|
|
Post by ticket2ride on Sept 25, 2013 8:47:14 GMT -5
us anything you know about how Paul changed after some time in 1966.
The problem with the PID theory is a lack of primary sources and if you were one of those girls who used to hang around outside his London home then surely you can give us better information than somebody who never saw Paul and posts photos that may simply be poor quality. If you were indeed an Apple Scruff please give us the benefit of your firsthand observations. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rubber Soul on Sept 25, 2013 21:23:34 GMT -5
us anything you know about how Paul changed after some time in 1966. The problem with the PID theory is a lack of primary sources and if you were one of those girls who used to hang around outside his London home then surely you can give us better information than somebody who never saw Paul and posts photos that may simply be poor quality. If you were indeed an Apple Scruff please give us the benefit of your firsthand observations. Thank you. |
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Sept 29, 2013 7:50:03 GMT -5
That photo comparison says it all; the eyebrows are nothing like and you cannot get that difference in eyebrows merely by plucking; the gap between tip of nose and top lip is wider on older guy; also the "six o' clock shadow" showing through is different: nostrils are visible on older guy, not on younger; this person is different to the present Faul as the nose does not match: the young Paul's nose being shorter at the tip, this is something that can't be changed by a "nose job"...this photo on the right is of the "mullet" hairstyle Faul who seemed to like wearing braces and tartan shirt (not JPM's sartorial style)
|
|
|
|
Post by ticket2ride on Sept 29, 2013 11:10:52 GMT -5
Thanks for your reply here and in another thread, thanks also to Lucy for their reference to a book by one of the Apple Scruffs.
I've been wondering if the person who may not be the real Paul McCartney is actually a cousin of the real Paul McCartney, the Bill or Billy we keep hearing referenced. In one of the Imaphoney videos Paul is in a Liverpool pub with friends and relatives and an old lady says hello Billy. However, this could be a case of her saying that to somebody else and Imaphoney giving the impression she is talking directly to Paul.
I have problems accepting the William Campbell was a member of the Police Force in Canada theory. As a policeman he didn't come out of nowhere and it is unlikely we wouldn't have had some confession or some information from Canadians by now. I also wonder if the new Paul if indeed he is a different Paul was one of James McCartney's illegitimate children?
Owing to all the cloning and doppleganger theories, some have forgotten that there are many famous people who are the unacknowledged children of other famous people or who are related to famous people, or who are famous but their background stories exclude the fact of their paternity or maternity which in previous times was known as 'illegitimacy'.
Could the new Paul be James McCartney's secret son? Up to the 80s there were many cases in even so called enlightened western so called liberal democracies of the true paternity or maternity of somebody being a secret as the child was 'illegitimate'. And before the days of the contraceptive pill on demand as well as access to legal abortion there were plenty of unacknowledged children.
I think the theory that the new Paul could be an unacknowledged brother or cousin is a reasonable avenue to go down although I haven't seen any kind of reference to it.
|
|
|
|
Post by linus on Sept 29, 2013 11:53:33 GMT -5
In one of the Imaphoney videos Paul is in a Liverpool pub with friends and relatives and an old lady says hello Billy. However, this could be a case of her saying that to somebody else and Imaphoney giving the impression she is talking directly to Paul. In this IAAP video, it is made to sound like someone in the Liverpool pub is calling McCartney "Billy". But watching the original footage clears it up. You can see that from 1:25-1:40, the old woman is talking to Paul about something else, and never says “Hello, Billy” to him. After the old lady is done talking to Paul, you hear another, younger sounding woman in the room say “Hello, Millie (or Billy?), are you going to sit here?” I doubt they were talking to Paul because he was already seated. IAAP shuffled the audio to create false implications. also read this thread on how IAAP used narration from a fictional audio book. invanddis.proboards.com/thread/6878/iamaphoney-scavenged-work-fiction |
|
