clarekuehn
Hard Day's Night
Yes he died. Yes 1 man replaced him. Yes that was it. Yes wasn't so well done. Yes big implications.
Posts: 46
|
Post by clarekuehn on Jul 28, 2014 0:02:40 GMT -5
I just feel like saying that though it's a bit macabre, I am proud of my little creepy, but friendly, dead Paul avatar. I think he's laughing in Heaven.
|
|
clarekuehn
Hard Day's Night
Yes he died. Yes 1 man replaced him. Yes that was it. Yes wasn't so well done. Yes big implications.
Posts: 46
|
Post by clarekuehn on Aug 22, 2014 0:14:23 GMT -5
I will be on Dr Jim Fetzer's broadcast again, on Sept 8, to talk of Paul's death, in time for the 48th anniversary on the 11th. The 11th itself was already booked for the 2001 fraud. www.revereradionetwork.com 6-8 pm EST, Sept 8. Archives will be available a few weeks later at www.radiofetzer.blogspot.com
|
|
|
Post by B on Aug 28, 2014 15:09:49 GMT -5
In a now-deleted post, NothingIsReal1985 wrote: "...excuse me if I deviate this discussion from Paul (or the rest of The Beatles/Featles) -- for a minute... but the subject is still yet the same..." As a moderator, I will excuse it this time, in as much as NothingIsReal1985 is making the point that, in her opinion, PID is part of a larger pattern, but I would prefer that if the discussion is about PID/PWR per se, that we not turn threads into the "Celebrity Flux" section of the board. In other words, if you want to say, "Well Paul was replaced, because - heck - that is what they do with everybody", you can say that, but then go into why you believe this was done or something. Tell us who does it, why they are doing it, what it accomplishes, and so on. I don't want long articles about other celebrities who have been replaced (with videos to prove it) to clutter discussions about why Paul himself may have been killed or replaced. Posters here are certainly welcome to point out that others may have suffered the same fate, but understand that pointing out the bodies at a murder scene doesn't solve the murder. I hope that you all understand my point. You are welcome to tie in everything but the kitchen sink to PID/PWR, but at least, tie it in. Thank you. your moderator
|
|
|
Post by NothingIsReal1985 on Aug 28, 2014 15:59:43 GMT -5
Well others have deviated this discussion from PID/PWR (as Cherilyn had to point out on more than one occasion)... why have you singled ME out to get back on the subject... why not all the others that are doing it? I see members post non-related, topic inappropriate subjects up here -- this thread included -- all the time... but you've never called THEM out on it. Well if it bothers you that much then I'll delete my post. This is the main reason why I lost interest & stopped coming over here months ago; people posting useless things that have NOTHING whatsoever to do with PID/PWR. I only dropped back in b/c a friend wanted me to b/c she didn't wanna be over here alone discussing... well, whatever it is that's being discussed. Moreover I was happy to share the things that I've learned over the past year concerning the replacement of not only Paul, but the rest of The Beatles. I would just like to point out that Paul WAS NOT the only Beatle/celebrity that's been replaced... countless others have been long before and after him; there's a certain pattern to lives and disappearance (and covert impostor-replacement) of public figures, both small and great, and I don't beleive it will ever changed. But then again, what do I know? Another subject for another time and place. Excuse me for being brusque, but I'm a bit angry that I'm feeling picked on at the moment up and outta the blue. As for the 'Celebrity Flux' section of this forum? No offense, but -- as interesting as some of that stuff is over there -- hardly anything (new) gets posted over there, so I hear crickets chirping every time I go over there, so I decided to post an off-topic subject in a "happening" place. If Paul had disappeared and was replaced -- for the sake of the thread I'll only mention Paul -- then it is VERY unlikely that he's still alive. The monster(s) that have pretended to be/impersonated him over the years have looked less and less like him as time went by. Moreover Paul -- and his early doubles/multiples -- would have been way past their sell-by date (as NO one in the entertainment industry lives past the age of 30, whether before or after fame), as the programming of a mind-control victim breaks down around that time... but if not it's some sort of ritual or routine to get rid of that individual for some reason or another. {I use the entertainment industry because it interests me the most, and that's what Paul happened to be a part of.}
|
|
|
Post by B on Aug 28, 2014 16:22:48 GMT -5
Nothing personal, NothingIsReal1985. I meant that for everyone. Don't delete your post. (She did.)I try to keep my moderating to a minimum, but sometimes I have to let people know that I still am around.
|
|
|
Post by NothingIsReal1985 on Aug 28, 2014 16:29:51 GMT -5
That's okay... I can deal. It's a good thing when mods/admins are paying attention to what's going on in forums/message boards. At my own forum when I post stuff making a point about the patterns ad disappearance/impostor-replacement of other stars/celebrities I then cut/copy/paste my post to the appropriate thread I've created (I then delete that post from the current thread). That way the topic/thread doesn't get weighed down or cluttered. Besides, my friend mentioned that she likes it better this way. As for my post... I've moved & re-posted it over here at the appropriate section and thread. It was just too juicy to delete altogether. Now back to the PID/PWR subject at hand... Some time ago when I went over to Tina Foster's blog, PlasticMacca I decided to go back to the beginning to find as much out about this impostor-replacement business as I could. I also enjoyed reading the comments below her posts because they were either funny or informative. (It's just too bad she doesn't own that PID Hoopla forum anymore b/c the mods/admins over there are as nasty as can be, so I couldn't say what I wanted to say about this subject.) Ironically, finding out that John Lennon was replaced is what got me into this whole PID/PWR stuff in the first place, mainly b/c I was quite relieved that John (and Paul, too) wasn't guilty of all that horrible stuff that the Fohns [and Fauls] were up to, including getting hooked up w/ Foko Fono & Finda Feastman... good GRIEF! {Sorry, but those 'females' were not only mind-controlled impostresses who replaced the original women, but down and outright HURT/UGLY!} On top of that I now know that The Beatles didn't just loose their looks -- as well as their talent, good music, clean-cut image, chemistry, happy, cheeky, witty, carefree, charismatic personalities and sense of humor -- outta the blue... they were repla-CIA-ed, plain and simple! NO ONE changes that much overnight for seemingly no good reason... it just doesn't make much sense, PERIOD.
|
|
clarekuehn
Hard Day's Night
Yes he died. Yes 1 man replaced him. Yes that was it. Yes wasn't so well done. Yes big implications.
Posts: 46
|
Post by clarekuehn on Aug 30, 2014 0:52:23 GMT -5
John was not replaced. Not only do photos match consistently, but yes, he mellowed while keeping his utter buoyancy bursting out. He also was strung out on heroin, bulimia, stress. But when he bursts, it's the same.
Goodness gracious.
& It wasn't overnight.
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Sept 2, 2014 17:10:21 GMT -5
I'm sorry Clare, but we do not agree with you and it is quite obvious that John who was SO attractive and always smiling in that cheeky, inimitable way that he could not turn into a sourpuss who was unattractive and also with changes in many other ways that I won't go into now.
Watch John (and the others) in "A Hard Day's Night" and there is no comparison with the people on the cover of Sgt Pepper.
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Sept 2, 2014 19:17:31 GMT -5
I'm sorry Clare, but we do not agree with you and it is quite obvious that John who was SO attractive and always smiling in that cheeky, inimitable way that he could not turn into a sourpuss who was unattractive and also with changes in many other ways that I won't go into now. Watch John (and the others) in "A Hard Day's Night" and there is no comparison with the people on the cover of Sgt Pepper. Yes I have to speak up again and say John (and ALL the Beatles) were replaced. George was replaced at least twice after 1966. Look at George during his "All Things Must Pass" phase and his "Traveling Wilburies" phase. His voice and head were dramatically different. Same with John.
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Sept 3, 2014 16:18:00 GMT -5
Thankyou hotman637, EVERYTHING changed after the end of 1966. The focus has been put on Paul/Faul/Bill to divert attention from the others.
Any real fan of John would be able to spot it is not him after 1966. Yes and George and Ringo.
The first place to look is the "Strawberry Fields Forever/Hello,Goodbye" promo films (not called videos back then).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2014 22:52:06 GMT -5
Thankyou hotman637, EVERYTHING changed after the end of 1966. The focus has been put on Paul/Faul/Bill to divert attention from the others. Any real fan of John would be able to spot it is not him after 1966. Yes and George and Ringo. The first place to look is the "Strawberry Fields Forever/Hello,Goodbye" promo films (not called videos back then). lol
|
|
|
Post by because on Sept 5, 2014 21:49:42 GMT -5
I'm not sure about the replacement of all members of the band. I know someone whose cousin was a huge Harrison fan.. in fact, when George died, Louise - George's sister called the man to let him know of George's passing. So I truly doubt George was replaced. I think John was assassinated because he was going to talk. His looks changed post 1966 but his inward self (his personality) .remained John to the end. It was hard to believe he fell for Yoko but he did. Ringo - he seems to be Ringo until today. I do think they used doubles. But what strikes me the most is the intensity of the grief the remaining band members experienced - it is heartbreaking when you finally see it. I always thought John went a little crazy after the Beatles disbanded - the loss of Paul is a legitimate explanation...
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Sept 8, 2014 10:50:13 GMT -5
I'm not sure about the replacement of all members of the band. I know someone whose cousin was a huge Harrison fan.. in fact, when George died, Louise - George's sister called the man to let him know of George's passing. So I truly doubt George was replaced. I think John was assassinated because he was going to talk. His looks changed post 1966 but his inward self (his personality) .remained John to the end. It was hard to believe he fell for Yoko but he did. Ringo - he seems to be Ringo until today. I do think they used doubles. But what strikes me the most is the intensity of the grief the remaining band members experienced - it is heartbreaking when you finally see it. I always thought John went a little crazy after the Beatles disbanded - the loss of Paul is a legitimate explanation... Take at look at videos of the song "While My Guitar Gently Weeps" in 1971 AND 1987. In both videos they have Ringo, George and Eric Clapton. But if you look closely you will see that the Ringo, George and Eric in the 1971 are TOTALLY DIFFERENT PEOPLE then the "Ringo", "George" and "Eric" in 1987! Their musical STYLE and VOICES and LOOKS are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT in just about every way! Also check out "Paul is Dead Miss Him Miss Him" forum. There is a thread about the "The Beatles" vs. the "Beatles" with all sorts of comparison pictures. Mommybird (who actually saw the fake John Lennon in a New York elevator) did some FANTASTC research and great posts on that forum.
|
|
|
Post by NothingIsReal1985 on Sept 9, 2014 15:40:40 GMT -5
If anything, this collage proves that there were various males sharing the identity of "John Lennon" over the years (until the brand was officially brought to a close in 1980), even before John Lennon hisself was replaced some time in the mid-1960's. Now there's PLENTY more where these come from... in a nutshell, I have many more images proving that both John AND the Fohns had doubles/multiples.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2014 18:45:18 GMT -5
If anything, this collage proves that there were various males sharing the identity of "John Lennon" over the years (until the brand was officially brought to a close in 1980), even before John Lennon hisself was replaced some time in the mid-1960's. Now there's PLENTY more where these come from... in a nutshell, I have many more images proving that both John AND the Fohns had doubles/multiples. hello? hello?
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Sept 21, 2014 14:02:55 GMT -5
I'm getting tired of reading something that is PID or Beatles replacement and finding God is a woman, man or "it". Really? I'm so over that and tired of having to read it everywhere and it's not relevant to the PID/PWR or Beatles.
I'm tired of threads plagued with that annoying "Imagine" logo...seriously, over kill.
I've been a part of this forum for almost as long as the moderators, and I'm tired of trying to read about one subject and continually finding these annoying things in the midst of the materials presented.
At first, which is about 10 years of realizing PID/PWR and at first I thought it was just Paul that had been replaced. But when people were showing posts of pics of the Beatles in the mid 60's and then later, as well as pre fame pics, not only did Paul look different, but it came to question John.
He had a straight nose,and then you see one with a slightly turned town tip of nose, and then the latter time one I call "beakman". There are pics of a nose that looks like a beak. Sorry, but that's not the same John of the mop top portion of the Beatles.
Maybe it was intentional from the start, that is, when they were in Hamburg, that they would have several sets of "Beatles".
I recall hearing stories that during their hey day and touring that they used "doubles" as decoys from the fans who mobbed them, so the "real ones" could travel and get away to the next town without being mobbed.
Well, if they used the doubles for that purpose, it could be said that they could have been used onstage, as their concerts were not quality performances as the crowds screamed louder than the music they performed.
There is clear evidence, throughout that touring period with filmed interviews that doubles had been used, especially during their 66 tour. That has been shown, not only did Paul look different, but the straight nose Lennon was used more than the turned down nose for a time. Then about the time of Sgt Pepper, the beak man appeared.
But in MMT, you can see they used a couple of them in the Fool on the Hill, and even I Am The Walrus. Both Paul and John were switched during the filming. So when the editors put the pieces together, you had some with one Faul and other moments the other Faul....
|
|
|
Post by NothingIsReal1985 on Sept 21, 2014 19:26:10 GMT -5
I'm getting tired of reading something that is PID or Beatles replacement and finding God is a woman, man or "it". Really? I'm so over that and tired of having to read it everywhere and it's not relevant to the PID/PWR or Beatles. I'm tired of threads plagued with that annoying "Imagine" logo...seriously, over kill. I've been a part of this forum for almost as long as the moderators, and I'm tired of trying to read about one subject and continually finding these annoying things in the midst of the materials presented. I'm with you about all of this off-topic mess that keeps appearing up here. To those of you who keep doing this: are you serious about this whole business of PWR/PID or BWR/BAD (The Beatles were replaced/are dead/deceased) or not? If you wanna post all of this weird, mundane, random stuff -- that no one neither understands NOR cares about -- then I suggest that you get your OWN blog or message board(s) for it. Otherwise it's pointless wasting your time coming over here. [But then I was targeted -- and chewed out -- by the moderators for being on-topic about CIA-lebrties and repla-CIA-ments, but deviating the subject slightly to give examples of other celebrities being victims of impostor-replacement simply because it was too unpleasant to find out that Paul McCartney was NOT the only one to get taken out of the game and replaced with these horrendous Faul characters... it was not only ironic, but unfair. But for some reason a few others get by with constantly post images with Imagine, rain boots and sneakers, along with commentary spreading false doctrine about New Age, feminist, pagan religions (e.g., nonsense about God being a woman/female and Satan being male). I'm gonna say this and be done with it, once and for all... and this is for those of you who keep spreading this manure of "God is a female, Satan/the Devil is a male". I believe the Bible -- the King James Version specifically, as it's the closest to the original scripts it was translated from back in 1611 by the scholars of King James of England -- the be the ultimate source of truth. (Thus I do NOT see anything anywhere in the Word about God being a "she"/female.) This same Bible refers to both God AND the Devil with the masculine pronouns of "he". If God was a female, then the sex/gender roles as spelled out in the Scriptures AND biologically would actually be opposite/switched/reversed, it's that simple. Although God/Jesus/the Holy Spirit (there is only ONE God, but with three important roles, as I myself have three familial roles of the daughter, sister and aunt, so don't think of the trinity of God being three separate persons) is a male, He -- in a way -- embodies feminine qualities, which was why God put Adam under anesthesia and surgically took out his rib [which means 'supporting beam' in Hebrew] and created Eve, a help-meet/mate for Adam [created first, then Eve was made second from the rib of Adam]. So this business about God being a female/woman is New Age doctrine that someone cooked/made up, and is totally contrary to the Word of God. Moreover this mess of God being a "she" is nothing more than a pagan and feminist concept, because many pagan religions worship the female. (Nothing against girls, women and females, as I'm one myself.) We also see this same stinking hot mess -- the worship of the female/woman and feminism, which has been the rot of our Western, English-speaking society -- being carried out in within politics, religion, literature, so-called "art", the entertainment industry, and the mainstream mass media [television, radio, newspapers, magazines, the Internet, and other media outlets not mentioned], and it's not only warping the minds and hearts of today's females, it's going the eventually bring our civilization to ruin. I'm all for building up females, but NOT at the expense of the men, who have different -- yet equally-important -- roles in this world. It's pretty ridiculous how these flesh-and-blood 'women' have been put on this pedestal with goddess-like status -- especially so-called 'beautiful' women, many who are not only NOT feminine NOR attractive, but constantly compete with men, are bitter, unfulfilled and have this flip, smart-Aleck, snappy, knee-jerk, feminazi "ANYTHING-men-and-boys-can-do-I-can-do-too-but-WAY/FAR-better" attitude -- when they're only human (and have the very same faculties and bodily functions) and a mere hunk of flesh, just like the rest of mankind. Only God is worthy of that kind of worship and adoration, and according to His Word He will NEVER share His glory -- and crown of deity -- with ANYONE else.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2014 19:39:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by NothingIsReal1985 on Sept 21, 2014 19:50:26 GMT -5
At first, which is about 10 years of realizing PID/PWR and at first I thought it was just Paul that had been replaced. But when people were showing posts of pics of the Beatles in the mid 60's and then later, as well as pre fame pics, not only did Paul look different, but it came to question John. He had a straight nose,and then you see one with a slightly turned town tip of nose, and then the latter time one I call "beakman". There are pics of a nose that looks like a beak. Sorry, but that's not the same John of the mop top portion of the Beatles. Maybe it was intentional from the start, that is, when they were in Hamburg, that they would have several sets of "Beatles". I recall hearing stories that during their hey day and touring that they used "doubles" as decoys from the fans who mobbed them, so the "real ones" could travel and get away to the next town without being mobbed. Well, if they used the doubles for that purpose, it could be said that they could have been used onstage, as their concerts were not quality performances as the crowds screamed louder than the music they performed. There is clear evidence, throughout that touring period with filmed interviews that doubles had been used, especially during their 66 tour. That has been shown, not only did Paul look different, but the straight nose Lennon was used more than the turned down nose for a time. Then about the time of Sgt Pepper, the beak man appeared. But in MMT, you can see they used a couple of them in the Fool on the Hill, and even I Am The Walrus. Both Paul and John were switched during the filming. So when the editors put the pieces together, you had some with one Faul and other moments the other Faul... Not to pick on those of you who disagree about John Lennon -- as well as the rest of The Beatles -- or anything, but it's high time you all accepted that our beloved Beatles left us by the end of the mid-'60s (specifically through ritual sacrifice/murder) and were replaced with these horrendous impostors. I'm not worried because I know that these guys are now happy and in a better place (heaven), where the people who caused them misery for much of their lives can no longer get to and hurt or harm them. I hope to join -- and meet -- them on the other side someday. The thought of this makes not only makes my heart swell with joy, but it makes me sleep that much better at night. I also know that God will handle the people who murdered them in cold blood someday. It was actually finding out (a year ago) that John was replaced that has lead me to not only discovering -- and accepting -- that Paul was also repla-CIA-ed, but as time went on I found out that ALL of The Beatles were knocked off and replaced by late 1966. Since John was -- and still is -- my favorite Beatle, I was beyond relieved when I found out that he was NOT guilty of all of the bad stuff that the Fohn Fennon impostors were guilty of. On top of that he DID NOT lose his looks, but it turns out that it was Fohn Fennons -- who took the place of the original John Lennon and his early doubles -- who were the unattractive ones. After I got to know "Yoko"/Foko I couldn't stand her and after finding out the truth about her and the role she played in "John's" life. But I'm sure glad that it wasn't John that married that THING. The truth is right before people's eyes (as a picture is worth a thousand words) but people still insist on believing the lies that they've been told for ages about The Beatles, without bothering to question -- as well as do research to look into -- the nonsense they've been fed over the years. As people are NOT in the business of changing -- as their personal traits/characteristics are a part of who they are as an individual -- I think that it's pretty sad that people just blindly believe that John just up and left his beautiful wife and son for an ugly, unfeminine 'female' of another race/nationality [nothing against that, but at the time it was looked down upon], an avant-garde artist who was the daughter of a war criminal and related to a prominent, elite Japanese banker. My gut told me that something just wasn't right about this mess -- "John"/Fohn merely hooking up with "Yoko"/Foko outta the blue -- until I eventually found out what the truth was, which makes PERFECT sense now. Many also blindly believe that John Lennon had an eating disorder, suddenly looking different and much older, losing all that weight, his good looks, toned, curvaceous, fit figure, and witty humor, in addition to his happy, loving, caring, attentive (to his wife, son and band-mates), friendly, clean-cut, well-dressed, stylish, charismatic, family-man persona. The personality, countenance and disposition -- on top of the energy profile, or auras/vibes -- of the John Lennon brand also changed overnight from happy, charming and friendly to bitter, mean and obnoxious. I've seen pictures of the original Yoko Ono, and I must say that I liked her; she was pretty (looked like her dad Eusike Ono, but not necessarily a raving beauty), feminine, sweet, delicate, well-dressed and seemed happy and relaxed. She was also married to another Japanese man [Toshi Ichiyanagi] in 1956, who she'd eventually got a "divorce" from and left him for a Jewish man Tony Cox [November 28, 1962]. But I believe she, too became a victim of impostor-replacement before this "artist" Foko Fono(s) emerged and hooked up with (the) Fohn(s), courtesy of the Tavistock Institute, military intelligence and/or the Illuminati. The divorce story -- in regards to Yoko Ono -- never made ANY kind of doggone sense to me, and I have a strong feeling that the reason that there was a "divorce" was because Yoko had been killed and repla-CIA-ed with an a more sinister, less attractive and classy impostress, so therefore she wasn't compatible with the original Yoko's [Japanese] husband. (I believe that he, too was sacrificed along with the original Yoko because he's never heard from again, either.) I'm not sure exactly when Yoko was repla-CIA-ed, but it happened at some point in time before the Foko Fonos were put with the Fohn Fennons.
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Sept 22, 2014 12:17:48 GMT -5
NothingIsRea1985, I am the one "spreading the manure" of God is woman! If you read ALL my posts you will see I have explained it over and over so I will not explain it again (at least for now, lol). Instead I will point out some of your inaccurate statements. First of all God being a woman is NOT a "new age" idea. It has been around since the beginning of time. The FACT is the oldest religions (Paganism and Hindism) have MANY Gods that are both male and female. It is a VERY recent idea that there was only ONE God and he was male and that idea came from the Bible. AND the interesting fact is that NO WHERE in the Old Testament is God called "God the Father". As it says in Numbers 23:19 "God is not a man that has to lie or a son of man that has to repent". I like your statement that "only God is worthy of that kind of worship and adoration", because that is exactly true about a woman! God is a woman because ONLY a woman can run the universe and ONLY woman should be worshiped. People who treat woman like trash (like Iraq and Afghanistan) are living in HELL! Heaven is run by a woman and Hell is run by men. If men just did what woman said the universe would work fine.
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Sept 22, 2014 14:44:36 GMT -5
LOVELYRITA, here are SOME of the reasons "God is a woman" is relevant to PID/PWR. #1 As I have explaned 9/11,PID and the JFK are all connected. The connection is they were ALL perpetuated by a goddess (Isis, Shakti and Durga). #2 MacFake has often been said to be a man AND a woman, so which is it? In other words gender issues are important. #3 MacFakes career has become stale and tedius. I think he should get into a new genre and do the NEW country song "God is a woman (and the Devil is a man)". He will make a million. #4 People will be confused until they understand God is woman and the Devil is a man.
|
|
|
Post by B on Sept 22, 2014 15:01:30 GMT -5
hotman637 wrote: I think he should get into a new genre and do the NEW country song "God is a woman (and the Devil is a man)". He will make a million.hymmmm... I never thought to ask her what the letter "G" stood for Paul McCartney - Sally G - Lyrics www.youtube.com/watch?v=biG8O9yJOpo
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Sept 22, 2014 16:41:44 GMT -5
hotman637 wrote: I think he should get into a new genre and do the NEW country song "God is a woman (and the Devil is a man)". He will make a million.hymmmm... I never thought to ask her what the letter "G" stood for Paul McCartney - Sally G - Lyrics www.youtube.com/watch?v=biG8O9yJOpo Hey that song is DAM GOOD! I never heard it before. "Mother Nature's Son" is also good. As I say he should "go country" and do "God is a Woman(and the Devil is a Man)". That should be the title of the album and he can do a number of songs explaining the whole PID thing. The universe is a country song and MacFake should cash in on it.
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Sept 24, 2014 19:10:40 GMT -5
New age movement has been something since the 1970's, which isn't "new" but re-visiting the goddess worship of the ancient times. Those who practice those beliefs call it new age, as well as those who were in the new age movement and became Christians. In ages past, Constantine took the ancient goddess worship that was in Rome, who took it from the Greeks, who took their beliefs from the mid eastern cultures that called them by other names as Asherah, Ishtar, Semiramis, (Pardon my spellings, I'm not up on ancient goddess spellings) You can research the subject yourself, and I'm basing briefly from a former Illuminati witch who put together a dvd on Which Queen of Heaven is Mary? He compared Roman Catholicism to ancient goddess worship and the names were changed, but the icons are the same.
But don't use the Bible and the God of the Bible and say it's a woman and the devil is a man. That is unscriptural. If you want to talk about a goddess, then just say goddess, don't mix the two.
I haven't followed the babblings of Faul Mc Cartney, as the very sight of him makes me sick to my stomach, and I pay no mind to his music or watch his performances. He's not Paul and I'm sick of him continuing this masquerade and ruining what's left of the global image of Paul Mc Cartney being this withered old fool on the hill. These younger generations have this idea of Paul Mc Cartney as an old fart. It's quite tragic.
|
|
|
Post by roscoe on Oct 6, 2014 2:24:45 GMT -5
John was not replaced. Not only do photos match consistently, but yes, he mellowed while keeping his utter buoyancy bursting out. He also was strung out on heroin, bulimia, stress. But when he bursts, it's the same. Goodness gracious. & It wasn't overnight. His mind was replaced. He went from smoking drinking pub brawler to Give peace a chance. He wrote TOMORROW NEVER KNOWS after his third LSD trip in January 1966. This track was the first to be recorded for the Revolver Album in April 1966 at Abbey Road 3. The title was taken from The Tibetan book of the Dead. The original title of the album REVOLVER was to have been ABRACADADABRA. "That's the first record with backwards music on it; before Hendrix, before The Who, before any f**ker."JOHN LENNON SPEAKING ABOUT REVOLVER. Actually it was on the recording for RAIN which (along with Paperback Writer) was done in the same session as the Revolver tracks but never made it onto the album. Notice how the image of John has Joan of Arc sitting on his ear (the only one shaded in). She heard voices too.
|
|