|
Post by MikeNL on Apr 17, 2008 9:41:12 GMT -5
1. Can you tell everything you know about the LOVE/CODE discovery? 2. What is the significance of the nurse who is supposed to be in danger? 3. Can you please explain in detail any new findings you may have made? 4. What is the complex cipher hidden on the Sgt. Pepper album cover that was shown in the rotten apple series? 5. Why was Paul murdered, if it was an accident, how did it happen? 6. How high up does the cover-up go? 7. Who has been killed to protect the secret of the cover-up and the possible murder? 8. Can you tell new things about the mal evans briefcase and its contents? 9. What is the true motive of the controllers of this project?
|
|
|
Post by il ras on Apr 17, 2008 9:44:19 GMT -5
1,3 and 8 can be answered with a "no"...
I suggest to fix them
|
|
|
Post by B on Apr 17, 2008 9:46:50 GMT -5
#5 presumes he was murdered. We don't know that. He may not even be dead.
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Apr 17, 2008 9:52:26 GMT -5
#5 presumes he was murdered. We don't know that. He may not even be dead. he died 9-11-66
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Apr 17, 2008 9:53:38 GMT -5
1,3 and 8 can be answered with a "no"... I suggest to fix them yeah, but i'm sure he doesn't do that... but if you can change it ? blackbird and me have been over the question list for maybe 100 times ;D
|
|
|
Post by il ras on Apr 17, 2008 9:57:21 GMT -5
simply take away "can you" and, at least, put a "please" in (no need to do that for number 3, of curse)
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Apr 17, 2008 10:01:44 GMT -5
simply take away "can you" and, at least, put a "please" in (no need to do that for number 3, of curse) then i need to remove the question mark..
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Apr 17, 2008 13:34:28 GMT -5
Well, he obviously WASN'T! "Paul McCartney, world renowned musical genius and trend-setting pop star of Beatle fame died in a car crash in 1966" Rotten Apple Nos. 42 and 45. There's not a hint in that sentence of anyone having been murdered -- otherwise, the old guy who's talking would have suggested that the car crash was arranged somehow. And if after all of this time, I can't have the simple question answered of just exactly who it was who said this -- which "we" of the "Beatles circle" is supposed to be talking -- I'm taking my briefcase and going home and leaving the Iamaphoney dog-and-pony show for good. To quote another phrase that I heard in RA 45, "f****** hell!".
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Apr 17, 2008 13:37:48 GMT -5
Well, he obviously WASN'T! "Paul McCartney, world renowned musical genius and trend-setting pop star of Beatle fame died in a car crash in 1966" Rotten Apple Nos. 42 and 45. There's not a hint in that sentence of anyone having been murdered -- otherwise, the old guy who's talking would have suggested that the car crash was arranged somehow. And if after all of this time, I can't have the simple question answered of just exactly who it was who said this -- which "we" of the "Beatles circle" is supposed to be talking -- I'm taking my briefcase and going home and leaving the Iamaphoney dog-and-pony show for good. To quote another phrase that I heard in RA 45, "f****** hell!". obviously? why would you exclude murder?
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Apr 17, 2008 13:41:50 GMT -5
Well, he obviously WASN'T! "Paul McCartney, world renowned musical genius and trend-setting pop star of Beatle fame died in a car crash in 1966" Rotten Apple Nos. 42 and 45. There's not a hint in that sentence of anyone having been murdered -- otherwise, the old guy who's talking would have suggested that the car crash was arranged somehow. And if after all of this time, I can't have the simple question answered of just exactly who it was who said this -- which "we" of the "Beatles circle" is supposed to be talking -- I'm taking my briefcase and going home and leaving the Iamaphoney dog-and-pony show for good. To quote another phrase that I heard in RA 45, "f****** hell!". obviously? why would you exclude murder? Because THEN he would have said that Paul was MURDERED in 1966. That would have been the first thing on his mind. The means used to accomplish it wouldn't have been. The phrase "died in a car crash" can't possibly suggest anything other than an accident.
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Apr 17, 2008 13:44:32 GMT -5
obviously? why would you exclude murder? Because THEN he would have said that Paul was MURDERED in 1966. That would have been the first thing on his mind. The means used to accomplish it wouldn't have been. The phrase "died in a car crash" can't possibly suggest anything other than an accident. if someone tampered with the car, he STILL died in a carcrash but anyways, the question goes 2 ways.
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Apr 17, 2008 13:55:44 GMT -5
Because THEN he would have said that Paul was MURDERED in 1966. That would have been the first thing on his mind. The means used to accomplish it wouldn't have been. The phrase "died in a car crash" can't possibly suggest anything other than an accident. if someone tampered with the car Then it was murder and the old guy would have SAID that Paul was murdered. But no one would describe deliberate murder in this manner. The crew of the USS Menges -- or some of them -- died from injuries sustained as a result of a torpedo attack lauched by a Nazi U-boat. No one would say merely that they "died of an explosion". That would be a grotesque over-simplification. I don't feel like getting into a prolonged discussion of this particular point. I want to know which "we" of the "Beatles circle" is supposed to have said this or claims to know this. If Iamaphoney has the testimony of a high-ranking member of "the Beatles circle", what else did he ever need and why hasn't he disclosed that person's identity before now? The guy SAYS that his decision to break rank would shock people but that he's finally made the decision to speak anyway. So it doesn't even sound as though he's asked for his identity to remain secret.
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Apr 17, 2008 14:12:04 GMT -5
65if is right. thats a very important question - why isn't it on the list?
|
|
|
Post by milesdeo on Apr 17, 2008 14:14:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by jarvitronics on Apr 17, 2008 14:19:59 GMT -5
If Iamaphoney has the testimony of a high-ranking member of "the Beatles circle", what else did he ever need and why hasn't he disclosed that person's identity before now? The guy SAYS that his decision to break rank would shock people but that he's finally made the decision to speak anyway. So it doesn't even sound as though he's asked for his identity to remain secret. Comment to 65: You are too logical for the magick to work and you are spoiling the spell. Quit thinking so clearly! General comment: Magick has been, and will always be, about one thing only: that is, to impress a "truth" upon the hearts of the weak-willed and thus cause them to act. -j
|
|
|
Post by milesdeo on Apr 17, 2008 14:24:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Apr 17, 2008 14:25:54 GMT -5
If Iamaphoney has the testimony of a high-ranking member of "the Beatles circle", what else did he ever need and why hasn't he disclosed that person's identity before now? The guy SAYS that his decision to break rank would shock people but that he's finally made the decision to speak anyway. So it doesn't even sound as though he's asked for his identity to remain secret. Comment to 65: You are too logical for the magick to work and you are spoiling the spell. Quit thinking so clearly! General comment: Magick has been, and will always be, about one thing only: that is, to impress a "truth" upon the hearts of the weak-willed and thus cause them to act. -j Comment to jarv: Somebody is going to come along and respond that you're being too MEAN and that Iamaphoney might have his feelings hurt and refuse to play any longer -- and his refusal to submit to an interview that is already overdue will be someone else's fault and not his.
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Apr 17, 2008 14:26:35 GMT -5
Or you can just sum it up in 1 question: IAAP - are you going to make 'the revelation' or continue to act like you are going to?? Haven't you noticed the SS IAAP channel? The schedule goes up to December (I think) and that makes me think that they're not planning on stopping (stopping by giving the truth.) They plan on keeping it going as long as they can. A real Caucus Race -- get wet, run around to get dry, then get wet again... repeat. Helter Skelter!
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Apr 17, 2008 14:27:07 GMT -5
65if is right. thats a very important question - why isn't it on the list? Particularly when it once WAS on the list?
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Apr 17, 2008 14:30:18 GMT -5
i thought so.. why was it removed?
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Apr 17, 2008 15:07:33 GMT -5
i thought so.. why was it removed? it was never on the list? i just summed up every question asked on youtube, hyves and NIR and put it in a topic.
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Apr 17, 2008 15:32:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Apr 17, 2008 15:50:27 GMT -5
that is the question DUMP list, every question that was asked on NIR, hyves and Blogger and YT was put there update; oh wait that is the wrong topic.. yeah ORIGINALLY it was there, untill i made a new topic with 40 questions in it
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Apr 17, 2008 17:22:10 GMT -5
that is the question DUMP list, every question that was asked on NIR, hyves and Blogger and YT was put there update; oh wait that is the wrong topic.. yeah ORIGINALLY it was there, untill i made a new topic with 40 questions in it Well, I'm registering displeasure with the fact that the question isn't there now. That's a very important question. PIA'ers are fond of saying that it is inconceivable that someone with knowledge would have failed to disclose what he knew after all of this time. Iamaphoney claims to have someone -- a Beatles insider -- with knowledge who has started to talk and yet we're not told who he is. Or who the old guy with the Mediterranean accent is. It defies human nature to have witnesses to an event such as we are describing here and to not produce them -- and if these people don't have names, then they haven't been produced, regardless of what it is they are saying on these videos. It just adds to my growing suspicion that this whole thing is a con -- for what purpose, I still don't know.
|
|
|
Post by fubarchad on Apr 17, 2008 20:35:28 GMT -5
that is the question DUMP list, every question that was asked on NIR, hyves and Blogger and YT was put there update; oh wait that is the wrong topic.. yeah ORIGINALLY it was there, untill i made a new topic with 40 questions in it Well, I'm registering displeasure with the fact that the question isn't there now. That's a very important question. PIA'ers are fond of saying that it is inconceivable that someone with knowledge would have failed to disclose what he knew after all of this time. Iamaphoney claims to have someone -- a Beatles insider -- with knowledge who has started to talk and yet we're not told who he is. Or who the old guy with the Mediterranean accent is. It defies human nature to have witnesses to an event such as we are describing here and to not produce them -- and if these people don't have names, then they haven't been produced, regardless of what it is they are saying on these videos. It just adds to my growing suspicion that this whole thing is a con -- for what purpose, I still don't know. Very true and very well put 65if !
|
|