|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Jun 17, 2008 10:17:34 GMT -5
I'm back just for this post. And it's because of such threads as this, it's beginning to look like TKIN and that is one of the reasons I had left a couple of months ago.
While I entertain ideas that are tossed about, some things are just getting out of hand and this is one of them!
Whether or not people want to acknowledge the fact that Paul was killed, does not change the fact that he was no longer a Beatle.
I'm still standing by my theory that there were at least Two Fauls, the one many know as Bill, the Faul we know today, and one that some had referred to as "Mountain Man" who is pictured NOT JPM!
There are people who want to think that Bill was the one and only Faul, but these pictures who some think is JPM returned, is the Mountain Man, who was on the cover of "Mc Cartney" album.
"Mountain Man" does not have the long face that Bill has and his eyes drooped more like JPM's than Bill's do. But that is NOT JPM!
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jun 17, 2008 10:43:26 GMT -5
Whether or not people want to acknowledge the fact that Paul was killed You have proof?
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jun 17, 2008 10:51:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Jun 17, 2008 13:07:08 GMT -5
the paul in that video is incredibly similar-looking to the one on the steps of abbey road in december... i dont know what it is, the eyebrow movements and the eyes a bit.. maybe the mouth too to an extent
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jun 17, 2008 13:13:27 GMT -5
the paul in that video is incredibly similar-looking to the one on the steps of abbey road in december... i dont know what it is, the eyebrow movements and the eyes a bit.. maybe the mouth too to an extent
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Jun 17, 2008 13:29:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Jun 17, 2008 15:13:33 GMT -5
LovelyRita, that was eloquent as usual. Rita posts alot on my forum & I always find that her posts are very intelligent & well thought out. I've been saying for a long time that she should get together with Doc, since the two of them seem to often be on the same wavelength. Not meaning to interfere here, I just wanted to say hi to Rita. Carry on, all... ;D
|
|
|
Post by paulumbo on Jun 17, 2008 16:13:09 GMT -5
Again, I used a Google search on this and found nothing, so if this was discussed before, sorry. I listened to the WKNR broadcast of 1969 on the website: Beatles.ncf.ca/trivia, and they had a tape of the man claiming to be Paul who had called in that October. They brought in an audiologist from Michigan State University, Professor Oscar Tossey who analyzed that tape with a tape Keener had made before with Paul and it was his conclusion that the voices matched--Real Paul. I read an article by Steve Cain who is a board certified and court qualified expert in audiotape analysis and he said studies show that there is a <1% chance of both false identifications and false eliminations when they compare voices using the voiceprint identification method. I think the real Paul McCartney was alive in 1969.
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Jun 17, 2008 17:16:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jun 17, 2008 17:38:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 17, 2008 17:53:13 GMT -5
I recognize it as from an interview from 1966, not sure exactly where or when other than the year.
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jun 17, 2008 18:04:23 GMT -5
"paul"
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jun 17, 2008 18:06:48 GMT -5
[/quote]
I recognize it as from an interview from 1966, not sure exactly where or when other than the year.[/quote]
right after the jesus comment, return to usa to tour, after first gig......
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Jun 17, 2008 18:32:25 GMT -5
apart from the nose and chin they fade fairly consistently. also bear in mind that the older shot is zoomed in from a distance, while the december one is shot much closer
|
|
|
Post by skyward on Jun 17, 2008 19:03:12 GMT -5
I always felt the one with the moustache had a narrower and longer face while the other had a rounder, fuller face. The length of nose, from between the eyes to the tip, looks different. Their right eyes match up in this fade, and of course there are differences in angle between the two shots...
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Jun 17, 2008 19:12:47 GMT -5
I thought so too, JoJo. It looks like JPM in a Beatle wig. And I'm also thinking it is from the American tour in that it looks like this video still has been stretched vertically in an NTSC-to-PAL conversion. I wonder how whoever made this still obtained the video. Corrected aspect?:
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jun 17, 2008 19:15:18 GMT -5
introduced by the brass........guess who is inside? sea of holes/green
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jun 17, 2008 21:23:32 GMT -5
I thought so too, JoJo. It looks like JPM in a Beatle wig. And I'm also thinking it is from the American tour in that it looks like this video still has been stretched vertically in an NTSC-to-PAL conversion. I wonder how whoever made this still obtained the video. Corrected aspect?: I dunno, tile size in original looks more authentic. Harsh lighting?
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Jun 18, 2008 7:17:12 GMT -5
I'm back just for this post. And it's because of such threads as this, it's beginning to look like TKIN and that is one of the reasons I had left a couple of months ago. While I entertain ideas that are tossed about, some things are just getting out of hand and this is one of them! Whether or not people want to acknowledge the fact that Paul was killed, does not change the fact that he was no longer a Beatle. I'm still standing by my theory that there were at least Two Fauls, the one many know as Bill, the Faul we know today, and one that some had referred to as "Mountain Man" who is pictured NOT JPM! There are people who want to think that Bill was the one and only Faul, but these pictures who some think is JPM returned, is the Mountain Man, who was on the cover of "Mc Cartney" album. "Mountain Man" does not have the long face that Bill has and his eyes drooped more like JPM's than Bill's do. But that is NOT JPM! Comparing us to the "Don Knotts theorists" because we've put forth an idea that the JPM "death" was figurative, not literal is a bit much, don't ya think? Well, I guess ya gotta do what ya gotta do..... cya. Don't let the door hit ya.... & all that good stuff!
|
|
|
Post by skyward on Jun 18, 2008 11:52:05 GMT -5
I thought so too, JoJo. It looks like JPM in a Beatle wig. And I'm also thinking it is from the American tour in that it looks like this video still has been stretched vertically in an NTSC-to-PAL conversion. I wonder how whoever made this still obtained the video. Corrected aspect?: When you compare two images, you try to match facial dimensions or features, and in this case, their right eyes seem to match pretty well... The angle of their facial position is slightly different. Right to left, up to down, forward to backward... they aren't in the exact same position with the same expression, so you will see some differences, but, some differences do seem rather evident, despite their positional differences. I think you can see evidence of Bell's Palsy on the left side of the non-moustached face when compared to the imposter. I think it is clear that the guy with the moustache is not the same guy.
|
|
|
Post by Valis on Jun 18, 2008 13:03:42 GMT -5
What if he did return and didn't return at the same time? What if nothing is real, that the past hasn't existed and we are continually changing our perception of the past by our changing consciousness? Reality being merely electrical signals interpreted by the brain.
That would explain a lot. Why it really was a hoax when I first heard of it 20 years ago, why there are several Bill's running around, why he had a seemingly different face every week in their busy year of 67 (without any signs of him walking with bandages), why none of his relatives, friends and other people he met regularly ever made a sound (they're all paid off, right lol).
It also explains Fingo, Knotts, Pauline and other TKIN drivel.
As I've stated before, to me this is a theatre teaching us about the nature of reality. The answer we are looking for has been in our face all the time, up in the red box on top of this page: NOTHING IS REAL, except for infinite love as David Icke said, and coincidentally that's also the main message of the Beatles.... ALL YOU NEED IS LOVE
"it's all in the mind"-George
|
|
|
Post by Valis on Jun 18, 2008 13:45:36 GMT -5
"there is no truth, only stories"-Nietzsche
"If you want your child to be genius teach it myths, if you want it to be more genius teach it more myths"-Einstein
This mystery has all the hallmarks of a classic myth, JPM being the innocent child and Bill the arrogant calculating adolescent. Two parts of one brain.
Time to put this mess together again, transcend this illusion of duality. I know the pieces fit cause I watched them fall away.
An alchemical wedding of the childlike JPM with the rational Bill ro create the alchemical wedding.
Dr Jekkyll and Mr Hyde again
All Love Jan
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Jun 18, 2008 13:49:47 GMT -5
The answer we are looking for has been in our face all the time, up in the red box on top of this page: NOTHING IS REAL exactly! This isn't the best forum for a person to belong to if they feel that everyone should agree with their theories or they'll just take their ball & go home. This forum has always been open to differing opinions surrounding the PWR mystery from PIA'ers, PID'ers, & plain ol' PWR'ers alike.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 18, 2008 18:11:53 GMT -5
What if he did return and didn't return at the same time? What if nothing is real, that the past hasn't existed and we are continually changing our perception of the past by our changing consciousness? Reality being merely electrical signals interpreted by the brain. That would explain a lot. Why it really was a hoax when I first heard of it 20 years ago, why there are several Bill's running around, why he had a seemingly different face every week in their busy year of 67 (without any signs of him walking with bandages), why none of his relatives, friends and other people he met regularly ever made a sound (they're all paid off, right lol). It also explains Fingo, Knotts, Pauline and other TKIN drivel. As I've stated before, to me this is a theatre teaching us about the nature of reality. The answer we are looking for has been in our face all the time, up in the red box on top of this page: NOTHING IS REAL, except for infinite love as David Icke said, and coincidentally that's also the main message of the Beatles.... ALL YOU NEED IS LOVE "it's all in the mind"-George Hey, when you decide to start writing again, it's always a home run Jan. Nothing is real? Maybe you're right, now official history says Paul's first name is John..
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Jun 18, 2008 20:18:05 GMT -5
""Nothing is real? Maybe you're right, now official history says Paul's first name is John.. ""
.. and remember that in 200 Motels Ringo is Zappa ;D
|
|