|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 18, 2008 3:34:59 GMT -5
OK. So I decided to play the backwards game and check out one of IAAP's songs in reverse-- One that hasn't been supplied in reverse by IAAP. This is IAAP's "A Day In The Life" www.mediafire.com/?1msmxzui3gcAbout mid-way through (just past the 2-minute mark) the lyrics clearly say: "Yeah, we're messing with people out there." There are more lyrics, clearly meant to be heard this direction. IAAP records music by singing in reverse. In most cases, the song that IAAP sings is just a reverse version of a Beatles song, so that when you actually play the song in reverse, it sounds like the original Beatles tune being played in the proper direction. Not so in this case. The tune is clearly based on (and titled) "A Day In The Life", but the lyrics that were sung do NOT come out to sound like "A Day In The Life" when the song is reversed. Instead, it's something original. What's more, the music when played forward is the forward version of music from ADITL, but with backwards singing. All the other IAAP songs are the backwards version of the music AND the lyrics, together. "Yeah, we're messing with people out there." Is this IAAP admitting they're just fucking with us all? Or is it supposed to be a statement on behalf of the Beatles? Can anyone make out the rest of the lyrics in this backwards version?
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Apr 18, 2008 3:45:28 GMT -5
GREAT FIND!
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 18, 2008 3:51:11 GMT -5
Thanks. I do what I can!
|
|
|
Post by malus on Apr 18, 2008 8:30:23 GMT -5
Beatles are...?
-A band with a great marketing team
-Gods
-Ascended Masters
-Demons
-Witches
-Aliens
-A supernatural force
-Spies (like us)
-Actors
-Drug company spokespersons
-Relatives of the Beast 666, Hitler, Satan, Krishna, or Francis Bacon
-Other
-All of the above
|
|
|
Post by il ras on Apr 18, 2008 8:41:49 GMT -5
2\3 of the above
|
|
|
Post by malus on Apr 18, 2008 8:58:51 GMT -5
A viral marketing campaign designed to sell the lads to the Gen-Y crowd, or to release information into the public consciousness and take the wind out of Heather Mills' sails?
Wall of confusion?
"Timing is everything." as they say.
|
|
|
Post by George Spiggott on Apr 18, 2008 9:29:03 GMT -5
"The Beatles" = 4 exceptionally talented, charismatic guys, in the wrong place at the wrong time. (?.)
"Beatles"= a machine created by a minority force, to be used at will, comprising of a series of ever-changing components & settings, (many of which, were incompatible to the system, &/or their rival components,)
The main objective of which, was to manipulate & propogate change within society.
|
|
|
Post by skyward on Apr 18, 2008 9:30:23 GMT -5
A viral marketing campaign designed to sell the lads to the Gen-Y crowd, or to release information into the public consciousness and take the wind out of Heather Mills' sails? Wall of confusion? "Timing is everything." as they say. But, the past 10 or so RA clips have only seen 5,000-12,500 views, and some might be multiple viewers? It isn't getting mainstream media recognition, you won't see it on the various entertainment news TV spots, e.g. no Larry King/CNN interviews like the Love/Cirque du Soleil. Not much of a distraction from any noteworthy news items, like Mills and the divorce settlement. It might prompt some people to buy the recent LOVE album, but a negligible percentage. Most people who have bought Beatles stuff would have bought the LOVE album anyway.
|
|
|
Post by malus on Apr 18, 2008 9:48:29 GMT -5
Disney was an occultist and he made movies that became popular. The FBI was fascinated with how the propaganda was sold to the germans, british, etc., during WWII. Remember that the movie houses used to show the news reels, and then the war reels, as they distributed the governments propaganda. They recuited Disney around 1941, and are the money behind his success. That is why each and every ride at Disneyland has a plaque that states which industrial military complex company (RCA-Space Mountain) sponsored the ride. These days, the messages are subliminally inserted into the movies themselves. Like Arnold being the Running Man after a Total Recall election... Demolition Man is released, starring Sylvester Stallone. In a scene between his character and Lenina Huxley (Sandra Bullock), Huxley informs John Spartan (Stallone) about the Arnold Schwarzenegger Library and how, due to the popularity of his movies, a Constitutional amendment was passed that allows Schwarzenegger to run for President, which he does, and wins. In real life, ten years after the release of Demolition Man, Arnold becomes the California Governor almost on the same date the movie was released. EYESPY PAUL McCARTNEY - SPIES LIKE US 1985 youtube.com/watch?v=B1rQGFZ83y0
|
|
|
Post by malus on Apr 18, 2008 9:52:39 GMT -5
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Apr 18, 2008 13:08:01 GMT -5
OK. So I decided to play the backwards game and check out one of IAAP's songs in reverse-- One that hasn't been supplied in reverse by IAAP. This is IAAP's "A Day In The Life" www.mediafire.com/?1msmxzui3gcAbout mid-way through (just past the 2-minute mark) the lyrics clearly say: "Yeah, we're messing with people out there." There are more lyrics, clearly meant to be heard this direction. IAAP records music by singing in reverse. In most cases, the song that IAAP sings is just a reverse version of a Beatles song, so that when you actually play the song in reverse, it sounds like the original Beatles tune being played in the proper direction. Not so in this case. The tune is clearly based on (and titled) "A Day In The Life", but the lyrics that were sung do NOT come out to sound like "A Day In The Life" when the song is reversed. Instead, it's something original. What's more, the music when played forward is the forward version of music from ADITL, but with backwards singing. All the other IAAP songs are the backwards version of the music AND the lyrics, together. "Yeah, we're messing with people out there." Is this IAAP admitting they're just fucking with us all? Or is it supposed to be a statement on behalf of the Beatles? Can anyone make out the rest of the lyrics in this backwards version? I think most speech reversals should be taken with a grain of salt. I know, I know, I'm a big supporter of IAAP so whatever I have to say will be seen as a pathetic attempt at defending someone who you believe clearly admitted that he (or they) is messing with people's heads. As you pointed out, IAAP does sing in reverse on most songs... ...but not this one. Instead, he's altering the lyrics to "A Day In The Life". This is more or less what he appears to sing for that part of the song: I saw a film today of "what" The english army had the trembles. A crowd of people was turned away. Fort Knox (fortnights?) and nights (Knights?) of love Then he read that book It's the "crowd of people was turned away" line that sounds conspicuously like "yeah we're messing with people out there". But there are many more messages in this song. Everything that he sings has a clearly audible reversal, but a lot of it didn't make sense to me. For instance: At the end of the (reversed) song you can clearly hear IAAP say "I'll kill the one I sing today", and then immediately after the (reversed) phrase "fucking Paul McCartney" is uttered. Does this mean that Phoney is going to kill Paul McCartney? Probably.
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 18, 2008 14:40:25 GMT -5
Actually, the "killing Paul McCartney" angle is the one that worries me. A lot of IAAP's clues seem to refer to Paul being in danger, and the date when "it" will happen.
I have been thinking about this a lot, too. All the references to Paul (Faul) being evil/associated with Crowley/etc. might be "justification" for a wacko to take Faul out because he thinks he's "saving the world"-- Look at the situation with Lennon.
What if IAAP is just a version of Chapman, mixed with a little Zodiac, for the digital age?
I'm playing devil's advocate here. I don't prescribe to anything yet-- I'm just throwing ideas out there.
I've had thoughts thought as to IAAP's identity. From everything I can research on the subject, the 1995 version of "Now and Then" was NOT released to the public in any way, and no know bootlegs existed before IAAP slapped it onto a RA video.
Where did IAAP get it?
There's one RA video about Heather Mills in which Faul is heard talking to someone about his wives. "My first wife was a groupie, and my next wife was a prostitute." or something to that effect. This sounds like a very private conversation; Not something that Sir Paul would say out loud on BBC 1 or Oprah.
There's another few RA videos where Faul can be heard saying something about clubbing someone to death. Again, I don't recall this being something Macca said in a public forum. This was a private conversation between him and someone close to him.
There are more examples of IAAP getting their hands on things that just Are Not Available to the general public.
Question: How would someone get these conversations, that song, and the other snippets of information?
Answer: IAAP includes a driver, bodyguard, or inside associate of Sir Paul McCartney. It cannot be someone close to him personally, because these conversations would be a tip-off to who it was if it was the person Sir Paul was talking to who recorded them. It is likely a peripheral person-- Someone who Sir Paul sees as "background" and basically ignores or trusts in some capacity.
Another possibility: IAAP includes Heather Mills, who managed to snatch these conversations because she has the wife's inside knowledge of Sir Paul, and she would also have access to the unreleased music if she were- at one point, anyway- a true partner to Sir Paul.
My theory on IAAP is still not wholly formed. Someone in that group has access to insider materials. Someone in that group is an excellent film editor with access to some decent equipment. Someone in that group is a talented music producer and has the equipment for that. Someone in that group can sing well. Someone in that group has some associations (or at least broad knowledge) of Crowley, the occult, the Freemasons, and some seriously secretive things in the lives of the Beatles and their associates.
And then there's that monologue from the unidentified older man, who says very clearly that Paul McCartney died, and that the cover-up is bigger than people imagined, and that his breaking ranks will be seen as a betrayal. He doesn't just sound like some old guy reading a script, either.
I can't discount IAAP completely because of these facts. There's something solid here. I just wonder how much is real and how much is a work?
And as I said in my OP, it could be IAAP saying "we're messing with people out there" or it could be IAAP is pointing out that Beatles and Sir Faul are messing with people out there. I just don't know.
All I do know is that this has more layers than an onion.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Apr 18, 2008 16:03:07 GMT -5
"Now and Then" has been around as a boot, I have it myself. I can't say definitively that's been around for a long time, but Lennon fans knew about Free as a Bird for example even before work started on the Anthology version, Sir Paul said as much himself.
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on Apr 18, 2008 17:05:12 GMT -5
I've had thoughts thought as to IAAP's identity. From everything I can research on the subject, the 1995 version of "Now and Then" was NOT released to the public in any way, and no know bootlegs existed before IAAP slapped it onto a RA video. Where did IAAP get it? The original Lennon demo was first made available in 1996 on the Pegboy bootleg "Free As A Bird - The Dakota Beatle Demos." The drums on the IAAP version (and on "St. Paul" as well, I believe) are sampled from Ringo's introduction to the Sgt. Pepper reprise. The backing vocals sound like the acappella version of "Because" found on the Anthology and Love. It's a very well-done outfake, but by no means legit. Definitely more modern and synthetic than what Jeff Lynne would have produced in 1995. There's another few RA videos where Faul can be heard saying something about clubbing someone to death. Again, I don't recall this being something Macca said in a public forum. This was a private conversation between him and someone close to him. It was most certainly said in a public forum - www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMV3Doxbg2A (warning, contains bloody baby seals). As for the remark about groupies and prostitutes, the voice in question didn't sound like Sir/Saint Paul/Faul at all. The voice goes on to talk about Heather's disreputable past from a point of view that is unlikely to be spoken by any McCartney, dead or alive. Here's the video in question: www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CA4Fg3xihY
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 18, 2008 17:17:22 GMT -5
Thanks for the clarifications!
It's amazing what things taken out of context can be made to sound like! Baby seals. I guess I missed that one.
As for the music, I'm guessing the Wikipedia entry is a little misinformed, but I couldn't find the boot anywhere else... At least not sounding like the one purported to be the 1995 edit done by the remaining Beatles.
. . .So that leaves us with a good video/sound editor with some musical talent. Hmm.
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Apr 19, 2008 7:31:14 GMT -5
I've had thoughts thought as to IAAP's identity. From everything I can research on the subject, the 1995 version of "Now and Then" was NOT released to the public in any way, and no know bootlegs existed before IAAP slapped it onto a RA video. Where did IAAP get it? The original Lennon demo was first made available in 1996 on the Pegboy bootleg "Free As A Bird - The Dakota Beatle Demos." The drums on the IAAP version (and on "St. Paul" as well, I believe) are sampled from Ringo's introduction to the Sgt. Pepper reprise. The backing vocals sound like the acappella version of "Because" found on the Anthology and Love. It's a very well-done outfake, but by no means legit. Definitely more modern and synthetic than what Jeff Lynne would have produced in 1995. my sentiments exactly. i don't know when now and then first surfaced - although i do remember seeing a link to a copy with a lot of background buzz perhaps a little more than a year ago now. so its not like IAAP just pulled this song out of his ass a hat
|
|
|
Post by Talalay on Apr 19, 2008 8:14:28 GMT -5
ZeroCorpse...
I'm not sure if you recall back to the earlier videos when the RA Series was less, shall we say... intense... IAAP actually used to respond directly quite often to the comments on YouTube.
When RA kicked off IAAP came across as very 'Gee thanks folks, really glad you like my work' - as opposed to the international man of mystery he now portrays... lol... maybe he's been replaced.
But on a number of ocasions he was accused of being the next Mark David Chapman, and he would positively balk at that.
The manner in which he seemed quite upset at that (and who wouldn't be?) did leave me with an impression that deep down he is a good guy and relatively harmless and I still believe that.
|
|
|
Post by ZeroCorpse on Apr 19, 2008 9:52:23 GMT -5
Well, good.
Whether or not we ever prove Faul is not Paul, I still don't want to see another Beatle assassinated!
So that takes us back to the beginning of this topic--- "We're messing with people out there."
Has anyone been able to decipher the rest of the song?
|
|
Jacobthelema
Help!
Sweet dreams, came true...today.....came true
Posts: 75
|
Post by Jacobthelema on Jun 18, 2008 19:47:55 GMT -5
Beatles are...? -A band with a great marketing team -Gods -Ascended Masters -Demons -Witches -Aliens -A supernatural force -Spies (like us) -Actors -Drug company spokespersons -Relatives of the Beast 666, Hitler, Satan, Krishna, or Francis Bacon -Other -All of the above Thelemites, Witches, ascended masters from transcendal meditation and LSD, and most of all, Fucking talented.
|
|