Post by timemuddies on Nov 17, 2016 12:49:06 GMT -5
Hi,
There is so much on the subject including the many ideas of people and fabrications of some for reasons unknown.
A lot of things can be explained away and counter-reasons provided to leave all still no closer to finding out the truth, one way or the other.
I would like to suggest a different approach which relies on opposite bias.
This could well show where the best evidence is to finally finding out the truth.
Is anyone else here on this forum interested in this approach?
What I'm Trying To Do
Prove that Paul wasn't replaced.
How I'm Trying To Do It
By following all clues/leads/evidence that he was replaced and seeing if they can be disproved or explained.
Why I'm Trying To Do It
To see if there is any truth to the dead/replaced theory.
What I'm Expecting The Outcome To Be
I'm expecting the outcome to end up casting more doubt on things overall and I expect it will show which angles are best to pursue for the truth.
What To Do After
Follow the most credible leads/evidence.
How Can Others Help
If anyone wants to bring things to my attention for research consideration the best way is to link me to where you found anything that caught your interest. You can also check this post here for the main areas I think should be investigated.
What If Others Are Certain He Died/Was Replaced
If you are certain and convinced find your best evidence and ask yourself this 'How credible is it? Can it be disputed?'
What If Others Are Certain He Is Alive/Was Never Replaced
If you are certain and convinced find your best evidence and let me know. Also, help me disprove all the dead/replaced clues/leads/evidence.
Clues
Leads
Evidence
I will keep adding to this post of mine.
I will try my best to keep an open mind but I know collectively, if both sides of opinion work together... we all will find the answer.
I have done some research myself so far and based on this, my own theory so far is as follows...
On Wednesday Sept 11 1966 in the early hours of the morning, the Beatles were in the studio at Abbey Road working on songs and a disagreement occured. Paul stepped out to cool off/get some fresh air (or he stormed off angry). He left the studio on foot and not long after was possibly crossing/stepping out into the road and was hit/ran over by a car and killed.
Based on my research it would seem this happened approx 5am and the car was possibly an Aston Martin possibly grey/silver/white in colour.
Paul sustained fatal/severe head injuries and his ankle was broken.
The remaining Beatles were then at the scene due to the need to ID the body due the the injuries making it difficult.
After this a decision was made to replace Paul with a lookalike that had been involved with the band for some time who was also a gigging musician.
Due to the economic impact on the country if the Beatles had split in 66, a replacement for Paul was already being considered prior to the tragedy due to Paul having already expressed his wishes to leave and retire to Scotland on a farm he had bought to live with Jane.
With the impact it would have had on the nations economy and the public, this made it easier to convince those involved on that tragic day to keep the truth to themselves eg police, medical staff etc.
This didn't stop information traveling fast enough that morning for it to reach a few radio reports and also the Liverpool Post paper. After the initial info spread it was quickly silenced/retracted and the morning paper in Liverpool was withheld from delivery that morning.
Paul's death devastated the 3 remaining Beatles and they were lost without him but had to continue due to others interests and control being in the position to call the shots.
Paul's replacement realising the opportunity did his best to fit into the role and lead the 3 others during the Sgt Pepper period.
Still unhappy to not only lose Paul but also to be unwillingly deceiving others, the remaining 3 Beatles and George Martin did their best to leave clues on recordings and in art for people to discover to find out the truth and work it out for themselves.
Pauls then girlfriend was away working and when she returned she found 'Paul' to be a totally different person, she either realised, was made aware, or never quite knew but the relationship ended and Jane left 'Paul'.
Paul's replacement now free of the forced relationship through circumstance, started to settle into his role as a Beatle and began to live his new life covering his tracks so the secret didn't get out and he took a leadership role in the band which never sat well with John (who had lost his best friend and was supposed to carry on as if nothing had happened).
Eventually things became strained within the band and with 'Paul's' controlling role adding to it, John decided to leave the Beatles thus signalling the bands end in 1970.
It was in the public interest to keep the truth from being known at the time and it would have had dire consequences for the strength of the economy during 6-67 onwards, therefore the involvement of collusion was likely to involve goverment also as well as people involved with the band.
Fast forward 10 years to 1980 and you have John involved with some groups who the uk govt. want to put a stop to, also the leader of one of the groups had a gang break into Lloyds in London and take the safety deposit box contents containing photos of Princes Margaret being done by a black guy. Might not seem major now but this is a Royal - in 1970-1980 was a different time back then with different public perceptions etc.
Why is this relevant?
John paid for the group leaders bail.
What became of the leader? He was killed abroad in a 'fire' allegedly
What became of John? He was killed abroad by a 'crazy fan' allegedly
Fast forward again 20 years to 2000 and 'Paul' has had a decent solo career after the Beatles since the 80s and in 2000 George Harrison is stabbed over 40 times at home by a 'crazy fan' allegedly trying to murder him.
Early 2000s, George Martin is granted permission for his own coat of arms and after 2 years planning it is finished and contains clues and hidden meaning.
Few years later 'Paul' meets and marries Heather Mills, has a child with her and then they divorce.
Heather live on TV calls 'Paul' out stating she knows a secret about him and its worse than cheating on her and will ruin his public reputation and it doesn't matter if he has her killed over it as if anything happens to her, a friend has copies and they will release it if anything happens to Heather.
After this George Harrison passes away due to cancer leaving Ringo the sole remaining original left to tell the truth... or not, maybe he will take it to his grave also.
After this George Martin passes away leaving his coats of arms to be his final message.
There is so much on the subject including the many ideas of people and fabrications of some for reasons unknown.
A lot of things can be explained away and counter-reasons provided to leave all still no closer to finding out the truth, one way or the other.
I would like to suggest a different approach which relies on opposite bias.
This could well show where the best evidence is to finally finding out the truth.
Is anyone else here on this forum interested in this approach?
What I'm Trying To Do
Prove that Paul wasn't replaced.
How I'm Trying To Do It
By following all clues/leads/evidence that he was replaced and seeing if they can be disproved or explained.
Why I'm Trying To Do It
To see if there is any truth to the dead/replaced theory.
What I'm Expecting The Outcome To Be
I'm expecting the outcome to end up casting more doubt on things overall and I expect it will show which angles are best to pursue for the truth.
What To Do After
Follow the most credible leads/evidence.
How Can Others Help
If anyone wants to bring things to my attention for research consideration the best way is to link me to where you found anything that caught your interest. You can also check this post here for the main areas I think should be investigated.
What If Others Are Certain He Died/Was Replaced
If you are certain and convinced find your best evidence and ask yourself this 'How credible is it? Can it be disputed?'
What If Others Are Certain He Is Alive/Was Never Replaced
If you are certain and convinced find your best evidence and let me know. Also, help me disprove all the dead/replaced clues/leads/evidence.
Clues
Leads
Evidence
I will keep adding to this post of mine.
I will try my best to keep an open mind but I know collectively, if both sides of opinion work together... we all will find the answer.
I have done some research myself so far and based on this, my own theory so far is as follows...
On Wednesday Sept 11 1966 in the early hours of the morning, the Beatles were in the studio at Abbey Road working on songs and a disagreement occured. Paul stepped out to cool off/get some fresh air (or he stormed off angry). He left the studio on foot and not long after was possibly crossing/stepping out into the road and was hit/ran over by a car and killed.
Based on my research it would seem this happened approx 5am and the car was possibly an Aston Martin possibly grey/silver/white in colour.
Paul sustained fatal/severe head injuries and his ankle was broken.
The remaining Beatles were then at the scene due to the need to ID the body due the the injuries making it difficult.
After this a decision was made to replace Paul with a lookalike that had been involved with the band for some time who was also a gigging musician.
Due to the economic impact on the country if the Beatles had split in 66, a replacement for Paul was already being considered prior to the tragedy due to Paul having already expressed his wishes to leave and retire to Scotland on a farm he had bought to live with Jane.
With the impact it would have had on the nations economy and the public, this made it easier to convince those involved on that tragic day to keep the truth to themselves eg police, medical staff etc.
This didn't stop information traveling fast enough that morning for it to reach a few radio reports and also the Liverpool Post paper. After the initial info spread it was quickly silenced/retracted and the morning paper in Liverpool was withheld from delivery that morning.
Paul's death devastated the 3 remaining Beatles and they were lost without him but had to continue due to others interests and control being in the position to call the shots.
Paul's replacement realising the opportunity did his best to fit into the role and lead the 3 others during the Sgt Pepper period.
Still unhappy to not only lose Paul but also to be unwillingly deceiving others, the remaining 3 Beatles and George Martin did their best to leave clues on recordings and in art for people to discover to find out the truth and work it out for themselves.
Pauls then girlfriend was away working and when she returned she found 'Paul' to be a totally different person, she either realised, was made aware, or never quite knew but the relationship ended and Jane left 'Paul'.
Paul's replacement now free of the forced relationship through circumstance, started to settle into his role as a Beatle and began to live his new life covering his tracks so the secret didn't get out and he took a leadership role in the band which never sat well with John (who had lost his best friend and was supposed to carry on as if nothing had happened).
Eventually things became strained within the band and with 'Paul's' controlling role adding to it, John decided to leave the Beatles thus signalling the bands end in 1970.
It was in the public interest to keep the truth from being known at the time and it would have had dire consequences for the strength of the economy during 6-67 onwards, therefore the involvement of collusion was likely to involve goverment also as well as people involved with the band.
Fast forward 10 years to 1980 and you have John involved with some groups who the uk govt. want to put a stop to, also the leader of one of the groups had a gang break into Lloyds in London and take the safety deposit box contents containing photos of Princes Margaret being done by a black guy. Might not seem major now but this is a Royal - in 1970-1980 was a different time back then with different public perceptions etc.
Why is this relevant?
John paid for the group leaders bail.
What became of the leader? He was killed abroad in a 'fire' allegedly
What became of John? He was killed abroad by a 'crazy fan' allegedly
Fast forward again 20 years to 2000 and 'Paul' has had a decent solo career after the Beatles since the 80s and in 2000 George Harrison is stabbed over 40 times at home by a 'crazy fan' allegedly trying to murder him.
Early 2000s, George Martin is granted permission for his own coat of arms and after 2 years planning it is finished and contains clues and hidden meaning.
Few years later 'Paul' meets and marries Heather Mills, has a child with her and then they divorce.
Heather live on TV calls 'Paul' out stating she knows a secret about him and its worse than cheating on her and will ruin his public reputation and it doesn't matter if he has her killed over it as if anything happens to her, a friend has copies and they will release it if anything happens to Heather.
After this George Harrison passes away due to cancer leaving Ringo the sole remaining original left to tell the truth... or not, maybe he will take it to his grave also.
After this George Martin passes away leaving his coats of arms to be his final message.