|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 13, 2004 23:17:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Dec 13, 2004 23:37:04 GMT -5
As you can see better when he turns his head, it looks more attached than detached.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 14, 2004 0:07:05 GMT -5
As you can see better when he turns his head, it looks more attached than detached. Eh... not in my opinion. Looks like the same ear to me.
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Dec 14, 2004 0:16:41 GMT -5
So Paul had his earlobes surgically detached after '66 'cause it was the "in" thing to do? Those crazy rock stars!
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Dec 14, 2004 0:36:45 GMT -5
You can look for more photos if you want, FP. But I don't see how that will explain away the ones that RedLion and JoJo have already posted. Paul's left earlobe was clearly attached, and Bill's wasn't/isn't. Anyone with a set of mildly functioning eyes can see the obvious. Game, set, and match.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 14, 2004 1:04:07 GMT -5
Anyone with a set of mildly functioning eyes can see the obvious. Game, set, and match. I don't blame you for seeing two different people there, I mean, it's one good illusion.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Dec 14, 2004 1:38:38 GMT -5
I don't blame you for seeing two different people there, I mean, it's one good illusion. I'm referring to the ear lobes I know better than to contest the "appearance" of Paul/Faul with you.
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Dec 14, 2004 7:34:21 GMT -5
Shadows FP shadows..... Why do you think Jojo did the work to show us this? I can assure you that you can look all you want, but you will not find any pics from 67 on that, when blown up, show an attached lobe. Admit it FP... it's 2 people who vaguely resemble each other... but they didn't work on the ear lobes. So go & try & find us some pics of Faul... closeup... with attached lobes.... have fun!
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Dec 14, 2004 10:42:10 GMT -5
JoJo, my guess is they edited out George in the recent pic, so you just see Paul and Ringo goofing around. In other words, getting rid of George highlighted what they wanted you to see. Mine on the left, TI's on the right.. Cmon now, some work was done on the chin, (for starters) rationalize if you wish, but there it is.
|
|
|
Post by Goldfinger on Dec 14, 2004 12:10:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Dec 14, 2004 12:55:54 GMT -5
Unbelievable! How can you say that with yer eyes open?? He must've had some "lobe-seperation" surgery! Never heard of that before! Lets see some zoom in close ups of Fauls completely attached lobe then.
|
|
|
Post by Goldfinger on Dec 14, 2004 13:53:36 GMT -5
Couple of things. That last photo is really lousy quality. Can't tell much from that. But he is much older, and I know from personal experience that soft things start to sag as you get older. My earlobes have gotten bigger, sag more and some other not so pleasant looks. The soft tissue at the tip of the nose starts to sag, too, which can give a hook look to it.
The pictures I posted above are clearer and to me are very similar
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Dec 14, 2004 14:29:03 GMT -5
Dead on sideways, so you can't tell. The profile is right on the money though. Maybe yes, maybe no, looks like a spot on the photo than it does a detatchment. Sorry, but if anything published after 1966 conflicts with what came before, then it's suspect. Believe me or not, assemble your own material and prove it to yourself. Sag yes, detach no.. I posted 3 frames, he turns his head this way and that, and no change. As Bill got older, there was less concern about making his appearance match, changing history is far easier...I know you hate to hear it/think that's BS, but it's true, sorry..
|
|
|
Post by Goldfinger on Dec 14, 2004 15:08:10 GMT -5
But you don't understand. As part of his interest in eastern religions, he was doing these exercises daily:
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Dec 14, 2004 15:21:24 GMT -5
...he is much older...soft things start to sag as you get older...soft tissue at the tip of the nose starts to sag...which can give a hook look to it. well, in his case, that must've happened around 1967
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 14, 2004 16:19:01 GMT -5
well, in his case, that must've happened around 1967 ^ I see a detached earlobe there. And I'm getting tired of this earlobe junk.
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Dec 14, 2004 16:39:57 GMT -5
... I'm getting tired of this earlobe junk. with all due respect, FP, we get tired of peep trying to tell us that those two photos show the same person
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 14, 2004 17:08:01 GMT -5
with all due respect, FP, we get tired of peep trying to tell us that those two photos show the same person Then ignore us.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Dec 14, 2004 17:11:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Dec 14, 2004 17:14:09 GMT -5
Then ignore us. When we do, you guys complain about that.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 14, 2004 17:25:58 GMT -5
AHA! Look at the hair part in those pics!!! When we do, you guys complain about that. Good point.
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Dec 14, 2004 17:34:19 GMT -5
Then ignore us. then ignore the earlobe thread ;D
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 14, 2004 17:38:06 GMT -5
then ignore the earlobe thread ;D ...Nah.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Dec 14, 2004 17:45:58 GMT -5
AHA! Look at the hair part in those pics!!! Yes, good point..
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Dec 14, 2004 18:46:56 GMT -5
[hijack] ...Nah. [/hijack] we now return to our regularly scheduled thread...
|
|