|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Oct 14, 2009 22:06:35 GMT -5
Don't cheat now. I mean it, seriously. Go ahead and guess.  And please, say Paul. |
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Oct 15, 2009 0:01:41 GMT -5
Don't cheat now. I mean it, seriously. Go ahead and guess. And please, say Paul. If you wish I will say Paul but mean John. It's John. How can you think that is Paul? Isn't it cleary evenly painfully obvious that that if Dr. Winston O'Boogie? |
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Oct 15, 2009 8:50:56 GMT -5
Or uh-huh, Elvis.
Thang ya very much.
|
|
|
|
Post by B on Oct 15, 2009 9:25:34 GMT -5
I was going to say David Crosby myself.
|
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Oct 15, 2009 18:12:51 GMT -5
Anyway, reply and point are being waited for with baited breath!  |
|
JS2
For Sale 
Goo Goo G'Joob etc.
Posts: 192
|
Post by JS2 on Oct 16, 2009 9:22:56 GMT -5
John; flipped. Bad quality pics/videos are often that way.
|
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Feb 9, 2010 3:52:22 GMT -5
No, really, it's Paul. There was a video around last year when you type in "Helter Skelter" it was the first to come up. Most of you should remember it, the one with the really fast slideshow to correlate with the guitar riff.
Silly me, I never actually saved the video, and obviously it's no longer up. Ah well, guess that's just going to be another one of those urban rumors "was Faul the real John Lennon?"
Judging by this image, if I were infact telling the truth, it certainly looks as if John were Faul.
|
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Feb 14, 2010 18:10:24 GMT -5
Search and you shall find
@1:43 CLEARLY that's Paul McCartney.
Oh, wait a second, but isn't the image I posted at the beg. John Lennon? Oh no! Something isn't right here.
|
|
|
|
Post by FP on Feb 14, 2010 18:16:27 GMT -5
There's nothing weird going on. It's just a bad quality screen cap of Paul. If it were a high quality close up, and it still looked like John, then you can say something weird is happening.
|
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Feb 14, 2010 18:19:26 GMT -5
Don't cheat now. I mean it, seriously. Go ahead and guess. And please, say Paul. If you wish I will say Paul but mean John. It's John. How can you think that is Paul? Isn't it cleary evenly painfully obvious that that if Dr. Winston O'Boogie? FP, man I understand you'd rather believe that Paul's double is some "gift from god" but when a man who calls himself a Doc says without a doubt that it's John Lennon, I'm inclined to side with the man with the more interesting name. |
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Feb 14, 2010 18:50:06 GMT -5
That is incredibly bizarre.
Regardless of quality, it certainly does look like John Lennon, which is who I thought it was from the beginning. Now I have seen that video it does appear as though Paul morphs into John.
Most peculiar indeed.
|
|
|
|
Post by FP on Feb 14, 2010 18:53:20 GMT -5
If you wish I will say Paul but mean John. It's John. How can you think that is Paul? Isn't it cleary evenly painfully obvious that that if Dr. Winston O'Boogie? FP, man I understand you'd rather believe that Paul's double is some "gift from god" but when a man who calls himself a Doc says without a doubt that it's John Lennon, I'm inclined to side with the man with the more interesting name. Well then I guess that paints an interesting picture of your unique deductive reasoning process. If I call myself "Dr.," or "Professor Pie", maybe you'll side with me next time.  That screen cap does look more like John then Paul. But now that we see the video, we know it's clearly Paul. I can give examples of misleading screen shots from pre -67 vids. And no, I don't think Faul is a gift from god, cause I don't believe in Faul! |
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Feb 14, 2010 19:00:14 GMT -5
FP, man I understand you'd rather believe that Paul's double is some "gift from god" but when a man who calls himself a Doc says without a doubt that it's John Lennon, I'm inclined to side with the man with the more interesting name. Well then I guess that paints an interesting picture of your unique deductive reasoning process. If I call myself "Dr.," or "Professor Pie", maybe you'll side with me next time. That screen cap does look more like John then Paul. But now that we see the video, we know it's clearly Paul. I can give examples of misleading screen shots from pre -67 vids. And no, I don't think Faul is a gift from god, cause I don't believe in Faul! No offence lol I just wanted to brag about how someone said it was John when it was Paul ;] But to quote David Letterman.. Or is it? |
|
|
|
Post by FP on Feb 14, 2010 19:57:18 GMT -5
None taken.
Well it does look like John, I think everyone can agree on that.
....YES, it is Paul!! Unless you subscribe to the reptile stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Feb 17, 2010 3:22:21 GMT -5
None taken. Well it does look like John, I think everyone can agree on that. ....YES, it is Paul!! Unless you subscribe to the reptile stuff. I know, it's "Paul" but if it were "Faul" makes you wonder who the "Fool" was |
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Feb 19, 2010 12:12:45 GMT -5
 I'd like to mention here that Paul doesn't seemingly morph into Neil Armstrong, Lance Armstrong, Louis Armstrong, or Buffy the Vampire Slayer. He seemingly morphs into John Lennon. Which brings us back to this:  |
|
|
|
Post by FP on Feb 19, 2010 14:00:56 GMT -5
Brings us back to what? What do you think this all implies?
|
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Feb 19, 2010 15:23:37 GMT -5
Brings us back to what? What do you think this all implies? I'm not sure, exactly, but shapeshifting certainly explains different looking Pauls through time (and remember, I don't think that JPM died). Maybe shapeshifting's not an exact science, and sometimes subtle things aren't quite the same after a shift, such as earlobes, and nose tips, etc. And trust me, I know that it could be considered a bit wacky to be talking about shapeshifting in a serious way, but if the human race was created by ancient alien astronauts (which I believe), then it's not unreasonable to think that those aliens might have abilities that we would find a bit wacky, and it's also not unreasonable to think that some of them would be hanging around today as our leaders, literally, and culturally (Paul as an alien/God). As for the image in question, I always thought that the concept of four Beatles emerging from a single proto Beatle might have been a subtle clue to cloning or shapeshifting.  The image comes from the beginning of this segment of the Director's Cut of Anthology, and it's just an odd thing to have included.. I mean, imagine somebody specifically requesting that a morph be created where the Beatles emerge from a single composite Beatle, and then sticking it into the Anthology Director's cut. Why? For what purpose? It's just strange. So again, I don't know exactly what to think, but I DO find it REALLY odd that of all the people on the planet, Paul morphs into John. Or maybe it's just a coincidental trick of the light. P(D) |
|
|
|
Post by malevans on Feb 23, 2010 10:17:04 GMT -5
i dont believe in shapeshifting but i do find it very odd. it is paul though.
|
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Feb 24, 2010 9:16:51 GMT -5
i dont believe in shapeshifting but i do find it very odd. it is paul though. No, really?! What gave that away?! |
|
|
|
Post by kennethmd on Nov 17, 2010 1:17:38 GMT -5
Have any of you ever heard of splicing? It's when you take different clips of films, cut them up and tap them together. Sometime it use in repairing music and film tapes.
When that scene were film, they had done it twice. One with Paul and the other with John. But John and Paul are wearing the same color shirt. John is in a way, is mocking Paul. After they had finish filming the two scenes. They then cut the two different film up and then spliced them together.
|
|
|
|
Post by linus on Aug 2, 2012 23:24:51 GMT -5
How odd, of all the resemblances he could've had at that moment, albeit dark and grainy. It would be interesting to see a higher quality version of this. Just thought this was bump-worthy.  (What's really odd is at that moment he looks like my friend who I've always thought looked like the love child of Lennon and McCartney.) |
|
|
|
Post by B on Aug 3, 2012 3:20:53 GMT -5
Lennon and McCartney had a love child?! Oh no!  Oh yeah... how could I have forgotten? |
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Aug 3, 2012 3:47:26 GMT -5
Lennon and McCartney had a love child?! Oh no! Oh yeah... how could I have forgotten?Does not the Potter have a right over the clay? I elder buried Paul ;D The most powerful wand in the Wizarding World of Harry Potter is a wand made of sambucus known as the "Elder Wand"en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sambucus |
|
|
|
Post by linus on Aug 27, 2013 17:23:45 GMT -5
Randy Newman looking very Radcliffe/Potter  |
|
