Two 1966 Interviews, Two different Pauls

[silverbeatle]

Two different interviews within weeks of each other, two different Paul McCartneys.

Just LOOK and you'll see for yourself. This confirms to me that they had use of a Paul double for reasons that I'm not sure of yet.

The first one is right before the 1966 August US tour. 'Paul' here is a smaller Paul. If you compare him to John next to him he's got a pretty small head and his clothes also seem a bit oversized. The other 3 seem almost uncomfortable around him almost seem to be looking at him to make sure he doesn't fluff his lines and his hair looks like it could be a wig.
This Paul looks like a 'kid brother' version of Paul. It leads me to believe that this is one a Paul stand in and it looks very much like a young JOHNNY HALLIDAY (The ex-Paul McCartney home caretaker).

In the second video, it's the Beatles already in the US (August 22nd), and we can clearly see a normal sized Paul (cool shirt btw), next to Lennon, same sized head as John more or less with more of a natural speaking voice and in the end he mentions the farm he bought (Scotland). Compare the two and see. SMALL Paul and then the Paul we are accustomed to. I had to view it a few times to make sure my eyes weren't playing tricks on me.

youtu.be/8-ydua3F1Ik


youtu.be/NVxCsszqz5I

[maxedison]

Look at the 1964 "Mockers" interview also. This is another "Paul". I guess they thought that because of the poor quality
of video at the time no one would notice. Keep his hair long enough to cover the Eyebrows, and ears the difference in size of
head could be explained by camera angles. They did not consider the fact that Video technology would get better.
I call the Paul in your first video "The round faced Paul/Faul". The round faced Paul does look more like the 1964 paul but
his head is still rounder and smaller and his eyebrows are even and sraight instead of Round with one higher than the other. He
even looks younger in your first video than he does in the 1964 interview.

[LOVELYRITA]

Yeah, the first video looked more like Paul, but it did seem "off" to me as well. This guy has a more heart shaped face than even James Paul....

The second video looked like the longer faced Faul type...but I don't think it was the Strawberry Fields Faul....

I also noticed the Lennon sitting beside the Faul on the second video had a strange nose...not Lennon-ish...seemed straight.
The real Lennon had a nose that at the tip bent down just a bit, not like beak man, but it was not like the guy in the second video. IMHO.

[linus]

Nov 7, 2014 2:49:44 GMT -5 silverbeatle said:

...in the end he mentions the farm he bought (Scotland).

youtu.be/NVxCsszqz5I

The point of note is that in the August 22nd, 1966 interview, he states that he's "always wanted a farm."

[silverbeatle]

The real Paul, correct?

[LOVELYRITA]

Paul wanted a farm or Faul??? Jr. couldn't be taken away from the farm.

[maxedison]

The August 22 Paul with Yellow shirt may be who some call Mountain Man. He looks like he has a bigger Frame than the others.
No wonder people think I am crazy. They use "Paul" to do most of the talking and it seems that he is telling the same stories just like nothing is going on but it is obvious (If you actually look and pay attention)that they are different people.
Even in candid interviews the LADS seem as though they had been there from the very beginning even if they were replacements.
Maybe it is like the 007 thing that when you become 007 agent you become James Bond and give up your former identity.

[silverbeatle]

I found a pic from the first interview. Even though 'Paul' is blurry, you can see that this is a thin and frailer looking 'Paul' stand in.
beatlephotoblog.com/66-press-confrence