|
Post by trutha on Feb 1, 2009 22:40:31 GMT -5
Oh, no, another comp where Faul doesn't resemble Paul very much :-P
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Feb 1, 2009 22:43:02 GMT -5
Oh, no, another comp where Faul doesn't resemble Paul very much :-P Oh no, you're quite blind! That looks like the same man 10 years later.
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Feb 1, 2009 22:52:03 GMT -5
If that's your explanation for why he looks different when he looks different, what's your explanation for why he looks the same when he looks the same? He looks different a lot more often than he looks the same. We've been through this many times before. This discussion is getting old. Maybe so, but the concept of "different" and the extent or significance of any "difference" are in the eye of the beholder. Many of the photographs of the later Paul -- which have been used as examples of how this just couldn't possibly be the same individual as the early Paul -- to my mind, actually do bear quite a close similarity to the early Paul when examined again. I'll post examples of what I mean in another thread later -- not intending to convince a single soul and knowing in advance that I probably won't.
|
|
|
Post by trutha on Feb 1, 2009 22:52:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Feb 1, 2009 22:54:24 GMT -5
Oh, no, another comp where Faul doesn't resemble Paul very much :-P Oh no, you're quite blind! That looks like the same man 10 years later. Yes. Dare I say that it's the same basic face and the same set of front teeth?
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Feb 1, 2009 22:57:16 GMT -5
Celebrities have surgery to alter their appearance on a regular basis and for reasons that have nothing to do with the motive of impersonating someone else.
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Feb 1, 2009 23:08:03 GMT -5
Paul's teeth are dented in on the left side of his face. Faul's are not. How can you not see this ? What possible reason would "Paul" have to wear fake ears ? Am I missing something here ?
|
|
|
Post by trutha on Feb 1, 2009 23:11:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by FP on Feb 1, 2009 23:21:41 GMT -5
Paul's teeth are dented in on the left side of his face. Faul's are not. How can you not see this ? I'm pretty sure the Paul pic is before he chipped that tooth.
|
|
|
Post by trutha on Feb 1, 2009 23:22:03 GMT -5
I can't believe this passed for Paul McCartney. Gawd :-P
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Feb 1, 2009 23:54:53 GMT -5
Yeah, insane isn't it? (just look at how those ears look EXACTLY the same).
A thing to keep in mind here is the multiple Faul aspect. We're comparing one real guy (THE JPM) with possibly 3 impersonators. ( visually speaking). One to one is hard enough. To really be concrete about anything is more of a challenge under this scenario.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Feb 2, 2009 0:20:52 GMT -5
There are so many different versions of 'ear' it's comical. You have the really close to the head version (like above), the radar dish version....
I think it would be cool to take shots of 'paul' over the yrs and put each shot into a separate frame as in a film. Then run the film like in a projector. When speeded up we'd see 'paul's' ears going out then in then out then in then... - it'd look like they were flapping like bird's wings. It would be fun to watch!
Would your's do that? No. Neither would mine. It'd be kinda boring. Nothing like the amazing flapping ears we'd see with the 'pauls'!
Of course if paul was really JPM the whole time and we made the same movie - it wouldn't be as fun to watch. there'd be virtually no movement. The reason is more than obvious.
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Feb 2, 2009 0:29:28 GMT -5
The same basic face is not the same thing as the same face The same basic face = the same face + age/lifestyle changes/distortions though the camera lens, etc.
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Feb 2, 2009 0:52:44 GMT -5
Paul's teeth are dented in on the left side of his face. Faul's are not. How can you not see this ? What possible reason would "Paul" have to wear fake ears ? Am I missing something here ? Holy Good Night! What reasons do wealthy people in general and entertainment personalities in particular have to pay good money for cosmetic surgery? Face lifts, eye lifts, brow lifts, tummy tucks, etc. Do you think that it's possible that the most prominent rock star in the world might have decided to get the same thing for himself? And the surgery wouldn't always even necessarily have been cosmetic. All four of the Beatles can be seen smoking heavily in many of those early Beatles films and appearances, as we can presume that they did in working-class Liverpool and, of course, George Harrison died at an early age of throat cancer. Do you think it's possible that all that tar and nicotine might have affected McCartney's gums as well, and that he might have needed dental surgery? Because I have a feeling that in between all of the performing and rehearsals and partying that took place on the road and in the studio, there might not always have been time to observe good dental hygiene. And what about his ears? Do you think it's possible that playing loud music on stereo in an enclosed studio and in stadiums with screaming fans on a regular basis might have affected his eardrums and that he might have needed surgery to deal with that, as well? There are so many innocent explanations for why a celebrity would have facial surgery for cosmetic or health-related purposes, which might also necessitate the use of -- for example -- prosthetic ears. He's not hiding his ear surgery from the world, is he, as if it were part of a big secret? He's appearing in a filmed interview and allowing the camera to take a close-up of it. To assume that the most likely explanation for all of this is an attempt to pose as someone else is substituting Occam's Razor with Occam's Kaleidoscope.
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Feb 2, 2009 0:57:11 GMT -5
I can't believe this passed for Paul McCartney. Gawd :-P The photo on the right was stretched by whoever edited it for reasons involving space and formatting, I am sure. After the photo on the right is restored to the normal dimensions of its subject, it looks more like the photo on the left -- again, after accounting for age and lifestyle differences.
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Feb 2, 2009 2:35:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Feb 2, 2009 3:20:56 GMT -5
Oh, no, another comp where Faul doesn't resemble Paul very much :-P Oh no, you're quite blind! That looks like the same man 10 years later. And, for that matter, dare I say that the older man on the right has BROWN or HAZEL eyes?
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Feb 2, 2009 3:24:24 GMT -5
i cant understand why you ignore all the photos whitch show the same man, but instead keep posting the same comparisons where he makes a weird face, the angle is off or which are blurry video stills. here are some more comps that show JPM: Why, I do believe that Penny Lane Paul also has brown eyes in this photo.
|
|