|
|
Post by whammo on Sept 29, 2014 8:32:50 GMT -5
I suppose everyone here is familiar with Lady Mucca's interview where she says the fans could never handle the truth about Paul. Simple question, assuming she speaks the truth, what do you believe that secret is?
|
|
|
|
Post by delysid on Sept 29, 2014 9:14:02 GMT -5
I think, given Mucca's fabled knowledge of The Beatles' history and catalogue (She didn't know 'Get Back' was them, for example), that she had discovered that there'd been some domestic violence in the past (not news but you did have to look for it) and this was the shockorama of the century to her (because she knew she deserved more than a slap herself  ) |
|
|
|
Post by delysid on Sept 29, 2014 9:16:24 GMT -5
But more than that, given that she has remarkably shut her gob since she got a payoff of £24m, it could be she was just hot diggity-diggin'. Is there ANYBODY, even the most sympathetic to her who would deny her the plaudit of 'Top Hostile Gold-Digga of the Century'? No wonder Macca likes Kanye She weren't complainin' bout no broke n*gga |
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Sept 29, 2014 10:25:27 GMT -5
So. it's not infidelity.
Evidently not physical abuse (at least from her cryptic description).
If it's something made up - why not just call her bluff?
Possible - 'hey everybody, it's not the Paul everyone thinks is Paul'.
|
|
|
|
Post by whammo on Sept 29, 2014 15:03:37 GMT -5
But more than that, given that she has remarkably shut her gob since she got a payoff of £24m, it could be she was just hot diggity-diggin'. Is there ANYBODY, even the most sympathetic to her who would deny her the plaudit of 'Top Hostile Gold-Digga of the Century'? No wonder Macca likes Kanye She weren't complainin' bout no broke n*gga Well one could argue then that the bigger the payoff, the bigger the secret. Signing a NDA must have been part of their deal. Now what's this about Paul & spousal abuse? Is this something Francie spread about? I used to see her in rec.music.beatles a lot, that woman was full of venom. That doesn't make it a lie though... |
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Sept 29, 2014 15:30:39 GMT -5
So. it's not infidelity. Evidently not physical abuse (at least from her cryptic description). If it's something made up - why not just call her bluff? Possible - 'hey everybody, it's not the Paul everyone thinks is Paul'. Verse #5 from my poem applies: There was a bitter divorce because their marriage was a sham because God is a woman and the Devil is a man. |
|
|
|
Post by delysid on Sept 29, 2014 20:06:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by delysid on Sept 29, 2014 20:17:40 GMT -5
New here and I don't know what just happened to my reply which was longer and better than this but to answer you Whammo, Danny Fields, Linda's biographer and a personal friend from before her marriage came to stay with them while researching and interviewing for the book. According to a couple of Daily Mail or other tabloid outings on this, our boy became incensed at the time she was spending chatting and after her death it was revealed that he was in legal action to retrieve the tapes Fields had made. This was undoubtedly the terrible truth that Mucca discovered while rummaging through the drawers in the home office. In the tapes, it's said Linda tells of domestic violence, the subject of the mild shock-horror in the tabloid features you'll find in the Google (I might add them later) They were debunked somewhat on the way to syndicated overkill by Linda's true confidant, Chrissy Hynde, fellow New Yorker who said Linda was no shrinking violet and had also told her about such incidents in the context of her own acts of violence. Sounded pretty much like a SMASHING Christmas Day in most houses but it was the (pretty standard) legal action that sparked the interest (Fields could only claim joint copyright on the tapes in any event so he did need to return at least a copy and seek agreement for any use) In short it never came to much as a story but I'm sure Mucca was very interested in using it to support her notorious 'These are MY breasts!' attacked with a broken wine bottle allegations (which I hoped were TRUE  Of course, there's no saying what really happened as I can easily see any male slapping any female behind closed doors (and vice versa) but as Jonathon Ross famously put it 'That woman's such a liar it'll turn out she has two legs'. I don't think there's much chance the tapes revealed he was giving her black eyes as I think Linda would have ensured the Paul Is Dead rumours were fulfilled in response But certainly some kinda shit went down. Although not, perhaps, the much-desired Satanic mind-control rituals of the Paul is Genghis Khan massif. |
|
|
|
Post by paulmoran on Oct 2, 2014 15:19:27 GMT -5
I would like to believe she found out that Paul is Faul.
But more likely she discovered that 'he' is a Satanist into some sick s**t OR Heather realized Faul is a "F-to-M transsexual" ("he's got bigger tits than me").
Wouldn't it be funny if being Faul WASN'T the big secret but she discovered that later herself online or someone told her?
|
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Oct 15, 2014 20:59:04 GMT -5
I think the media made Heather look like a gold digger, and then tried to discredit her by making her look like an idiot, or crackpot, or whatever you want to call her. I think it was all staged to make her look bad, and if she did speak badly about Faul, nobody would take her seriously.
If people would think outside the box and opposite of what the press tells us. She most likely realized it's not the real Paul and wanted to spill the beans, but his handlers made her a mockery.
|
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Oct 15, 2014 21:02:07 GMT -5
So. it's not infidelity. Evidently not physical abuse (at least from her cryptic description). If it's something made up - why not just call her bluff? Possible - 'hey everybody, it's not the Paul everyone thinks is Paul'. Verse #5 from my poem applies: There was a bitter divorce because their marriage was a sham because God is a woman and the Devil is a man. Of course....the bricks of Babel have fallen upon thine head |
|
|
|
Post by astro4 on Feb 10, 2015 7:20:10 GMT -5
My opinion here is worth nothing. But, having said that, I don't reckon it was just about him saying to her, "Look, darling, I'm not quite who you think i am because fifty years ago..." Something utterly freaked her out, it wasn't about something that happened fifty years ago. I'm not in a hurry to believe he shape-shifted into a reptilian in front of her eyes. Sorry, only kidding. But I wonder if she may have experienced a duality about the man she married. One with green eyes, one with blue eyes, catch my drift?...................
Asked in 2007: “Knowing what you know now about Paul, would you have married him in the first place?” she firmly replied “Never.” There was, she added, ‘A lot of fear of the truth coming out from a certain party.’ Her ex-husband “had betrayed me immensely, I mean, beyond belief – and I don’t mean infidelity, or anything like that … If you pop me off, the truth will come out … People don’t want to know what the truth is, ’cause they could never, ever handle it; they would be too devastated. And that’s why I have stayed quiet. I married a legend and there’s a machine behind. I can’t really go into it, but, you know, you have to read between the lines…. I still love him and he's the father of my child. And, you know, there's things go on. Things are not what you see...” I have a box of evidence, and should anything happen to me it will come out… I found out that someone I had loved for a long time had betrayed me immensely, and I don’t mean infidelity or anything like that, like, beyond belief’ |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2015 11:04:46 GMT -5
"I have a box of evidence"
…….there’s a machine behind. I can’t really go into it, but, you know, you have to read between the lines….
lol  |
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Feb 21, 2015 9:10:18 GMT -5
Pandora's box....
that's what came to mind....when opened, imagine what's in there?
Regarding the "machine behind"....sounds like the Illuminati machine...some of us can read between the lines, but the masses are dumbed down and salute him as Sir Paul!
|
|
)
