tal
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 3
|
Post by tal on Apr 7, 2004 7:30:15 GMT -5
i'm doing a "research" on whether Paul is really dead or not , and i would like to know what you guys think. i found lots of pics showing a diffrence in the distance between Paul's and "Fual's" eyes , new scars that appeared in paul's photo's and are shown on old pics of campbel. anyhow , i'm actually starting to believe that paul is dead. what do you think? is paul dead? is it all just a pablicity stant? how else could all those clues be explaned? thanks!
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Apr 7, 2004 7:34:57 GMT -5
Well, each one of us has a different view on whether Paul's dead or not, I don't think so, but I do believe that something happened. Anyway, WELCOME!
|
|
tal
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 3
|
Post by tal on Apr 7, 2004 7:43:49 GMT -5
well this research is a part of my highschool diploma , and i'm supposed to do some kind of a survey or questionaire...so any point of view on this metter is welcome!
|
|
madtitan125
For Sale
"There is no knowledge that is not power!"
Posts: 99
|
Post by madtitan125 on Apr 7, 2004 10:21:11 GMT -5
Without physical proof, we can't declare Paul "dead."
We can, however, view evidence (in my opinion) that clearly demonstrates differences in facial structure (including forehead size and hair part orientation), eye color, head shape, height, voice, etc. and come to the conclusion Paul was replaced.
This doesn't necessarily mean he's dead.
I think he probably is, though. For one thing, the Beatles' demeanor sure changed post-1966. They collectively just stopped smiling (almost).
There are lots of signs, but the one that gets me is George crying "Paul, Paul..." at the end of "While My Guitar Gently Weeps." His pain seems genuine.
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Apr 7, 2004 11:11:38 GMT -5
I think we've collected enough circumstantial visual, aural, and anecdotal discrepancies to conclude that Paul was replaced after 1966. The most likely reason is that he died.
"His" voice definitely changed after the Beatles last tour press conference in August 1966. "His" voice has remained the same ever since.
At best, Faul does an imitation of a Liverpudlian accent, but not a very convincing one.
|
|
Harb
Help!
Posts: 74
|
Post by Harb on Apr 7, 2004 11:51:10 GMT -5
Being honest here, I hope you spell-check your report when it's finished. Had a bit of trouble working out what you were saying then. I personally think that they were up to something. There's too many things that suggest this. The legend actually came out in 1966, but nobody took any notice and so it died prompty. I believe that the Beatles heard of this, and thought it was a good idea to mess about it, maybe to relieve some of the boredom and 'sameness' that being a Beatle brought. I believe that many of the clues found are just coincidence or twisting them the wrong way. But the facial changes. Maybe it was because after the touring Paul lost weight, causing the 'full-ness' of the cheeks to go and leave him a little more gaunt. The accident with the moped may have prompted some cosmetic surgery as well. But I doubt that he's dead. It would have been way to big to be able to cover up completely. Those guys were hounded by the newspapers and had journalists and trailing them all the time. And the crowd of people around the accident. Surely they would have known? Plus I don't think that the doctors and police that were at the accident would be able to keep quiet about it. Surely by now surely one of the many may have revealed the secret on his deathbed or something? But if you go to my site, you'll see a huge database of every clue that's ever been found.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 7, 2004 15:22:55 GMT -5
Unless--and here I go out on the shakiest limb yet---so I expect some "oh, please,Dr. R.'s" on this.......
But, perhaps they produced a temporary Paul just to fool everybody right at the time of the, well, whatever happened? A very strong look-a-like, one that would not have to have any musical talent at all, merely to get up from under a sheet and say, "Im fine." If there ever HAD been "security doubles" for the FAB 4, maybe there was a ready stand-in who showed up to the "accident" (Whatever form that took) and they did some switcho-chango-presto for the crowd, or whoever that for which it was crucial to see a "living" testimony of a "Paul."? Just a idea. They could get by on the real short term with a sufficient look-a-like, then comes the trick of finding the talented, musical one to actual gel with the group................
Of course, the problem I already see with this, is that there would be people who remember the day and would talk about how they saw Paul get out of the ambulance after they thought he was unconscious.
(Pin drops. Loudly.)
Sorry, y'all. OK everyone go back to whatever you were doing........
|
|