|
Post by paulicista on Jan 8, 2012 3:54:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by B on Jan 8, 2012 8:42:54 GMT -5
If the pictures are from the "Coming Up" period, then obviously they're not from 1965. Why they would be labeled as if they were is anyone's guess. I'm thinking that, as you've already said, they are supposed to be a representation of how Paul looked in 1965. The "Date created: 01 Jan 1965" is questionable, because hardly anyone is at work on New Year's Day. In the video, this is a representation of Paul around 1965, but of course, everyone in the video is either Faul or Linda.
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jan 8, 2012 16:46:56 GMT -5
"] Gettyimage wrong date: that's Billy
|
|
|
Post by paulicista on Jan 9, 2012 0:17:29 GMT -5
the picture from getty images is obviously from the coming up video because of the wedding ring too (among all the rest of features we know are far different from Paul's) In my opinion (if the getty images admins didn't make a mistake) they wanted to let us believe that paul used to look like that in 1965.
I put images from the coming video to prove that the image of "paul" from getty images was not from 1965 as they want us to believe, but from the coming up photo sessions.
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jan 9, 2012 14:57:41 GMT -5
the picture from getty images is obviously from the coming up video because of the wedding ring too (among all the rest of features we know are far different from Paul's) In my opinion (if the getty images admins didn't make a mistake) they wanted to let us believe that paul used to look like that in 1965. I put images from the coming video to prove that the image of "paul" from getty images was not from 1965 as they want us to believe, but from the coming up photo sessions. This one is from the same photo session. "] Many years ago I've called that photo "Ridiculous Faul"
|
|
|
Post by destron on Feb 5, 2012 3:42:47 GMT -5
They do look remarkably similar in the last comparison.
|
|
|
Post by Silversong on Feb 10, 2012 23:05:33 GMT -5
Do these look more alike now? The one on the left in the other comparison is a Paul from the earlier 60s, who showed up again in the 70s with the mullet.
|
|
|
Post by paulicista on Feb 14, 2012 2:20:09 GMT -5
This one is from the same photo session. "] [/quote] Yes, you're right.
|
|