Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Dec 25, 2008 7:42:59 GMT -5
You pity me for my common sense? Yes, of course. Why on earth would you call yourself thisone if you weren't a McCartney fan? Am I missing something here? Why do you hate him so much? At any rate, if a lack of a photo of the towers being hit signifies his guilt, wouldn't that mean that EVERYONE on that plane were liars and puppets? An entire plane full of CIA/Tavistock/Spooky Organization of Your Choosing dummies? What are the odds? There is a bigger hole that is sinking your ship, but I'll wait until your next response to share with you what it is. I know! It wasn't in the news, so they must have supressed it, so therefore it MUST BE TRUE![/u] Did you know that Paul McCartney is Aleister Crowley's son? Paul McCartney hasn't denied it, so it must be true! It was never in the newspapers, so it MUST BE TRUE! Any sad, paranoid little thing that creeps out of the tortured, frightening bowels of my imagination must be true and there is a conspiracy to conceal it all from the public. And if you don't agree with me, you're nothing more than a pitiful sheep. I'm not even saying they weren't murdered. Just that it wasn't a ritual. Look up the meaning of the word. Well there's videos about it on Youtube, so it must be true! But it is of relevance. I asked you if you remembered the exact time of day when you saw the towers burning on TV. If you don't remember, why should Paul? His memory was off by only 13 minutes (which of course, is very relevant, since we all that 13 is a Masonic number!).
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Dec 25, 2008 10:19:05 GMT -5
Out of this quote" "' Warmer than the sun, cooler than the air.'" They get an insult to his ex-wife Heather? ;D That seems a rather un-en lightened assumption.
Aristotle’s theory of the basic constituents of matter looks to a modern scientist perhaps something of a backward step from the work of the atomists and Plato. Aristotle assumed all substances to be compounds of four elements: earth, water, air and fire, and each of these to be a combination of two of four opposites, hot and cold, and wet and dry. (Actually, the words he used for wet and dry also have the connotation of softness and hardness).
Aristotle’s whole approach is more in touch with the way things present themselves to the senses, the way things really seem to be, as opposed to abstract geometric considerations. Hot and cold, wet and dry are qualities immediately apparent to anyone, this seems a very natural way to describe phenomena. He probably thought that the Platonic approach in terms of abstract concepts, which do not seem to relate to our physical senses but to our reason, was a completely wrongheaded way to go about the problem. It has turned out, centuries later, that the atomic and mathematical approach was on the right track after all, but at the time, and in fact until relatively recently, Aristotle seemed a lot closer to reality. He discussed the properties of real substances in terms of their “elemental” composition at great length, how they reacted to fire or water, how, for example, water evaporates on heating because it goes from cold and wet to hot and wet, becoming air, in his view. Innumerable analyses along these lines of commonly observed phenomena must have made this seem a coherent approach to understanding the natural world. galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/lectures/aristot2.html
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Dec 26, 2008 6:04:35 GMT -5
Yawn! Did you say something? Must have been a boring xmas day in the Jude household!
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Dec 26, 2008 9:05:23 GMT -5
It took you more than 24 hours to not respond to the challenges I made to your intelligence but instead to issue a mere nonsensical jest?
Weak, thisone. Just weak. Quit before you further embarrass yourself.
Why don't you take notes from all my anonymous "acquaintances" at the Phoney blog? At least they *sometimes* provide counterarguments instead of flouting me with faux superiority (which is all that you have shown me you are capable of, other than making unfounded claims of Michael Jackson being scheduled to be executed by the 911 attacks).
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Dec 26, 2008 9:22:40 GMT -5
And before you point it out, yes, I know that I too am guilty of the same air of arrogance that I am accusing you of. Only the difference is, I'm not above responding to your claims, but you seem to feel that you are above (but are in reality quite below) taking the time to respond to challenges I made to your earlier statements regarding Sir Paul McCartney's honesty and whether Michael Jackson was scheduled to die in the 911 attacks. Those who make ridiculous claims without backing them up with anything whatsoever deserve, in my opinion, to be challenged with logic and fact, even if it's done sarcastically as I have. The problem---and it is only made so much more obvious with your silly, three sentence joke about boring Christmas in my household (I live alone---it's not much of a household)--is that you can't back a single one of your outrageous statements with a fact, or even due cause for suspicion. You're like beatlies part deux!
If you have something you want to say to me (like I don't know, an ACTUAL EXPLANATION for why you hate Paul McCartney or think Michael Jackson was going to be a "ritual sacrifice"), do so via PM. If you can't give any real reasons, then don't bother at all.
|
|
|
Post by Girl on Dec 26, 2008 17:36:15 GMT -5
Joooooooood.... you're back! ;D Hooray!
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Dec 26, 2008 19:14:03 GMT -5
JUDE, I was hoping that it was you ! Welcome back, my friend !!! ;D
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Dec 26, 2008 19:16:53 GMT -5
Thanks, Girl and mommybird!
|
|
|
Post by B on Dec 26, 2008 20:32:37 GMT -5
Jude, thisone said that Michael Jackson was supposed to be sentenced that day, not killed. You appear to have misunderstood what he wrote. Also, imo, it was a ritual, by some very twisted people, if that word can even be used for the 'beings' involved, but I do not believe that Sir Paul was a part of it.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Dec 26, 2008 21:44:08 GMT -5
It was Boxing Day, 1967 when the Beatles unveiled their long-awaited surreal TV musical, Magical Mystery Tour, including scenes of the Fab Four gliding effortlessly in a spectacular white-tie and tails routine. Today is Boxing Day, and I caught a holiday episode of M*A*S*H last night.. The plot, which started with the crew being visited by some British soldiers, involved the idea that the British enlisted men/officers trade places for the day as a tradition.
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Dec 27, 2008 11:12:35 GMT -5
Jude, thisone said that Michael Jackson was supposed to be sentenced that day, not killed. You appear to have misunderstood what he wrote. Also, imo, it was a ritual, by some very twisted people, if that word can even be used for the 'beings' involved, but I do not believe that Sir Paul was a part of it. All I was saying was that for something to be called a ritual, there must be a precedent for it happening. A ritual, according to my dictionary, is a customary observance or practice, or the prescribed procedure for conducting religious ceremonies. I think that thisone was leaning towards the second definition. Someone might make a practice of killing thousands of people at a time, but it's only ritualistic if they have a precise way of doing it, just like you'd only call someone a serial killer if they targeted certain types of people and killed them in specific ways. I can't think of any time in recent memory besides 911 when a missile or a plane burned two towers to ground, killing over 5,000 people. I wouldn't say it wasn't a sacrifice---indeed, 911 may have been a more sinister plot than people have been led to believe---just not a ritualistic one, because I can't think of anything like it in recent memory. Anyway, you're right, I did misquote thisone by saying that Michael Jackson was supposed to die that day. But saying he was supposed to be "sentenced" that day is nearly ever bit as fictitious. Sentenced to what? And by whom? Unless thisone can fill in those blanks and provide a source or two in support of his claims, I think he is just making it up as he goes along (which really isn't fair to the two individuals in question).
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Dec 27, 2008 14:11:11 GMT -5
I've said it before and I'll say it again - . I do not see Paul McCartney as "A Person" . It is a media whore role played by several different people over the years. My desire is to simply see an end to the charade that is Paul McCartney.
If others wish to idolize some freak-show charade thats their choice.
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Dec 27, 2008 14:26:56 GMT -5
If others wish to idolize some freak-show charade thats their choice.
Indeed. Yet I don't see anyone else paying tribute to Paul McCartney's hit single from Flowers in the Dirt.
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Dec 27, 2008 16:12:31 GMT -5
9/11 was a recreation of a number of religous "rituals" that have occured through out history. The twin towers falling was representative of a number of events. The renting of the vail from top to bottom when Jesus died on the cross. The destruction of the money changers by Jesus and with the Statue of Liberty in the back ground. the unvailing if Isis. When the Salomon Brothers building fell the destruction of Solomons Temple was represented. I am sure there are others if you know more about religion then I do. You may ask why all this. As I have stated in the thread "All Conspiracies Explained" Aliens landed on earth 5 or 6 thousand years ago and gave us the religions and science and technology to create our modern world. The deal was we have to follow thier "plan". All these conspiracies (9/11, PID, CIA, Kennedy assassinations, etc, ect. ) are part of this "plan". The aliens set up shop in the middle east and consider it important, that is why so many of these conspiracies have connections there.
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Dec 27, 2008 21:23:46 GMT -5
If he's referring to 9/11 - the twin towers disaster, I have to agree with him.
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Dec 29, 2008 17:11:36 GMT -5
If he's referring to 9/11 - the twin towers disaster, I have to agree with him.
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Dec 29, 2008 19:06:42 GMT -5
thisone, can you please elaborate concerning that capture ? I don't know where it came from and what you're trying to say with it...
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Dec 29, 2008 19:47:06 GMT -5
thisone, can you please elaborate concerning that capture ? I don't know where it came from and what you're trying to say with it... It's a capture from Evan Fairbanks' 9/11 "footage". Not trying to avoid your question but - what do you see?
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Dec 30, 2008 10:09:10 GMT -5
I see someone making an unusual hand gesture. I see the back & side of someone's head. The person resembles Sir Paul from this angle. Whether it's him or not, who knows
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Dec 30, 2008 12:14:24 GMT -5
If he's referring to 9/11 - the twin towers disaster, I have to agree with him. Hmm. Nice photo of Not Paul McCartney looking up at a burning building.
|
|
|
Post by B on Dec 30, 2008 12:26:51 GMT -5
If others wish to idolize some freak-show charade thats their choice.Indeed. Yet I don't see anyone else paying tribute to Paul McCartney's hit single from Flowers in the Dirt. What? Please clarify/elaborate.
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Dec 30, 2008 13:28:42 GMT -5
Letter B, I was talking about the name thisone. This One was one of the singles from the Flowers in the Dirt album. Thisone is so hard on people who admire Paul McCartney, but the nickname he uses happens to be the name of one the more popular songs from that particular Paul McCartney album. I was just trying to express how odd it is for him to lash out at Paul the way he does, yet his nickname gives him the appearance of a Macca fan.
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Dec 30, 2008 19:34:52 GMT -5
I have to admit that Sir Paul's later work seems to be of a higher caliber. I liked Band On The Run also. Why would someone who gives the impression that he dislikes Sir Paul, use one his song titles as his username ?
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Dec 31, 2008 12:03:59 GMT -5
Hmm. Nice photo of Not Paul McCartney looking up at a burning building. And thats not an Apple either!
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Dec 31, 2008 21:07:06 GMT -5
No, I see an Apple. Just not a Paul.
|
|