|
Post by iameye on May 7, 2009 18:28:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on May 8, 2009 1:30:07 GMT -5
I thought i'd come and look to see what all the fuzz is about. I regret reading every post in this thread. i have a headache now.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on May 8, 2009 3:28:00 GMT -5
I suppose the Neferititi thing was a bad example of you going off on angelic/demonic/religious tangent. I certainly remember you commenting on the Nefertiti image on the Pepper album, even if you weren't the one who originally posted the image (skyward takes the credit for that, and even he doesn't seem to remember you getting involved in any way). But that's all in the past, and we've been through all this already! Jude, I remember how that topic/thread unfolded and the participants. I didn't mention that in my previous post because it isn't relative to my point. Iameye only responded re: Nefertiti because I posted the image, it wasn't something that just popped out of thin air. Your central aim, then and now, is to target Iameye for bringing up Nefertiti and I feel that was unwarranted, that is the main point I want to establish. I brought up the possibility of Nefertiti and Iameye responded to me, so can we put this Nefertiti-centered 'attack' to rest now? Here are the images. The first from IAAP's Rotten Apple My image based on a YouTube video "We are the Walrus" which super-imposed Macca over Crowley. You might see a Nefertiti hat, a Walrus, a golden table (of rock or coral, like the Alice in Wonderland Walrus pose) and an OTO pose. Use Crowley's nose to Blue-Jacketed Macca's nose (on the Pepper album) as a mirror line to see for yourself.You make a compelling presentation.
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on May 8, 2009 8:39:15 GMT -5
OK guys, enough yeah, we don't another one of these mass arguments do we? We barely got over the last one lol! Plastic Paul is obviously drunk. LOL At barely 4.30 in the afternoon I wish I was but alas I was not.
|
|
|
Post by iameye on May 8, 2009 8:43:45 GMT -5
Of course not...it was just a topical joke.
|
|
|
Post by FAUllibLE on May 10, 2009 12:52:35 GMT -5
Reverse speech in music is a special kind of occurrence. Its doesn't follow the same rules as normal speech, it does what it wants to. Your dealing with magick and entities rather than subconscious Freudian like slips in reverse.
There is 30+ words in a row With mega groups like zep and the beatles more reverse occurred, its the nature of the beast.
Another fascinating occurrence is with yhshvh10's videos is that the reactions they get. It's almost like a reverse phenomenon the way the easily persuadable can get really stirred up about them, causing over reactive veiw points, possibly even manifesting as a mean and bitter stance. Its very strange, I dunno
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on May 10, 2009 13:58:05 GMT -5
He's a very controversial fellow, there's no doubt about that. I don't think he'd have it any other way, to be honest.
|
|