But remember, it's not just Faul's enormous forehead that proves that Paul is dead and that the boat picture is worthless. His green eyes and his uncute features also prove that.
They don't just prove that he's dead; they prove that he was MURDERED.
Really, it just burns me up right now to think about how those murderers got away with it.
65, I find it quite offensive that you would dare use the word "cute" in the same sentence with "Faul." It is common knowledge that "Faul" is/was not cute and even when he was a baby he was ugly due to the large forehead.
With regard to Paul's murder, I prefer not to talk about it, as it is very painful......
No worries though, good news is on the horizon. My spirit guides tell me that Paul has rested long enough and is getting ready to reincarnate. His task in coming back will be to eliminate world hunger, by returning as a powdered meat sales rep who sells at discounted prices to third world countries! I'm so excited!
First of all, if you're considering Paul being murdered, you better get the facts straight.
If you're trying to proove that, then this photo was taken in 1966. To go along with that possible statement, the man you state to be Brian Jones, is John Lennon.
Don't say it isn't true.
However, as to "3 Pauls" I can believe it. If the Beatles were making Strawberry Fields, you can notice all three of them. The one who looks like "Billy" is the man you see walking backwards then jumping up into the tree.
A silencing of both those who claim this is all bogus and those who claim he's dead. Someone said it's the Holy Grail! As I said before, the funny thing is that many of you already have this photo somewhere in your Beatles books....but my question is: is it really important whether it comes from this or that magazine? if the photo proves genuine, will it be enough to prove to you this very simple truth, that Paul, for some (health?) reason, after 1965-6, was replaced in public by one or more Fauls? Moreover, was the '66 (balding? sick?) Paul in the photo wearing a wig?, that's why his hair appear unruffled by the wind, certainly blowing on the yacht? and now there's a clue for you all.....now it'e easy to find the source:
PIA: " The picture, even if authentic, shows only one Paul, there on the left....err wait ...center, yeah center.....but it might be the fellow on the right.... take yer pick but only one of 'em is Paul."
Alright, I'll take my pick. It's definitely from 1968, with Paul in the middle. The guy on the left isn't Paul, and the guy on the right definitely isn't "a" Paul. So hopefully we'll be able to identify those guys if we find more pics.
Hah, you keep saying that.. I think the point you are missing is not whether the picture proves anything necessarily, it may or may not, but.. Step one is seeing the source in a context other than a post from someone who hasn't built up the "trust capital" that a long time member would.. I hope you understand and take no offense.
I have a lot of Beatle books, no secret there, and while there's no way I remember each and every photo I've run across, anything related to the Apple announcement or for that matter any situation where the photos are in short supply would get my attention for sure.. Probably would have posted them long ago. Still have no idea.
If this is from a rare book, for example that Derek Taylor/George Harrison one, then forget it.. I don't have the spare two grand or so to pick it up on Ebay next go 'round. May get cheaper with the economic situation, but anyway..
"It is quite possible that societies - much like individuals - collectively repress information, concepts, and ideas which would produce high anxiety levels if dealt with consciously."
the funny thing is that many of you already have this photo somewhere in your Beatles books....
I get it now.. Issue 61 of "The Beatles Book" (August 1968)
I don't have the actual paper and ink version, have quite a few, but not this one. But some kind soul (you know who you are) gave me the electronic version of every issue. Everyone may rest assured it is exactly as he posted it here.
Yes pauliedied, the Powers That Be might have been able to produce a decent Paul sound-alike, but no one could never, EVER reproduce the well-groomed, clean-shaven looks of the one-and-only JPM! Anyone who can't see past that greasy hair and ugly smile is either programmed, uneducated, or both!
That's right! The real Paul was a REAL man. He loved eating hamburgers, and sweating, and all sorts of manly things that manly men love that are really manly! Whereas FAUL is very effeminate, and probably bisexual (he has been seen with Elton John many, many times! ::)). Gay men have a natural aversion to meat, which explains why FAUL is such a ugly, greasy, unwashed veggie freak!
Nothing compared to the cute and handsome Bill/Faul:
ooh, eehr, wait a minute.....
Pauliedied, how could you?!
That second photo was OBVIOUSLY touched up by Illuminati puppets in order to make Faul seem only slightly handsome, while the first photo was touched up to make poor JPM---the most talented musician who ever was and ever will be THAT THEY MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD---look like that extremely uncute IMPOSTOR who calls himself "Paul McCartney".