|
Post by il ras on Apr 14, 2008 17:01:10 GMT -5
hope he uses the same pw for each account (or an excel file)
|
|
|
Post by rbbrsoul on Apr 14, 2008 20:24:20 GMT -5
Here are some more possible "Phonie" accounts: youtube.com/user/BlllClinton (CEMETERY AS CHANTRY: The Mccartney Years ) Joined: 25 July 2007 Age: 41 Country: Cambodia ---------------------------------------------------------------- youtube.com/user/paymrcleancut (paul mccartney) Joined: 15/06/07 Age: 41 Country: Egypt -------------------------------------------------------------- youtube.com/user/MemoryAImostFull2007 (Paul Rocks) Joined: 01/08/07 Age: 53 Country: Canada There are also a couple of Heather Mills accounts....
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 14, 2008 22:58:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skyward on Apr 14, 2008 23:09:06 GMT -5
The thread for YouKnowMyName231 is Here... Great video series. Worth watching them all.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 14, 2008 23:11:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 14, 2008 23:20:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by skyward on Apr 14, 2008 23:29:13 GMT -5
There are some amazing recordings there... There are 7 pages of discussion on YouKnowMyName231's videos in this thread... Thread is Here... I don't think YKMN231 is regarded as a IAAP sock puppet, which is this thread's topic.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 14, 2008 23:31:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 14, 2008 23:36:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 14, 2008 23:44:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Apr 14, 2008 23:51:15 GMT -5
Not me. I've got nothing good to say about the degenerate long-haired hippie freak who has borne that name over the last 42-65 years (I'm still not sure). He has no redeeming features as a human being and not enough redeeming features as an artist to matter.
|
|
|
Post by B on Apr 15, 2008 22:29:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 16, 2008 0:29:01 GMT -5
Hey. I like Steve's impressions. He does a smashingly good John. His Bowie's pretty good, too.
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Apr 16, 2008 1:26:41 GMT -5
Hey. I like Steve's impressions. He does a smashingly good John. His Bowie's pretty good, too. yeah, he's great! he can impressions of every beatle! with an almost correct vocal identity
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Apr 16, 2008 12:17:46 GMT -5
Not me. I've got nothing good to say about the degenerate long-haired hippie freak who has borne that name over the last 42-65 years (I'm still not sure). He has no redeeming features as a human being and not enough redeeming features as an artist to matter. You've gone too far this time. No redeeming features as a human being? How did Paul McCartney piss on your parade, 65if? What has he (or has not) done to make you so embittered towards him?
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Apr 16, 2008 14:56:06 GMT -5
Not me. I've got nothing good to say about the degenerate long-haired hippie freak who has borne that name over the last 42-65 years (I'm still not sure). He has no redeeming features as a human being and not enough redeeming features as an artist to matter. You've gone too far this time. No redeeming features as a human being? How did Paul McCartney piss on your parade, 65if? What has he (or has not) done to make you so embittered towards him? Well, let's just say that the fool on the hill had come down from the hill and landed on one of "Sir Paul's" estates in London. Or Beverly Hills. Or Long Island. Or on his ranch in Arizona. Or East Sussex. Or on the Mull of Kintyre. Do you imagine that "Sir Paul" would gently and compassionately have the fool escorted into his sitting room and then sit himself worshipfully at the feet of the fool, hoping to share in his wisdom? Or do you think that it's more likely that he'd have his un-hippie-like uniformed security guards escort the fool off of the premises (maybe not so gently)? Well, he wants to shame YOU into inviting the fool into your two-bedroom condominium unit. And if you don't want that fool inside your two-bedroom condominium unit, Jude, if you don't want him there, and if you're not willing to consider every garbled word that comes from his inebriated lips a pearl of wisdom, then you're just one of those "bad" people who himself is really one of the "foolish ones" and SHAME ON YOU! A rich and successful hippie is still a hippie -- worse yet, a rich and successful hippie is a contradiction in terms simply by virtue of his refusal to divest himself of his wealth and go live on the hillside with that fool -- but he preaches that this is exactly what YOU should do.
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Apr 16, 2008 18:07:56 GMT -5
You've gone too far this time. No redeeming features as a human being? How did Paul McCartney piss on your parade, 65if? What has he (or has not) done to make you so embittered towards him? Well, let's just say that the fool on the hill had come down from the hill and landed on one of "Sir Paul's" estates in London. Or Beverly Hills. Or Long Island. Or on his ranch in Arizona. Or East Sussex. Or on the Mull of Kintyre. Do you imagine that "Sir Paul" would gently and compassionately have the fool escorted into his sitting room and then sit himself worshipfully at the feet of the fool, hoping to share in his wisdom? Or do you think that it's more likely that he'd have his un-hippie-like uniformed security guards escort the fool off of the premises (maybe not so gently)? Well, he wants to shame YOU into inviting the fool into your two-bedroom condominium unit. And if you don't want that fool inside your two-bedroom condominium unit, Jude, if you don't want him there, and if you're not willing to consider every garbled word that comes from his inebriated lips a pearl of wisdom, then you're just one of those "bad" people who himself is really one of the "foolish ones" and SHAME ON YOU! A rich and successful hippie is still a hippie -- worse yet, a rich and successful hippie is a contradiction in terms simply by virtue of his refusal to divest himself of his wealth and go live on the hillside with that fool -- but he preaches that this is exactly what YOU should do. Wow. I really can't relate to a single word of what you just wrote. I love hippies, I love free-spirited people, and I really don't think Paul McCartney is a hypocrite.
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Apr 16, 2008 18:52:08 GMT -5
Well, let's just say that the fool on the hill had come down from the hill and landed on one of "Sir Paul's" estates in London. Or Beverly Hills. Or Long Island. Or on his ranch in Arizona. Or East Sussex. Or on the Mull of Kintyre. Do you imagine that "Sir Paul" would gently and compassionately have the fool escorted into his sitting room and then sit himself worshipfully at the feet of the fool, hoping to share in his wisdom? Or do you think that it's more likely that he'd have his un-hippie-like uniformed security guards escort the fool off of the premises (maybe not so gently)? Well, he wants to shame YOU into inviting the fool into your two-bedroom condominium unit. And if you don't want that fool inside your two-bedroom condominium unit, Jude, if you don't want him there, and if you're not willing to consider every garbled word that comes from his inebriated lips a pearl of wisdom, then you're just one of those "bad" people who himself is really one of the "foolish ones" and SHAME ON YOU! A rich and successful hippie is still a hippie -- worse yet, a rich and successful hippie is a contradiction in terms simply by virtue of his refusal to divest himself of his wealth and go live on the hillside with that fool -- but he preaches that this is exactly what YOU should do. Wow. I really can't relate to a single word of what you just wrote. I love hippies, I love free-spirited people, and I really don't think Paul McCartney is a hypocrite. Well, I hate hippies; I hate free-spirited people; and I don't see why you don't think that Sir Paul McCartney is a hypocrite when I've explained pretty clearly why he is one -- he indeed might be a hypocrite simply for no reason other than the fact that he calls himself "Paul McCartney". And as for what you can "relate to", for about $100, you can learn about your genographic history with assistance from National Geographic. That $100 includes a buccal swab kit and instructions on how to use it, and if you did use it, you would be differentiating yourself from certain people who have never been swabbed.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Apr 16, 2008 20:11:36 GMT -5
Derek Taylor... (paraphrasing from memory)
It's perfectly alright to be long haired on the inside, no one bothers about that, it's when the hair no longer struggles to get free that a man becomes concerned.. That's why there's such a market for toupees..
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Apr 16, 2008 21:46:06 GMT -5
Well, I hate hippies; I hate free-spirited people; So how would you classify yourself politically, then? Extremely far right (a la the the Nixon administration, Reagan administration, and the FBI as led by Edgar Hoover)? Communist, perhaps? I'm just trying to figure you out (as no doubt you are I). Oh--and genographic is not a word, silly.
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Apr 16, 2008 22:36:30 GMT -5
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Apr 17, 2008 0:56:56 GMT -5
Oh really? Last time I checked, Nixon and Reagan were both right-wingers.....conservatives. But the way you decry the way I talk about their administrations, I wonder if you once served under either of them. Well you seem to despise free thought, so I was just wondering. dictionary.reference.com/browse/genographic
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Apr 17, 2008 1:13:18 GMT -5
Oh really? Last time I checked, Nixon and Reagan were both right-wingers.....conservatives. You have no idea of what you are talking about. You have no idea of what you are talking about. By that definition, you would qualify as "right wing". www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=genographicResults 1 - 10 of about 130,000 for genographic
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Apr 17, 2008 7:05:46 GMT -5
By that definition, you would qualify as "right wing". Would I? Do tell. I wasn't the one who said he hates free-spirited people. Your hatred of such reminds me of the American conservatives of the 60's---they hated the hippie generation so much that, in my opinion, they orchestrated the events that led to John Lennon's death. As an aging rock star, he was still very powerful and clearly didn't give a fuck what the establishment thought of him or what he had to say. Go ahead! Type "you don't know what you're talking about" one more time. It won't change the fact that Nixon, Reagan, and Hoover were Rupublicans, and they all HATED the Beatles and the long-haired hippie generation. Your anti-peacenik ramblings also remind me of communism, which is a form of socialism. All socialism, in my view, is in inherent opposition to free-spirited people. You DID say you hated free-spirited people, right?
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Apr 17, 2008 12:51:02 GMT -5
By that definition, you would qualify as "right wing". Would I? Do tell. I wasn't the one who said he hates free-spirited people. You are the one trying to decree how people can and cannot refer to "Sir Paul McCartney". You are trying to decree a number of things. Lennon was killed by a fan; that is, by someone who LOVED him. Actually, neither Nixon nor anyone else was so scared of Lennon as to stand in the way of votes for 18 year olds. That amendment passed easily and with Nixon's support. I'm pretty sure that Nixon got a majority share of the youth vote in the 1972 election, as did Reagan in the 1980 election. Both of them also must have gotten a fair share of votes from older people who regarded themselves as Beatles fans. So maybe, in the end, Lennon was not all that powerful. It was Lennon whose opinion no one "gave a fuck" about. It IS pretty disgusting, however, to look and see what a wreck that witch turned Lennon into. He should have stayed married to Cynthia and churned out more songs like "Please Please Me". Well, you DON'T. I'm sure you're exaggerating. George Harrison was a guest at the Ford White House. Yes, I did. I still do. Free-spirited people want all the freedom and none of the responsibility that attends it or that should attend it. I don't remember any "anti-peacenik ramblings" on my part.
|
|