|
Post by seasaltcaramel on Feb 28, 2016 6:03:51 GMT -5
1972, allegedly.
|
|
|
Post by superman on Mar 2, 2016 20:33:44 GMT -5
Paul's eyes look to be a lighter brown in the 1st two photos, than in the last one. I still don't think that he looks anything like Bill. Faul, 1967 Bill, 1967 The reason I posted those two photos, is to illustrate that it's very possible that more than one person impersonated Paul in 1967. Neither one of them looked "exactly" like Paul. oh, no doubt. There were two of three "main" Pauls in the mix as far as I can tell. Then there were others who'd stand in for whole interviews and some were like one-shots for photo ops. I think I've counted six different guys identified as "Paul" through the years. Some came and went and came back in certain years with one-shot Photo-op Pauls popping in and out for photo shoots. It's a mess, but I'm sure its what they planned ... perhaps intending that no one got a clear, "fixed" image of Paul to hold in their heads. Who knows? THEN you have to consider the "Doctored Photo Pauls" where someone would take a physical trait-bit from Paul A in a photo and replace parts of Paul B with then in other photos. Just a mess.
|
|
|
Post by chica on Apr 17, 2016 15:22:25 GMT -5
Hate to tell you this, but in this pic Paul's eyes don't look ......lighter brown....they look hazel. In his book "The True Story Of The Beatles" Billy Shepherd says on pg. 176, Paul's eyes are hazel. Hey just sayin guys.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Nov 3, 2018 3:32:40 GMT -5
THIS IS PAUL MCCARTNEY: Paul McCartney (on the left) compared with "Crossover False Paul" (on the right): "Crossover False Paul" (on the left) compared with Faul (Phil Ackrill): "Crossover False Paul" (on the left) and Faul (Phil Ackrill) (on the right): It's great that these photos are still available. However: 1) No amount of plastic surgery could have ever turned Phil Ackrill into any of the Fauls we know today. Ackrill's nose is unquestionably vertically longer than the noses of any of the Fauls or Pauls. The nasal spine (where the bottom of the nose connects to the face) cannot be moved up or down vertically on the face. As such, the vertical length of the nose is, for the most part, unchangeable. The caveats there are very recent, controversial and outcome unpredictable complete nose metamorphoses by South Korean surgeons making patients resemble anime characters. None of the Fauls would have had access to such a surgery unless they also had access to a time machine. 2) By 1959, there were, at least, 4 different people publicly appearing as a musician named "Paul McCartney". There are three different boys shown in photographs of "Paul McCartney" from toddlerhood through high school. If there was a "real" Paul, he wasn't the cutie cartoon mouse eyes Paul so many PIDers wants to believe was "James Paul". He was this kid:
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Nov 3, 2018 14:56:48 GMT -5
THIS IS PAUL MCCARTNEY: Paul McCartney (on the left) compared with "Crossover False Paul" (on the right): "Crossover False Paul" (on the left) compared with Faul (Phil Ackrill): "Crossover False Paul" (on the left) and Faul (Phil Ackrill) (on the right): I've been looking for a photo of "Sir Faul" squeezing his chin, I saw it in a video clip, but forgot which one it was. It's definitely a cruel jibe at the real Paul who had such a chin - unlike Faul. The only picture in the montage I believe is the real Paul is from the cover of With The Beatles. I'd like to see a couple of the others in context, but the vast majority are Sir Faul wearing various prosthetics.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Nov 20, 2018 5:44:04 GMT -5
lol, that's a whole new layer to this onion!
|
|
|
Post by IWILL on Nov 20, 2018 10:29:48 GMT -5
right? lol
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Mar 31, 2019 7:33:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Mar 31, 2019 20:44:59 GMT -5
They think they can sell us anything if they put "The People's..." in front of it. You've got the people's prime minister Jeremy Corbyn, who has no power but the governmedia use as a scapegoat for all their policies that rip the people off. Then you've got the people's vote, which is a re-run of the referendum which will contain loaded choices so that we remain in the EUSSR no matter which way we vote.
This is obviously a bid to get images of the various Beatles and their doubles out of the public's hands.
|
|
|
Post by joanmissqizzical on Jun 18, 2019 13:44:44 GMT -5
but that "set" is not the original "set" we need the first measurement info You're right. Look at the cover of Sgt Pepper, and the wax figures are very different.
|
|
|
Post by B on Jan 8, 2020 20:28:49 GMT -5
Paul Mccartney | Transformation From 1 To 76 Years Old www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMgiA0VAu60Top Famous Tube Feb 10, 2019 "Birthday: June 18, 1942 Nationality: British Famous: Quotes By Paul McCartney Left Handed Sun Sign: Gemini Age: 76 Years, 76 Year Old Males Also Known As: Sir James Paul McCartney, James Paul McCartney Born In: Walton, Liverpool Famous As: Singer-Songwriter Height: 1.80 M Family: Spouse/Ex-: Heather Mills, Jane Asher, Linda McCartney, Nancy Shevell Father: James McCartney Mother: Mary McCartney Siblings: Mike McGear, Ruth McCartney Children: Beatrice McCartney, Heather McCartney, James McCartney, Mary McCartney, Stella McCartney Personality: ISFP Founder/Co-Founder: Apple Records, Apple Corps, MPL Communications, Liverpool Institute For Performing Arts, Northern Songs Net Worth: $1.2 Billion As Of May 17, 2017 "
|
|
|
Post by bandi on Jan 11, 2020 15:30:05 GMT -5
Completely different noses on the two 'Pauls'. Wasn't this 'comparison' obvious to the person that made the video ? Why would someone show us the two pics and even think it wouldn't be obvious to someone else that actually looked at the two pics ? I'm tired, tired of this kind of unrealistic-ness. Watch what you wish for--like all of us who 'want to get to the bottom of all these different Pauls', cause you might not like the reality of what was actually the truth with the 'lads'.
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Jan 11, 2020 18:37:53 GMT -5
Completely different noses on the two 'Pauls'. Wasn't this 'comparison' obvious to the person that made the video ? Why would someone show us the two pics and even think it wouldn't be obvious to someone else that actually looked at the two pics ? I'm tired, tired of this kind of unrealistic-ness. Watch what you wish for--like all of us who 'want to get to the bottom of all these different Pauls', cause you might not like the reality of what was actually the truth with the 'lads'. So WHAT is actually the truth of the "lads"? The BILLION DOLLAR question!
|
|
iameye
Electric Arguments
Posts: 1,119
|
Post by iameye on Jan 11, 2020 18:49:59 GMT -5
Completely different noses on the two 'Pauls'. Wasn't this 'comparison' obvious to the person that made the video ? Why would someone show us the two pics and even think it wouldn't be obvious to someone else that actually looked at the two pics ? I'm tired, tired of this kind of unrealistic-ness. Watch what you wish for--like all of us who 'want to get to the bottom of all these different Pauls', cause you might not like the reality of what was actually the truth with the 'lads'. So WHAT is actually the truth of the "lads"? The BILLION DOLLAR question!
|
|