Wanting some clarification

[cranberryfaul]

New member to the PWR/PID theory and there's something that's been bugging me. How many fauls were there? Because I've heard people say 1,2,3 (ect.), but i'm tending to stick to the idea that there were multiple fauls from 1965-2012 because JPM kept coming in and out of the scene for '65-'70.

Thanks for answering.

[linus]

Hi cran, welcome.

In all the PID forums I’ve read, I’ve found that most people can't agree on the following:
The criteria for identifying Paul (physical, voice, personality)
How many Pauls there were
When, why and how Paul left
Whether or not Paul died, retired or semi-retired
Who became Faul
The criteria for identifying Faul (physical, voice, personality)
What kind of surgery Faul needed
How many Fauls there were
What has been doctored and what hasn’t
Whether or not one or more of the other Beatles and their managers were killed/replaced, and by who


The focus of this forum has shifted long ago to more of the esoteric side of the Beatles, rather than the who, what and when of the PID conspiracy. I would suggest finding other forums, and doing your own research, if you’re only interested in discussing the latter. I would talk to you about the latter, but I don’t want to get into a row with everyone that will disagree with me, it can be very frustrating. And trust me, there are as many theories and opinions on these forums as there are members. About the only part of the actual PID issue that gets discussed around here anymore is whether the clues were alluding to Paul really dying, or were a metaphor, a ruse, just a prank, or some combination of the four.

Feel free to read through the threads in this forum, but be prepared to be more confused than you were going in, as most newcomers are.


Let me ask you this:
If Paul was just using a stand-in, why did they put all the PID clues in their work?
How did you arrive at the 1965-70 dates?

[LOVELYRITA]

I"ve been doing this for many years and there are differences of opinion. Some people wish to believe the real Paul is still alive. I don't believe this, but it's up to you to decide what you want to believe.

There have been several Fauls, but many debate and argue that it's photo fakery, and other such things to support just one Faul.
Examine the pics on as many forums as you wish to search for. It depends on how much you want to get into reading other people's ideas, and how open you are to what is being discussed. You have to be careful to examine people who are just crackpots and throwing stupidity into the discussions. After some time, you can tell by the content of their posts if they are serious seekers, or just people wanting to argue or debate.

If you don't feel that Paul was replaced and choose to think it 's the same person, then these types of forums will not be for you. If you are looking at both sides, then you should research the matter. But if you are not open to the idea that people can be replaced, then this type of thing isn't for you.

Trying to turn people away from their pov will not be of much success. People will decide for themselves what they want to believe.

Trying to find vintage material that hasn't been photo shopped and hacked to make Paul look like Faul is difficult. I suggest if you can find places that show vintage material, is the best place to start comparisons. There are people who try to use doctored photos to argue that there is no Faul. You need to research many sources.

[GN]

I"ve been doing this for many years and there are differences of opinion. Some people wish to believe the real Paul is still alive. I don't believe this, but it's up to you to decide what you want to believe.

There have been several Fauls, but many debate and argue that it's photo fakery, and other such things to support just one Faul.
Examine the pics on as many forums as you wish to search for. It depends on how much you want to get into reading other people's ideas, and how open you are to what is being discussed. You have to be careful to examine people who are just crackpots and throwing stupidity into the discussions. After some time, you can tell by the content of their posts if they are serious seekers, or just people wanting to argue or debate.

If you don't feel that Paul was replaced and choose to think it 's the same person, then these types of forums will not be for you. If you are looking at both sides, then you should research the matter. But if you are not open to the idea that people can be replaced, then this type of thing isn't for you.

Trying to turn people away from their pov will not be of much success. People will decide for themselves what they want to believe.

Trying to find vintage material that hasn't been photo shopped and hacked to make Paul look like Faul is difficult. I suggest if you can find places that show vintage material, is the best place to start comparisons. There are people who try to use doctored photos to argue that there is no Faul. You need to research many sources.

[JeremyHBoob]

I believe SOMETHING happened to Paul during the making of Sgt Pepper and that the Paul we see today isn't the same guy.

Take a look, they even made Paul and Faul action figures! ;D

[ramone]

Hey, you're right!
I think Peter Max should get a bigger cut.

oh, and Faul has a bigger jaw.
lol

[iameye]

parkwestgallery.wordpress.com/category/artists-special-collections/peter-max-artists-special-collections/

In his pocket was a portrait by the Queen