Is It Possible that Mike McCartney Was Replaced?

[conneeconehead]

Mike McCartney does not resemble his father, nor mother. I know that it is indeed possible for a child to be born and resemble a relative. (For example, my eldest son resembles
my brother, my mother and my husband.( However, the photos of Paul & Mike McCartney as children, well they look A LOT alike and were often photographed wearing
matching outfits. Is is possible that John Halliday is Mike McCartney?
 So how could two brothers who looked SO MUCH ALIKE turn out to look like complete opposites?  I just cannot get this.

The reason I ask is that he is so much shorter than Paul McCartney but the resemblance between John Halliday and Paul McCartney is amazing.  It's the height and eye color
which makes me question it.  I have seen videos on youtube, particularly on "The Mike Douglas Show" where Mike McCartney was in the front row, denying everything the
"Paul is Dead" guest was explaining.  Just a thought.  I do not believe that the current Paul McCartney is the pre-1966 McCartney, particularly the great difference in height
(especially the photos with Jane Asher), Jane Asher's complete silence about the matter over the years, the ears (Paul's stuck out, Faul's are longer and flatter to his head), the eye color, etc.
 I was only 10 when The Sgt. Pepper album arrived and I remember thinking "who is this?" when I saw Paul on the cover. I think the current Mike McCartney is NOT Paul McCartney's brother;
I think John Halliday is. And that Paul did indeed pass away in 1966.

Your thoughts?

[Deleted]

do you have any comparisons photos?

[cherilyn7]

Michelle, that is ridiculous Mike McGear looks nothing like John. Also, in that wedding photo above, the nose of "Mike" has been photoshopped to look more beaky. John's nose was not beaky at all.

[superman]

Apr 13, 2017 15:37:48 GMT -5 cherilyn7 said:

Michelle, that is ridiculous Mike McGear looks nothing like John. Also, in that wedding photo above, the nose of "Mike" has been photoshopped to look more beaky. John's nose was not beaky at all.

Oh I don't know if I'd describe his other noses as "beaky", but...

[cherilyn7]

Bottom right is Mark Staycer.

[joseph]

Apr 8, 2017 17:25:24 GMT -5 @meddle said:

do you have any comparisons photos?

[ekauqodielak]

I think Mike (or one of the Mikes?) looks exactly the woman identified in photos as Mary McCartney. Dead on. Only one of the Pauls looked like them, though. And nobody resembles the father.

This might be too out there, even for this community, but has anyone else wondered if, perhaps, the fellows playing "Paul" and "John" and, possibly, one of the "George's swapped roles?

[joseph]

Dec 17, 2018 4:50:10 GMT -5 ekauqodielak said:

I think Mike (or one of the Mikes?) looks exactly the woman identified in photos as Mary McCartney. Dead on. Only one of the Pauls looked like them, though. And nobody resembles the father.

This might be too out there, even for this community, but has anyone else wondered if, perhaps, the fellows playing "Paul" and "John" and, possibly, one of the "George's swapped roles?

I said in another thread that Faul might be really Mike McCartney - the real brother of Paul. I am wondering if there were two "Mike McGears" with the same age spread, then one of each was given to the other one's mother.

[ekauqodielak]

Why would a Mike Baby swap have been done? All the pix of "Mike" that I've seen have looked like the same fellow to me.