|
|
Post by B on Jul 24, 2011 11:53:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jul 24, 2011 17:43:47 GMT -5
Flight 77 was it?
The Pentagon still stands, even if the towers don't.
|
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jul 24, 2011 18:47:33 GMT -5
BTW, "The pentagram symbol is based on Venus (the Queen of Heaven)", and she will never, ever let anyone mess with the Dept of Defense! It'll never happen! Lucky you! 9/11? what does that mean to you now? anything new? Pentagrams in the Dirt soundcheck  |
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Jul 24, 2011 20:05:57 GMT -5
Flight 77 was it? The Pentagon still stands, even if the towers don't. That's a good breakdown of that silly pentagon plane footage. Haven't seen that one before. That brave Pentagon employee lady better watch her back. They may have to plant a pound of weed on her so she can be sent away to think about what she's done... |
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jul 25, 2011 8:58:39 GMT -5
Flight 77 was it? The Pentagon still stands, even if the towers don't. That's a good breakdown of that silly pentagon plane footage. Haven't seen that one before. That brave Pentagon employee lady better watch her back. They may have to plant a pound of weed on her so she can be sent away to think about what she's done... Don't worry, she's protected |
|
1billyshears1
Hard Day's Night 
Living the beatles legend!
Posts: 34
|
Post by 1billyshears1 on Jul 30, 2011 12:18:35 GMT -5
I've always believed 9/11 to be an excuse to invade the Middle East. Also, anyone who believes any plane hit the pentagon is a bloody idiot. In all the footage i've seen there is nothing that even closely resembles a plane. Surprised they didn't just digitally add planes in like they did with the twin tower footage. I just have a haunting feeling that there will be a false flag attack this September, probably pull the "Revenge for our leader's death!" card and have another reason to keep sending our troops to the Middle East fighting a false war.
|
|
|
|
Post by B on Jul 30, 2011 14:11:54 GMT -5
If they could get away with it, they probably would, but I don't think it's
going to be allowed. In fact, I think that was the plan by the powers
that be, but their abuses of power are now being challenged, imo.
I think the higher powers are being allowed to intervene.
If they weren't, we'd all be in FEMA camps by now.
|
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Jul 30, 2011 14:43:48 GMT -5
Not only did NO plane hit the Pentagon,NO plane hit ANY of the buildings! There were NO planes on 9/11! Three missles were fired hitting the two towers and the Pentagon. The"planes" were created using special effects. The passenger lists were made up and put into data banks. That is why the"planes" were not reported on radar. Three missles fired three buildings demolished,EVERYTHING else was fake.The simpler the plan the better.
|
|
|
|
Post by ipuffin on Jul 30, 2011 15:19:47 GMT -5
Just like New York City,
Just like Jericho,
Pace the halls and climb the walls
and get out when they blow
|
|
|
|
Post by B on Aug 1, 2011 19:56:58 GMT -5
Not only did NO plane hit the Pentagon, NO plane hit ANY of the buildings! There were NO planes on 9/11! Three missles were fired hitting the two towers and the Pentagon. The"planes" were created using special effects. The passenger lists were made up and put into data banks. That is why the" planes" were not reported on radar. Three missles fired three buildings demolished,EVERYTHING else was fake.The simpler the plan the better. The views expressed are not necessarily mine. |
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Aug 1, 2011 20:15:48 GMT -5
can I get a witness?
theres more here than meets the Eye.
The ultimate witness.
|
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Aug 1, 2011 22:55:08 GMT -5
Witness #2 Seaming the bathroom window |
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Aug 2, 2011 6:13:25 GMT -5
 Live from Church Street |
|
|
|
Post by simplythevest on Aug 2, 2011 6:57:10 GMT -5
Not only did NO plane hit the Pentagon, NO plane hit ANY of the buildings! There were NO planes on 9/11! Three missles were fired hitting the two towers and the Pentagon. The"planes" were created using special effects. The passenger lists were made up and put into data banks. That is why the" planes" were not reported on radar. Three missles fired three buildings demolished,EVERYTHING else was fake.The simpler the plan the better. The views expressed are not necessarily mine. I just watched the first 1.30 of the video, and had to comment as everyone of his points so far have simple explanations. 1. They needed footage of a plane hitting the tower to fully put it in the public mind that planes hit the towers obviously, that IS the reason they made the footage and why the events of that day had so much impact on people. 2. They used a documentary crew because the first hit was only part of that whole particular psy-op, which of course was to have emotionally charged footage of heroic fire-fighter involved in the events of the day, a propagandists wet-dream. Also, with firefighters they were able to block off traffic to the road in that area where they had to be stood in the middle in order to get the view they needed. On the pavement could have obstructed their view. Of course using a documentary crew with firefighters provided the perfect cover to have them in that location that early in the morning under the guise of investigating an alleged gas leak. Of course that it was a 'gas leak' they were reacting to as opposed to a very real fire, meant that they could more easily high-tail it out of there to the trade centre as soon as the 'plane' hit. 3. The camera was not focused on the tower initially but this is clearly to not make it look so suspicious in the first place. However, it looks like a very 'rehearsed' move to the left and up to the right to focus on the tower just as the 'plane' comes into view. Their location is perfect in the middle of that street as if it was left to chance the chances are that they would not have had a good view of the towers because of the other buildings. The footage itself proves no plane hit the building: www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjQmxS-DpyMInterestingly, the fire station the Naudet's were stationed at was based on Duane St, which you might notice is an anagram of 'Naudet's'. |
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Aug 2, 2011 7:52:27 GMT -5
They used a documentary crew  because the first hit was only part of that whole particular psy-op, which of course was to have emotionally charged footage of A heroic fire-fighter involved in the events of the day, a propagandists wet-dream.
Also, with firefighters they were able to block off traffic to the road in that area where they had to be stood in the middle in order to get the view they needed. On the pavement could have obstructed their view  Of course using a documentary crew with firefighters provided the perfect cover to have them in that location that early in the morning under the guise of investigating an alleged gas leak. Of course that it was a 'gas leak' they were reacting to as opposed to a very real fire, meant that they could more easily high-tail it out of there to the trade centre as soon as the 'plane' hit. every hook and ladder leads to heaven the heroic fire-fighter involved in the events of the day The time to hesitate is through. No time to wallow in the mire! save the nation from the conflagration, Fireman! |
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Aug 2, 2011 9:27:00 GMT -5
I would like to say that only in this forum could footage of a plane striking a building be used to prove that a plane never struck a building.
I'd like to say that, but, of course, it happens in many forums.
The trouble is that when you have long hair and a beard, fibers get in your eyes at inopportune moments and you'll miss certain things.
|
|
|
|
Post by B on Aug 2, 2011 15:57:30 GMT -5
 I don't miss much. |
|
|
|
Post by B on Aug 2, 2011 16:42:57 GMT -5
I was glancing through some of this guy's videos, and I found his viewpoint interesting. Here's the first of a ten part series: SEPTEMBER CLUES A from simonshackwww.youtube.com/watch?v=AXda5Kn2LAMI am inclined to be in agreement with Dr. Judy Wood's evidence that the towers were powder-ized with the use of exotic weaponry. Rense & Dr Judy Wood - Where Did The Towers Go? www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkvmS53QVv0 |
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Aug 2, 2011 22:20:25 GMT -5
I am inclined to be in agreement with Dr. Judy Wood's evidence that the towers were powder-ized with the use of exotic weaponry. Oh, yes. Precisely, exotic weaponry. Something about a drum skin and 911 HE DIE inclines my agreement. |
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Aug 2, 2011 22:25:41 GMT -5
I don't miss much. she's not the kind of girl that misses much, so they said Mother Superior jumped the gun
Mother Superior jumped the gun
Mother Superior jumped the gun
Mother Superior jumped the gun
Mother Superior jumped the gun
Mother Superior jumped the gun
she started the race before you, turned around, and coached you towards the finish line, that Mother Superior. What a gal! |
|
|
|
Post by B on Aug 3, 2011 20:04:14 GMT -5
iameye wrote:
"Something about a drum skin and 911 HE DIE inclines my agreement."
That is a very interesting comment.
|
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Aug 3, 2011 21:34:19 GMT -5
iameye wrote: " Something about a drum skin and 911 HE DIE inclines my agreement." That is a very interesting comment. Just Imagine all the other "comments" you missed. |
|
|
|
Post by simplythevest on Aug 4, 2011 6:20:36 GMT -5
I would like to say that only in this forum could footage of a plane striking a building be used to prove that a plane never struck a building. I'd like to say that, but, of course, it happens in many forums. The trouble is that when you have long hair and a beard, fibers get in your eyes at inopportune moments and you'll miss certain things. Where's this footage of the plane hitting the building you're talking about? |
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Aug 5, 2011 1:02:28 GMT -5
I would like to say that only in this forum could footage of a plane striking a building be used to prove that a plane never struck a building. I'd like to say that, but, of course, it happens in many forums. The trouble is that when you have long hair and a beard, fibers get in your eyes at inopportune moments and you'll miss certain things. Where's this footage of the plane hitting the building you're talking about? You'll just say that you don't see it or that the Illuminati overlords have used their vast powers to create some photographic trick. And then you'll say that only Barack Obama can save us from them. |
|
|
|
Post by simplythevest on Aug 5, 2011 6:56:52 GMT -5
Where's this footage of the plane hitting the building you're talking about? You'll just say that you don't see it or that the Illuminati overlords have used their vast powers to create some photographic trick. And then you'll say that only Barack Obama can save us from them. I don't believe in the Illuminati, and never mention them. I don't give a rats arse about Obama. Where's this footage of a plane hitting the first building? |
|
because the first hit was only part of that whole particular psy-op, which of course was to have emotionally charged footage of A heroic fire-fighter involved in the events of the day, a propagandists wet-dream. 
Of course using a documentary crew with firefighters provided the perfect cover to have them in that location that early in the morning under the guise of investigating an alleged gas leak. Of course that it was a 'gas leak' they were reacting to as opposed to a very real fire, meant that they could more easily high-tail it out of there to the trade centre as soon as the 'plane' hit.