|
Post by FlamingPie on Sept 30, 2004 18:19:41 GMT -5
Yes, that's why he still looks like Faul. Look at those eyes. Those're Faul's eyes, not Paul's. But you think Faul looks like Paul, so there's the source of confusion. Yes, I do think Paul looks like "Faul" ^ I think they look like the same guy, so I must be "blind" and "brainwashed".
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Sept 30, 2004 21:04:05 GMT -5
Then why did "Faul" get plastic surgery in the first place? So he could look as much like him as possible. Why else?
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Sept 30, 2004 21:04:42 GMT -5
Yes, I do think Paul looks like "Faul" ^ I think they look like the same guy, so I must be "blind" and "brainwashed". How did you know which was Faul and which was Paul if they are the same person?
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Sept 30, 2004 21:40:53 GMT -5
A chip off the old Faul, wouldn't you say? That's pre-surgery Paul right there. It's been suggested that Paul's natural hair color might have been red. No way of knowing for sure, but his son's hair might support that theory.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Sept 30, 2004 21:46:03 GMT -5
How did you know which was Faul and which was Paul if they are the same person? There are times I can't. But I can tell it's "Faul" if he's wearing a moustache, beard, long hair, wearing something psychedelic, or old age.
|
|
|
Post by YoDawgSUP on Sept 30, 2004 22:23:09 GMT -5
There are times I can't. But I can tell it's "Faul" if he's wearing a moustache, beard, long hair, wearing something psychedelic, or old age. Yep. Because of the above, I can also tell post-67 George/John/Ringo from pre-67, but there are times I can't there. Those pictures you showed are great examples. Masterpiece!
|
|