held in Liverpool, thousands showed up for it, not to be confused with the one held in the US by a teen magazine. The winner was then taken to Africa, and had some surgery performed to perfect him. There were pictures of the winner put in the public domain at the time, and even before the surgery he looked like Paul, and there were also pictures of a bandaged up winner making the rounds at the time as well. Everyone kinda knew what was going on.. but in England there is 'duty to the crown' so everyone turned a blind eye and pretended everything was normal. About the songs, many of the Lennon/Mccartney songs were demos, with Bill's vocals added on top, or altogether. Also, talk was going around at the time that the reason George got so heavily into eastern religion was that so he could channel Paul, so that John and George could continue to write. It may be quite true that George attempted this, explaining the visit to the Maharishi, and all the rancor that followed. After John and George left the ashram, John of course went on to write "Sexy Sadie" (made a fool of everyone) That, and other outtakes where he used far stronger language, lead one to believe that the Maharishi promised far more than eternal peace and happiness. Perhaps they were promised direct communication with Paul's spirit, explaining John's anger, and how the Maharishi's platitudes got past John's BS detector, using this vulnerability. Paul was cremated immediately, and his remains buried on one of the islands the Beatles purchased, and there are currently people living there. The Magical Mystery Tour album tells the whole story, but Lucy in the Sky is the most important song on the Pepper album. His real name is Bill btw, and he was possibly from England, but that isn't certain. The relationship between Bill and the rest of the Beatles were mostly OK, the public infighting was just to give an excuse for a breakup. After 1970 he was supposed to release an mediocre album, become a has been and fade away at the farm in Scotland with his family.. but the media hounded him after the rumour broke and they knew he could never leave the limelight.. it became a lifelong contract. Finally, why keep it a secret? If people knew the crown has this kind of power..not as benign as they would have everyone believe. As for Brian, there was nothing making the rounds regarding him, although it's possible he was so devestated that there was a replacement put out there to make everything appear normal, while he stayed away in seclusion. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Another meeting with the person from Liverpool, this is what transpired: How long did it take the authorities to find Paul's body? How long was he missing? Not sure.. but there was a missing time period.What is the significance of the white Volkswagon on the White Album poster and the cover of Abbey Road? Nothing other than the license plate, don't know of any other significanceWho was it that discovered Paul's body? AuthoritiesWere there any rumors of Paul having an illegitimate child? Was he secretly married to Jane Asher? Yes there was rumour of a little boy. No he and Jane never married.What is it exactly about "Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds" that makes it the most important song on Sgt Peppers as far as telling the story of Paul's replacement? Lucy in the sky with Diamonds is a destination. And it's apparently a railway station, where a train will take you somewhere near a shore, then you will take a boat out to the island where Paul's ashes are in a glass urn. She knew someone who was planning on going to the station.. he dissapeared, and she is pretty sure as rumours at the time have it, that it's a commune where there is no government control.We are curious about Fool on the Hill, were the opening lines done by George, and then Bill's voice blended in? As a matter of fact, a general question about whether there was an interim imitator, or was it just the three remaining Beatles using George Martin's wizardry until Bill was ready. In that vein, We would ask about Denny Laine, what did he do for those five years between leaving an up and coming group and joining Wings? No knowledge about Denny Laine.. but Fool on the hill, Penny Lane, and Hello Goodbye were done by 3 different people other than Paul or Billy. It was part of the competition to record, so finalists did these recordings.. signed a contract by the crown and were paid a huge sum. Then they slowly morphed Paul's voice into Bill's over a period of time, (there were alot of demos etc..) so no-one would notice the change.Were callboxes frequently found in England, especially Lancashire, in the 60's? If so, how abundant were they found near the roads or in random, rural places? In abundance in the suburban areas.. in rural places they are at every Post Office and few scattered here and there.Other things that were volunteered: The reason they broke up was because George couldn't cope with it all. Bill wanted out, wanted to go back to his old life, so they said release a mediocore album and fade away. But it didn't happen, so he had to sign for life.. under the proviso that all 4 beatles release a certain amount of solo material to keep the money flowing until they said they could stop. Apparently John got into a lot of hot water over his refusal in the late 70's. The fights and what not were all orchestrated.
Their relationship with Bill was fine. George struggled with it, because he had known Paul practically his whole life as there families were close. John embraced him, but he went weird and started to think that Bill was actually Paul, and it freaked Bill out. After a while John started to self destruct, cause Paul was the only 'real' thing in his life. And he eventually fell apart.
There was a rumour a few weeks before he died that he and Jane had split-up.
His family and Jane and everybody involved had to sign contracts.. and were threatened.
Apparently in the late 70's Bill wanted to out himself, but John talked him out of it saying that they were watching him, and they'd kill him if he did.
Klaus Voorman may have been a passenger in the car along with Martha This accident supposedly took place at 5 a.m. on November 9, 1966, after a discussion with George and Ringo in the recording studio. He took his Aston Martin and he started driving, after a few minutes the accident was caused by a hitchhiker named Marie who Paul had picked up along the road and he lost control of his car skidded into a pole ten miles north on Dewsbury Road and he was decapitated, the young girl died in the fire. Brian and George identified the body early Sunday morning Sept 11. The truth is that Paul lost his head in the car accident.
If you listen to John's song "Remember Love" backwards You will hear "Lost his head in accident Paul & Marie, Paul & Marie". Some say that the girl's name was Rita but her real name is Marie.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Jan 14, 2019 8:55:55 GMT -5
How would anybody know the hitch-hiker's name if she burned to death?
|
|