|
Post by Doc on Feb 1, 2006 19:42:19 GMT -5
Maybe I'm sounding monotonous but the phatasmagoric man across from JPM in the window reflection looks a lot like former Liverpool resident Hitler. The date on the photo is significant also, DoctorRobert --- June 22, 1966 is the 25th anniversary of Hitler's surprise, unprovoked, blitzkrieg invasion of the Soviet Union and a major day (June 22)of celebration and reverance for Nazis and other fascists because it marks the start of the destruction, pillage and killing of 20 million "subhuman" communists and Russians. The "22" is also symbolic to them of the "SS" of the Nazi SS, the "supermen" leaders of the master race, global war and the Holocaust. Were they in their former host country of West Germany or traveling through Germany on this date when the photo was shot? Some say, that in biblical "gamatria", 11 is the number denoting tyranny and corruption in leadership, and 22 is the number denoting the zenith of the same, i.e., a double portion of corruption and tyranny.
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Feb 5, 2006 23:41:58 GMT -5
[/quote] This looks like Bill, IMO Unless it's been faultered.
|
|
|
Post by lili on Feb 6, 2006 13:24:31 GMT -5
I don't think that it's been touched Rita. I think it might just be the angle making his face appear longer. Thanks for supplying us with that information, Lenmac. As far as their being stuff put into the window of that photo, who knows ? It could just have turned out that way by coincidence. The person facing us in the window looks like he's sitting in the row before the boys. I don't know why it turned out so strange, with missing people & all. Maybe it was retouched by those who wish to deceive us. If so, why was Paul left untouched ? Can it be like Doc says, that they are starting to make blatant mistakes ?!
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 15, 2016 8:58:49 GMT -5
It's a shame some of the pictures you guys are talking about are missing. Why?
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Apr 16, 2016 15:52:43 GMT -5
A case can be made we're dealing here with Bruce Jenner story. JPM was raised as a boy but thought he was a woman. He put on his female outfit for that event. To my eye JPM and 'Bill' here are one and the same person.
"Bruce Jenner" and "Caitlyn Jenner" are NOT the same person EITHER! Everyone (nearly) has been replaced! www.youtube.com/watch?v=23qpGPYl610
|
|
|
Post by superman on Apr 17, 2016 2:44:21 GMT -5
A case can be made we're dealing here with Bruce Jenner story. JPM was raised as a boy but thought he was a woman. He put on his female outfit for that event. To my eye JPM and 'Bill' here are one and the same person.
Listen carefully to the much-overlooked Beatles classic "Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da" (Especially the ending)
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 17, 2016 14:37:41 GMT -5
A case can be made we're dealing here with Bruce Jenner story. JPM was raised as a boy but thought he was a woman. He put on his female outfit for that event. To my eye JPM and 'Bill' here are one and the same person.
Listen carefully to the much-overlooked Beatles classic "Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da" (Especially the ending) OK, picked up on "Desmond stays at home and does...his....pretty face" and in the evening...she's...a singer with the band. So what yuh gettin at? Desmond is a transgender married to a straight woman?
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 17, 2016 14:51:13 GMT -5
THERE REALLY MAY NOT BE ANYTHING TO IT: When singing the vocals over the final verse, McCartney made a slip and said "Desmond stays at home and does his pretty face" (rather than Molly), and had Molly letting "the children lend a hand". Reportedly, this mistake was retained because the other Beatles liked it.[9] Harrison and Lennon yell "arm" and "leg" between the lines "… Desmond lets the children lend a hand" and "Molly stays at home …"[10] [9] Turner 2005, p. 154. [10] Lewisohn 1988, p. 141. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ob-La-Di_Ob-La-Da
|
|
|
Post by superman on Apr 17, 2016 19:59:27 GMT -5
THERE REALLY MAY NOT BE ANYTHING TO IT: When singing the vocals over the final verse, McCartney made a slip and said "Desmond stays at home and does his pretty face" (rather than Molly), and had Molly letting "the children lend a hand". Reportedly, this mistake was retained because the other Beatles liked it.[9] Harrison and Lennon yell "arm" and "leg" between the lines "… Desmond lets the children lend a hand" and "Molly stays at home …"[10] [9] Turner 2005, p. 154. [10] Lewisohn 1988, p. 141. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ob-La-Di_Ob-La-Da I dunno. I am of the opinion that almost every crafty step these "Beatles" made were very carefully orchestrated. And they DO lie. From cranberry sauce to "Paul" going barefoot on an album cover because "It was a hot day".
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 17, 2016 20:25:49 GMT -5
THERE REALLY MAY NOT BE ANYTHING TO IT: When singing the vocals over the final verse, McCartney made a slip and said "Desmond stays at home and does his pretty face" (rather than Molly), and had Molly letting "the children lend a hand". Reportedly, this mistake was retained because the other Beatles liked it.[9] Harrison and Lennon yell "arm" and "leg" between the lines "… Desmond lets the children lend a hand" and "Molly stays at home …"[10] [9] Turner 2005, p. 154. [10] Lewisohn 1988, p. 141. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ob-La-Di_Ob-La-Da I dunno. I am of the opinion that almost every crafty step these "Beatles" made were very carefully orchestrated. And they DO lie. From cranberry sauce to "Paul" going barefoot on an album cover because "It was a hot day". The Abbey Road comment was so stupid even my daughter who isn't into PID when I told McFartney's excuse said WHAT? ? As much music as they sang I wouldn't doubt that it could happen. But, I don't understand where you're going with the Ob-La-Di_Ob-La-Da thing. What are you getting at?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2016 21:08:55 GMT -5
lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2016 21:14:53 GMT -5
Here's one that FP (aka Larry King) posted at MMH. What's odd is the caption says June 22, 1966 for the Revolver sessions! The Beatles were touring by June 22, '66, weren't they? Revolver was already finished by then. It's most likely a year, 2 albums and a singer off. I don't think there's any question, it's Bill in '67. No, it's Bill in B.C. Jerusalem entering Solomon's Temple to sprinkle incense. Pardon my fascination with the milieu of the ancient Hebrews, but this strange, voluminous garment is as "mod" as it is from antiquity. Shalom, y'all. lol What's up, Doc?
|
|
|
Post by superman on Apr 17, 2016 21:55:49 GMT -5
I dunno. I am of the opinion that almost every crafty step these "Beatles" made were very carefully orchestrated. And they DO lie. From cranberry sauce to "Paul" going barefoot on an album cover because "It was a hot day". The Abbey Road comment was so stupid even my daughter who isn't into PID when I told McFartney's excuse said WHAT? ? As much music as they sang I wouldn't doubt that it could happen. But, I don't understand where you're going with the Ob-La-Di_Ob-La-Da thing. What are you getting at? Oh, it's not so much the song itself, but the idea that "Beatles" played around with sexuality as much as anything else. They don't tackle it full-on, but "play around" with it in songs, pictures, videos. I believe they [The Beatles] engaged in homosexual practices, dabbled with the transgenderism (is that a word?) at times as well. The back cover of Abbey Road has the woman in the blue dress who happens to create the shape of Paul's profile. The leg of the woman in the blue dress is quite manly as someone pointed out some years ago, and I know that this was done on purpose. Even after Beatlemania you see this. I mean, the "Paul" seen in the video "Waterfalls"... is that Faul or Faulette? I've already spoken on Harrison's "When We Was Fab".
Check out Linda McCartney in this vid. Hilarious.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2016 22:02:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 17, 2016 23:27:48 GMT -5
The Abbey Road comment was so stupid even my daughter who isn't into PID when I told McFartney's excuse said WHAT? ? As much music as they sang I wouldn't doubt that it could happen. But, I don't understand where you're going with the Ob-La-Di_Ob-La-Da thing. What are you getting at? Oh, it's not so much the song itself, but the idea that "Beatles" played around with sexuality as much as anything else. They don't tackle it full-on, but "play around" with it in songs, pictures, videos. I believe they [The Beatles] engaged in homosexual practices, dabbled with the transgenderism (is that a word?) at times as well. The back cover of Abbey Road has the woman in the blue dress who happens to create the shape of Paul's profile. The leg of the woman in the blue dress is quite manly as someone pointed out some years ago, and I know that this was done on purpose. Even after Beatlemania you see this. I mean, the "Paul" seen in the video "Waterfalls"... is that Faul or Faulette? I've already spoken on Harrison's "When We Was Fab".
Check out Linda McCartney in this vid. Hilarious. OK, watched the "When we was fab", don't see what you're talking about if it pertained to sexuality even read the lyrics. I surely believe John dabbled in homosexual pratices: Whether the rest did I think is pure speculation, just because they sang about those things I think was more about changing times and could have had more to do with shock effect than anything else. Remember Epstein was homosexual and they considered him the fifth Beatle and probably loved him and it was their way of opening peoples eyes to what they thought was, well, what it was. Kinda like it's real folks, deal with it. Don't forget Sweet Loretta Martin.
|
|
|
Post by superman on Apr 18, 2016 0:16:11 GMT -5
OK, watched the "When we was fab", don't see what you're talking about if it pertained to sexuality even read the lyrics. I surely believe John dabbled in homosexual pratices: Whether the rest did I think is pure speculation, just because they sang about those things I think was more about changing times and could have had more to do with shock effect than anything else. Remember Epstein was homosexual and they considered him the fifth Beatle and probably loved him and it was their way of opening peoples eyes to what they thought was, well, what it was. Kinda like it's real folks, deal with it. Don't forget Sweet Loretta Martin. George Harrison - When We Was Fab As I've oft stated, many disagree with me, but I believe "When we was Fab" was a song about George's homosexual past. The video is full of clues to all sorts of things and I know I've missed more than a few of them. But some I believe I've figured out...Notice how the "B" in "FAB" was spray-painted to look kind of like a "G" turning "FAB" to "FAG"?At 0:39 he sings, “Caresses feast you in the morning light… casualties at dawn…. And we did it ALL” He’s obviously speaking of sexual encounters, but with WHO?Well the answer seems to come at 0:58. He’s wearing a Sgt Pepper uniform, but not the one HE wore on Pepper. It looks like John’s Pepper suit. So is he hinting at some relationship with John?At 1:15 we see a black man wearing illuminati-marker black-and-white stripes and a white woman dressed in red (a color that also has a meaning in the illuminati circles when combined with black-and-white checkerboards and/or stripes). At 1:36 we see the woman in red walking back all alone…and checking her purse to make sure she hasn’t been robbed.At 3:55 we get the first real Beatles reunion with Paul, John, George and Ringo all in frame at the same time since 1970.At 2:20 we get another reference to past homosexual behavior as a man wheeling a huge fruit cart passes George just as he says “long time ago when we was fab”…At 2:28 is that supposed to be David Crosby (a past lover?) dancing by?
He is followed at 2:40 by Elton John who drops money into George’s tin cup (‘nuff said)
At 2:45 a transvestite and/or crossdresser passes by.
At 2:57 a man passes by leading another man who is drowsy and appears to have been roofied or given some sort of drug. Somehow I doubt it was just two drunks heading to the next pub or whatnot.
At 3:05 we see Ringo staring lustfully at Nile Rodgers who is passing by. At the same time ringo is holding up a keyboard which seems to be symbolic of a fat long penis … or maybe a motorized dildo (notice the words DX TURBO written on it)
At 3:14 we see a parade of men bending over for George
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 18, 2016 9:20:33 GMT -5
Since he's still singing it I guess Desmond started singing with the band and became a female impersonator? Heard a story once that when they were in Germany some club they were playing in had strippers (could they have been female impersonators?). Anyway they found John back stage in one of their dressing rooms stark butt naked. I think the story eluded to that fact.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 18, 2016 9:32:52 GMT -5
Superman, even watched the Waterfalls vid and didn't see anything in it. I think people are right, you are making too much of this. Oh and the back of the Abbey Road albumn doesn't look like a manly leg to me.
|
|
|
Post by superman on Apr 18, 2016 11:21:38 GMT -5
Superman, even watched the Waterfalls vid and didn't see anything in it. I think people are right, you are making too much of this. Oh and the back of the Abbey Road albumn doesn't look like a manly leg to me. Who are these “people” whom you think are right anyway? And what did you think of my take on "When We Was Fab?" Whatever the case, don’t let it ever be said that I didn’t believe everyone was entitled to their opinions. But if the few examples I’ve pointed out are evidence that I’m "making too much of things", then let me REALLY take you down (ahem!)… I don’t believe the Beatles were just this loveable cadre of talented moptops who just happened to rise to the top through innovations and a few unconventional tactics within the music industry. I believe they were selected to be a part of a bigger picture that they themselves most-likely weren’t even aware of… in the beginning. They, and other rockers, were instructed to pursue a plan that would herald in a so-called “Harmonic Convergence,” which in turn would ultimately usher in an era global New Age unity and a one world religion. The CIA, The Tavistock Institute and the MK-Ultra mind-control program were (and most-likely still are) the brain-trusts of this gambit. They’re financed by the sickest of the sick – the uber-wealthy elite who view regular people as inhuman chattel to be manipulated, experimented upon… even executed if need be. In the 60’s, the first phase of the plan centered on the proliferation of mind expanding narcotics within the United States. These are drugs like LSD (and Beatles just sat there either completely silent or blatantly lying through their teeth about the meaning of Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds). What we have today, in the form of a myriad of disguised and corrupted liberation movements (Women’s movements, gay movements and so on) can be traced back to a plan created by the elites to corrupt the youth through mind control, sex and drugs and, of course, media/music. By creating and exalting a so-called “counterculture”, a generation of Americans were left susceptible to mass manipulation. And the Beatles led the way. Hell, Rockers like Harrison would later say that they were disgusted by the sight of bunt-out hippies and aimless, brain-blasted kids … and yet take absolutely no responsibility in having guided many of their adoring sheep down these paths. A beatle (with an “a”) is a spike-like tool used to shatter stone. Jesus is often referred to as The Rock (sorry Dwayne). When a rock gets cracks in it, the beatle tool is wedged into one of the fissures and is struck with a hammer until the stone shatters. The Early successful rockers were symbolic of the cracks in the stone, but The Beatles were the tool that symbolically shattered the rock in the minds of those who had this goal in mind. I won’t get into things like Operation Mockingbird, artificially-gestated clones and the Satanism involved in all of this. I mean, .If you think the few examples I’ve showcased are evidence that I’m “making too much of things”, stuff like that will most-certainly leave you with the opinion that I’m a full-blown nut job. Again, I won’t devalue your opinion in any way.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 18, 2016 12:10:58 GMT -5
Superman, even watched the Waterfalls vid and didn't see anything in it. I think people are right, you are making too much of this. Oh and the back of the Abbey Road albumn doesn't look like a manly leg to me. Who are these “people” whom you think are right anyway? And what did you think of my take on "When We Was Fab?" Whatever the case, don’t let it ever be said that I didn’t believe everyone was entitled to their opinions. But if the few examples I’ve pointed out are evidence that I’m "making too much of things", then let me REALLY take you down (ahem!)… I don’t believe the Beatles were just this loveable cadre of talented moptops who just happened to rise to the top through innovations and a few unconventional tactics within the music industry. I believe they were selected to be a part of a bigger picture that they themselves most-likely weren’t even aware of… in the beginning. They, and other rockers, were instructed to pursue a plan that would herald in a so-called “Harmonic Convergence,” which in turn would ultimately usher in an era global New Age unity and a one world religion. The CIA, The Tavistock Institute and the MK-Ultra mind-control program were (and most-likely still are) the brain-trusts of this gambit. They’re financed by the sickest of the sick – the uber-wealthy elite who view regular people as inhuman chattel to be manipulated, experimented upon… even executed if need be. In the 60’s, the first phase of the plan centered on the proliferation of mind expanding narcotics within the United States. These are drugs like LSD (and Beatles just sat there either completely silent or blatantly lying through their teeth about the meaning of Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds). What we have today, in the form of a myriad of disguised and corrupted liberation movements (Women’s movements, gay movements and so on) can be traced back to a plan created by the elites to corrupt the youth through mind control, sex and drugs and, of course, media/music. By creating and exalting a so-called “counterculture”, a generation of Americans were left susceptible to mass manipulation. And the Beatles led the way. Hell, Rockers like Harrison would later say that they were disgusted by the sight of bunt-out hippies and aimless, brain-blasted kids … and yet take absolutely no responsibility in having guided many of their adoring sheep down these paths. A beatle (with an “a”) is a spike-like tool used to shatter stone. Jesus is often referred to as The Rock (sorry Dwayne). When a rock gets cracks in it, the beatle tool is wedged into one of the fissures and is struck with a hammer until the stone shatters. The Early successful rockers were symbolic of the cracks in the stone, but The Beatles were the tool that symbolically shattered the rock in the minds of those who had this goal in mind. I won’t get into things like Operation Mockingbird, artificially-gestated clones and the Satanism involved in all of this. I mean, .If you think the few examples I’ve showcased are evidence that I’m “making too much of things”, stuff like that will most-certainly leave you with the opinion that I’m a full-blown nut job. Again, I won’t devalue your opinion in any way. Let me start by saying I apologize if I left you with the impression that I think you're a full-blow nut job. It's been suggested that the Beatles were a creation of Tavistock and that I don't believe, that being said I do believe that Tavistock could have seen the huge potential to utilize them for their agenda because of their mass appeal. I do believe there are people with money and power that manipulate people in an effort to bring about what they want and could care less if it is for the betterment of mankind and see humanity as no better than cattle and care less about human collateral damage because to them the end justifies the means. Do I think Paul could have been offed because he wouldn't cooperate, sure. It's interesting that this guy could be a poster child for a NWO It's not inserting my videos again, here is the URL www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tks0bS4tXw
|
|