|
Post by JoJo on Dec 27, 2004 9:58:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 27, 2004 15:46:13 GMT -5
Haha, I'm gonna have fun with these. ;D
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 27, 2004 17:11:20 GMT -5
Not fade worthy, but comparison worthy. I don't even need to make a comparison for those. He's SOOO obviously Paul, it's not even funny. Come on, look at that ATTACHED earlobe. The 4th pic down makes a great comparison with another pic I have, but the angles are slightly off, so it would be worthless to you guys.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Dec 27, 2004 17:25:47 GMT -5
Haha, I'm gonna have fun with these. ;D I forgot to fire the Flaming Pie starting pistol, oops, my bad! Haha is right, this one looks like one of you guys did your "spraypaint on the mustache" on a pic of JPM. ;D
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 27, 2004 17:28:29 GMT -5
Haha is right, this one looks like one of you guys did your "spraypaint on the mustache" on a pic of JPM. ;D EXACTLY!! Even JoJo thinks that looks like JPM + a moustache!
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Dec 27, 2004 17:29:58 GMT -5
EXACTLY!! Even JoJo thinks that looks like JPM + a moustache! Right, not a picture of Bill.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 27, 2004 17:37:13 GMT -5
Right, not a picture of Bill. I don't know what to say. Unless you find the same picture of Paul without a moustache, that IS "Bill" in 1967.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Dec 27, 2004 17:54:07 GMT -5
Two examples of photos that have been tampered with nothing more nothing less. They appear to be composites having aspects of both Faul and Paul.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 27, 2004 17:59:56 GMT -5
Two examples of photos that have been tampered with, nothing more nothing less. Have any proof/evidence that they've been tampered with?
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Dec 27, 2004 18:10:32 GMT -5
Have any proof/evidence that they've been tampered with? Dont need any, unlike some people I can tell the difference between Faul and Paul.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 27, 2004 19:28:08 GMT -5
Dont need any, unlike some people I can tell the difference between Faul and Paul. So if it looks like Paul, then it was doctored. If it looks like Faul, then it's reliable. ...Am I the only one here who thinks that's sorta... Know what? It's not worth risking getting banned by speaking my mind right now. I just think that's incredibly "closed minded".
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Dec 27, 2004 20:31:10 GMT -5
So if it looks like Paul, then it was doctored. If it looks like Faul, then it's reliable. I never said that. The pics in question are a blending of Paul/Faul, the others at the top of this thread are all Faul. Anyone who has viewed enough photos knows this . There is no doubt, even you should be able "see" it. Your visual skills arent as bad as you have led members here to believe. I just think that's incredibly "closed minded". If you mean closed minded like these two guys are the same person? Then yes, I'm very closed minded as they are not. BTW take a good look at your avatar, anyone looking at it and not reading your posts will think you are a PIDer.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 27, 2004 20:54:04 GMT -5
I never said that. The pics in question are a blending of Paul/Faul, the others at the top of this thread are all Faul. Why? Because they either "look like Paul", or they don't. Now why would you have some pics of Paul, and some pics of Faul in the same book? Wouldn't people be able to tell the obvious "differences"? My avatar is a perfect fade. And I've shown before that that pic matches with JPM. img120.exs.cx/img120/5389/cross0an.jpg
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Dec 27, 2004 21:01:48 GMT -5
Now why would you have some pics of Paul, and some pics of Faul in the same book? Wouldn't people be able to tell the obvious "differences"? Apparently not. It's very naive of ya to just assume pics are what they say they are.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 27, 2004 21:06:11 GMT -5
Apparently not. It's very naive of ya to just assume pics are what they say they are. Why would I think otherwise?
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Dec 27, 2004 23:37:14 GMT -5
Why would I think otherwise? You've answered your own question..
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 27, 2004 23:41:47 GMT -5
You've answered your own question.. Yeah, you're right. I trust the date, because I don't think they would doctor or lie about photographs, because they wouldn't have any reason to! And I don't think they would have any reason too, because I don't believe he was replaced!
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Dec 28, 2004 0:15:17 GMT -5
Gotta admit it looks like a painted-on 'stache to me. Too bad they didn't have Photoshop back then. But seriously, it's sad they felt they had to cover up his replacement by defacing photos of Paul that way.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 28, 2004 0:25:53 GMT -5
Frightwolf asked a good question.
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Dec 28, 2004 0:42:38 GMT -5
Why I don't get is why they think that they tampered with 2 pictures but not the rest! Because the moustache is so blatantly painted-on a photo of Paul. But you guys can't tell the difference between them for some reason.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 28, 2004 0:43:42 GMT -5
Because the moustache is so blatantly painted-on a photo of Paul. But you guys can't tell the difference between the two guys for some reason. Uh, it's not just us. It's the entire world, other than the people here.
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Dec 28, 2004 0:44:52 GMT -5
Uh, it's not just us. It's the entire world, other than the people here. Look at the moustache, man. You can't see it's painted on?
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 28, 2004 0:59:11 GMT -5
Look at the moustache, man. You can't see it's painted on? Well, it does look a bit more blurry than the rest of the pic... But I still think he looks like Paul from the 1967 period.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Dec 28, 2004 1:36:12 GMT -5
Now why would you have some pics of Paul, and some pics of Faul in the same book? Wouldn't people be able to tell the obvious "differences"? The mass public was not aware of PID in 1967. They were being conditioned to think Paul/Faul was the same person. My avatar is a perfect fade. And I've shown before that that pic matches with JPM. Nothing personal FP but where Paul/Faul is concerned there has never been a perfect fade regardless of who made it. Scaling pics so head sizes look equal does not make a match.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Dec 28, 2004 2:06:10 GMT -5
The mass public was not aware of PID in 1967. They were being conditioned to think Paul/Faul was the same person. Nothing personal FP but where Paul/Faul is concerned there has never been a perfect fade regardless of who made it. Scaling pics so head sizes look equal does not make a match. I call it a match when the eyes, head, mouth, lips, and nose match up. Just like my avatar.
|
|