|
|
Post by joseph on Oct 1, 2018 22:31:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by letitbeatle on Oct 2, 2018 6:25:55 GMT -5
That's Paul!
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Oct 2, 2018 19:56:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Oct 2, 2018 20:07:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Oct 2, 2018 20:34:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by michelle on Oct 4, 2018 2:17:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Oct 4, 2018 8:12:29 GMT -5
I had a look through the gallery and saw that Harry Benson was on the Brooklyn bridge when the twin towers were in flames. I thought, "ah this is interesting,"
so I googled his name and had a read of his wiki page and read to this part,
"Benson was standing next to Robert F. Kennedy when the senator was shot on 5 June 1968 and has remarked on the difficulty of steeling himself to document the historic moment:
"I kept telling myself 'this is for history, pull yourself together, fail tomorrow, not today.'"
He is standing next to the greatest conspiracies of the age, which strengthens my notion that Beatlemania is a conspiracy.
In answer to your question, I think it is Faul with a prosthetic chin.
|
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Oct 5, 2018 0:29:35 GMT -5
LOL! Wall is also Law backwards!  |
|
|
|
Post by michelle on Oct 5, 2018 0:51:50 GMT -5
I had a look through the gallery and saw that Harry Benson was on the Brooklyn bridge when the twin towers were in flames. I thought, "ah this is interesting," so I googled his name and had a read of his wiki page and read to this part, "Benson was standing next to Robert F. Kennedy when the senator was shot on 5 June 1968 and has remarked on the difficulty of steeling himself to document the historic moment: "I kept telling myself 'this is for history, pull yourself together, fail tomorrow, not today.'" He is standing next to the greatest conspiracies of the age, which strengthens my notion that Beatlemania is a conspiracy. In answer to your question, I think it is Faul with a prosthetic chin. Thank you Joseph! What 'Joseph' stands for? Stalin? |
|
|
|
Post by letitbeatle on Oct 5, 2018 6:57:10 GMT -5
Lucy, Iameye, JL1990,MrPilgrim, Recommendation: you should stop imitating apollo
|
|
|
|
Post by IWILL on Oct 5, 2018 7:08:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Oct 5, 2018 17:16:11 GMT -5
lol  One day Apollo I chuckled to myself yesterday when I thought I wouldn't be surprised if Harry Benson had been on the moon (film set) to meet apollo  |
|
|
|
Post by IWILL on Oct 5, 2018 19:00:02 GMT -5
lol One day Apollo I chuckled to myself yesterday when I thought I wouldn't be surprised if Harry Benson had been on the moon (film set) to meet apollo |
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Oct 5, 2018 21:01:15 GMT -5
Faul's nose looks really strange to me in the skit. I know the helmet is hiding where the bridge blends into his forehead, but the bridge still seems like it goes much higher up (Roman nose) than...well than the noses of most Fauls.
|
|
flowerchild
Help!
not in Kansas anymore.......
Posts: 68 
|
Post by flowerchild on Oct 6, 2018 13:41:36 GMT -5
I totally agree! It looks more like John,like his profile with a dark wig,like his cheekbones,too...like even his mouth...like 1965 John!
|
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Oct 6, 2018 17:47:04 GMT -5
B why did you edit my post?
|
|
|
|
Post by B on Oct 6, 2018 19:41:49 GMT -5
I have requested - ad nauseum - that posters limit the length of their lines of text to about 2/3 of the available space, due to the fact that on old Windows 98 and XP systems
any lines longer than that distort the appearance of the page and make all the posts virtually unreadable. People who fail to do so may find their posts have been modified
by me to fit the page as it appears in those old systems. I rarely alter what has been written, though at times I do for the sake of clarity or spelling. It is never to change
the content of what has been said. A rare exception is when it is necessary to make a post compliant with Proboard guidelines, in which case I post a statement saying so.
|
|
|
|
Post by letitbeatle on Oct 7, 2018 11:21:27 GMT -5
it's definitely Paul , Remember, Faul 1 (1964) had a square head  |
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Oct 7, 2018 17:34:02 GMT -5
it's definitely Paul , Remember, Faul 1 (1964) had a square head funny - we don't remember that. doubtful if anyone does  |
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Oct 7, 2018 20:07:04 GMT -5
it's definitely Paul , Remember, Faul 1 (1964) had a square head That is the man calling himself Sir Paul McCartney today. |
|
|
|
Post by Rubber Soul on Oct 7, 2018 23:21:41 GMT -5
There was no Faul until October 1966. Anything before Is either bad photographs or doctoring.
|
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Oct 8, 2018 4:53:45 GMT -5
There was no Faul until October 1966. Anything before Is either bad photographs or doctoring. There was no Paul after June 21st 1964. The Shakespeare skit was April 1964. It is no coincidence that the chosen play was "A Midsummer Night's Dream" because the Beatles were killed on the solstice. The PID "conspiracy theory" has been concocted from a mixture of truth and lies by the conspirators themselves. The purpose of which is to misdirect people from the whole truth. |
|
|
|
Post by letitbeatle on Oct 8, 2018 6:03:16 GMT -5
There was no Faul until October 1966. Anything before Is either bad photographs or doctoring. Yes Faul (1964-2018) Faul 2 or Billy (1967-2018) |
|
|
|
Post by letitbeatle on Oct 8, 2018 6:05:04 GMT -5
it's definitely Paul , Remember, Faul 1 (1964) had a square head That is the man calling himself Sir Paul McCartney today. Of course,this man and Billy |
|
|
|
Post by Rubber Soul on Oct 8, 2018 17:17:15 GMT -5
There was no Faul until October 1966. Anything before Is either bad photographs or doctoring. There was no Paul after June 21st 1964. The Shakespeare skit was April 1964. It is no coincidence that the chosen play was "A Midsummer Night's Dream" because the Beatles were killed on the solstice. The PID "conspiracy theory" has been concocted from a mixture of truth and lies by the conspirators themselves. The purpose of which is to misdirect people from the whole truth. Proof? there is no evidence for a Faul before Billy arrived on the scene circa October 1966. The Italian Forensic scientists have proven that there has been only one Paul before September 66 who consistently matches himself, And one Faul after September 66 who consistently matches himself. That is fact! |
|
.jpg){kind=icon}
