|
Post by Silversong on Jun 6, 2011 16:22:13 GMT -5
Isn’t this first one singing Fool on the Hill, Paul, not Bill? He sings with such melancholy and soul, and he has that typical trouble reaching the high notes, unlike Bill who can’t reach the low ones. I think Fool on the Hill was written about the replacement that was brought in to promote LSD. He has all the right components, including the lip and eyebrow scars, head and shoulder movements. Everything lines up, IMO. He looks like the same Paul McCartney who sang “Yesterday” in 1966. He has the same hands – the long fingers and short palms, unlike Bill’s short fingers and long palms. This second one sounds like it was recorded something like 10 years earlier, and that’s not the same Paul as the above video, I can tell, with the green eyes, so tall. Short, pointed eyebrows.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jun 7, 2011 10:51:46 GMT -5
Isn�t this first one singing Fool on the Hill, Paul, not Bill? He sings with such melancholy and soul, and he has that typical trouble reaching the high notes, unlike Bill who can�t reach the low ones. I think Fool on the Hill was written about the replacement that was brought in to promote LSD. He has all the right components, including the lip and eyebrow scars, head and shoulder movements. Everything lines up, IMO. He looks like the same Paul McCartney who sang �Yesterday� in 1966. He has the same hands � the long fingers and short palms, unlike Bill�s short fingers and long palms. This second one sounds like it was recorded something like 10 years earlier, and that�s not the same Paul as the above video, I can tell, with the green eyes, so tall. Short, pointed eyebrows. The demo version is worth a listen in this context. compared to: compared to:
|
|