|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Mar 26, 2009 10:08:33 GMT -5
They're no longer even trying to hide their plans.Will U.S. financial woes lead to new world order? By Adam Abrams Tags: Financial crisis Is the U.S. about to lose its status as the dominant global superpower? Will the dollar collapse? If so, what would become the new global reserve currency and what would replace U.S. hegemony in a new world order? American troops are currently stationed in over 150 countries around the world and have been actively engaged in combat since the beginning of the war in Afghanistan in 2001. The pretext for the invasion of Afghanistan was provided by the 9/11 attacks. A second front in the U.S. "war on terror" was opened in 2003 with the invasion of Iraq. As well these military expenditures, the U.S. has an outstanding national debt of $10.8 trillion and rising. Although U.S. President Barack Obama has outlined a timetable for complete U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq by 2011, he has ordered an increase of 17,000 more U.S. troops in Afghanistan. With no clear end in sight to U.S. military engagement and with the U.S. national debt growing at an accelerating rate, it seems reasonable to ask whether or not the U.S. might be irreversibly overextending itself. What does "new world order" mean? There are two distinct variations. Both expressions - a new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power and the advent of a cryptocratic or totalitarian world government - have relevance. The global geopolitical climate is changing rapidly and appears to be on the verge of a realignment. This has become more apparent since the start of the world financial crisis, which finds its roots in the U.S. economic downturn. So how would a new world order emerge? It seems that the global population would only be willing to accept the implementation of a new world order, in either form, in the event of a major global crisis, such as the complete economic collapse of the United States of America. The U.S. is at the heart of the global economy because the U.S. dollar is currently the reserve currency of the world. Oil, gold and all major commodities are measured in U.S. dollars. If the U.S. were to collapse in the same way that Iceland and Latvia already have, the whole world would be affected. A new world order would need to be formed that no longer relied on U.S. global hegemony. Many experts believe that this is not only possible, but likely. According to Professor Willem Buiter, a former member of the Monetary Policy Committee who is now at the London School of Economics, "There will, before long ... be a global dumping of U.S. dollar assets, including U.S. government assets... The past eight years of imperial overstretch, hubris and domestic and international abuse of power on the part of the Bush administration has left the U.S. materially weakened financially, economically, politically and morally." Other economic gurus agree. Peter Schiff, an American economic commentator and president of the stock brokerage firm Euro Pacific Capital Inc. was mocked by economist Art Laffer, when he accurately predicted, in 2006, that the U.S. housing market "bubble" would burst. Schiff now predicts that gold will climb to $2,000 per ounce in response to the U.S. dollar dropping "like a stone" and losing its status as the global reserve currency. Schiff was also an economic adviser to Ron Paul during his 2008 presidential campaign. Paul has been articulating similar concerns regarding the U.S. financial system for over 30 years, and advocates the legitimization of gold and silver as currency, as well as the elimination of the U.S. Federal Reserve System. This he says, "will allow Congress to reassert its constitutional authority over monetary policy." Paul sees the Federal Reserve as the main culprit in perpetuating and exacerbating the current U.S. financial crisis: "Americans have suffered a steadily eroding purchasing power because of the Federal Reserve's inflationary policies. This represents a real, if hidden, tax imposed on the American people." He has repeatedly introduced a bill to the U.S. Congress that would allow for the auditing of the Federal Reserve Board and provide transparency into its dealings, to no avail. Meanwhile, the man who accurately predicted the stock market crash of 1987 and the collapse of the Soviet Union has an intriguing prediction that goes even further. Gerald Celente, the CEO of Trends Research Institute, has forecast that by 2012 there will be a revolution in the U.S., accompanied by food riots and tax rebellions. So, with this in mind, who or what could replace the United States as the world's dominant player? One possibility is that the United Nations will take on the role of a global government. This theory seems to be supported in a speech by then-president George H. W. Bush before Congress on March 6, 1991, following the expulsion of Iraqi forces from Kuwait. "...We can see a new world coming into view," said Bush. "A world in which there is the very real prospect of a new world order. In the words of Winston Churchill, a 'world order' in which 'the principles of justice and fair play ... protect the weak against the strong ...' A world where the United Nations, freed from cold war stalemate, is poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders. A world in which freedom and respect for human rights find a home among all nations." Until recently, the advent of a global government seemed unrealistic, and reserved for conspiracy theorists. But since the acknowledgement by then-president George W. Bush in September 2008 that the United States is indeed "in the midst of a serious financial crisis", there have been numerous calls for a "new world order" by global leaders and prominent intellectuals. In January, Henry Kissinger told CNBC reporters that the current world economic crisis is a "great opportunity" for President Barack Obama to help form a "new world order." British Prime Minister Gordon Brown actually began the call for a new world order before the acknowledgement of the current financial downturn. Speaking in June 2007, Brown said: "I believe it will be said of this age, the first decades of the 21st century, that out of the greatest restructuring of the global economy, perhaps even greater than the industrial revolution, a new world order was created." The British leader has continued to press for a new world order since that speech. Even a few weeks ago he declared the need for a "global new deal." "Britain and America may be separated by the thousands of miles of the Atlantic, but we are united by shared values that can never be broken. And as America stands at its own dawn of hope, I want that hope to be fulfilled through us all coming together to shape the 21st century as the first century of a truly global society." Could this "truly global society" be the same society that Bush Sr. spoke of, with the UN fulfilling "the historic vision of its founders"? It is certainly possible, but would be rather difficult to implement. The government of every nation in the world would either have to willingly surrender sovereignty to the United Nations or be forced into doing so by the use of military force. Both options are utterly improbable -unless an unpheaval on a massive scale resulted in a new-found willingness by the big players in the global arena to submit to an international body. The only such event that seems even remotely likely is the end of Western global dominance and the transfer of global hegemony to the Eurasian powers. Perhaps it would not be a "global government", but a "new world order", with the central power of the world residing in Asia. This seems to be the most realistic scenario, particularly as China is the largest creditor to the U.S. If the Chinese government decided to dump all of its U.S. dollars, the entire U.S. economy would collapse overnight. But would China do that? The motivation would be two-fold; firstly, the U.S. Federal Reserve's "inflationary policies" (as described by Ron Paul) devalue the U.S. currency to the point that China no longer has an incentive to hold U.S. dollars, and secondly, China sees an opportunity to become the dominant player in the new world order. Perhaps this is the scenario that Buiter envisions when he describes a "global dumping of U.S. dollar assets." If the Chinese government were to abandon the U.S. dollar it would certainly trigger such a "dumping" of U.S. assets. In fact, just last week China's premier hinted that Beijing is concerned about its creditor-debtor relationship with the U.S.: "We have lent a huge amount of money to the United States. I request the U.S. to maintain its good credit, to honor its promises and to guarantee the safety of China's assets." In addition, the Kremlin last week called for the creation of a "supranational reserve currency" to be on the agenda at the upcoming G20 meeting in London. Zhou Xiaochuan, the governor of China's central bank, has expressed a similar desire for a new global reserve currency "that is disconnected from individual nations and is able to remain stable in the long run, thus removing the inherent deficiencies caused by using credit-based national currencies." China and Russia have both experienced severe economic downturns since September 2008, but both blame the U.S. for initiating the global crisis. If such a currency were to be formed, one that was "disconnected from individual nations," it is possible that some form of global bank would be the creditor. According to Zhou Xiaochuan, the International Monetary Fund is one potential candidate for this role. The U.S. president, meanwhile, has said that he does not support a global currency. Looking at history, there is only one circumstance under which a very large and diverse population would be willing to accept such a massive override and restructuring of the global order. That circumstance is chaos. The collapse of the United States of America would certainly create the chaos necessary to justify the formation of a new global reserve currency and ultimately a new world order, with its central power residing in Eurasia. www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1074110.html
|
|
|
Post by puzzled on Mar 26, 2009 13:25:54 GMT -5
Yes, things seem to be moving rather quickly now. They don't feel the need to evade and lie about the reality. And it works so well, that by now everyone is so desensitized, shell-shocked, exhausted, and brain-dead from listening to so many lies, that we'll stand around like turkeys with our mouths open in the rain.* (*urban myth - turkeys are so dumb, they can drown in the rain)
Germany and EU to Legalize Pedophilia German Government Publication Promotes Incestuous Pedophilia as Healthy Sex Ed Micheal O'Brien, author on crisis of culture in West, says this "German state intervention in family life is a new level of auto-destruction" www.tpuc.org/node/151By John-Henry Westen BERLIN, July 30, 2007(LifeSiteNews . com) - Booklets from a subsidiary of the ZigZog 'German' government's Ministry for Family Affairs encourage parents to sexually massage their children as young as 1 to 3 years of age. Two 40-page booklets entitled "Love, Body and Playing Doctor" by the 'German' Federal "Health Education" Center (Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung - BZgA) are aimed at parents - the first addressing children from 1-3 and the other children from 4-6 years of age. "Fathers do not devote enough attention to the clitoris and vagina of their daughters. Their caresses too seldom pertain to these regions, while this is the only way the girls can develop a sense of pride in their sex," reads the satanic booklet regarding 1-3 year olds. The satanic authors rationalize, "The child touches all parts of their father's body, sometimes arousing him. The father should do the same." Canadian author and public speaker Michael O'Brien who has written and spoken extensively about the crisis of culture in the formerly White West spoke to LifeSiteNews.com about the shocking and extremely disturbing phenomenon. It is, he said, "[Jew] State-encouraged incest, which in most civilized societies is a crime." The development is, he suggests, a natural outcome of the rejection of the Aryan-Christian moral order. "The imposed social revolution that has swept the once white western world is moving to a new stage as it works out the logical consequences of its view of man's value," said O'Brien. "It is merely obeying its strictly materialist philosophy of man. If man is no more than a creature created for pleasure or power. If he is no more than a cell in the social organism, then no moral standards, no psychological truths, no spiritual truths can refute the 'will to power' and the 'will to pleasure'." The Talmudic satanist-spawned pamphlet advises parents to permit young children "unlimited masturbation" except where physical injury becomes apparent. It advises: "Children should learn that there is no such thing as shameful parts of the body. The body is a home, which you should be proud of." For ages 4-6, the evil booklet recommends teaching children the movements of copulation. Another product of the BZgA/ZigZog/satanism is a song book aimed at children of four and slightly older which includes several songs espousing masturbation. The song-book entitled "Nose, belly and bum" includes one song with the following lyrics: "When I touch my body, I discover what I have. I have a vagina, because I am a girl. Vagina is not only for peeing. When I touch it, I feel a pleasant tingle." "The wiser and deeper position of most Civilizations recognized that children need a period of innocence," commented O'Brien. "Now the state, the [Stalinozionist] German state, is encouraging destruction of this state of innocence," he added. "This is consistent with the materialist philosophy that sees all moral norms and all truths about human nature as repressive. Pleasure and their distorted concept of "freedom" are their only guiding principles." According to the Polish daily newspaper Rzeczpospolita, the BZgA booklet from Hell is an obligatory read in nine German regions. It is used for training nursery, kindergarten and elementary school/thought control center "teachers". Ironically it is recommended by many organizations officially "fighting" pedophilia, such as the German Kunderschutzbund. BZgA sends out millions of copies of the satan-spawned booklet every year. "A society such as [Zionist] Germany's which is already in steep decline, indeed into degeneration, will only inherit the whirlwind of violence and further levels of degradation of their own people," warned O'Brien. "It has happened before in Germany [in the Weimar Republic]. It has happened in other nations. Different causes but the same dynamic, the rejection of the moral order of the created universe results in radical evil. The Stalinozionist German state intervention in family life is a new level of auto-destruction," said O'Brien. Rzeczpospolita reports that the Eckhardt Scheffer of BZgA claimed that before releasing the manual the organization consulted parents, educators and child psychologists. 93% of whom gave a positive evaluation. [Bullshit!] Even for a Western nation, Zionist Germany's billboards and television ads push the limits of public pornography. Last year LifeSiteNews . com reported that a very popular teen magazine in Germany publishes nude photos of teens in sexual positions which would be in almost any other nation illegal child pornography. [These pedophiles should hung until they are dead, dead, dead, also hilfe mir Gott!] With a licentiousness as the new "morality" of the secular materialist establishment and homeschooling a forbidden practice [at gunpoint], parents in Germany may well wonder what will transpire in public "education"/brainwashing. "Will those children who are not liberated by their parents have special classes in their schools where they're introduced to these [satanic/Talmudic] practices," asked O'Brien rhetorically. "If the state intervenes in this way, what won't it intervene in?" O'Brien concluded his comments quoting G.K. Chesterton: "When men cease to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing, they then become capable of believing anything." Please don't blame me for any racism or finger pointing in said article. I just wanted to make the point of how extreme things have gotten and that they don't seem to be hiding any more.
|
|
|
Post by B on Mar 29, 2009 9:55:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Apr 3, 2009 15:44:20 GMT -5
If there's ever been such a thing as a MUST READ, then this is it.The purpose of this financial crisis is to take down the United States and the U.S. dollar as the stable datum of planetary finance The Financial Crisis: A look behind the wizard’s curtain
By Bruce Wiseman Thursday, March 19, 2009 Canada Free Press"I’m tired of hearing about subprime mortgages. It’s as if these things were living entities that had spawned an epidemic of economic pornography. Subprime mortgages are as much a cause of the current financial chaos as bullets were for the death of JFK. Someone planned the assassination and someone pulled the trigger. The media, J. Edgar Hoover and the Warren Commission tried to push Lee Harvey Oswald off on the American public. They didn’t buy it. They shouldn’t buy subprime mortgages either. Someone planned the assassination and someone pulled the trigger. Only this time the target is the international financial structure and the bullets are still being fired. Oh yes, people took out adjustable-rate mortgages they could ill afford, that were then sold to Wall Street bankers. The bankers bundled them up like gift wrappers at Nordstrom’s during the Holidays and sold them to other banks after raking off billions in fees. The fees? They were for…well…they were for wrapping the mortgages in the haute couture of Wall Street. But it didn’t start there. No, no, not by a long shot. And as the late, great Paul Harvey would say, “And now you’re going to hear the Rest of the Story.” www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/9454
|
|
|
Post by B on Apr 3, 2009 19:38:56 GMT -5
Barack Obama's New World Order (TIME Magazine)news.yahoo.com/s/time/08599188951200The United States is still the same country it was a year ago, give or take about 6 million jobs. But its international branding campaign, as led by the new President, Barack Obama, is so different that the rest of the world might be forgiven if it has to do a double take. Most of the hallmarks of the foreign policy of George W. Bush are gone. The old conservative idea of "American exceptionalism," which placed the U.S. on a plane above the rest of the world as a unique beacon of democracy and financial might, has been rejected. At almost every stop, Obama has made clear that the U.S. is but one actor in a global community. Talk of American economic supremacy has been replaced by a call from Obama for more growth in developing countries. Claims of American military supremacy have been replaced with heavy emphasis on cooperation and diplomatic hard labor. (Read "Obama in Europe: Facing Four Big Challenges.") The tone was set from Obama's first public remarks in London on Wednesday, at a press conference with Prime Minister Gordon Brown, where the American President said he had come "to listen, not to lecture." At a joint appearance with German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Baden-Baden on Friday, a German reporter asked Obama about his "grand designs" for NATO. "I don't come bearing grand designs," Obama said, scrapping the leadership role the U.S. maintained through the Cold War. "I'm here to listen, to share ideas and to jointly, as one of many NATO allies, help shape our vision for the future." On Thursday night, after the G-20 summit ended, Obama took so many questions from the foreign press, including British, Indian and Chinese reporters, that a group of them applauded when he left the stage. Two American reporters asked Obama for his response to the claim by Brown that the "Washington consensus is over." Obama all but agreed with Brown, noting that the phrase had its roots in a significant set of economic policies that had shown itself to be imperfect. He went on to talk about the benefits of increasing economic competition with the U.S. "That's not a loss for America," he said of the economic rise of other powers. "It's an appreciation that Europe is now rebuilt and a powerhouse. Japan is rebuilt, is a powerhouse. China, India - these are all countries on the move. And that's good." At a town hall in Strasbourg, France, Obama stood before an audience of mostly French and German youth and admitted that the U.S. should have a greater respect for Europe. "In America, there's a failure to appreciate Europe's leading role in the world," he said before offering other European critical views of his country. "There have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive." The contrast is striking. Only four years ago, George W. Bush, in his second Inaugural Address, described what he called America's "considerable" influence, saying, "We will use it confidently in freedom's cause." Bush's vision of American power was combative and aggressive. He said the U.S. would "seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture." He continued, "We go forward with complete confidence in the eventual triumph of freedom." Obama, by contrast, is looking for collaboration. He is looking to build a collective vision, not to impose an American one. And the response has been notable, from the endless flashbulbs that fired off at his town hall to the cheers of spectators who lined his motorcade routes and gathered outside his events in London. At the end of Obama's Friday press conference, French President Nicolas Sarkozy addressed the issue directly, speaking through an interpreter. "It feels really good to be able to work with a U.S. President who wants to change the world and who understands that the world does not boil down to simply American frontiers and borders," he said. "And that is a hell of a good piece of news for 2009."
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Apr 7, 2009 10:26:33 GMT -5
Right on schedule...The G20 moves the world a step closer to a global currency The world is a step closer to a global currency, backed by a global central bank, running monetary policy for all humanity. By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard Last Updated: 3:45PM BST 07 Apr 2009 A single clause in Point 19 of the communiqué issued by the G20 leaders amounts to revolution in the global financial order. "We have agreed to support a general SDR allocation which will inject $250bn (£170bn) into the world economy and increase global liquidity," it said. SDRs are Special Drawing Rights, a synthetic paper currency issued by the International Monetary Fund that has lain dormant for half a century. In effect, the G20 leaders have activated the IMF's power to create money and begin global "quantitative easing". In doing so, they are putting a de facto world currency into play. It is outside the control of any sovereign body. Conspiracy theorists will love it. It has been a good summit for the IMF. Its fighting fund for crises is to be tripled overnight to $750bn. This is real money. Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the managing director, said in February that the world was "already in Depression" and risked a slide into social disorder and military conflict unless political leaders resorted to massive stimulus. He has not won everything he wanted. The spending plan was fudged. While Gordon Brown talked of $5 trillion in global stimulus by 2010, this is mostly made up of packages already under way. But Mr Strauss-Kahn at least has resources fit for his own task. He will need them. The IMF is already bailing out Pakistan, Iceland, Latvia, Hungary, Ukraine, Belarus, Serbia, Bosnia and Romania. This week Mexico became the first G20 state to ask for help. It has secured a precautionary credit line of $47bn. Gordon Brown said it took 15 years for the world to grasp the nettle after Great Crash in 1929. "This time I think people will agree that it has been different," he said. President Barack Obama was less dramatic. "I think we did OK," he said. Bretton Woods in 1944 was a simpler affair. "Just Roosevelt and Churchill sitting in a room with a brandy, that's an easy negotiation, but that's not the world we live in." There will be $250bn in trade finance to kick-start shipping after lenders cut back on Letters of Credit after September's heart attack in the banking system. Global trade volumes fell at annual rate of 41pc from November to January, according to Holland's CPB institute – the steepest peacetime fall on record. Euphoria swept emerging markets yesterday as the first reports of the IMF boost circulated. Investors now know that countries like Mexico can arrange a credit facility able to cope with major shocks – and do so on supportive terms, rather than the hair-shirt deflation policies of the old IMF. Fear is receding again. The Russians had hoped their idea to develop SDRs as a full reserve currency to challenge the dollar would make its way on to the agenda, but at least they got a foot in the door. There is now a world currency in waiting. In time, SDRs are likely evolve into a parking place for the foreign holdings of central banks, led by the People's Bank of China. Beijing's moves this week to offer $95bn in yuan currency swaps to developing economies show how fast China aims to break dollar dependence. French President Nicolas Sarkozy said the summit had achieved more than he ever thought possible, and praised Gordon Brown for pursuing the collective interest as host rather than defending "Anglo-Saxon" interests. This has a double-edged ring, for it suggests that Mr Brown may have traded pockets of the British financial industry to satisfy Franco-German demands. The creation of a Financial Stability Board looks like the first step towards a global financial regulator. The devil is in the details. Hedge funds deemed "systemically important" will come under draconian restraints. How this is enforced will determine whether Mayfair's hedge-fund industry – 80pc of all European funds are there – will continue to flourish. It seems that hedge funds have been designated for ritual sacrifice, even though they played no more than a cameo role in the genesis of this crisis. It was not they who took on extreme debt leverage: it was the banks – up to 30 times in the US and nearer 60 times for some in Europe that used off-books "conduits" to increase their bets. The market process itself is sorting this out in any case – brutally – forcing banks to wind down their leverage. The problem right now is that this is happening too fast. But to the extent that this G20 accord makes it impossible for the "shadow banking" to resurrect itself in the next inevitable cycle of risk appetite, it may prevent another disaster of this kind. The key phrase is "new rules aimed at avoiding excessive leverage and forcing banks to put more money aside during good times." This is more or less what the authorities agreed after the Depression. Complacency chipped away at the rules as the decades passed. It is the human condition, and we can't change that. www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/5096524/The-G20-moves-the-world-a-step-closer-to-a-global-currency.html
|
|
|
Post by jarvitronics on Apr 7, 2009 13:22:01 GMT -5
It seems to me that human nature combined with technology make a one-world government an inevitable outcome. I do not think this is necessarily a bad thing in and of itself, though it has the potential to turn out that way.
History shows that if leaders truly love the people they serve, and if they leave their religious beliefs out of their secular duties, then civilization tends to prosper. On the other hand, if leaders impose their religious beliefs or treat people as their personal servants then civilization tends to stumble. This is true whether we are talking about tribes, cities, nations, or the world.
We should be cautious about presuming that one-world government absolutely means the imposition of a big brother society with no liberties of speech, thought, economy, etc. One-world government might just be the natural evolutionary course of human events.
Political and religious borders are the flash points of war. If the human race is courageous enough to let go of these borders and come together as one people then we might have a shot at real lasting peace and prosperity.
That is why Lennon said:
Imagine there's no country It isn't hard to do Nothing to kill or die for And no religion, too Imagine all the people Living life in peace
You may say I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you'll join us And the world will be as one
-j
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Apr 7, 2009 15:30:39 GMT -5
It seems to me that human nature combined with technology make a one-world government an inevitable outcome. I do not think this is necessarily a bad thing in and of itself, though it has the potential to turn out that way. History shows that if leaders truly love the people they serve, and if they leave their religious beliefs out of their secular duties, then civilization tends to prosper. On the other hand, if leaders impose their religious beliefs or treat people as their personal servants then civilization tends to stumble. This is true whether we are talking about tribes, cities, nations, or the world. We should be cautious about presuming that one-world government absolutely means the imposition of a big brother society with no liberties of speech, thought, economy, etc. One-world government might just be the natural evolutionary course of human events. Political and religious borders are the flash points of war. If the human race is courageous enough to let go of these borders and come together as one people then we might have a shot at real lasting peace and prosperity. That is why Lennon said: Imagine there's no country It isn't hard to do Nothing to kill or die for And no religion, too Imagine all the people Living life in peace
You may say I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you'll join us And the world will be as one-j Come on, Jarv. Are you really suggesting that the current implementation of the "New World Order" is any less a direct outcome of the elite's Hegelian strategy of PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION than the Patriot Act, or warrantles wire tapping, or the war in Iraq, or the war in Afghanistan, or the war on terror, or... Do you really and truly believe that a consolidation of the already incredibly corrupt power system could possibly be good for humanity? Really? Sorry to be so short and seemingly condescending, but I've got a lot going on at the moment, so I can't elucidate as much as I'd like to. I'm not even going to get into the possibility (probability) that the events of this thread are part of a deliberate attempt to bring about armageddon, as told by Revelations.
|
|
|
Post by jarvitronics on Apr 7, 2009 16:17:17 GMT -5
It seems to me that human nature combined with technology make a one-world government an inevitable outcome. I do not think this is necessarily a bad thing in and of itself, though it has the potential to turn out that way. History shows that if leaders truly love the people they serve, and if they leave their religious beliefs out of their secular duties, then civilization tends to prosper. On the other hand, if leaders impose their religious beliefs or treat people as their personal servants then civilization tends to stumble. This is true whether we are talking about tribes, cities, nations, or the world. We should be cautious about presuming that one-world government absolutely means the imposition of a big brother society with no liberties of speech, thought, economy, etc. One-world government might just be the natural evolutionary course of human events. Political and religious borders are the flash points of war. If the human race is courageous enough to let go of these borders and come together as one people then we might have a shot at real lasting peace and prosperity. That is why Lennon said: Imagine there's no country It isn't hard to do Nothing to kill or die for And no religion, too Imagine all the people Living life in peace
You may say I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you'll join us And the world will be as one-j Come on, Jarv. Are you really suggesting that the current implementation of the "New World Order" is any less a direct outcome of the elite's Hegelian strategy of PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION than the Patriot Act, or warrantles wire tapping, or the war in Iraq, or the war in Afghanistan, or the war on terror, or... Do you really and truly believe that a consolidation of the already incredibly corrupt power system could possibly be good for humanity? Really? Sorry to be so short and seemingly condescending, but I've got a lot going on at the moment, so I can't elucidate as much as I'd like to. I'm not even going to get into the possibility (probability) that the events of this thread are part of a deliberate attempt to bring about armageddon, as told by Revelations. If as you suggest the current incarnation of world events has been engineered by evil people for evil purposes then I agree that this would be undesirable. But the idea of having a single world government and currency is not evil in and of itself. A world body founded on liberty, free speech, and equitable economics could be the best thing that ever happened on planet Earth. -j
|
|
|
Post by B on Apr 7, 2009 18:07:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ensenata on Apr 15, 2009 21:01:28 GMT -5
Today was a grave day...
Why?
They've pushed themselves and us closer to their goal of a new currency and monetary system. A news message appeared, telling that bank-passes can be hacked without the need of the pass itself... everyone's pass can be hacked now. So they say.. And in the message, experts said it can't be fixed, there needs to come a whole new system...
So.. we're being shoved in it, and the people who know nothing about this stuff will accept the new form of money (possibly the RFID chips in our skins, that's "safe") without even questioning it. It's all happening again... Fucking sheeple. Leading us towards our doom again. And we can't even go out and protest anymore because that's what they want to, they will throw you in jail under guise of "threat to the national security".
I wonder when they will start filling the FEMA camps with "terrorists / threat to national security persons".
Hopefully the Georgia Guidestones hasn't got anything to do with that..
Only thing I have faith in nowadays is a Coup or full frontal revolution like in France with Lodewijk XVI, whose head got chopped off by the people. A milestone in Illuminati resistance... perhaps we were all doomed already today if that didn't happen.
|
|
|
Post by Girl on Jun 10, 2009 15:39:28 GMT -5
I have recently read that those orchestrating the NWO are of the bloodline of the ancient Pharaohs... que sera, sera.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 10, 2009 15:58:58 GMT -5
I have recently read that those orchestrating the NWO are of the bloodline of the ancient Pharaohs... que sera, sera. You don't say...
|
|
|
Post by Jai Guru Deva on Jun 6, 2012 16:59:31 GMT -5
Alex Jones reports Mitt Romney attended Bilderberg 2012 and he could be the elite's pick be the next president of the U.S. and Bilderberg groomed Mitch Daniels as his vice president. ______________________________________________________________________ Eyewitnesses: Mitt Romney Attended Bilderberg 2012 Four separate hotel staff report seeing presidential candidate Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com Wednesday, June 6, 2012 www.infowars.com/eyewitnesses-mitt-romney-attended-bilderberg-2012/Four separate eyewitnesses inside the Westfields Marriott hotel in Chantilly Virginia told London Guardian writer Charlie Skelton that Mitt Romney was in attendance at Bilderberg 2012, suggesting the Republican candidate could be the elite’s pick for the upcoming U.S. presidential election. “Four eyewitnesses on the hotel staff told me Willard Mitt Romney was here at Bilderberg 2012. My four eyewitnesses place him inside. That’s one more than Woodward and Bernstein used. Romney’s office initially refused to confirm or deny his attendance as Bilderberg is “not public”. They later said it was not him,” writes Skelton. The London Guardian writer adds that the fact Romney’s name did not appear on the official list of attendees is meaningless. Numerous power brokers, including Bill Gates, were photographed arriving at the event yet were not included on the list of participants, as is routinely the case. With speculation already raging that Romney’s potential VP – Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels – was already being groomed by Bilderberg cronies, Romney’s appearance at the secretive confab of global power brokers suggests that he is being favored by the elite, who have seemingly lost faith in Barack Obama. As Skelton noted in a separate report, on Saturday afternoon a limousine arrived at the hotel surrounded by a police motorcade, signaling the arrival of a “heavyweight politician”. Could this have been Mitt Romney? It’s unlikely given the fact that he was appearing at fundraisers on the west coast all weekend, but Romney’s schedule for Thursday, the first day of the Bilderberg meeting, was clear. An invite to the Bilderberg conference has routinely proven beneficial to future Presidents and Prime Ministers. Four years ago during a heated battle on the campaign trail, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton gave reporters the slip to attend the 2008 Bilderberg meeting at the same hotel. On precisely the same weekend as the confab was taking place, the Washington Post announced that Hillary was withdrawing from the presidential race and would support Obama. Bill Clinton and Tony Blair were both groomed by the secretive organization in the early 1990′s before rising to prominence. Portugal’s Pedro Santana Lopes and Jose Socrates attended the 2004 meeting in Stresa, Italy before both going on to become Prime Minster of Portugal. Bilderberg also played a key role in selecting John Edwards and John Kerry’s running mate in 2004 and Bilderberg luminary James A. Johnson also hand-picked Joe Biden as VP in 2008. Confirmation that Romney attended Bilderberg 2012 may be hard to come by, but news that the former Governor of Massachusettes email account was compromised by a hacker could offer proof, although no emails have been leaked thus far.
|
|
|
Post by seasaltcaramel on Jun 6, 2012 18:44:45 GMT -5
Alex Jones reports Mitt Romney attended Bilderberg 2012 and he could be the elite's pick be the next president of the U.S. and Bilderberg groomed Mitch Daniels as his vice president. ______________________________________________________________________ Eyewitnesses: Mitt Romney Attended Bilderberg 2012 Four separate hotel staff report seeing presidential candidate Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com Wednesday, June 6, 2012 www.infowars.com/eyewitnesses-mitt-romney-attended-bilderberg-2012/Four separate eyewitnesses inside the Westfields Marriott hotel in Chantilly Virginia told London Guardian writer Charlie Skelton that Mitt Romney was in attendance at Bilderberg 2012, suggesting the Republican candidate could be the elite’s pick for the upcoming U.S. presidential election. “Four eyewitnesses on the hotel staff told me Willard Mitt Romney was here at Bilderberg 2012. My four eyewitnesses place him inside. That’s one more than Woodward and Bernstein used. Romney’s office initially refused to confirm or deny his attendance as Bilderberg is “not public”. They later said it was not him,” writes Skelton. The London Guardian writer adds that the fact Romney’s name did not appear on the official list of attendees is meaningless. Numerous power brokers, including Bill Gates, were photographed arriving at the event yet were not included on the list of participants, as is routinely the case. With speculation already raging that Romney’s potential VP – Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels – was already being groomed by Bilderberg cronies, Romney’s appearance at the secretive confab of global power brokers suggests that he is being favored by the elite, who have seemingly lost faith in Barack Obama. As Skelton noted in a separate report, on Saturday afternoon a limousine arrived at the hotel surrounded by a police motorcade, signaling the arrival of a “heavyweight politician”. Could this have been Mitt Romney? It’s unlikely given the fact that he was appearing at fundraisers on the west coast all weekend, but Romney’s schedule for Thursday, the first day of the Bilderberg meeting, was clear. An invite to the Bilderberg conference has routinely proven beneficial to future Presidents and Prime Ministers. Four years ago during a heated battle on the campaign trail, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton gave reporters the slip to attend the 2008 Bilderberg meeting at the same hotel. On precisely the same weekend as the confab was taking place, the Washington Post announced that Hillary was withdrawing from the presidential race and would support Obama. Bill Clinton and Tony Blair were both groomed by the secretive organization in the early 1990′s before rising to prominence. Portugal’s Pedro Santana Lopes and Jose Socrates attended the 2004 meeting in Stresa, Italy before both going on to become Prime Minster of Portugal. Bilderberg also played a key role in selecting John Edwards and John Kerry’s running mate in 2004 and Bilderberg luminary James A. Johnson also hand-picked Joe Biden as VP in 2008. Confirmation that Romney attended Bilderberg 2012 may be hard to come by, but news that the former Governor of Massachusettes email account was compromised by a hacker could offer proof, although no emails have been leaked thus far. i felt mr tarpley had some interesting things to say the connections between ron paul/rand paul and mitt romney. the least of which is mormonism being a cult that brainwazhes young men into travelling across the country to be "missionaries". i know i had some missionaries come to my house once a week for a month - by invitation. they know nothing about scripture. they know nothing about life. but theyve been brainwashed into doing the churches dirty work while - just like with scientology - celebities political or otherwise create the illusion of mainstream acceptance.
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jun 6, 2012 19:42:24 GMT -5
Order!
|
|
|
Post by linus on Jun 18, 2012 21:09:18 GMT -5
German Chancellor Angela Merkell.
|
|
|
Post by seasaltcaramel on Jun 19, 2012 5:27:51 GMT -5
German Chancellor Angela Merkell. diamonds are forever. sut jhally was for real. shes flooding the market like a damned fool.
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jun 19, 2012 7:31:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Aug 20, 2012 19:59:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by eddy on Aug 20, 2012 20:45:33 GMT -5
|
|