For the heck of it

[Frightwolf]

lennonlives said:

how about you don't make baseless statements and provide something to back up your story!
go on prove it! think about how your story sounds, the more people who are assumed to have changed or been replaced, the less and less viable the story becomes.
Think about it four people who had families, friends and loved ones. The number of people who had to be hushed up or kept in the dark is growing endlessly! and then dont forget the fans who might have noticed something when the band they grew up with and had liked since 1962 was now noticebly different, yet to my knowledge it has only ever been Pauls' and Brians' appearance that have been questioned not Johns', Georges' or Ringos'

here's arguably one of the last pictures of john taken before his death
www.cathedralstone.net/Pics/JohnLennon2.jpg

one in 1974 www.bobgruen.com/files/johnlennon/files/R.318-JOHN%20LENNON%20-FACE%20CURL-74.jpg

one taken by Astrid Kirchherr (c 1962)
www.center-of-beat.com/bildarchiv/archiv/de_john_lennon.html

www.tuttoperinternet.it/musica/artisti_stranieri/images/John%20Lennon.Jpg

www.born-today.com/Today/pix/lennon_j.jpg

not twenty I know but there enough!

Lennon, you took my statement too literally, so back off please. I made that statement to show that you could easily find pictures where features of all the Beatles don't match up, so it is not as if Paul was the only one who changed a bit. They all changed, and not all the pictures of the Beatles match up. Look at the links I provided and you'll see that all their faces look longer and many other featuers too.

[FlamingPie]

ecenzo1 said:

Flaming Pie: I saw you were on line. Just a quick question. I don't know the bios of any of the members but a thought crossed my mind. Has anyone thought to submit "pre" "post" pictures of Paul to someone with a photo analysis background to see if anything unusual pops up? Could be someone on the site falls into this category. I just don't know enough of the participants backgrounds. For all I know there is at least one individual with this type of expertise. I realise this type of photo anaylsis would probably cost mucho $$$, but it may bring some type of clarity to the picture debate...

I don't know anyone here who compares pictures of people for a living (for whatever reason), but I know LarryC's job is enhancing pictures, or making graphics, and Kazu, like he said, his work involves looking for pictures of celebrities head's placed on other people's bodies.
Am I right?

But either way, if the first post on this thread doesn't make them consider the possibility of Paul being alive, nothing will. ;D

[matchbox]

Flaming said:

but I know LarryC's job is enhancing pictures, or making graphics, and Kazu, like he said, his work involves looking for pictures of celebrities head's placed on other people's bodies.
Am I right?

Actually, Larry C is a helicopter pilot, and kazu is an operative for the Illuminati.


True story. ;D

[eyesbleed]

Flaming said:

But either way, if the first post on this thread doesn't make them consider the possibility of Paul being alive, nothing will. ;D

The 1st post doesn't make me consider a PIA possibility.
It reminds me of all the unanswered questions & the various possibilities surrounding this whole thing.

[kazu]

Well, my job did not entail looking for celebrities fake pictures. I just used that as an example. My job of the past was to actually digitally and traditionally (Photo chemical and darkroom processes) alter images to create effects that seemed real, but were not. This included removing blemishes, Making people thinner, taller, appear to be in a place they never were, etc...

I guess that could automatically make me suspect. But I have always stated my case as being a PIA believer trying to find out why Paul looks odd after 66. So making photos match all the time really does not help me. I am not going to post random non-matching images right now though. I am not quite finished with my angle.

MB: The Illuminati would not have me. I work for Mickey now.

When I compile anything interesting, I will let you guys know. Partly, I am afraid that it may actually help the PID cause (nothing against anyone who believes PID) which is why I have to keep a lid on it until it is formatted and presented properly. Basically, when it is done, it may not help either side. I gottsta show what I find. In truth I find this all fascinating. I mean I must belong to the PIDNWHABSWMHDIHHA group. But no one would remember that Domain name if I registered it.

www.PaulisdeadNoWaitHesAliveButSomethingsWrongMaybeHesDeadIHopeHesAlive.com

If I were completely PIA no bones about it, I would just forget about all this. To me, PID is not neccessarily about Paul not being alive, it is about something happening, or a change that occured and continued to occur throughout the 70s and 80s.

[ecenzo1]

Reading Lenon's post once again brings up some of the same questions I still struggle with. The amount of effort (not to mention $$$) that it would take to effect a cover-up of this magnitude still baffles me. Not to mention the possibility of discovery as the circle of those involved would have to be large as well. I know...we'll probably never know for sure. But it's fun to keep asking questions, nonetheless...