Paul McCartney, the whole truth and nothing but...

[thewalrus1966]

Well people, you can finally lay all your worries to rest because you are going to hear exactly what happened to Paul McCartney and not only that you can prove it to yourself beyond any shadow of a doubt.
There is absolutely no doubt that Paul, during the autumn of 1966 disappeared from public view, perhaps doubles were used in his absence and the Beatles changed forever.
They stopped touring and performing live, changed their style of music and became different people. Something happened which changed this band forever and their attitude toward life and 'that' something happened to Paul McCartney, Heather Mills knows it and so do a lot of people. All the clues in the album covers are aimed at telling you that Paul is different from what he used to be but the subliminal backwards messages in the music such as 'Paul is dead' are unfortunately rubbish. I have analyzed all of them and apart from the obvious ones that are innocent the rest of them under advanced sound software prove to be fictitious.
The Beatles when they did the Sg Pepper album were indeed telling us something and that was that the old Beatles which we all loved, the Beatles who were essentially a live band were now unable to tour anymore and were indeed - dead.
I have proved with sound analysis software (over in the clues section) that the Paul McCartney of 1963 is indeed the Paul McCartney that is still producing music today, there can be no argument about that at all. 
So....what happened to Paul that would change his life and the life of the Beatles forever?
Take a look at this picture:



Do you know what this is? It's the typical pattern of facial muscles of a stroke victim. Take as look at the next picture:



Do you know what this is? Its the typical pattern of facial muscles of a stroke victim but with a difference. The lower left side of his face has been reconstructed after the stroke complete with scars. You remember I posted this?



I mentioned the pin protruding out of Paul's lower jaw on the left as we look at him. Do you know what that pin is? That pin is part of a mechanism which held Paul's face level all the time he had surgery to correct the damage the stroke did. Originally he had two of them, one on either side with a connecting rod between the two and when he was visited by John in hospital, John said he looked like a Walrus. .....And so, the Walrus was born and yes it was Paul.
But in the picture of Paul above (the second one down of Paul's full face) we can see other tell tale signs besides the surgery scars. His left eye still has stroke damage which was to be corrected in later surgery. The lower eyelid muscles departing from the rest of the eye. I could show you a thousand pictures of the same damage to many stroke victims but I won't because you can go look for yourselves.
In the above picture we can see the scars from the 1960's and indeed the scars from a modern Paul on his face in the same places.
When this happened to Paul they must have thought it was all over for the Beatles, the doctors would have said Paul can never tour again and had to take it easy for the rest of his life. Ringo being consoled by Paul on Sg Pepper isn't because Paul is dead its because Ringo loved playing live and touring and took the news badly and Paul consoles him.
That poor lad, in his prime struck down by this terrible affliction, there is no wonder it did what it did to the band. So.......no more tours and it takes a lot of operations to put Paul's face to something like he used to look and his life and the band are changed forever. Research it yourselves, you'll form the same conclusions as I did. Paul had a stroke and some clues are in Lennon's lyrics.
As for Paul's later life...well he probably said stuff it after a while, I'm gonna just live and formed Wings. The rest is history.
The reason they didn't tell us? your guess is as good as mine. Sleep well people.

[beacon]

Sept 30, 2013 18:40:48 GMT -5 thewalrus1966 said:

Well people, you can finally lay all your worries to rest because you are going to hear exactly what happened to Paul McCartney and not only that you can prove it to yourself beyond any shadow of a doubt.
There is absolutely no doubt that Paul, during the autumn of 1966 disappeared from public view, perhaps doubles were used in his absence and the Beatles changed forever.
They stopped touring and performing live, changed their style of music and became different people. Something happened which changed this band forever and their attitude toward life and 'that' something happened to Paul McCartney, Heather Mills knows it and so do a lot of people. All the clues in the album covers are aimed at telling you that Paul is different from what he used to be but the subliminal backwards messages in the music such as 'Paul is dead' are unfortunately rubbish. I have analyzed all of them and apart from the obvious ones that are innocent the rest of them under advanced sound software prove to be fictitious.
The Beatles when they did the Sg Pepper album were indeed telling us something and that was that the old Beatles which we all loved, the Beatles who were essentially a live band were now unable to tour anymore and were indeed - dead.
I have proved with sound analysis software (over in the clues section) that the Paul McCartney of 1963 is indeed the Paul McCartney that is still producing music today, there can be no argument about that at all. 
So....what happened to Paul that would change his life and the life of the Beatles forever?
Take a look at this picture:

View Attachment

Do you know what this is? It's the typical pattern of facial muscles of a stroke victim. Take as look at the next picture:

View Attachment

Do you know what this is? Its the typical pattern of facial muscles of a stroke victim but with a difference. The lower left side of his face has been reconstructed after the stroke complete with scars. You remember I posted this?

View Attachment

I mentioned the pin protruding out of Paul's lower jaw on the left as we look at him. Do you know what that pin is? That pin is part of a mechanism which held Paul's face level all the time he had surgery to correct the damage the stroke did. Originally he had two of them, one on either side with a connecting rod between the two and when he was visited by John in hospital, John said he looked like a Walrus. .....And so, the Walrus was born and yes it was Paul.
But in the picture of Paul above (the second one down of Paul's full face) we can see other tell tale signs besides the surgery scars. His left eye still has stroke damage which was to be corrected in later surgery. The lower eyelid muscles departing from the rest of the eye. I could show you a thousand pictures of the same damage to many stroke victims but I won't because you can go look for yourselves.
In the above picture we can see the scars from the 1960's and indeed the scars from a modern Paul on his face in the same places.
When this happened to Paul they must have thought it was all over for the Beatles, the doctors would have said Paul can never tour again and had to take it easy for the rest of his life. Ringo being consoled by Paul on Sg Pepper isn't because Paul is dead its because Ringo loved playing live and touring and took the news badly and Paul consoles him.
That poor lad, in his prime struck down by this terrible affliction, there is no wonder it did what it did to the band. So.......no more tours and it takes a lot of operations to put Paul's face to something like he used to look and his life and the band are changed forever. Research it yourselves, you'll form the same conclusions as I did. Paul had a stroke and some clues are in Lennon's lyrics.
As for Paul's later life...well he probably said stuff it after a while, I'm gonna just live and formed Wings. The rest is history.
The reason they didn't tell us? your guess is as good as mine. Sleep well people.

thewalrus1966 this is an interesting theory and reminds me of a discussion over at tkin some years ago speculating that Paul may have had Bells Palsy.

I do feel it needs some further elaboration though. When I look at your picture of Paul I don't see the droopy mouth, nor do I see the evidence of the pin. I see a line that seems to go from beneath the tip of his moustache and continues down onto his neck. This seems to be a continous line that doesn't account for the contours of the face.

Also, your quote...and when he was visited by John in hospital, John said he looked like a Walrus. .....And so, the Walrus was born and yes it was Paul.Where is this from?

Essentially, there is a three month window from the Melody Maker awards in August 66 until his reappearance from Kenya on November 19 1966 for Paul to have recovered from this stroke, unless of course doubles were used, in which case we are not really any wiser as to who they are and to what extent they were used. Three months seems to be a very quick time for a recovery, even for a young man.

I am not saying your theory is incorrect but I would like to see you post some more details.

Also, I am very interested in your voice analysis results, but can you explain it in layman terms? All I see is a series of graphs but I am not sure what the corelation is between the various source interviews, or, between the top and bottom graphs. Can you help?

[thewalrus1966]

I posted these enlarged pictures on another thread. Please click to enlarge, these are much bigger.





I have outlined the scar tissue on Paul's face on the lower picture and outlined the metal pin which has a metal loop on the end of it. Here is an enhanced picture of the pin. I have enlarged it and drawn on the lower image where it is.



The scar tissue from the surgery after the stroke is all around Paul's mouth and cheek, on the last picture you can see clear scar tissue below the lip in what looks like a graft. The later pictures of Paul say it all really, you can see evidence from all the work in his later years.

[thewalrus1966]

I will explain the voice analysis in a further thread for you to understand what the data means.

[cherilyn7]

I take on board what you say and your reasons for your conclusions: however, how does the "stroke" theory account for the different ears, different shape head, different height and change in personality among many other factors?

[thewalrus1966]

Oct 1, 2013 17:03:15 GMT -5 cherilyn7 said:

I take on board what you say and your reasons for your conclusions: however, how does the "stroke" theory account for the different ears, different shape head, different height and change in personality among many other factors?

I did mention that throughout Paul's recovery that they may well have used doubles to fill in. If he did have a stroke and I strongly believe he did, it will have taken years to put Paul's face back to something like and he will have been missing from public view for long periods of time over a number of years. Different doubles could have possibly been used, there lies the height conflict. Judging by the examination of the pictures I have done thus far in regard to the ears, well to be honest I'm a bit perplexed by that because i'm currently examining pictures from 62/63 where some of the Beatles seem to be sporting false ears. But I will work on it.

[linus]

I’m enjoying the research, but I have some observations and questions.

I'm guessing the 1967 photo in question was taken in the early part of 1967.

The promotional film for "Strawberry Fields Forever" was an early example of what later became known as a music video.[66] It was filmed on 30 and 31 January 1967, in Knole Park in Sevenoaks. It was directed by Swedish television director Peter Goldman.
During the same visit to Knole Park, Goldman produced the promotional film for "Penny Lane"
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strawberry_Fields_Forever

Many commenters here have stated it is highly likely these photos were taken the same day as the SFF/PL film shoots.
beatlephotoblog.com/need-help-with-date

What I'm noticing is that there's no indication of a rod in these photos from the same day, or in the Penny Lane and SFF films.


This session was shot by Jean-Marie Perier




Here I see what could be stitching or something in that area, or it could be highlighted skin textures, notice the other three have similar occurences on their faces.


I’m noticing that if that is a rod, the lighting & shadows are not consistent with the lighting falling on the subject’s face.
The darker edge of the ‘rod’ is on our right, and the lighter edge is on our left. Accoring to the stage lighting used in this photo, it should be the reverse of that.
I believe what is seen here could be an indentation in the paper the photo was printed on. Or a hair that got onto the scanner this may have been scanned on.

I do see a round mass that could be a skin graft under his lip, and the slight possibility that the line in question may have been airbrushed out on this image, but there's nothing of the same nature in the rest of this photo session or the SFF/PL films.
And like Beacon said, the line in the photo you posted does not seem to follow the contours of his face. It appears to be a rather straight line on a two-dimensional piece of paper. As if it were cutting through the planes of space that the chin would be extending out into.



Here the photography crew is in the shot.


The image was flipped and used on the Hey Jude single.
Several of their albums & singles use flipped images.


from the same photo sessions.


There are more photos with these backgrounds, that I can't find at the moment.






another photo from around the same time.
The key would be to analyze photos from Jan-Feb 1967 and look for rods.


Jean-Marie Perier also took the photos of them in 1964 where Paul lights his lighter with his right hand.


I, like Beacon, would like to know more about Lennon's “walrus” quotes. And the instances in which he alluded to Paul’s stroke in his music.

I did mention that throughout Paul's recovery that they may well have used doubles to fill in. If he did have a stroke and I strongly believe he did, it will have taken years to put Paul's face back to something like and he will have been missing from public view for long periods of time over a number of years.

Then how and why is he in the early-67 photo session?
One would think they would use one of the 'doubles' for a photo shoot if Paul had rods protruding from his face.
Also, your voice print results indicate he was at the '68 interview as well.


Also, what side of his face did the damage occur?


I am also trying to find documentation on stroke victims having such rods used in reconstruction surgery, but so far am not finding anything. I have a friend that is a plastic surgeon, I will ask her if that is the case.

Different doubles could have possibly been used, there lies the height conflict. Judging by the examination of the pictures I have done thus far in regard to the ears, well to be honest I'm a bit perplexed by that because i'm currently examining pictures from 62/63 where some of the Beatles seem to be sporting false ears.

In my research I have found the major height discrepancies occurred in 1963 with both Paul and George.
See my post in this thread:
invanddis.proboards.com/thread/1968/stuart-grays-documentary?page=2&scrollTo=107037

And I also see fake ears going as far back as ’64 and some iffy ones in ’63 – with both Paul and Ringo.

Melody Maker awards in August 66

Beacon, wasn’t the ’66 Melody Maker awards in September?

[Deleted]

Oct 1, 2013 18:22:25 GMT -5 linus said:

lol

[Deleted]

Quarryman

genealogy.familyeducation.com/surname-origin/perrier
lol

[Deleted]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_jar

[beacon]

Oct 1, 2013 18:22:25 GMT -5 linus said:

Beacon, wasn’t the ’66 Melody Maker awards in September?

Linus, I stand corrected.

[Deleted]

Oct 2, 2013 3:34:05 GMT -5 beacon said:

Linus, I stand corrected.

Well protected, resurrected?
Have it my way.
<<<

[thewalrus1966]

Hi Linus, it is interesting that most of the pictures you have posted have the side of McCartney's face which I am interested in shadow which is the left as we look at it or his right. The first picture you showed at quick glace has three signs of airbrushing, most of the pictures are in poor resolution and difficult to process or work on.
Do you think it is coincidence that the light source always seems to be from the right all the time and never from the left unless we are in long shot?
The law of averages states that at least one photographer would have used a light source from the left at least one time. They are hiding McCartney's face from full exposure, there is no doubt about it.
www.uwmedicine.org/patient-care/our-services/medical-services/reconstructive-surgery/pages/articleview.aspx?subId=128

[Jai Guru Deva]

Interesting theory about Faul having stroke...

But it could be a genetic disease like Parry-Romberg Syndrome...

Or it could the way Faul's face is structured (I'm leaning toward this explaination)... Stella has a similar look about her with one eye/eyelid a different shape than the other, and she, Heather, and James have one eye lower than the other.

[linus]

Paul can be seen with a 'droopy' left side of the face/lower left eye in vintage Beatlemania magazines.

Here's just a few

Link to vintage scan: jojoplace.org/Shoebox/James_Paul_McCartney.org/beautifulPaul2.jpg


jojoplace.org/Shoebox/James_Paul_McCartney.org/drinking.jpg


jojoplace.org/Shoebox/James_Paul_McCartney.org/hdnnwhr.jpg

(This image was printed flipped, but it helps bring attention to his lower left eye)

www.jamespaulmccartney.org/album64/cgi-bin/album.pl?photo=JPM_011/16M0765010.jpg

[cherilyn7]

Someone who has a stroke bad enough to paralyze one side of their face would also have paralysis down that side of their body as well. 24 is young for a stroke in any event. Unless it was Bell's Palsy which would affect the face only. This rarely, if ever returns to how it appeared before. Having rods and wire threaded through the chin I have never heard of this before. The fact is; the personality changed anyway after circa 1965 as vOOdOOguru has pointed out 1966 seems to be something of a red herring...when is this alleged stroke supposed to have happened? Yes there are false ears all over the place imo Paul and Ringo in particular but it is my contention that Ringo was replaced as was John also and, in fact, all four at different times and eventually completely. Something strange was definitely going on but I, personally, do not buy into this stroke theory.

[cherilyn7]

Thankyou Linus for those pictures, but the problem is: they are not Paul they are the double/Faul/Bill! That's why the chin is different; that is why there were scars....I believe this stroke theory is yet another red herring. To answer my question re "different ears" by saying lots of false ears were seen circa '63 and '64 that is because it was not the "original" person but imposters/doubles as far back as then....vOOdOOguru has produced photos showing a "different Paul" circa 1962 with a different face and I believe there was a plan to replace Ringo with Jimmy Nichol in 1964 this did not work, unfortunately for Nichol as George would not accept it and also as he was not a "double" the public would not have accepted it....however, I feel, as does NothingisReal1985 that he was replaced early on.

[skyw]

Oct 2, 2013 16:15:45 GMT -5 linus said:

Paul can be seen with a 'droopy' left side of the face/lower left eye in vintage Beatlemania magazines.

Here's just a few

Link to vintage scan: jojoplace.org/Shoebox/James_Paul_McCartney.org/beautifulPaul2.jpg

 Pretty sure that this is Bell's Palsy  Bell's Palsy at WebMD
George Clooney had it when he was younger.

[thewalrus1966]

Oct 2, 2013 16:23:34 GMT -5 cherilyn7 said:

Someone who has a stroke bad enough to paralyze one side of their face would also have paralysis down that side of their body as well. 24 is young for a stroke in any event. Unless it was Bell's Palsy which would affect the face only. This rarely, if ever returns to how it appeared before. Having rods and wire threaded through the chin I have never heard of this before. The fact is; the personality changed anyway after circa 1965 as vOOdOOguru has pointed out 1966 seems to be something of a red herring...when is this alleged stroke supposed to have happened? Yes there are false ears all over the place imo Paul and Ringo in particular but it is my contention that Ringo was replaced as was John also and, in fact, all four at different times and eventually completely. Something strange was definitely going on but I, personally, do not buy into this stroke theory.

Most of your evidence is based on speculation and your own personal opinion. My sound analysis would stand up in a court of law and that is a fact. The 1963 Paul is the Paul of 2006 in interviews - fact.
There are no red herrings just people trying to understand what has and is going on and trying to form some kind of credible case.
The evidence is not about one eye being higher than the other, it is the fact that the lower eyelid muscles have collapsed and pulled the lower eyelid away from the eye which is a tell tale sign of a stroke or indeed as people have stated Bells Palsy.
You cannot form a credible hypothesis on opinion and speculation, you need hard evidence, evidence which can be used in a court of law if necessary.
Strokes do not always affect the entire side of the body, there are plenty of recorded cases of such strokes. Strokes have happened in children as young as five years old, they are caused by blood clotting in the brain. Some people can have Bells Palsy all their life and not be affected by it severely, others can have an attack and be disfigured for life just like a stroke. Therefore I cannot rule out a severe attack of Bells Palsy. At the moment I am studying Paul's singing, the movement of his lips and jaw for signs of stroke and I must confess that the Paul of pre 1966 is singing different from the Paul of perhaps early 1967 onward and it appears there is restricted lip movement and it appears he is singing out the side of his mouth.
I strongly believe Paul had a full facial construction after either a stroke or an attack of Bells Palsy. This I will continue to work on and produce further evidence when ever I can.

[linus]

Oct 3, 2013 10:58:53 GMT -5 thewalrus1966 said:

The evidence is not about one eye being higher than the other, it is the fact that the lower eyelid muscles have collapsed and pulled the lower eyelid away from the eye which is a tell tale sign of a stroke or indeed as people have stated Bells Palsy.

Could you show us photos of McCartney that illustrate this?

[thewalrus1966]

Close up of Paul's eye. Please enlarge by clicking.

If you look at his left eye (right eye as we look at the picture) the lower eyelid where I have marked in red is actually touching the eye. Upper and lower eyelids do this for a number of reasons, to keep dirt out and so that when you shut your eyes and blink they act like a windscreen wiper and clean the eye with the use of naturally produced fluid.
Now look at Paul's right eye (left eye as we look) and you will see where I have marked in red that the lower eyelid has come away from the eye and a shadow has been cast behind it between the eyelid and the eye. This is not a natural phenomenon and is caused when the muscles in the cheek below collapse and the eyelid muscle collapses too and pulls it away from the eye, usually due to stroke or Bells Palsy.
If this is not surgically corrected that part of the eye will become damaged and possibly infected when dirt and debris get trapped between the lid and eye. Later pictures show that the eyelid has been corrected and there is no longer a gap.
There is clear evidence of the whole side of Paul's face at that side having surgery in the eye, the cheek, the lower jaw and lip, the upper lip and the area between the cheek and the nose.
 

[NothingIsReal1985]

Oct 1, 2013 17:28:02 GMT -5 thewalrus1966 said:

Judging by the examination of the pictures I have done thus far in regard to the ears, well to be honest I'm a bit perplexed by that because i'm currently examining pictures from 62/63 where some of the Beatles seem to be sporting false ears. But I will work on it.

I have a bunch of pictures of the boys sporting false ears (which I'll post later on), which kinda ruined otherwise great photos that these fellas took. It looks as though all of them wore false ears except for John, it looks to me like. 

[NothingIsReal1985]

Oct 1, 2013 18:22:25 GMT -5 linus said:

Jean-Marie Perier also took the photos of them in 1964 where Paul lights his lighter with his right hand.

I often light lighters w/ my left hand (although I'm right-handed). I although use my left hand to brush my teeth, something I've been at for 5.5 years now. Both felt odd at first, but I got the hang of it. I first began learning & practicing using my left hand (for writing and many other things) back in the 8th grade 14 years ago. So it's not like my less dominant hand just limply and idly hangs to my side, useless. So it's safe to say that I'm ambidextrous.

So I can understand how Faul (who's actually right-handed) had to make the switch. On top of that I know of an actress -- January Jones from that horrible show Mad Men -- that's a lefty, but she used her right hand to light the same kind of lighter (to light a cigarette) you see The Beatles using above.

[thosefreakswasright]

Sorry but the stroke suggestion is a step too far for me. His age at the time, his relatively good health since and the fact that his whole left side would have been buffered. Also it would be in extremely bad taste for them to place all those clues. Not that it wasn't in bad taste if he died.

[linus]

Oct 4, 2013 12:45:15 GMT -5 NothingIsReal1985 said:

I often light lighters w/ my left hand (although I'm right-handed). So it's not like my less dominant hand just limply and idly hangs to my side, useless. So it's safe to say that I'm ambidextrous.

So I can understand how Faul (who's actually right-handed) had to make the switch.

This brings out the real point I try to make when showing images of 'Paul' using his right hand:
That PIDers extend certain courtesies to 'Paul', but hold a double-standard and do not extend the same courtesies post-66.
There has not been one instance that I'm aware of that shows any Paul using his right hand to write or play guitar - that wasn't flipped.
Be sure to look for things like, shirt buttons, lip scar, hair part, writing, pick guard, lower left eye, etc.

Often, when some see an image of, say, 'Faul' holding a pitch pipe in his right hand, they say, "See, this proves Paulie died!"
But when shown images of 'Paulie' batting, drinking, pouring, slicing cakes, lighitng lighters etc. etc. etc. right-handed, they say, "Oh, that's normal."

There is no evidence that any P/Faul is or was right-handed, per se. Although ambidextrous-ness seems to run through the entire McCartney career.