|
|
Post by iameye on Jun 10, 2008 8:42:27 GMT -5
I told you not to take the brown acid man  and sugar cubism runs as a subtheme (wouldn't eat those either) (Breakout artist Pablo P. Dali gets intrigued.) (Meanwhile, back in LaLa land, breakout designer K. Plastinina, also intrigued, gets on the blower to pablo to sketch out the beginnings of a beautiful relationship. - together, they'll take the 3 dimensional world and leave those flatlanders behind.) (meanwhile, not wanting to be behinds, the Olsens pay big money to become triplets) (the third will be named Mary Kashley Olsen) lol  |
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jun 10, 2008 9:42:12 GMT -5
Doc, first you say: True. But the overlapping is remarkably consistent. then you continue: She has poor eye distance; William's are much further apart. Also, her head is longer and thinner; Sir Paul has a face a bit more rounded and the nose is altogether a different shape. Sir Paul's hair goes naturally from right to left; Pearl's hair goes in several directions at once. As you wrote before (you are in full contradiction here) the animation tells the contrary:   Pauline and Faul have the same: 1) eye distance 2) head shape 3) hair attach 4) vein on their left (our right) templeThe differences could be made by a professional make-up |
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jun 10, 2008 9:49:01 GMT -5
... each feature .. each wrinkle ... just ... Let It Be This nonsense may work at TKIN............here..............not so much   I agree it's a nonsense. |
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jun 10, 2008 9:50:00 GMT -5
This just proves that you can match up any two random people in a fade pretty easily. I'd LOVE to see ANOTHER example about from you. |
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Jun 10, 2008 10:53:48 GMT -5
I'd LOVE to see ANOTHER example about from you. Why would I bother? |
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Jun 10, 2008 12:20:40 GMT -5
This just proves that you can match up any two random people in a fade pretty easily. I'd LOVE to see ANOTHER example about from you. I will give to you a real fade instead... good joke GN, time to close the thread. Paul is not a 95 year old grandma:   |
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Jun 10, 2008 13:40:59 GMT -5
I'm with Doc. I don't really see anything in all of this that screams to me that it's definitely the same person.  |
|
|
|
Post by blackbird on Jun 10, 2008 14:02:35 GMT -5
That was funny and unusual that it "seems" to fit the facial shape............but.... come on now  The eye sockets above the eye AND the eyebrows don't match up. The old lady's eyebrows would have fallen NOT be higher than his. It is a good LAUGH though. |
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Jun 10, 2008 17:45:52 GMT -5
You have to admit - our Paul pouts a lot.
|
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 10, 2008 21:18:54 GMT -5
I seem to recall Uberkinder doing a fade with himself and JPM to illustrate that it was possible to make certain features match. (for those who don't know, Uberkinder was the one who originally made this presentation) Now really... this is highly impractical, an old woman who gets made up as "Paul" for public appearances. Perhaps it seems rather dull a story, finding someone with a "jawline that matched Paul's" (that part made sense, as that would be an excellent starting point) ) and with at least some basic music ability and training him to be a replacement... Why start the race with a handicap? |
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Jun 10, 2008 21:21:11 GMT -5
Doc, first you say: True. But the overlapping is remarkably consistent. then you continue: She has poor eye distance; William's are much further apart. Also, her head is longer and thinner; Sir Paul has a face a bit more rounded and the nose is altogether a different shape. Sir Paul's hair goes naturally from right to left; Pearl's hair goes in several directions at once. As you wrote before (you are in full contradiction here) the animation tells the contrary: Pauline and Faul have the same: 1) eye distance 2) head shape 3) hair attach 4) vein on their left (our right) templeThe differences could be made by a professional make-up A terrible stupid post on my part. |
|
|
|
Post by skyward on Jun 10, 2008 22:15:04 GMT -5
I'd say the chance that Pauline is playing the role of JPM these days is 0.000000000001% What about Pauline and Linda? And their kids?
The chance that she played the role of JPM at some point during the 60s? ~0.1%
At some point, meaning, as a lark or a test to see how far they could go, a sit in for a photoshoot, or some other innocuous stint.
I'd have a hard time believing she sang any songs or spoke to anyone in public, unless she had someone alter her vocal chords or something.
The thing is, sometimes people resemble other people, they might be closely related or they just might look alike. It happens. I could believe that she is Macca's long lost aunt, Pauline.
|
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Jun 11, 2008 1:42:27 GMT -5
This nonsense may work at TKIN............here..............not so much I agree it's a nonsense. It may be nonsense, but this is, as the Jews say, this is a shunda. OMG, look out, it's a flaming desert water buffalo.  |
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jun 11, 2008 11:32:55 GMT -5
I'd LOVE to see ANOTHER example about from you. I will give to you a real fade instead... good joke GN, time to close the thread. Paul is not a 95 year old grandma:  What's the problem? Nose length? You have to LOOK better .... it was badly tampered there ...  Better that one... Now you know WHY insiders can't tell all the truth.... just unbelievable ... People are not ready ... yet ... |
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Jun 11, 2008 13:34:48 GMT -5
GN is a funny guy!
|
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jun 12, 2008 9:09:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Jun 12, 2008 9:58:31 GMT -5
OK, Mary does resemble her a little. However, how could he/she have "fathered" her ?
Now I'm TOTALLY confused... ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jun 12, 2008 10:10:03 GMT -5
OK, Mary does resemble her a little. However, how could he/she have "fathered" her ? Now I'm TOTALLY confused... ;D Don't worry Mommy that confused me too and so much. Just a note: first human cloning experiments generated only female .....  Sorry I still can't see penis or balls "emboss" there .... Don't worry ... that's just a "preview" of what IAAP will put on video ... soon |
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Jun 12, 2008 18:44:09 GMT -5
This is great!!
|
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Jun 12, 2008 18:54:27 GMT -5
OK, Mary does resemble her a little. However, how could he/she have "fathered" her ? Now I'm TOTALLY confused... ;D Don't worry Mommy that confused me too and so much. Just a note: first human cloning experiments generated only female ..... Sorry I still can't see penis or balls "emboss" there .... Don't worry ... that's just a "preview" of what IAAP will put on video ... soon As fascinating as those vids are, we haven't really learned anything at all. Future ones might be fascinating as well, but what will be the meaning behind the flash? And getting back to the age thing. I don't think that's been completely addressed. Here billy boy's about what- 60? He looks great for 60!. I'm figuring about 35 plus 25 more (compensating for pauline's age) Maybe I'll give up meat. |
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Jun 12, 2008 22:42:30 GMT -5
LADY FAUL'S CAMELTOE EXPOSED
A film by Iamaphoney and SunKing
Coming soon.
|
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Jun 12, 2008 22:58:11 GMT -5
LADY FAUL'S CAMELTOE EXPOSED A film by Iamaphoney and SunKing Coming soon. Cameltoe? Isn't that a neighborhood in Phoenix? |
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jun 12, 2008 23:00:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Jun 12, 2008 23:02:59 GMT -5
There is ONE other possibility----
Bill is Pauline's secret love child!
Scream!
Now there's one for the National Enquirer!
What if she gave him up for her courier career, and now they've been reunited thru some sort of crazy reality Brit-hit TV show like, "So, Who's Yer Real Mama?", created and produced by Simon Cowell?
.....just an idea......
|
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Jun 12, 2008 23:20:37 GMT -5
The stardom ferris wheel always offers up some titillation. It seems "nudity" or near nudity goes in and out in a cycle. First it's in, and everybody's happy, and then it goes out, making everyone want it to come back in again. It's just in and out, year after year; how can one stop that? It's like the Republicans and the Democrats; the Grand Old Party has control of things, then public unrest brings in the Donkey for a season. And in the 70's everybody got back to nature and a little bit funky. Unwashed, half naked, unshaven, uncombed, unscented, undressed, and uncouth was in. Skin was in. Show yo' hippy skin. Macca's daughter laying atop swaddling fabric, draped across Macca's unclad loin-al area wasn't a case of child porn or perversion, it was just typical Hippy-Chic. I bet the photographer got a whiff of arm-pit when he got too close---and that was from the baby alone! The 70's were funhk-ee. I mean, Macca's not EVEN wearing a bra! He probably burned it. HOW anti-class. But, yea, seeing those kinda made me wanna say,:"Look, dudes, dress already." I am not a nudist; not so much. If you are, fine. But every morning I wake up and shave, I remember WHY I am not a good candidate for nudism. Does NUDISM rhyme with BHUDISM? Does nudist go with bhudist? We say in the American South "NOOD_ism" and "NOOD-ist" which sounds so horrible; like "BOO-DIS" and "BOO-DAT." Like BOODY and BOOD-ISM. I think it should be nuddist, nudde, nuddism, and nuhdy flic. I think it should be Buddist, Bhuh-da, Bhudde-ism, and a Buhdy Flic. I guess that makes me a "bluh-ty nuh-ty fuhdy-duhdy." Hmmmmm, that just needs a tune. Or, hehehe a tuhnne. |
|
