How many fauls were/is there?

[thewalruswaspaul]

I belive there were three possibly four fauls. The first Faul looks like the real JPM quite alot, but he would be the Sgt. Pepper Paul. I could have found a better pic. The Let it Be Paul is, I beleive, the real JPM. The Hey Jude Faul, or number three, is the one that gets me. While 4,2, and 1 have some sort of resemblence to JPM, 3 is the least resemblence in my opnioin.

More on this to come, I need feedback though.

Attachments:

[Red Lion]

Left side #2 is actually a real JPM pic circa 1966.

[65if2007]

Mar 23, 2011 19:24:54 GMT -5 thewalruswaspaul said:

I belive there were three possibly four fauls. The first Faul looks like the real JPM quite alot, but he would be the Sgt. Pepper Paul. I could have found a better pic. The Let it Be Paul is, I beleive, the real JPM. The Hey Jude Faul, or number three, is the one that gets me. While 4,2, and 1 have some sort of resemblence to JPM, 3 is the least resemblence in my opnioin.

More on this to come, I need feedback though.

Well -- uh -- then which of them is senior citizen "Faul" today?

[thewalruswaspaul]

Red Lion thanks for pointing that out. The senior citizen would be Faul number four. But like i said there is more on this to come.

[thewalruswaspaul]

Again here is some connections.

Attachments:

[thewalruswaspaul]

Just Kidding......the last post was meant to be a joke dont take it serously...

[65if2007]

Mar 24, 2011 11:58:16 GMT -5 thewalruswaspaul said:

Red Lion thanks for pointing that out. The senior citizen would be Faul number four. But like i said there is more on this to come.

Well, why should the real JPM surreptitously leave the Beatles, briefly come back, and then disappear permanently?

On the other hand, the guy with the goatee -- who you say is the real JPM but not senior citizen McCartney -- had his picture taken in 1970, not 1968 -- or at least, that's a picture from a 1970 album.

On the other hand, who's this guy from 1967?

[thewalruswaspaul]

So look at the attachement. He looks, acts, and sounds alot like JPM, but i fond another pic that looks nothing like Paul, but its him. Obviously, the guy in the clips with the guru was NOT the same guy being interviwed.

Attachments:

[65if2007]

Mar 27, 2011 14:45:05 GMT -5 thewalruswaspaul said:

So look at the attachement. He looks, acts, and sounds alot like JPM, but i fond another pic that looks nothing like Paul, but its him. Obviously, the guy in the clips with the guru was NOT the same guy being interviwed.

I'm confused.

[thewalruswaspaul]

how?

[1billyshears1]

What i don't understand is why would there be a need for so many replacements? Wouldn't just one look a like be enough? I am very new to this whole theory and it just gets plain confusing when we start bring in multiple Fauls. Unless someone can dumb it down for stupid old me then i really think this is getting far fetched!

[truthseeker]

There is only one impostor. Doubleback Fake Paul. And thats a fact.

Different head shapes -

[thewalruswaspaul]

oh god here comes you. i ran into u a while back. There the same dude sorry.

[Silversong]

I'd like to see a comparison where one of them doesn't have the puffy cheeks. That can make anybody look different. Also where one doesn't have his head tilted back like this:



I can tell, though, that the eyebrows are definitely different regardless of the head positions.

[Silversong]

Mar 31, 2011 22:50:42 GMT -5 1billyshears1 said:

What i don't understand is why would there be a need for so many replacements? Wouldn't just one look a like be enough? I am very new to this whole theory and it just gets plain confusing when we start bring in multiple Fauls. Unless someone can dumb it down for stupid old me then i really think this is getting far fetched!

I understand where you're coming from. I certainly believe there was a replacement, at least for a while, and it did begin at least in 1965 if not sooner. Perhaps it's too difficult for just one person to live the life of someone that famous and in demand, but the deceitfulness of it is unacceptable.

Why there might be the need for more than one replacement might be due to illness, deciding not to continue, etc.

[Silversong]

Here's where I see the first appearance of Faul - the one in the middle "1965":



The you tubes from where I took these three screen shots can be viewed respectively at:

Even though his face looks longer in this one than in the third one, his head is the regular full, rounded shape:



Take note of what John says at the 5 minute mark in this next video. Also take note that the singer of "Yesterday" seems to be unable to keep a straight face throughout the song, like he's pulling one over on us:

www.youtube.com/watchv=LxSTH2ecrVE&feature=player_embedded

Singing in a much lower key, sounding more like Paul again:




How possible is it that the 1965 singer of Yesterday went on to be one of the Fauls we have seen over the years?





There must have been 2 false Pauls. This one has a longer, narrower face. What do you think... possible?

Truthseeker, do you have any knowledge of why they needed to have a stand-in during 1965? For some reason, I'm finding a different Faul for 1965 than you are, or maybe there were 2 different ones? Someone has said there was a whole set of "decoy" Beatles anyway.

[P(D)enny La(i)ne]

Jun 4, 2011 14:09:23 GMT -5 Silversong said:

Here's where I see the first appearance of Faul - the one in the middle "1965":



The you tubes from where I took these three screen shots can be viewed respectively at:

Even though his face looks longer in this one than in the third one, his head is the regular full, rounded shape:



Take note of what John says at the 5 minute mark in this next video. Also take note that the singer of "Yesterday" seems to be unable to keep a straight face throughout the song, like he's pulling one over on us:



Singing in a much lower key, sounding more like Paul again:




How possible is it that the 1965 singer of Yesterday went on to be one of the Fauls we have seen over the years?





There must have been 2 false Pauls. This one has a longer, narrower face. What do you think... possible?

Truthseeker, do you have any knowledge of why they needed to have a stand-in during 1965? For some reason, I'm finding a different Faul for 1965 than you are, or maybe there were 2 different ones? Someone has said there was a whole set of "decoy" Beatles anyway.

I'm with EB on the Goodnight Tonight vid. There are two different Pauls; one singing and one playing the bongos. It's not like they haven't gotten up to that type of chicanery in other videos. Here's a good example from the Wonderful Christmas Time video.



As for your analysis of the two versions of Yesterday, silversong, I need to correct you on one thing; they're not in different keys.

Lennon's comment on the 65 version that "it was just like him" is compelling, and the 66 version is definitely sung in a slightly lower register, but that could be explained by mood (talented singers have lots of tools in their vocal toolbox), overworked vocal chords, illness, or any number of other reasons.

I'm NOT saying that there wasn't an extra Paul running around in 1965, but I am saying that these two examples aren't incontrovertible evidence.

Best,

P(D)

[Silversong]

Hi PL,

I certainly did misspeak. What I should have said was, even when they're singing in the same key, one "sounds" higher than the other.

I saw a sonographic comparison somewhere on a website that a person could click on and hear them both sing the same word from the same song in the same key, but Bill sounding higher than Paul. I've been trying to find that again. Anybody seen that and know where it is?

Thank you for the correction!

[LOVELYRITA]

In another forum, we had discussed the appearance of "Bill" was in the picture of them coming off a plane in San Francisco, circa 1966 during their final tour. We figured he showed up during the last leg of the tour....

[thewalruswaspaul]

I think alot of the fauls were in the studio, even maybe both singing songs TOGETHER!!!!!!!

Like 'You never give me your money"
youtu.be/wobmyEB-dsk

Somone is singing and then at 1:10 Lady Madonna Faul jumps on the scene

[truthseeker]

Jun 4, 2011 14:09:23 GMT -5 Silversong said:

Truthseeker, do you have any knowledge of why they needed to have a stand-in during 1965? For some reason, I'm finding a different Faul for 1965 than you are

I don't know why Paul was replaced periodically from around 1963 to 1967 when he was permanently replaced.

What different Faul are you finding?

[truthseeker]

Jun 1, 2011 15:58:58 GMT -5 thewalruswaspaul said:

oh god here comes you. i ran into u a while back. There the same dude sorry.

Go back to illuminati training school. Your disinfo campaign isn't working.

I'm too clever, and so is Silversong.

[Silversong]

My research is showing there were as many PAULs after 1966 as there were before. The Beatles who came to America in 1964 seem not to have been the originals, so perhaps all we ever saw were "Fauls"/ human copies. There was a short one, and one or two tall ones between 1964 and 1966.

Very surreal, very unusual, but time we find out about it.

[thewalruswaspaul]

"Go back to illuminati training school. Your disinfo campaign isn't working"

You need to get off this forum because i am not a illuminati your the one whos the disfino campaign bringing ion this gay crap about Doubleback. thats a load of fereakin crap and thats it. Im with iPuffin. he knows how you are to

Now, back to the original discusion.

[deewubbsyou]

i dont understand how people think theres more than one Paul? I thought Paul was dead since '66 and they had Faul double him. Why would they need an extra double?