|
Post by JoJo on Feb 17, 2009 15:28:24 GMT -5
Double LOL! See, this is why Red Lion is my favorite moderator... (no offense, Jo!) ;D None taken, RL cracks me up too.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Feb 17, 2009 15:36:03 GMT -5
But remember, it's not just Faul's enormous forehead that proves that Paul is dead and that the boat picture is worthless. His green eyes and his uncute features also prove that.
They don't just prove that he's dead; they prove that he was MURDERED.
Really, it just burns me up right now to think about how those murderers got away with it.
65, I find it quite offensive that you would dare use the word "cute" in the same sentence with "Faul." It is common knowledge that "Faul" is/was not cute and even when he was a baby he was ugly due to the large forehead.
With regard to Paul's murder, I prefer not to talk about it, as it is very painful......
No worries though, good news is on the horizon. My spirit guides tell me that Paul has rested long enough and is getting ready to reincarnate. His task in coming back will be to eliminate world hunger, by returning as a powdered meat sales rep who sells at discounted prices to third world countries! I'm so excited!
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Feb 17, 2009 15:41:15 GMT -5
First of all, if you're considering Paul being murdered, you better get the facts straight.
If you're trying to proove that, then this photo was taken in 1966. To go along with that possible statement, the man you state to be Brian Jones, is John Lennon.
Don't say it isn't true.
However, as to "3 Pauls" I can believe it. If the Beatles were making Strawberry Fields, you can notice all three of them. The one who looks like "Billy" is the man you see walking backwards then jumping up into the tree.
|
|
dark66horse
Hard Day's Night
Nobody can deny that there's something there...
Posts: 23
|
Post by dark66horse on Feb 17, 2009 16:07:28 GMT -5
A silencing of both those who claim this is all bogus and those who claim he's dead.Someone said it's the Holy Grail! As I said before, the funny thing is that many of you already have this photo somewhere in your Beatles books....but my question is: is it really important whether it comes from this or that magazine? if the photo proves genuine, will it be enough to prove to you this very simple truth, that Paul, for some (health?) reason, after 1965-6, was replaced in public by one or more Fauls? Moreover, was the '66 (balding? sick?) Paul in the photo wearing a wig?, that's why his hair appear unruffled by the wind, certainly blowing on the yacht? and now there's a clue for you all.....now it'e easy to find the source:
|
|
|
Post by FP on Feb 17, 2009 16:59:26 GMT -5
PIA: " The picture, even if authentic, shows only one Paul, there on the left....err wait ...center, yeah center.....but it might be the fellow on the right.... take yer pick but only one of 'em is Paul." Alright, I'll take my pick. It's definitely from 1968, with Paul in the middle. The guy on the left isn't Paul, and the guy on the right definitely isn't "a" Paul. So hopefully we'll be able to identify those guys if we find more pics.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Feb 17, 2009 17:48:40 GMT -5
Hah, you keep saying that.. I think the point you are missing is not whether the picture proves anything necessarily, it may or may not, but.. Step one is seeing the source in a context other than a post from someone who hasn't built up the "trust capital" that a long time member would.. I hope you understand and take no offense. I have a lot of Beatle books, no secret there, and while there's no way I remember each and every photo I've run across, anything related to the Apple announcement or for that matter any situation where the photos are in short supply would get my attention for sure.. Probably would have posted them long ago. Still have no idea. If this is from a rare book, for example that Derek Taylor/George Harrison one, then forget it.. I don't have the spare two grand or so to pick it up on Ebay next go 'round. May get cheaper with the economic situation, but anyway.. Cheers D66H.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Feb 17, 2009 18:09:37 GMT -5
the funny thing is that many of you already have this photo somewhere in your Beatles books.... Very clever.. I get it now.. Issue 61 of "The Beatles Book" (August 1968) I don't have the actual paper and ink version, have quite a few, but not this one. But some kind soul (you know who you are) gave me the electronic version of every issue. Everyone may rest assured it is exactly as he posted it here.
|
|
dark66horse
Hard Day's Night
Nobody can deny that there's something there...
Posts: 23
|
Post by dark66horse on Feb 17, 2009 18:50:14 GMT -5
the funny thing is that many of you already have this photo somewhere in your Beatles books.... Very clever.. I get it now.. Issue 61 of "The Beatles Book" (August 1968) JOJO is the Winner| this is the source! page 11!
|
|
|
Post by FP on Feb 17, 2009 20:29:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Feb 17, 2009 23:18:16 GMT -5
LOL But what do YOU think? Well, if the photo is authentic and we have JPM as well as an additional "Paul" or two in there, it does shatter some myths. If not, it's business as usual with all the wild theories ad naseum. Double LOL! See, this is why Red Lion is my favorite moderator... (no offense, Jo!) ;D Thanks for the plug, but JoJo is still the man. First of all, if you're considering Paul being murdered, you better get the facts straight. Just having a bit of fun with words. No one was murdered, least of all Paul.
|
|
|
Post by B on Feb 17, 2009 23:47:57 GMT -5
Close, but no cigar.
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Feb 18, 2009 2:36:10 GMT -5
Would you look at how greasy Faul's hair is? His greasy, disgusting hair only makes his enormous forehead more noticeable. If anything, this proves BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT that Paul was murdered!
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Feb 18, 2009 3:02:39 GMT -5
Very true Jude, very true! His greasy hair even proves that he was murdered by the illuminati!! Poor Paul!
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Feb 18, 2009 3:16:13 GMT -5
Yes pauliedied, the Powers That Be might have been able to produce a decent Paul sound-alike, but no one could never, EVER reproduce the well-groomed, clean-shaven looks of the one-and-only JPM! Anyone who can't see past that greasy hair and ugly smile is either programmed, uneducated, or both!
|
|
|
Post by -Wings- on Feb 18, 2009 3:24:37 GMT -5
The grease comes from not eating enough meat. Why, the real Paul was known to BATH in beef broth in order to stay extra manly. Obviously the Masons had to watch him die for this.
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Feb 18, 2009 3:48:17 GMT -5
Everyone knows that Paul's eyes were hazel while Faul's are green so this photo was obviously retouched to show Faul with hazel eyes.
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Feb 18, 2009 4:40:29 GMT -5
That's right! The real Paul was a REAL man. He loved eating hamburgers, and sweating, and all sorts of manly things that manly men love that are really manly! Whereas FAUL is very effeminate, and probably bisexual (he has been seen with Elton John many, many times! : . Gay men have a natural aversion to meat, which explains why FAUL is such a ugly, greasy, unwashed veggie freak!
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Feb 18, 2009 5:13:33 GMT -5
Yea, so true! Look at how ugly Paul was... Nothing compared to the cute and handsome Bill/Faul: ooh, eehr, wait a minute.....
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Feb 18, 2009 5:19:02 GMT -5
Yea, so true! Look at how ugly Paul was... Nothing compared to the cute and handsome Bill/Faul: ooh, eehr, wait a minute..... Pauliedied, how could you?! That second photo was OBVIOUSLY touched up by Illuminati puppets in order to make Faul seem only slightly handsome, while the first photo was touched up to make poor JPM---the most talented musician who ever was and ever will be THAT THEY MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD---look like that extremely uncute IMPOSTOR who calls himself "Paul McCartney". More like FAUL McUGLY, am I right?
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Feb 18, 2009 8:38:44 GMT -5
Oh come on this is just getting ridiculous, I know it's all funny and everything but I think you've made your point now, let's not get too far away from the original topic of this thread.
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Feb 18, 2009 8:45:13 GMT -5
yeah, you are probably right. but it was funny!
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Feb 18, 2009 11:58:30 GMT -5
Back on topic... Is the chap in the center/back really Tara Browne?
|
|
|
Post by B on Feb 18, 2009 12:05:30 GMT -5
But of course! (He didn't really blow his mind out in a car.) There are actually 6 pauls on that boat. Can you find them all?
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 18, 2009 13:57:07 GMT -5
(im not gay but) lets get one thing straight, faul will never be as good looking as paul.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 18, 2009 13:59:36 GMT -5
eeeww i just noticed some thing...ringos nose is unusually big in this pic!
|
|