|
Feet
Apr 19, 2016 9:21:14 GMT -5
Post by chica on Apr 19, 2016 9:21:14 GMT -5
This has really got me puzzled. Sorry don't have a date on the vintage one with Martha. The one with Paul/Faul standing against the door frame was supposedly taken by Linda. Look at the feet of the one with Martha and the one with Paul/Faul sitting against the brick wall they look the same (very long), could it be because of the angle the one against the door frame the feet don't look as long? Attachments:
|
|
|
Feet
Jul 1, 2016 8:07:58 GMT -5
Post by brucefree on Jul 1, 2016 8:07:58 GMT -5
This has really got me puzzled. Sorry don't have a date on the vintage one with Martha. The one with Paul/Faul standing against the door frame was supposedly taken by Linda. Look at the feet of the one with Martha and the one with Paul/Faul sitting against the brick wall they look the same (very long), could it be because of the angle the one against the door frame the feet don't look as long? There is nothing to be puzzled about. Faul has deformed and large feet whilst Paul has normal feet as can be seen in some pictures. This forum has a bunch of them to compare: 60if.proboards.com/thread/1876/feet-comparisons-paul-faul
|
|
|
Feet
Aug 12, 2016 11:40:19 GMT -5
joseph likes this
Post by chica on Aug 12, 2016 11:40:19 GMT -5
This has really got me puzzled. Sorry don't have a date on the vintage one with Martha. The one with Paul/Faul standing against the door frame was supposedly taken by Linda. Look at the feet of the one with Martha and the one with Paul/Faul sitting against the brick wall they look the same (very long), could it be because of the angle the one against the door frame the feet don't look as long? There is nothing to be puzzled about. Faul has deformed and large feet whilst Paul has normal feet as can be seen in some pictures. This forum has a bunch of them to compare: 60if.proboards.com/thread/1876/feet-comparisons-paul-faulThanks for the link and I believe this is James Paul and not McFartney.
|
|