|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Jan 27, 2009 21:46:12 GMT -5
This just in: Paul McCartney announced as live performer at 51st Grammy Awards www.examiner.com/x-2082-Beatles-Examiner~y2009m1d26-This-just-in-Paul-McCartney-announced-as-performer-at-the-Grammy-Awards2-8-2009, hmm, isn't that the next date on IAAP youtube page? Oh! That's right! For the second straight month, Paul McCartney has been doing something the same day the new video was supposed to be released! Didn't something happen last month about an autograph signing? Yeah! That's right! But clearly, after all this. The Fireman knowledge on these Youtube accounts months before Paul announced it to the public along with these accurate dates, photo proof of there being another McCartney, yet this isn't enough for people to believe IAAP is Paul, Faul, John, whomever! Then again, IAAP isn't just one person, it's "we" said that youtube account. So it might be just everyone.. Paul, George Martin, Ringo, Yoko, John.. Yeah, I said John. Nobody else buys it, but I do. I think John Lennon is still alive. Don't believe me? It doesn't matter.. that's my opinion, we all have them.
|
|
JS2
For Sale 
Goo Goo G'Joob etc.
Posts: 192
|
Post by JS2 on Jan 28, 2009 7:30:28 GMT -5
He could've easily found out about the Grammy date, and prove that he knew about the new Fireman album, not just the (already existing) Fireman, please.
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Jan 28, 2009 10:05:22 GMT -5
He could've easily found out about the Grammy date, and prove that he knew about the new Fireman album, not just the (already existing) Fireman, please. I think you're missing the bigger picture here, JS2. Iamaphoney had that date on his YouTube page long before Paul was ever announced for the Grammys. Also, I don't know if ph0neyprophet caught this or not, but while Paul is performing on February 8th it will be February 9th in England. February 9th, now where have I heard that date before...?  |
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Jan 28, 2009 14:55:54 GMT -5
I have little doubt that Faul is part of the IAAP team. What I'd love to know is what they are trying to accomplish with all the drama  |
|
|
|
Post by malevans on Jan 28, 2009 16:52:02 GMT -5
since noboby really could answer my questions I have done a little research on my own. I have read the 2 Paul is dead books, turn me on, dead man and the walrus was paul. None of them hasn't obviously not the information IAAP started to show us november the 9th 2006. There is no mention on the most to my ears clue we will sing it man we will be reverse, and all the other clues IAAP had come up with, Actually only the #9 and i'm so tired backwards clues are mentioned in the books. It is at least clear for me that Paul wanted these clues out and since nobody really noticed he had to start the machine himself. Why is there so much fireman music and clues and flashes in the early IAAP videos from number 39 i think. Why? and why is the fireman coming out with a new album after 12 years of silence? and why is Paul making backwards speech on the album. I think this is only the beginning and we have a lot of stuff to look forward to concerning IAAP and Paul. What do you guys think? I wish someone would take the time to go through the whole rotten apple serie, I think a lot of answers is buried there, I am just not clever enough to see them, i think you have to be very clever, especially if Paul really do as it says in the rotten apple 72, take the book of the law that serious, with all the cipher and cryptogram stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by B on Jan 28, 2009 17:55:09 GMT -5
|
|
JS2
For Sale
Goo Goo G'Joob etc.
Posts: 192
|
Post by JS2 on Jan 29, 2009 14:56:18 GMT -5
PIA or not, you have to admit that IAAP tampers! Look at vintage footage from "Imagine". Beatle Phil. Phil Spector. Not Billy Shears.
|
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Jan 29, 2009 17:32:01 GMT -5
|
|
JS2
For Sale
Goo Goo G'Joob etc.
Posts: 192
|
Post by JS2 on Feb 9, 2009 11:58:51 GMT -5
For the ABSOLUTELY LAST TIME, IAAP could've known about The Fireman. They've been going for nearly 16 years! Just because he references The Fireman, then they release an album is not a big thing. He references a number of things, and in that instance just got lucky.
|
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Feb 10, 2009 5:47:06 GMT -5
He seems to get lucky an awful lot....
He would also have to work incredibly hard to find out this information, unless he did have a little help from his friends here and there. I personally find it difficult to believe that IAAP isn't in some way connected to somebody Beatle related due to the amount of time and effort that has been put into these videos purely for the sake of youtube. Good production, re-sung songs that sound incredibly like the originals, trips to California, a briefcase planted, interviews with the world and his wife.
So for ABSOLUTELY THE LAST TIME, just plain ol' lucky? I think not.
|
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Feb 10, 2009 10:54:48 GMT -5
Plastic Paul is right. IAAP either IS an insider or has some impressive connections.  |
|
|
|
Post by puzzled on Feb 13, 2009 21:45:59 GMT -5
No argument here, but you must admit that it would only take being a friend or family member to someone that works closely with him to have access to behind-the-scenes information, and does not require automatically that IAAP = JPM. JPM is an awfully busy guy, I just can't picture him sitting around in his underwear late at night in front of his computer, hanging out in forums and YouTube  |
|
|
|
Post by B on Feb 13, 2009 23:11:54 GMT -5
"I just can't picture him sitting around in his underwear late at night in front of his computer,
hanging out in forums and YouTube"Oh give it a try! 
|
|
|
|
Post by puzzled on Feb 14, 2009 0:06:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Feb 14, 2009 1:54:04 GMT -5
RA 72 (?) the one where "just a good,replica" emerged..
The man who read's Crowley's quotes.. Is it me, or is there something about that voice that somewhat sounds like "Nothing too much, just out of sight"
Not from the entire song, but I mean the ending.. the angry, deep voice he claimed to have done.
|
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Feb 14, 2009 3:37:26 GMT -5
"I just can't picture him sitting around in his underwear late at night in front of his computer,
hanging out in forums and YouTube"Oh give it a try! By jove, I think we should sit around during the wee hours on the internet, posting away with great enthusiasm. All that's really missing is a uniform, or at least, an outfit that goes along with our madness hobby. Perhaps footsies, loose socks or stockings, large dark colored boxer briefs, a Staff t-shirt, a "I heart the Beatles" bill cap (or, Bill cap if you must) and a smoking jacket or light bathrobe, initialed "N.I.R." down the right lapel. Yes, I said staff t-shirt. Now, what would that be? Something with "NIR" on it, and maybe, "Paul was replaced", or, "Paul is alive", and a silk screen of the Fab Four; and maybe the url across the back. Too complex? So's "our mission." And, as to the idea of, is Sir Paul/Bill surfing the net late and reading NIR? My third rate and often faulty ESP tells me now that, yes, it's true, he "logs in" to NIR every now and then. In fact, I suspect that he is actually logged in and typing at this exact moment, tonight, right now. Who is he? Well I dunno. Is his screen name IAAP? Wouldn't that be too obvious? So, no, that's a red herring. IAAP is a concerned onlooker for sure, but not likely Bill himself. No, Bill's screen name must be something very nonchalant, very non-indicating, very cool and neutral. Something like "iamrightunderneathyourverynoses" or even, "billsheppardjustkidding". We are an entertainment of sorts. A reality/non-reality show. And if I've ever, ever, EVER made even one person from the Macca camp laugh, even a little, then I've done my job. The same for all of us. If we've been interesting, witty, pithy, informative, half-way enlightening or revelatory, or just downright corny, then it's all been for a good reason. We're not a dry bunch. We don't do dry, clinical, flat data. We're a bunch with a--with a, why, a heart. And why of course. A heart for St. Valentine's Day. Happy Valentine's Day, everyone here on these boards. (as a holiday toast, not a romantic gesture....) Though, I wish for everyone to have at least one decent "romantic" conversation with an interesting "other", some time during the day today. Perhaps even a nice dinner date with wine and chocolates. |
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Feb 14, 2009 3:53:55 GMT -5
This just in: Paul McCartney announced as live performer at 51st Grammy Awards www.examiner.com/x-2082-Beatles-Examiner~y2009m1d26-This-just-in-Paul-McCartney-announced-as-performer-at-the-Grammy-Awards2-8-2009, hmm, isn't that the next date on IAAP youtube page? Oh! That's right! For the second straight month, Paul McCartney has been doing something the same day the new video was supposed to be released! Didn't something happen last month about an autograph signing? Yeah! That's right! But clearly, after all this. The Fireman knowledge on these Youtube accounts months before Paul announced it to the public along with these accurate dates, photo proof of there being another McCartney, yet this isn't enough for people to believe IAAP is Paul, Faul, John, whomever! Then again, IAAP isn't just one person, it's "we" said that youtube account. So it might be just everyone.. Paul, George Martin, Ringo, Yoko, John.. Yeah, I said John. Nobody else buys it, but I do. I think John Lennon is still alive. Don't believe me? It doesn't matter.. that's my opinion, we all have them. You may well be right. Someone did indeed die, even if the only person (who was greatly missed) was the original Brian Epstein. I read "Eleanor Rigby" as "Elegy for Brian", it's only missing one letter, the "F", which must assuredly be found somewhere else. F? Eph-grave? "...wearing a face that she keeps in a jar by the door, who is it FOR" Brian was one of the "lonely people." |
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Feb 14, 2009 8:13:08 GMT -5
"I just can't picture him sitting around in his underwear late at night in front of his computer,
hanging out in forums and YouTube"Oh give it a try! By jove, I think we should sit around during the wee hours on the internet, posting away with great enthusiasm. All that's really missing is a uniform, or at least, an outfit that goes along with our madness hobby. Perhaps footsies, loose socks or stockings, large dark colored boxer briefs, a Staff t-shirt, a "I heart the Beatles" bill cap (or, Bill cap if you must) and a smoking jacket or light bathrobe, initialed "N.I.R." down the right lapel. Yes, I said staff t-shirt. Now, what would that be? Something with "NIR" on it, and maybe, "Paul was replaced", or, "Paul is alive", and a silk screen of the Fab Four; and maybe the url across the back. Too complex? So's "our mission." And, as to the idea of, is Sir Paul/Bill surfing the net late and reading NIR? My third rate and often faulty ESP tells me now that, yes, it's true, he "logs in" to NIR every now and then. In fact, I suspect that he is actually logged in and typing at this exact moment, tonight, right now. Who is he? Well I dunno. Is his screen name IAAP? Wouldn't that be too obvious? So, no, that's a red herring. IAAP is a concerned onlooker for sure, but not likely Bill himself. No, Bill's screen name must be something very nonchalant, very non-indicating, very cool and neutral. Something like "iamrightunderneathyourverynoses" or even, "billsheppardjustkidding". We are an entertainment of sorts. A reality/non-reality show. And if I've ever, ever, EVER made even one person from the Macca camp laugh, even a little, then I've done my job. The same for all of us. If we've been interesting, witty, pithy, informative, half-way enlightening or revelatory, or just downright corny, then it's all been for a good reason. We're not a dry bunch. We don't do dry, clinical, flat data. We're a bunch with a--with a, why, a heart. And why of course. A heart for St. Valentine's Day. Happy Valentine's Day, everyone here on these boards. (as a holiday toast, not a romantic gesture....) Though, I wish for everyone to have at least one decent "romantic" conversation with an interesting "other", some time during the day today. Perhaps even a nice dinner date with wine and chocolates. you're beautiful, doc Happy St. Valentine's Day Sometimes late when things are real
And people share the gift of gab between themselves
Some are quick to take the bait
And catch the perfect prize that waits among the shelves
But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have
And Cause never was the reason for the evening
Or the tropic of Sir Galahad.
So please believe in me
When I say I'm spinning round, round, round, round
Smoke glass stain bright color
Image going down, down, down, down
Soapsuds green like bubbles
Oh, Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have
And Cause never was the reason for the evening
Or the tropic of Sir Galahad
[/i] |
|
|
|
Post by B on Feb 14, 2009 11:18:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Feb 15, 2009 1:00:17 GMT -5
By jove, I think we should sit around during the wee hours on the internet, posting away with great enthusiasm. All that's really missing is a uniform, or at least, an outfit that goes along with our madness hobby. Perhaps footsies, loose socks or stockings, large dark colored boxer briefs, a Staff t-shirt, a "I heart the Beatles" bill cap (or, Bill cap if you must) and a smoking jacket or light bathrobe, initialed "N.I.R." down the right lapel. Yes, I said staff t-shirt. Now, what would that be? Something with "NIR" on it, and maybe, "Paul was replaced", or, "Paul is alive", and a silk screen of the Fab Four; and maybe the url across the back. Too complex? So's "our mission." And, as to the idea of, is Sir Paul/Bill surfing the net late and reading NIR? My third rate and often faulty ESP tells me now that, yes, it's true, he "logs in" to NIR every now and then. In fact, I suspect that he is actually logged in and typing at this exact moment, tonight, right now. Who is he? Well I dunno. Is his screen name IAAP? Wouldn't that be too obvious? So, no, that's a red herring. IAAP is a concerned onlooker for sure, but not likely Bill himself. No, Bill's screen name must be something very nonchalant, very non-indicating, very cool and neutral. Something like "iamrightunderneathyourverynoses" or even, "billsheppardjustkidding". We are an entertainment of sorts. A reality/non-reality show. And if I've ever, ever, EVER made even one person from the Macca camp laugh, even a little, then I've done my job. The same for all of us. If we've been interesting, witty, pithy, informative, half-way enlightening or revelatory, or just downright corny, then it's all been for a good reason. We're not a dry bunch. We don't do dry, clinical, flat data. We're a bunch with a--with a, why, a heart. And why of course. A heart for St. Valentine's Day. Happy Valentine's Day, everyone here on these boards. (as a holiday toast, not a romantic gesture....) Though, I wish for everyone to have at least one decent "romantic" conversation with an interesting "other", some time during the day today. Perhaps even a nice dinner date with wine and chocolates. you're beautiful, doc Happy St. Valentine's Day Sometimes late when things are real
And people share the gift of gab between themselves
Some are quick to take the bait
And catch the perfect prize that waits among the shelves
But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have
And Cause never was the reason for the evening
Or the tropic of Sir Galahad.
So please believe in me
When I say I'm spinning round, round, round, round
Smoke glass stain bright color
Image going down, down, down, down
Soapsuds green like bubbles
Oh, Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have
And Cause never was the reason for the evening
Or the tropic of Sir Galahad
[/i] [/quote] Thanks! And for the song lyric, too. I've always liked that particular song by "America." Funny. It resonates more with me now than it did back when it was new. |
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Feb 15, 2009 1:01:47 GMT -5
Plastic Paul is right. IAAP either IS an insider or has some impressive connections. Hits nail on head. (IMO) |
|
|
|
Post by knowthe411 on Nov 23, 2009 3:48:58 GMT -5
Hi everyone. I believe that Iamaphoney is the Alesiter Crowley-William Sheppard-Campbell Paul. And yet, since the YouTube page says "we", it's probably all three Pauls: the real Paul, Crowley-Sheppard-Campbell Paul, and Phil Ackrill Paul. I've seen enough of the RA videos to realize it's someone who has access to personal photos of Paul, newspaper clippings and private videotapes of key people in the PID hoax. I've come to the conclusion that all three Pauls know about the others' personal schedules, itineraries etc. They coordinate.
Like Phoneyprohet, I too believe that John Lennon is alive and living in Toronto. I don't care what anyone thinks about that either.
|
|
|
|
Post by B on Nov 23, 2009 11:24:51 GMT -5
Why Toronto?
|
|
|
|
Post by privyprincess on Nov 30, 2010 22:43:16 GMT -5
I don't think IAAP is Paul, but I do think he (and his pals) work for Paul in some way.
|
|
|
|
Post by jamesmcc on Jan 30, 2011 18:56:50 GMT -5
Hey guys, first post here, but how many have noticed that The Winged Beatle is now featured on both PauIMcC and Ringo's official utube channels. Heck, Ringo's even has it as the trailer vid playing as soon as you visit. Is that unusual? Edit, well maybe not the official channels I notice, www.youtube.com/user/RlNGOSTARRwww.youtube.com/user/PAUIMCCARTNEYor are they? |
|
