|
Post by FP on Jul 27, 2009 16:54:50 GMT -5
What are you talking about? That moderator sounds like a situation at another forum. Btw, at that "other" forum, some here would have been banned about 100 posts ago.. Yep, which is why there's barely anyone posting there. But I'm talking about power loving jonna, who constantly flaunted the "yeah i'm a prick, get used to it" attitude. Remember now, JoJo?
|
|
|
Post by 8749 on Jul 27, 2009 17:53:43 GMT -5
I was a Beatles fan in the '60's and I almost totally agree with Letter B. There will be a few old Beatles fans who fell for the BS, but if you are a true old fan, you can see the difference(s) clearly. NB saw them play live, did you? Yes. I saw them live in Detroit twice, 1964 and 1966. "See" and "hear" were relative words when it came to Beatles concerts, of course. I heard a grand total of 3 or 4 notes at each concert and we were seated behind them both times and at the 1966 concert, the only one to turn around to look at "those of us in the cheap seats" was John (and by that time it could have been Fohn.) But there was saturation coverage of them when they visited, so we saw them clearly on TV and in the papers.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jul 27, 2009 22:25:09 GMT -5
Yep, which is why there's barely anyone posting there. But I'm talking about power loving jonna, who constantly flaunted the "yeah i'm a prick, get used to it" attitude. Remember now, JoJo? Yeah I remember.. You actually took her seriously?
|
|
|
Post by FP on Jul 27, 2009 23:56:00 GMT -5
Yeah I remember.. You actually took her seriously? So it was a she after all... Of course I took her seriously, she had power, I was in constant fear of being banned back then. What the deal was with her? She seemed to just come out of nowhere, I hope she wasn't just some friend.
|
|
|
Post by knowthe411 on Nov 25, 2009 22:03:43 GMT -5
Most of those photos are of Bill/Faul not JPM. As best I can tell, Revolver is the last album the four original Beatles did together. Some of their doubles may have been on the covers - or not. Once you get to Sgt. Pepper's, you're seeing the four replacements on the cover. And you can see the four original Beatles in B&W standing to the side, looking at Beatles etc being laid to rest.
|
|
|
Post by lilyknows on May 30, 2011 2:37:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by B on May 30, 2011 10:45:13 GMT -5
Not likely, lillyknows. It doesn't even look like him, imo.
1. Paul had a small forehead; the hairline is always a giveaway. 2. 'Paul' with Linda - always points to Faul.
Interesting photo though. It may be an artifact of the light, but there is a perfect circle on this guy's forehead.
|
|
|
Post by lilyknows on May 30, 2011 13:33:35 GMT -5
Not likely, lillyknows. It doesn't even look like him, imo. 1. Paul had a small forehead; the hairline is always a giveaway. 2. 'Paul' with Linda - always points to Faul. Interesting photo though. It may be an artifact of the light, but there is a perfect circle on this guy's forehead. I know, i'm with you. That's why i think it's Paul. He totally looks like Paul and nothing like that forhead-guy:
|
|
|
Post by FP on May 30, 2011 15:48:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by B on Jun 1, 2011 4:56:56 GMT -5
Always good to hear from the resident forum disinformationalist. Honey I shrunk Linda McCartney! (Must've been the cancer.)
|
|
|
Post by ipuffin on Jun 1, 2011 16:42:57 GMT -5
Always good to hear from the resident forum disinformationalist. Honey I shrunk Linda McCartney! (Must've been the cancer.) Hey! I thought I hold this position!! ...I was anointed by the apple-picker himself, wasn't I... www.wikihow.com/Make-an-Apple-Pipe WE'VE TAKEN OVER THE THRONE!!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by lilyknows on Jun 3, 2011 8:20:44 GMT -5
i found another one that shows the real JPM in 1978:
|
|
|
Post by Silversong on Jun 3, 2011 21:32:13 GMT -5
First one = watermarked... We all know what that means... TAMPERED! Oopsie, I seem to have forgotten, I have sense. Quietly ignore this post... I think a watermark means "proprietary, please purchase before using".
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jun 3, 2011 21:41:59 GMT -5
First one = watermarked... We all know what that means... TAMPERED! Oopsie, I seem to have forgotten, I have sense. Quietly ignore this post... I think a watermark means "proprietary, please purchase before using". No one ever said water was never involved ;D A watermark is a recognizable image or pattern in paper that appears as various shades of lightness/darkness when viewed by transmitted light (or when viewed by reflected light, atop a dark background), caused by thickness or density variations in the paper.[1] There are two main ways of producing watermarks in paper; the dandy roll process, and the more complex cylinder mould process. Watermarks vary greatly in their visibility; while some are obvious on casual inspection, others require some study to pick out. Various aids have been developed, such as watermark fluid that wets the paper without damaging it. Watermarks are often used as security features of banknotes, passports, postage stamps, and other documents to prevent counterfeiting. A watermark is very useful in the examination of paper because it can be used for dating, identifying sizes, mill trademarks and locations, and the quality of a paper. Encoding an identifying code into digitized music, video, picture, or other file is known as a digital watermark. live her pool!
|
|
|
Post by lilyknows on Jun 4, 2011 2:56:59 GMT -5
How to bring another thread offtopic to hide the truth: I think a watermark means "proprietary, please purchase before using". No one ever said water was never involved ;D A watermark is a recognizable image or pattern in paper that appears as various shades of lightness/darkness when viewed by transmitted light (or when viewed by reflected light, atop a dark background), caused by thickness or density variations in the paper.[1] There are two main ways of producing watermarks in paper; the dandy roll process, and the more complex cylinder mould process. Watermarks vary greatly in their visibility; while some are obvious on casual inspection, others require some study to pick out. Various aids have been developed, such as watermark fluid that wets the paper without damaging it. Watermarks are often used as security features of banknotes, passports, postage stamps, and other documents to prevent counterfeiting. A watermark is very useful in the examination of paper because it can be used for dating, identifying sizes, mill trademarks and locations, and the quality of a paper. Encoding an identifying code into digitized music, video, picture, or other file is known as a digital watermark. live her pool!
|
|
|
Post by Silversong on Jun 4, 2011 3:53:09 GMT -5
Would some of you please watch this video and tell me who you think this is? Is it the return of JPM, or did they get a better double than Faul in the next video? There's that small forehead again, the smaller, wider face, the prominent cheek bones. The cuteness is back! Many things are identical and match up with the real Paul, including the lower register in which he sings, the richer tones, the more masculine presence, the way he holds his guitar. Profile in video "Goodnight Tonight" (screen left) and real Paul on right. A match?? One of the biggest issues in this discussion is that Faul’s nose was longer than Paul’s, but compare these two – it’s not longer in this video screen shot. The picture on the right is probably up closer to the camera, making the ear 'appear' larger. Compare to this next video: long, narrow face, higher forehead, higher voice, more effiminate. I've found other videos and picture comparisons with the same differences and similarities, showing an effiminate, taller, thinner Paul in some, and the other one identical to JPM in others. I'd like to get some responses on this first, though, before posting more. Maybe there's another explanation than what I'm thinking?
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Jun 4, 2011 8:03:57 GMT -5
Is that Bill on bongos & Paul vocals & bass guitar?
or should I say... is that supposed to be Bill on bongos & Paul vocals, bass
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jun 4, 2011 9:17:49 GMT -5
How to bring another thread offtopic to hide the truth: lol
|
|
|
Post by jarvitronics on Jun 4, 2011 14:16:50 GMT -5
How to bring another thread offtopic to hide the truth: -j
|
|
|
Post by ipuffin on Jun 4, 2011 14:19:18 GMT -5
How to bring another thread offtopic to hide the truth: -j ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by Silversong on Jun 4, 2011 14:49:30 GMT -5
Is that Bill on bongos & Paul vocals & bass guitar? or should I say... is that supposed to be Bill on bongos & Paul vocals, bass That's exactly what I want to know! It looks like both Paul and Faul in both videos to me. Paul singing lead in GNTN and Faul singing in CU. In Goodnight Tonight, Paul has that boyish playfulness that's manly instead of effiminate like Bill in Coming Up. Now look at this. Doesn't it look and sound different from the above Coming Up video? The bulkier body again, the smaller forehead, lower key, richer tones.
|
|
|
Post by Silversong on Jun 4, 2011 15:05:18 GMT -5
Look at this from the first Coming Up video. I'm not sure but what the real JPM isn't playing all the male parts in the orchestra in this video. Here's an example: He was showing all his top teeth like the real Paul, too.
|
|
|
Post by Jai Guru Deva on Jun 6, 2011 10:05:17 GMT -5
Dang, Faul's ears in that video are as fake as Pamela Anderson's fantastic plastic ying-yangs!
|
|
|
Post by B on Jun 6, 2011 10:42:03 GMT -5
Well maybe not that fake.
|
|
paulr
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 21
|
Post by paulr on Jun 6, 2011 17:39:32 GMT -5
Well maybe not that fake. And not as fun 2 play with. ;D
|
|