Facial Comparison of Paul

[cb_brooklyn]

Has this link ever been posted here? It offers animated below/after graphics making it easy to tell that Paul is not Paul.


Undeniable Proof that Paul McCartney was replaced with a Look-Alike:
Part 1 of Facial Comparison: Getting A Reference.
digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fc1.html


The above link should be checked out in detail and any possible errors discussed.

[MikeNL]

bullocks from 60IF

[B]

"bullocks from 60IF " is too unfair a comment for what you referenced,
cb_brooklyn, in my opinion. Many of us have seen that site. Most of us, I'd say.
Those were the pictures that woke many of us up to the fact that Paul had been replaced,
and "60IF" was the first site most of us started in.
NIR-PWR (this site) was created after a number of people learned that SunKing/Beatle Paul
at 60IF was not being up front about his source material, and a board "manager" there started
arbitrarily deleting posts and banning people.
But yes, most of us know of those comparisons, and they're not bad, imo.
Dark Horse, Jojo, and Paul Bearer [here] can tell you more information, if you're interested.
Thanks for bringing them to our attention.
We used to have a Search functon here that I would refer you to, for further exploration, but
unfortunately it has been rendered useless by Proboards, the technical host of this site.
It's there in the blue bar at the top of the page if you want to try it just for laughs.

[MikeNL]

Aug 28, 2008 11:39:15 GMT -5 B said:

"bullocks from 60IF " is too unfair a comment for what you referenced,
cb_brooklyn, in my opinion. Many of us have seen that site. Most of us, I'd say.
Those were the pictures that woke many of us up to the fact that Paul had been replaced,
and "60IF" was the first site most of us started in.
NIR-PWR (this site) was created after a number of people learned that SunKing/Beatle Paul
at 60IF was not being up front about his source material, and a board "manager" there started
arbitrarily deleting posts and banning people.
But yes, most of us know of those comparisons, and they're not bad, imo.
Dark Horse, Jojo, and Paul Bearer [here] can tell you more information, if you're interested.
Thanks for bringing them to our attention.
We used to have a Search functon here that I would refer you to, for further exploration, but
unfortunately it has been rendered useless by Proboards, the technical host of this site.
It's there in the blue bar at the top of the page if you want to try it just for laughs.

this site is based on weird photo overlays. and is always correct, ONLY on the Faul/Paul comparison thing. that's the most important part, and it's done WRONG.

[cb_brooklyn]

Thanks for the comments. (I did look for a search function, to no avail of course.)

The key is the change in skull structure. Maybe if Paul was a teen in the early photos, but he's not. He's in his 20s.

I think a properly done scientific study of the photos would be beneficial. In another thread I saw suggestions of George and Ringo having doubles. Has anyone done overlays of those images?

How does one continue to enjoy Paul's material (such as Wings) when it's not Paul after all?

[MikeNL]

Sept 14, 2008 23:41:14 GMT -5 cb_brooklyn said:

Thanks for the comments. (I did look for a search function, to no avail of course.)

The key is the change in skull structure. Maybe if Paul was a teen in the early photos, but he's not. He's in his 20s.

I think a properly done scientific study of the photos would be beneficial. In another thread I saw suggestions of George and Ringo having doubles. Has anyone done overlays of those images?

How does one continue to enjoy Paul's material (such as Wings) when it's not Paul after all?

because he's a nice guy, and i like his music.

[mommybird]

cbbrooklyn, you have made some excellent observations. Letter B is right. Mike is also right. However, if you'd like to see a sh*tload of comparisons, come over to my forum.
only1rad.proboards62.com/

BTW, I come from Broolklyn !!!