Post by maxedison on Dec 3, 2014 13:58:08 GMT -5
I like NIR and there are still people here who have good thoughts to share but the posts are few and farbetween. Most of the new posts are basically a running gag between a few members.
This is still a topic that requires attention and thought. That fact that something is up is obvious to me. The man in the video's from Kenya looks nothing like Paul McCartney yet even George Martin says the trip actually happened and that it is Paul in the video. No one has owned up to the fact that doubles were used in Photo ops, in interviews or videos. There are accounts of doubles used to veer fans away from the lads and OFFicial doubles were named for John, George and Ringo but not for Paul. This in itself is odd to me.
I have read some of the theories that have been posted on this Forum(along with a few others) but most seem like flights of fantasy(and I realise that truth can be stranger than fiction).
The obvious change was between 66 and 67. But there were different "Pauls" before that, so why the major change then. Why give another person Plastic surgery when there were already 3 or 4 guys playing the Paul part who looked more like Paul than in 67 and after? If the guy in the Kenya film was the intended Paul after 67 why would he need plastic surgery at all? He did look more like paul in the kenya film than he did after the supposed surgery.
Back to the reason for this thread. Is there a current forum that still has active members who are reputable? I am not meaning that the active members here are not reputable only that there are days or weeks before there is a new post.
This is still a topic that requires attention and thought. That fact that something is up is obvious to me. The man in the video's from Kenya looks nothing like Paul McCartney yet even George Martin says the trip actually happened and that it is Paul in the video. No one has owned up to the fact that doubles were used in Photo ops, in interviews or videos. There are accounts of doubles used to veer fans away from the lads and OFFicial doubles were named for John, George and Ringo but not for Paul. This in itself is odd to me.
I have read some of the theories that have been posted on this Forum(along with a few others) but most seem like flights of fantasy(and I realise that truth can be stranger than fiction).
The obvious change was between 66 and 67. But there were different "Pauls" before that, so why the major change then. Why give another person Plastic surgery when there were already 3 or 4 guys playing the Paul part who looked more like Paul than in 67 and after? If the guy in the Kenya film was the intended Paul after 67 why would he need plastic surgery at all? He did look more like paul in the kenya film than he did after the supposed surgery.
Back to the reason for this thread. Is there a current forum that still has active members who are reputable? I am not meaning that the active members here are not reputable only that there are days or weeks before there is a new post.