|
Post by tafultong on Mar 6, 2008 14:58:36 GMT -5
1. Has anything happened subsequent to the Love/Code discovery or has Apple still refused to acknowledge the existence of this find, and is the love code more than the mirrored CODE? Okay, question #1 is actually three questions. If he lets you get away with that, then please try to put 64 questions in each question. But I have to tell you, this is my nightmare-------- Mike: Question 1, Has anything happened subsequent to the Love/Code discovery...
IAAP: No
Mike: ...has Apple still refused to acknowledge the existence of this find...
IAAP: Yes
Mike: ...and is the love code more than the mirrored CODE?
IAAP: Yes
Mike: Now, question #2
IAAP: No, the next question is #4. You have already asked me three questions and I have answered them. You have six more.So, Mike, please try to stay away from yes/no questions.
|
|
|
Post by skyward on Mar 6, 2008 15:05:29 GMT -5
1. Has anything happened subsequent to the Love/Code discovery or has Apple still refused to acknowledge the existence of this find, and is the love code more than the mirrored CODE? Okay, question #1 is actually three questions. If he lets you get away with that, then please try to put 64 questions in each question. But I have to tell you, this is my nightmare-------- Mike: Question 1, Has anything happened subsequent to the Love/Code discovery...
IAAP: No
Mike: ...has Apple still refused to acknowledge the existence of this find...
IAAP: Yes
Mike: ...and is the love code more than the mirrored CODE?
IAAP: Yes
Mike: Now, question #2
IAAP: No, the next question is #4. You have already asked me three questions and I have answered them. You have six more.So, Mike, please try to stay away from yes/no questions. That is what I was addressing with the 'pedantic djinni' type interview. Another topic would be Yoko Ono, the Imagine Peace Tower and the Dennis Kucinich appearance in the videos. Is the tower located in a specific location for a specific purpose? Another, what about the fires that have occurred on the dates that were provided, how are they related, if at all?
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Mar 10, 2008 20:37:55 GMT -5
Alright, we've got a list of ±30 questions. I'll need some guys to help with which questions we're gonna ask (and alter them) in private...
i think it's better if we don't do that on the forum, but on instant messaging, or a IRC conversation, for iamaphoney to be surprised (i'm sure he reads this list)
if you feel something for this, feel free to PM me
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Mar 10, 2008 20:59:28 GMT -5
A wacky gypsy named Madam Palinda is going to psychically channel John and Paul and ask them from beyond.
Tune in on your local crystal ball and find those revelations....
Well, it doesn't sound any more far fetched than Bill revealing anything on tv or radio.
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Mar 10, 2008 21:19:14 GMT -5
Mike,
Dear heart. This Q & A thing has been brewing for quite some time, and You have repeatedly asked for questions. We have given them. We have waited on deadlines. One answer to any question will suffice. 9 is quite the Field day. Iaap is talking to YOU. Get what you need. Report back, soldier.
PS IAAP you can always reach me here. Three questions and we're done.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Mar 10, 2008 23:03:43 GMT -5
A wacky gypsy named Madam Palinda is going to psychically channel John and Paul and ask them from beyond. Tune in on your local crystal ball and find those revelations.... Well, it doesn't sound any more far fetched than Bill revealing anything on tv or radio. Far-fetched? A this point? I agree with you---what is left? No much in the way of surprises. The only "surprise" that I could find surprising at this point would be for Sir Paul to "out" himself. And the public would think he was totally like kidding. Even if he said, "No, really. I am not joking. I am being completely serious." They'd think he was being either cute and charming, or sarcastic and outrageous and have a big laugh. The interviewer would say," That Macca---as big a sport as ever! And now this commercial from our sponsor." USA Today (McPaper) would have a funny blurb about how Macca put everyone on again and how silly it sounds (PID) after all these years! Nothing short of a concerted, long term campaign in the newspapers, TV, and on Billboards across America for WEEKS building up to a "big announcement" and supported with mountains of "proof" (whatever that might be) could even start to make a dent. In the long run, a well financed "pulling back of the drapes" might not even work. People would say, "Remember last year when Sir Paul launched that expensive, crazy, but very entertaining campaign claiming that he was really some kind of replacement for some other Paul guy? Wasn't that wild? Wasn't it dramatic and entertaining? Always coming up with some crazy media stunt, that Paul. What a real card! So creative!" And we'd all be saying, "Listen to him! Listen! He's not kidding!" And then they'd laugh at us. It's just how it really is. He's lucky he's got all of us, the full membership of these boards! Cause, hey, we'd believe him and support him in the outcome, whatever it would be. Believe me NOTHING would change. Except that we would know that Sir Paul TRIED to tell everyone, but the masses simply refused to believe it. He would have done all he could do to reveal the hidden truths, and still been unable to get people to accept it. He can't do it; we can't do it; basically, it can't be done. He'll never escape the legend. We'll never escape the position of "half-knowing*" what will never be fully understood. The rest of the world will never progress beyond being blissfully clueless about the whole thing. And blissfully happy about it to boot. *Half-knowing-------really, not knowing at all, but merely partially tuned in to all of the clues and hints left by Lennon and everyone else at Apple. Left by John and others to torment those of us with even a modicum of operational "radar". Radar for perceiving how all the little remarks that Lennon made might fit into the grand scheme. We have Aunt Mimi to thank for John's penchant for word play and witticisms. Perhaps she is worthy of more scrutiny in the weeks to come.
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Mar 11, 2008 1:01:15 GMT -5
A wacky gypsy named Madam Palinda is going to psychically channel John and Paul and ask them from beyond. Tune in on your local crystal ball and find those revelations.... Well, it doesn't sound any more far fetched than Bill revealing anything on tv or radio. Far-fetched? A this point? I agree with you---what is left? No much in the way of surprises. The only "surprise" that I could find surprising at this point would be for Sir Paul to "out" himself. And the public would think he was totally like kidding. Even if he said, "No, really. I am not joking. I am being completely serious." They'd think he was being either cute and charming, or sarcastic and outrageous and have a big laugh. The interviewer would say," That Macca---as big a sport as ever! And now this commercial from our sponsor." USA Today (McPaper) would have a funny blurb about how Macca put everyone on again and how silly it sounds (PID) after all these years! Nothing short of a concerted, long term campaign in the newspapers, TV, and on Billboards across America for WEEKS building up to a "big announcement" and supported with mountains of "proof" (whatever that might be) could even start to make a dent. In the long run, a well financed "pulling back of the drapes" might not even work. People would say, "Remember last year when Sir Paul launched that expensive, crazy, but very entertaining campaign claiming that he was really some kind of replacement for some other Paul guy? Wasn't that wild? Wasn't it dramatic and entertaining? Always coming up with some crazy media stunt, that Paul. What a real card! So creative!" And we'd all be saying, "Listen to him! Listen! He's not kidding!" And then they'd laugh at us. It's just how it really is. He's lucky he's got all of us, the full membership of these boards! Cause, hey, we'd believe him and support him in the outcome, whatever it would be. Believe me NOTHING would change. Except that we would know that Sir Paul TRIED to tell everyone, but the masses simply refused to believe it. He would have done all he could do to reveal the hidden truths, and still been unable to get people to accept it. He can't do it; we can't do it; basically, it can't be done. He'll never escape the legend. We'll never escape the position of "half-knowing*" what will never be fully understood. The rest of the world will never progress beyond being blissfully clueless about the whole thing. And blissfully happy about it to boot. Interesting. A number of Iamaphoney's videos show how one of the "PAUL" logos becomes "Bill" when given the "mirror treatment" (i.e., the same mirror treatment given to the Sgt Pepper drum or given to "LOVE" in order to change it into "CODE"). It's the logo in which you-know-who's vertical physique -- with feet outstretched - forms the "A" in "PAUL". When it's given the mirror treatment, the "P" becomes a "B"; the left stem in "U" becomes an "I", and the right stem in "U" and the capitol "L" both become small "l's. The body no longer stands for the letter "A" or for any letter at all; it's just window-dressing. It really does work. When I first saw how Iamaphoney was able to change "PAUL" into "Bill" by using the mirror trick, it made me think that you-know-who might be thinking or might at one time have thought of changing -- without explanation -- his professional name from "PAUL" to "Bill". If he did THAT without explanation, then yeah, that's how the public would respond. The public would treat it like another "Paul is live" album with he and the sheepdog running across Abbey Road and with that backmasked recipe for lentil soup. Yeah, if he simply changed his professional name to "Bill", they would assume that he was again thumbing his nose at the death/replacement rumors, having yet another laugh at them. But no, if he soberly made a full-fledged confession, with details as to what happened to the original JPM and further details about his own pre-1966 life, I think that people would HAVE to believe him. It would all depend on how the message was communicated.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Mar 11, 2008 1:32:44 GMT -5
Far-fetched? A this point? I agree with you---what is left? No much in the way of surprises. The only "surprise" that I could find surprising at this point would be for Sir Paul to "out" himself. And the public would think he was totally like kidding. Even if he said, "No, really. I am not joking. I am being completely serious." They'd think he was being either cute and charming, or sarcastic and outrageous and have a big laugh. The interviewer would say," That Macca---as big a sport as ever! And now this commercial from our sponsor." USA Today (McPaper) would have a funny blurb about how Macca put everyone on again and how silly it sounds (PID) after all these years! Nothing short of a concerted, long term campaign in the newspapers, TV, and on Billboards across America for WEEKS building up to a "big announcement" and supported with mountains of "proof" (whatever that might be) could even start to make a dent. In the long run, a well financed "pulling back of the drapes" might not even work. People would say, "Remember last year when Sir Paul launched that expensive, crazy, but very entertaining campaign claiming that he was really some kind of replacement for some other Paul guy? Wasn't that wild? Wasn't it dramatic and entertaining? Always coming up with some crazy media stunt, that Paul. What a real card! So creative!" And we'd all be saying, "Listen to him! Listen! He's not kidding!" And then they'd laugh at us. It's just how it really is. He's lucky he's got all of us, the full membership of these boards! Cause, hey, we'd believe him and support him in the outcome, whatever it would be. Believe me NOTHING would change. Except that we would know that Sir Paul TRIED to tell everyone, but the masses simply refused to believe it. He would have done all he could do to reveal the hidden truths, and still been unable to get people to accept it. He can't do it; we can't do it; basically, it can't be done. He'll never escape the legend. We'll never escape the position of "half-knowing*" what will never be fully understood. The rest of the world will never progress beyond being blissfully clueless about the whole thing. And blissfully happy about it to boot. Interesting. A number of Iamaphoney's videos show how one of the "PAUL" logos becomes "Bill" when given the "mirror treatment" (i.e., the same mirror treatment given to the Sgt Pepper drum or given to "LOVE" in order to change it into "CODE"). It's the logo in which you-know-who's vertical physique -- with feet outstretched - forms the "A" in "PAUL". When it's given the mirror treatment, the "P" becomes a "B"; the left stem in "U" becomes an "I", and the right stem in "U" and the capitol "L" both become small "l's. The body no longer stands for the letter "A" or for any letter at all; it's just window-dressing. It really does work. When I first saw how Iamaphoney was able to change "PAUL" into "Bill" by using the mirror trick, it made me think that you-know-who might be thinking or might at one time have thought of changing -- without explanation -- his professional name from "PAUL" to "Bill". If he did THAT without explanation, then yeah, that's how the public would respond. The public would treat it like another "Paul is live" album with he and the sheepdog running across Abbey Road and with that backmasked recipe for lentil soup. Yeah, if he simply changed his professional name to "Bill", they would assume that he was again thumbing his nose at the death/replacement rumors, having yet another laugh at them. But no, if he soberly made a full-fledged confession, with details as to what happened to the original JPM and further details about his own pre-1966 life, I think that people would HAVE to believe him. It would all depend on how the message was communicated. Yes, you are right of course. It all depends on how it's done. The biggest thing, the thing that people always jump on when I have tried to talk to a few friends about PWR, the thing they always resort to, is, "Why." That is my observation. They find PWR to be so unlikely, so unbelievable, not because of HOW could they get away with it, or HOW did they accomplish it, but WHY would something like this be carried out on a high level? THey always realize that for it to work, it had to be carried out at a high level. The other thing they balk at is, the ones I know that are old enough to have seen Sullivan in 1964 and remember, they can't see HOW they could have been fooled. They get how the public could be hoodwinked, how people too young now, or older people from back then who didn't care for the Beatles, they see how they could have not noticed. But these folks say that they were too big of a fan too have not noticed something drastically different about Paul. Actually, they say they noticed a difference, a small one, all on a account of losing his facial baby fat. I truly wish that he could come forward and just give it all up and give the full public the whole truth regarding whatever it was that happened. I truly wish that he could, and I truly wish that he wanted to do just exactly that. I really do. You don't know how much I wish he would/could. I wish that those in charge and Bill would suddenly find that the advantages to revealing the truth outweigh the official procedural directives of never telling it. Then we could see a factual reconciliation of all the composing credits of Beatle songs. We could see Paul get the praise he was entitled to; and William could finally get the true recognition for his work before, during and after the Beatles. We here at the boards could take a break and accept kudos for our collective hard work of gathering all things Beatles as exhibits and research. I live in a dream world. Sometimes. I'll forget it then. These wishes are worthless. Wishes are impotent everywhere in the world except the Magic Kingdom. But I don't Falt Disney.
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Mar 11, 2008 2:16:33 GMT -5
Interesting. A number of Iamaphoney's videos show how one of the "PAUL" logos becomes "Bill" when given the "mirror treatment" (i.e., the same mirror treatment given to the Sgt Pepper drum or given to "LOVE" in order to change it into "CODE"). It's the logo in which you-know-who's vertical physique -- with feet outstretched - forms the "A" in "PAUL". When it's given the mirror treatment, the "P" becomes a "B"; the left stem in "U" becomes an "I", and the right stem in "U" and the capitol "L" both become small "l's. The body no longer stands for the letter "A" or for any letter at all; it's just window-dressing. It really does work. When I first saw how Iamaphoney was able to change "PAUL" into "Bill" by using the mirror trick, it made me think that you-know-who might be thinking or might at one time have thought of changing -- without explanation -- his professional name from "PAUL" to "Bill". If he did THAT without explanation, then yeah, that's how the public would respond. The public would treat it like another "Paul is live" album with he and the sheepdog running across Abbey Road and with that backmasked recipe for lentil soup. Yeah, if he simply changed his professional name to "Bill", they would assume that he was again thumbing his nose at the death/replacement rumors, having yet another laugh at them. But no, if he soberly made a full-fledged confession, with details as to what happened to the original JPM and further details about his own pre-1966 life, I think that people would HAVE to believe him. It would all depend on how the message was communicated. Yes, you are right of course. It all depends on how it's done. The biggest thing, the thing that people always jump on when I have tried to talk to a few friends about PWR, the thing they always resort to, is, "Why." That is my observation. They find PWR to be so unlikely, so unbelievable, not because of HOW could they get away with it, or HOW did they accomplish it, but WHY would something like this be carried out on a high level? THey always realize that for it to work, it had to be carried out at a high level. The other thing they balk at is, the ones I know that are old enough to have seen Sullivan in 1964 and remember, they can't see HOW they could have been fooled. They get how the public could be hoodwinked, how people too young now, or older people from back then who didn't care for the Beatles, they see how they could have not noticed. But these folks say that they were too big of a fan too have not noticed something drastically different about Paul. Actually, they say they noticed a difference, a small one, all on a account of losing his facial baby fat. I truly wish that he could come forward and just give it all up and give the full public the whole truth regarding whatever it was that happened. I truly wish that he could, and I truly wish that he wanted to do just exactly that. I really do. You don't know how much I wish he would/could. I wish that those in charge and Bill would suddenly find that the advantages to revealing the truth outweigh the official procedural directives of never telling it. Then we could see a factual reconciliation of all the composing credits of Beatle songs. We could see Paul get the praise he was entitled to; and William could finally get the true recognition for his work before, during and after the Beatles. We here at the boards could take a break and accept kudos for our collective hard work of gathering all things Beatles as exhibits and research. I live in a dream world. Sometimes. I'll forget it then. These wishes are worthless. Wishes are impotent everywhere in the world except the Magic Kingdom. But I don't Falt Disney. both 3 posts are heavy to read, i know what you mean... but if sir paul will someday come forward, i'm sure he's doing it his way.. on his own tempo actually, i'm just guessing, because i don't have a single clue on whether or not he's gonna come clean
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Mar 11, 2008 2:45:50 GMT -5
Yes, you are right of course. It all depends on how it's done. The biggest thing, the thing that people always jump on when I have tried to talk to a few friends about PWR, the thing they always resort to, is, "Why." That is my observation. They find PWR to be so unlikely, so unbelievable, not because of HOW could they get away with it, or HOW did they accomplish it, but WHY would something like this be carried out on a high level? THey always realize that for it to work, it had to be carried out at a high level. The other thing they balk at is, the ones I know that are old enough to have seen Sullivan in 1964 and remember, they can't see HOW they could have been fooled. They get how the public could be hoodwinked, how people too young now, or older people from back then who didn't care for the Beatles, they see how they could have not noticed. But these folks say that they were too big of a fan too have not noticed something drastically different about Paul. Actually, they say they noticed a difference, a small one, all on a account of losing his facial baby fat. I truly wish that he could come forward and just give it all up and give the full public the whole truth regarding whatever it was that happened. I truly wish that he could, and I truly wish that he wanted to do just exactly that. I really do. You don't know how much I wish he would/could. I wish that those in charge and Bill would suddenly find that the advantages to revealing the truth outweigh the official procedural directives of never telling it. Then we could see a factual reconciliation of all the composing credits of Beatle songs. We could see Paul get the praise he was entitled to; and William could finally get the true recognition for his work before, during and after the Beatles. We here at the boards could take a break and accept kudos for our collective hard work of gathering all things Beatles as exhibits and research. I live in a dream world. Sometimes. I'll forget it then. These wishes are worthless. Wishes are impotent everywhere in the world except the Magic Kingdom. But I don't Falt Disney. both 3 posts are heavy to read, i know what you mean... but if sir paul will someday come forward, i'm sure he's doing it his way.. on his own tempo actually, i'm just guessing, because i don't have a single clue on whether or not he's gonna come clean Well, fortunately, Mike, we don't need to wait for Sir Paul anyway. Because, as I understand it, Iamaphoney has all the answers and presumably a proverbial "smoking gun" in his holster in the form of hard evidence for whatever those answers are. And on April 10, he's going to give it all to us. At least, that's what I thought that I understood. I seem to remember reading that April 10 was going to be "huge".
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Mar 11, 2008 9:14:49 GMT -5
Well, fortunately, Mike, we don't need to wait for Sir Paul anyway. Because, as I understand it, Iamaphoney has all the answers and presumably a proverbial "smoking gun" in his holster in the form of hard evidence for whatever those answers are. And on April 10, he's going to give it all to us. At least, that's what I thought that I understood. I seem to remember reading that April 10 was going to be "huge". I remember hearing the last date (so memorable I've forgotten it) was supposed to blow our minds. Instead we got a phantom suitcase in the rough. FORE!
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Mar 11, 2008 23:38:35 GMT -5
How will it happen? Perhaps Bill will use sound effects as like thunder and a powerful voice like James Earl Jones with an otherworldly sound to it....like it came from the heavens...
Maybe in visions...or dreams.....or a visit from a man in white....
oh wait, that's the Good Humor man...or the men from the "home"....
I'm thinking perhaps Ringo will be onstage with a drumroll...and Bill will jump through a giant Sgt. Pepper drum and come to a microphone and announce it...worldwide....live via satellite and we would all be dazed and confused...
Oh yeah...maybe in La La Land...
|
|
|
Post by George Spiggott on Mar 12, 2008 19:15:06 GMT -5
Interesting.., we've gone from, Nothing is Real, To; Everything is Real. What a wonderful twist of fate. Personally, I love it when the underdog triumphs, as do the Irish in boxing. Perhaps the term 'butchers dog' might be more apt tho', as in, (still) 'fit as' one .. Phwooaarr!!.. How has he managed it??
|
|
|
Post by B on Mar 12, 2008 19:22:19 GMT -5
Speaking of butchers: I would like to modestly propose that this cover is not about "butchers" at all, save the butchering of Osiris into 14 pieces, but then, did Osiris have two heads? (No.) It is, imho, the lab techs in a bio lab, in their white coats, attempting to a little genetic engineering. A little bio-engineering, if you will, bringing mummies back to life. "My Mummy's Dead" as John wrote. The Beatles yesterday (pharaohs) and today (beatles). They were the egg men (goo goob a joob!). They're portraying the origins of Faul, and possibly Paul and John. Above: Mummy resurrections. Below: clones
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Mar 12, 2008 20:08:07 GMT -5
Interesting.., we've gone from, Nothing is Real, To; Everything is Real. What a wonderful twist of fate. Personally, I love it when the underdog triumphs, as do the Irish in boxing. Perhaps the term 'butchers dog' might be more apt tho', as in, (still) 'fit as' one .. Phwooaarr!!.. How has he managed it?? Fit as a butcher's dog: The allusion is to a butcher's dog, which would be expected to be very well fed from scraps. Why that is considered to epitomize fitness isn't clear, as it might be thought more likely that the dog would be overweight than fit. John Camden Hotten, in A Dictionary of Modern Slang, Cant and Vulgar Words, 1859, defined 'butcher's dog' this way:
"To be like a butcher's dog, i.e. lie by the beef without touching it; a simile often applicable to married men."
That's clearly a different meaning, i.e. butcher's dog was then a metaphor for 'something we are close to but cannot have'. That meaning has gone out of use. I look forward to your posts Mr. Spiggot.
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Mar 12, 2008 20:54:32 GMT -5
Interesting.., we've gone from, Nothing is Real, To; Everything is Real. What a wonderful twist of fate. Personally, I love it when the underdog triumphs, as do the Irish in boxing. Perhaps the term 'butchers dog' might be more apt tho', as in, (still) 'fit as' one .. Phwooaarr!!.. How has he managed it?? ya learn somethin' new every day: phwooar An expression of extreme lust,desire www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=phwooar
|
|
|
Post by iburiedpaul on Mar 13, 2008 11:22:00 GMT -5
Speaking of butchers: did Osiris have two heads? (No.) Osiris did have two heads in a sense. He had his "manhood" head which was lost...In fact, Isis had to create a replacement: "She fashioned a substitute penis after seeing the condition it was in once she had found it." (a neat trick) <grin> "Isis had Osiris' body returned to Egypt after his death; Set had retrieved the body of Osiris and dismembered it into 14 pieces which he scattered all over Egypt. Thus Isis went out to search for each piece which she then buried. This is why there are many tombs to Osiris. The only part she did not find in her search was the genitals of Osiris which were thrown into a river by Set. She fashioned a substitute penis after seeing the condition it was in once she had found it and proceeded to have intercourse with the dead Osiris which resulted in the conception of Horus the child.[8]" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horus
|
|
|
Post by jarvitronics on Mar 13, 2008 11:54:52 GMT -5
Speaking of butchers: did Osiris have two heads? (No.) Osiris did have two heads in a sense. He had his "manhood" head which was lost...In fact, Isis had to create a replacement: "She fashioned a substitute penis after seeing the condition it was in once she had found it." (a neat trick) <grin> "Isis had Osiris' body returned to Egypt after his death; Set had retrieved the body of Osiris and dismembered it into 14 pieces which he scattered all over Egypt. Thus Isis went out to search for each piece which she then buried. This is why there are many tombs to Osiris. The only part she did not find in her search was the genitals of Osiris which were thrown into a river by Set. She fashioned a substitute penis after seeing the condition it was in once she had found it and proceeded to have intercourse with the dead Osiris which resulted in the conception of Horus the child.[8]" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HorusThat's icky. -j
|
|
|
Post by B on Mar 13, 2008 20:45:05 GMT -5
There's a face in the meat by John's finger.
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Mar 17, 2008 2:22:36 GMT -5
guys, the suitcase is still on the exact same spot as before
phoney inc. told me
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Mar 17, 2008 8:14:43 GMT -5
If it really is still there, it surely must be obvious to iaap inc no one following his antics is in state to pick it up. Hop back in your car, iaap, the one with NY plates, and bring it back home to the empire.
|
|
|
Post by B on Mar 17, 2008 8:15:00 GMT -5
Why would they leave it out and exposed?!
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Mar 17, 2008 8:21:11 GMT -5
It never rains in California.
Fed ex works too, iaap. c/o JoJo , King of New England, USA.
|
|
|
Post by jarvitronics on Mar 17, 2008 8:36:58 GMT -5
Why would they leave it out and exposed?! Maybe it is being watched? -j
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Mar 17, 2008 8:42:09 GMT -5
Why would they leave it out and exposed?! Maybe it is being watched? -j by the watchers? brbrbrbuuuuhahahahahaah! heh
|
|