|
Post by GN on Mar 6, 2009 11:53:06 GMT -5
Yes that's Paul on both pictures. Sadly the one on the right is just a photomontage That's the real look of Faul under those days with Maharishi.
|
|
|
Post by FAUllibLE on Mar 6, 2009 14:01:27 GMT -5
Yes that's Paul on both pictures. Sadly the one on the right is just a photomontage That's the real look of Faul under those days with Maharishi. Yes they were very active tryin to confuse the average joe like Red. Photomontage has been documented here before, so to prove that p isnt d using photos is unreliable to say the least. The conspirators were much more clever. Nice job, chalk another one up for GN, his right side of his face looks blurred. Most likely a forgery from the Facca camp.
|
|
|
Post by FAUllibLE on Mar 6, 2009 14:35:45 GMT -5
Looks like his face was pasted in here, because his face looks too small for the size of his head. He appears rather tall here also.
|
|
|
Post by FAUllibLE on Mar 6, 2009 14:41:28 GMT -5
once again a totally different look. Paul pasted on from the neck up. I'd like to find the original picture its from.
|
|
|
Post by FP on Mar 6, 2009 15:46:25 GMT -5
once again a totally different look. Paul pasted on from the neck up. I'd like to find the original picture its from. Funny you should say that, cause if you look at John, you'll see it's a pre-67 pic!
|
|
|
Post by FAUllibLE on Mar 6, 2009 17:11:36 GMT -5
once again a totally different look. Paul pasted on from the neck up. I'd like to find the original picture its from. Funny you should say that, cause if you look at John, you'll see it's a pre-67 pic! Are you sayin they pasted lennon in also or are you sayin this is a pre67 trip to India. If its the latter, when did the beatles make the pre 67 trip?
|
|
|
Post by FAUllibLE on Mar 6, 2009 20:22:13 GMT -5
Right before India. It took a few more operations to get the look right. The impacted tooth needed fixed too.
|
|
|
Post by FP on Mar 6, 2009 20:40:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by FAUllibLE on Mar 6, 2009 20:48:49 GMT -5
My mistake, I didnt realize the real paul went to India.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Mar 6, 2009 22:56:28 GMT -5
Yes they were very active tryin to confuse the average joe like Red. Photomontage has been documented here before, so to prove that p isnt d using photos is unreliable to say the least. The conspirators were much more clever. Nice job, chalk another one up for GN, his right side of his face looks blurred. Most likely a forgery from the Facca camp.
My apologies for being the epitome of mediocrity, I haven't studied this subject for too long. Oh and BTW, in 1968 there wasn't anyone to "try" and confuse.
|
|
|
Post by overdude on Mar 9, 2009 21:47:04 GMT -5
So I just found myself randomly hopping around the 'net a bit after a whimsical launch from one or two of those photo links posted just above, and found something kind of noteworthy... At a particular page, I found myself looking at the following photo.... And what immediately came to mind was the phrase "Two are flying, Two are not." Which was actually located just to the right of this image at www.nemsworld.com/beatles/tit/tit.htmWhich finally, was just to the right of this image: Of course I don't know exactly what it all means, could mean - or if it means anything at all - but I thought it was worthy of a mention here (even though the title of this thread is 1968-JPM, and these three pictures are tagged as being from 1969)... At the very least, I'm pretty sure that it's the first time I, personally, have seen any shred of photographic or audio evidence that even remotely ties in to John's "Two are Flying" statement. Thoughts???
|
|
|
Post by FP on Mar 9, 2009 22:27:04 GMT -5
I'm thinking the height difference between John and George is a smack in the face to the "Faul is taller" claim.
|
|
|
Post by B on Mar 9, 2009 22:31:50 GMT -5
Well it certainly looks as if Ringo and Faul were about to go flying if they weren't careful!
|
|
|
Post by GN on Mar 10, 2009 9:52:40 GMT -5
True photo: The tampered one: None of THE BEATLES were the ORIGINAL ONES there ...
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Mar 10, 2009 12:45:31 GMT -5
Who's the guy in the back with the mustache between Ringo and Patti? True photo:
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Mar 10, 2009 13:33:31 GMT -5
True photo?
Sorry GN but it's very badly blurred and a different angle and position, how can we compare anything about it?
|
|
|
Post by pataphysical on Mar 10, 2009 15:40:10 GMT -5
So I just found myself randomly hopping around the 'net a bit after a whimsical launch from one or two of those photo links posted just above, and found something kind of noteworthy... At a particular page, I found myself looking at the following photo.... And what immediately came to mind was the phrase "Two are flying, Two are not." Which was actually located just to the right of this image at www.nemsworld.com/beatles/tit/tit.htmWhich finally, was just to the right of this image: Of course I don't know exactly what it all means, could mean - or if it means anything at all - but I thought it was worthy of a mention here (even though the title of this thread is 1968-JPM, and these three pictures are tagged as being from 1969)... At the very least, I'm pretty sure that it's the first time I, personally, have seen any shred of photographic or audio evidence that even remotely ties in to John's "Two are Flying" statement. Thoughts??? Ironically, the two who were flying are not the two that picture suggests. I wish I could remember the source of the interview, but as I remember it, John is talking about the front cover picture of the Sgt. Pepper album, and says (paraphrased): "If you look at the cover you can see that two are flying and two are not. (pause) Two of us didn't share it with the others." Looking at the cover, one can see John's face flushed like he's been sunburned, George has a bit of color in his cheeks, not as fully-flushed as John. Paul and Ringo have no such color in their faces (John and George didn't "share" with them). If you have the record album, you can't help but notice John's "blushing" (and George's a bit too). The "flying" is due to some drug (an LSD rush?); only John and George were under the influence at the time of the cover shot. Other photos of them on the album show no such flushing in anyone's face. I think too much is being read into John's cryptic statement. I think he wanted to be subtle and not just blurt out "Hey George and I were trippin' on LSD, Beatle People!" -pataphysical
|
|
|
Post by FP on Mar 10, 2009 16:31:01 GMT -5
I've seen other pics from that shoot, that's definitely Paul's brother Mike. Who's the guy in the back with the mustache between Ringo and Patti? True photo:
|
|
|
Post by overdude on Mar 11, 2009 11:24:35 GMT -5
Hey pataphysical ~~
Thanks for your post and explanation -
I have never heard it explained that way before, but it certainly makes sense to me... I'll be sure to take a closer look at the faces of John and George the next time I have a copy of Pepper in my hands!
|
|
|
Post by GN on Mar 26, 2009 19:39:10 GMT -5
Funny you should say that, cause if you look at John, you'll see it's a pre-67 pic! Are you sayin they pasted lennon in also or are you sayin this is a pre67 trip to India. If its the latter, when did the beatles make the pre 67 trip? That photo was taken at New Delhi on July 6 1966
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Mar 27, 2009 0:00:11 GMT -5
Are you sayin they pasted lennon in also or are you sayin this is a pre67 trip to India. If its the latter, when did the beatles make the pre 67 trip? That photo was taken at New Delhi on July 6 1966 That would fit. This one is July 8 66 coming into London. Notice the clothes. John could have the same jacket and the shirt looks the same. Paul's jacket could be the same as well. Could be the same trousers come to think of it. (let's hope it stopped there)
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Mar 27, 2009 13:53:25 GMT -5
When was this pic taken? Was it during that summer visit when Paul was still 'around' in the summer of '66 or was it during George and Pattie's trip to India that started September 19, 1966? (Notice George is in the beginning stages of a mustache)
|
|
|
Post by FP on Mar 27, 2009 14:52:16 GMT -5
When was this pic taken? Was it during that summer visit when Paul was still 'around' in the summer of '66 or was it during George and Pattie's trip to India that started September 19, 1966? (Notice George is in the beginning stages of a mustache) It's the one in the later part of '66, probably October. George didn't have time to grow a mustache before then.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Mar 27, 2009 14:55:39 GMT -5
Yes and it's interesting that he went back to mop-top after wearing his hair longer throughout most of 1966.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Mar 27, 2009 15:45:15 GMT -5
Evidently George knew Jon Lovitz.
|
|