I remember sometime in the late '60s or early '70s John saying that he kept the charade going because there were 300 people in The Beatles' organization plus their families who had become dependent on it and would have starved if he didn't.
WOW, some of you sure know your business. Linus you made some very interesting observations about the piano. In his book "THE MACS MIKE McCartney's FAMILY ALBUMN" Copyright Peter Michael McCartney 1981, Paul's brother says (there are no pg.#'s in the book):
"Encouraged by father Joe, another of Dad's great loves was music, and after teaching himself chords on the second hand 'Nems' piano, given to the the Mac's during World War I, he formed the Masked Melody Makers (Mmm!)."
Father Joe would have been Paul's grandfather.
There was always a piano in their home and the book shows pics of Paul hammering away on a set of drums. So drums and piano wouldn't have been foreign to him.
Sorry if this has been posted before but I did a quick search on the forum and couldn't find it. This sounds like a woman with her head screwed on about PID. She sticks to what she knows.
Thank you. (Note the Lennon drawing image -- below -- is sometimes not displaying and I don't know why. I have re-added it.)
Hello all and respectfully!
1. Someone on Twitter was attempting to spoof Pid and my work, by using cLairekuehn and now is using ciarekuehn, which on Twitter, because it appears in Arial font, looks like CLARE.
My name is CLARE KUEHN.
2. In my strong opinion, Paul is dead, plus replaced. I heartily disagree that Paul died before Sept 11, 1966, or anytime in 1969 when the rumour hit the USA in a big way, but not when it started.
3. John was not replaced. (Yes I have worked hard to see/ not see all Beatles and Eppie replaced, just for sake of argmt but in my utterly strong opinion, only Paul is, and there's a massive case in support of that.) In no way was John replaced; the argument is from 3/4 photos, etc., as he lost weight and his inimitable responses in his body and heart remain.
Hi. I am honoured for the thread. Thank you very much, everyone.
Actually, my dear friend Jim Fetzer found this thread. (Dunno how.) And I joined in gratitude and to make a quality post about my work in the Beatles issues (incl. John's death) early into the thread.
For a full overview of the case, go to all items at the Facebook link given in the Tweet here & consider the argument generalities in the comment at the Facebook link:
The interviews with most substance, besides the summary at spreaker.com listed among many things in that link above, are at:
You can go to any of these links on that archive & search my name in the field at the top left, so that you can hear these other shows and my other topics, as well.
(To hear the actual interviews, click on the box at the top of the blog that reads "The Real Deal with Jim Fetzer podcast" at the links above. - edit by B)
-- Actually, B, to hear the interviews, click the green name of the show's guest (for any of his shows), or right-click that green name to save & listen on your own player, which is best (since the slider if you only click the green name, is less sensitive). -- Edit by Clare
Here, below, is a copy of John's drawing of Paul dead.
It is no doodle (though it is simple). There are multiple forensically accurate things about the head and ankle injuries and it was done privately, not when given to the collector, who didn't know what it was.
Note the gap on the figure's left side, pulling up the left eye (our right side in view). This has to be injury, serious injury. In that line of reasoning, the man is dead or nearly so.
The zig-zag above the face, at the top, is therefore the top of a broken head (done as though eggshell top), and the zig-zag is therefore not the bottom of a dark hat.
More info below the drawing ...
He snuck it out to us: it was a private drawing, is blunt-trauma forensically accurate, though simplified. He must have done it to exorcise the vision and memorialize the funeral (shovel, dirt), etc.
As one item in many, this is strong evidence of personal knowledge of a death. Its details are supportive of direct knowledge. But it is also atypical for the artist (John). It is not "the proof" -- it is part of the total, but the most personal, poignant statement of them all, if seen within the case for PID.
In reply to someone on Youtube, a supporter of my work in general posted this, where the detractor had stated John was self-absorbed and surreal and that explains everything:
"I never said the drawing is overall accurate; I said it conveys features accurately for certain types of head and body impact. - As to "me me me" [for John Lennon's own character], it's irrelevant for this issue. The types of wounds and areas match all other Paul-related clue references in detail and sense, as well as being even more detailed in where damage shifted for bones in the head, which is, as I said, accurate. For example, frontal bones (forehead bones) are one strong bone, behind the eyes and crossing the upper nose (bridge). If shifted, indeed an indent and the beginning of a shift would become noticeable at the nose bridge (as in the drawing), shift or pop the eyes out, and cut or split the temple and the ear would likely be affected by temporal bone (side circular bone) shift as well; temple and ear on left are split and hanging with gore or ear flap. -- Not imaginary but yes, a concept in the mind as everything in life is when argued. It's called inductive (as opposed to pre-set, deductive math reasoning). -- Open your mind and learn more about the drawing and its relation to very specific items in the clues references, repeated over many years. The eyes are shown in that configuration (right bulging, left crushed or smaller and overall dislocated), in 4 items. You should be more careful and less on one side before deciding. The case overall is extensive and the drawing is a wonderful lynchpin as well. -- Surrealism is one claim someone (you) can make; but the interrelatedness of this drawing and its sadness, carefulness in injury areas and specific additions it makes to the clues are striking, too. As such, it is in the PID argument. Saying something would normally be "surreal" is merely putting down the idea. You handle no details; I do. As to the idea it might be surreal, think of this, as well: his other drawings are usually far less representative, do not deal with gore and when more accurate are friendly and hopeful. Hm."
It shows the body from above (blood spilling out), but also representing the digging of the grave after death, with a comforting God and flower or magic mushroom for dreaming/ visions. He snuck this out to an unsuspecting collector who asked for the album itself and a signature (which John did on the front). - The bone movements are surprisingly accurately represented, if he'd never seen a smashed head. The frontal bone's (forehead's) dislocation through the mid-eyes and noticeable irst at upper nose bridge, as well as cutting the temple region, and the parietal bone's (top side of head) hanging open, are the main accuracies; however, the flat jagged top edge is also evocative of frontal bone behaviour. The shoes (Beatle boot style) are dissheveled, ankles broken (common in impact on street or in vehicle). The bruised, partly dislocated eyes are also carefully drawn. -- The discussion is on my blog (link above).
(Note to PIDers: Note my avatar here. I made it! Heart eyes, fake ears, glasses which look like skull, Beatles haircut, sewn mouth, kind of Beatles suit. )
And interview regarding sources on and what's known about John Lennon's death (hour 1, with another interviewee on same topic in hour 2):
radiofetzer.blogspot.ca/2012/12/clare-keuhn-total-info.html (Note: other interviewee is great but misunderstood my point re. elevator man/ repairman. I suggested he, who was first suspected by police, could have been an unidentified hitman, passing John and spinning back to shoot him, with Perdomo the outside doorman -- who seems to have been the same Jose Perdomo as the head of the CIA Anti-Castro Bay of Pigs Operation 40 assassination squad -- as backup behind him. The other interviewee thought I meant the elevator man/ repair man shot toward the front, but as he and I know that is not tenable, from reports of the blood and risk to Perdomo. ----- Also note: Salvador Astuccia, whose site is now down, also scanned the reports he got when he contacted NYPD to get the two reporting officers' notes and for those he was refused each time; he also scanned his request for the crime scene photographs, but those were marked "NOT FOUND".)
It doesn't take the shill one sentence to frame the parameters of investigation into Paul McCartney's death to 1966. It turns the stomach that people like this exist.
I actually watched a few Fetzer vids early in my own investigation, which put me on to a talk by someone called Kallestrom. It was after watching that I realised that there are going to be plenty of sick fucks making a masturbatory career out disinforming the public about what happened to The Beatles.
it's unfortunate that clare kuehn has put her faith in fetzer - check out his promotion of crazy lady judyth baker and her ludicrous claim of being lee oswald's girlfriend in '63. the education forum has over two hundred pages dealing with her and the unmistakable conclusion was she and fetzer were running a game