|
Post by Jai Guru Deva on Jul 30, 2013 18:45:59 GMT -5
For whatever it's worth, a woman who (as she says at the top of her page) is a mom of four kids and in her mid 30's with some psychic abilities, answers a question about whether or not Paul McCartney was replaced... psychicfocus.blogspot.com__________________________________________________ Q.Was Paul McCartney replaced by a double in 1966? If so, what happened to the original Paul McCartney? Who was behind this and what were the motivations? Were any other of the Beatles replaced with doubles at any time?
A. I'm getting that he was replaced.. He died some kind of embarrassing or shameful way I'll focus on that in a minute). The Beatles didn't want to tarnish the name or have any bad associations with their name, so it was easier to just replace him. I am also getting that the Beatles knew, as well as their manager figure and also some big record company. They were all in the know, they didn't all agree, but it was a majority rule type situation. It was done strictly to protect their name...
Now when I try to focus on how he died... I keep getting the words embezzling and government..so it appears his death was associated to that.
To further answer the question, I see no other Beatle being replaced...
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Aug 6, 2013 6:58:44 GMT -5
Who is this "psychic"? It's obvious that the others "knew". How can you be with someone virtually every day for years and not know if, suddenly, it is someone else? As for the others agreeing; they would not have had any choice in the matter, however, I think George and John were "in shock" and just did as they were told in order for the group to continue (minus touring); Ringo, however, was a different kettle of fish. Having been brought in just as the group were on the verge of fame and fortune: he would go along with anything as he hadn't been as close to Paul as the other two. However, I disagree that none of the others were replaced. I believe there were "doubles" from early on and that Ringo was probably replaced late sixties. There was an attempt to replace him in 1964 when the session drummer, Jimmy Nichol went on the tour of Sweden. It did not work, as he was not a "lookalike". Other groups have brought in replacements too; for whatever reason, maybe the original was not a very good musician.
|
|
|
Post by jpmtruthcanuck on Aug 12, 2013 17:38:48 GMT -5
If the ability to 'Remote View' is true, I wonder what someone with this capability could tell about JPM's replacement and possible demise?
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Aug 16, 2013 16:14:47 GMT -5
We don't need a "remote viewer" to tell us that Paul was replaced. It would be more illuminating to "remote view" what happened in the last hours of Brian Epstein.
|
|