|
Post by joseph on Oct 8, 2018 18:51:39 GMT -5
There was no Paul after June 21st 1964. The Shakespeare skit was April 1964. It is no coincidence that the chosen play was "A Midsummer Night's Dream" because the Beatles were killed on the solstice. The PID "conspiracy theory" has been concocted from a mixture of truth and lies by the conspirators themselves. The purpose of which is to misdirect people from the whole truth. Proof? there is no evidence for a Faul before Billy arrived on the scene circa October 1966. The Italian Forensic scientists has proven that there have been only one Paul before September 66 who consistently matches himself, And one Faul after September 66 who consistently matches himself. That is fact! I posted proof enough for me in the OP. It's two different men and one of them is the man calling himself Paul McCartney today. If you don't think what I say is true, I can't help you.
|
|
|
Post by Rubber Soul on Oct 8, 2018 19:02:23 GMT -5
Proof? there is no evidence for a Faul before Billy arrived on the scene circa October 1966. The Italian Forensic scientists has proven that there have been only one Paul before September 66 who consistently matches himself, And one Faul after September 66 who consistently matches himself. That is fact! I posted proof enough for me in the OP. It's two different men and one of them is the man calling himself Paul McCartney today. If you don't think what I say is true, I can't help you. it's you who needs help my friend if you think Paul died in 1964. You need to have your eyes checked.
|
|
|
Post by letitbeatle on Oct 9, 2018 9:46:18 GMT -5
There was no Faul until October 1966. Anything before Is either bad photographs or doctoring.
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Dec 26, 2018 17:00:30 GMT -5
Lucy, Iameye, JL1990,MrPilgrim, Recommendation: you should stop imitating apollo Who in the hell are you - - oh, if it isn’t the walking VISA warrant herself. No, I’m only one account on here - as much as you’d like to think otherwise
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Dec 26, 2018 17:01:54 GMT -5
There was no Faul until October 1966. Anything before Is either bad photographs or doctoring. You’d learn a thing or two if you didn’t always kiss someone’s ass so much. “I only listen to Paul” ..... that’s yer problem
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Dec 26, 2018 19:32:28 GMT -5
You’d learn a thing or two if you didn’t always kiss someone’s ass so much. “I only listen to Paul” ..... that’s yer problem Beatlas231, was there Shakespeare before 1966? Oh yeah, it’s goes ages back.. hundreds of years I believe
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Dec 26, 2018 19:37:15 GMT -5
Way,
way back forever and a day...back before the day
" Nothing will come of nothing.’'
i t 's e a s y
lol
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Dec 27, 2018 4:37:54 GMT -5
Proof? there is no evidence for a Faul before Billy arrived on the scene circa October 1966. The Italian Forensic scientists have proven that there has been only one Paul before September 66 who consistently matches himself, And one Faul after September 66 who consistently matches himself. That is fact! No, what they proved was that the man in one-pre 66 photo ID'd as "Paul McCartney" was not the same man ID'd as "Paul McCartney in a post-66 photo. What you're stating is a complete misunderstanding of the both the study those scientists performed and the facts. Further, there is voluminous evidence of multiple individuals identifying as "Paul McCartney" far before the 1960s. See More Here: imgur.com/a/blHUHZV
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Apr 25, 2019 2:38:35 GMT -5
I totally agree! It looks more like John,like his profile with a dark wig,like his cheekbones,too...like even his mouth...like 1965 John! I don't know what happened but my phone stopped working and all of my social media accounts say I'm dead. This isn't spam, more like an SOS
|
|
|
Post by B on Apr 25, 2019 15:15:22 GMT -5
Have you checked the obituaries?
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Apr 26, 2019 0:14:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Apr 26, 2019 6:45:17 GMT -5
Thanks for bumping this thread timmyb52 Look at his fucking hand in the rehearsal shot: That right hand has 3 finger nubs with prosthetics masking the missing length and the entirely missing 4th digit.
|
|
|
Post by iamafunny on Apr 26, 2019 7:44:51 GMT -5
I totally agree! It looks more like John,like his profile with a dark wig,like his cheekbones,too...like even his mouth...like 1965 John! I don't know what happened but my phone stopped working and all of my social media accounts say I'm dead. This isn't spam, more like an SOS I am glad to hear that you are alive, yesterday I was really shocked when I thought that you were dead.
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Apr 30, 2019 2:12:48 GMT -5
Thanks for bumping this thread timmyb52 Look at his fucking hand in the rehearsal shot: That right hand has 3 finger nubs with prosthetics masking the missing length and the entirely missing 4th digit. Yes...alot of these pics contain a srong paranormal aspect to them IMHO.
|
|
|
Post by mystick on Jun 15, 2022 12:19:05 GMT -5
I don't know what happened but my phone stopped working and all of my social media accounts say I'm dead. This isn't spam, more like an SOS www.facebook.com/morffin42
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Jun 16, 2022 15:23:23 GMT -5
I don't know what happened but my phone stopped working and all of my social media accounts say I'm dead. This isn't spam, more like an SOS www.facebook.com/morffin42Aye that’s mine
|
|
|
Post by mystick on Jun 16, 2022 16:18:09 GMT -5
So it was just a little death?
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Jun 17, 2022 21:38:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mystick on Jun 20, 2022 7:25:03 GMT -5
Buster Bloodvessel Roll up Roll up for the Mystery Tour Roll up Roll up for the Mystery Tour The Magical Mystery Tour Is coming to take you away Coming to take you away The Magical Mystery Tour Is dying to take you away Dying to take you away Take you today www.etymonline.com/word/rollThe slang meaning "act of sexual intercourse" is attested from 1942 (compare roll in the hay). www.etymonline.com/word/welcomefrom willa "pleasure, desire, choice" (see will (n.)) + cuma "guest," related to cuman "to come,"
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Jun 22, 2022 6:14:06 GMT -5
There was no Faul until October 1966. Anything before Is either bad photographs or doctoring. This comparison is Paul is dead in a nutshell. People will dismiss the conspiracy theory and move on with their lives without investigating whether an earlier replacement took place or whether the others were replaced. The theory is doomed to fail by design.
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jun 29, 2022 8:25:49 GMT -5
Paul's face was very expressive - in fact he had the acting talent among The Beatles. But here's news flash. His expressions changed from minute to minute and day to day. But there is zero differences in the biometric measurements of the 'candidates' for your conspiracy theory - which appear to be multiple Pauls
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Jun 30, 2022 4:57:34 GMT -5
Paul's face was very expressive - in fact he had the acting talent among The Beatles. But here's news flash. His expressions changed from minute to minute and day to day. But there is zero differences in the biometric measurements of the 'candidates' for your conspiracy theory - which appear to be multiple Pauls I may have my original opinion in the OP wrong here. It is likelier the original Paul in both instances than Paul at rehearsals and Faul on television. A lot has changed since I made this thread and my understanding that the same person may look different at different times has developed. I can even apply that knowledge to photographs of myself in my own photo collection You talk about biometrics, but apply those biometrics to me and you could be mistaken for thinking I was replaced. Faul looks very much like Paul. Also, Faul looks different in photographs of himself and Paul looks different in photographs of himself. When I first saw that movie poster of Barbra Streisand tied up to a baby bottle, I converted it into a point of information that I I placed between two other points of information that were Barbra's face in What's Up Doc? and The Way We Were. I knew that analysing images from Up The Sandbox would tell me if that was the last movie by Barbra or the first movie by her imposter replacement. I am not looking at individuals like Paul McCartney in isolation. I am looking at a constellation of points of information that includes the movie poster for Up The Sandbox. When I find a new point of information and add it to the constellation, all the other points of information move to accommodate it. It could be a movie poster, it could be a song lyric, it could be a live performance. I am looking at imposter replacements from an unlimited amount of dimensions. I am not afraid to be wrong - far from it, I love being wrong. My own bias led me to believe that Barbra Streisand was replaced in 1979. It didn't sit well with me so I explored other avenues of investigation. It was her concert history that told me to look around 1972. Her's much better evidence of Paul and Faul. Not only is it Paul singing Long Tall Sally and Faul singing Long Tall Sally, it's The Beatles performing Long Tall Sally and The Fetals performing Long Tall Sally. You can see they're different, hear they're different in every note played, and you can feel it in the audience. I especially love it when the blonde girl screams, "SHIIIIT!!" in the first video, because she's overcome with excitement.
|
|
|
Post by cayetana on Jun 30, 2022 11:41:50 GMT -5
Buster Bloodvessel Roll up Roll up for the Mystery Tour Roll up Roll up for the Mystery Tour The Magical Mystery Tour Is coming to take you away Coming to take you away The Magical Mystery Tour Is dying to take you away Dying to take you away Take you today www.etymonline.com/word/rollThe slang meaning "act of sexual intercourse" is attested from 1942 (compare roll in the hay). www.etymonline.com/word/welcomefrom willa "pleasure, desire, choice" (see will (n.)) + cuma "guest," related to cuman "to come," Pink Floyd recorded their debut album Piper At The Gates of Dawn at the same time, in the same studio, as The Beatles recording Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. The studio album borrows its name from the title of chapter seven of Kenneth Grahame's 1908 novel The Wind in the Willows, which refers to the nature god Pan who plays his pan pipes at dawn. Find me in my field of grass, Mother Nature's son Swaying daises sing a lazy song beneath the sun. Piper (Latin) = Pepper (English)
|
|
|
Post by mystick on Jun 30, 2022 16:13:36 GMT -5
Buster Bloodvessel Roll up Roll up for the Mystery Tour Roll up Roll up for the Mystery Tour The Magical Mystery Tour Is coming to take you away Coming to take you away The Magical Mystery Tour Is dying to take you away Dying to take you away Take you today www.etymonline.com/word/rollThe slang meaning "act of sexual intercourse" is attested from 1942 (compare roll in the hay). www.etymonline.com/word/welcomefrom willa "pleasure, desire, choice" (see will (n.)) + cuma "guest," related to cuman "to come," Pink Floyd recorded their debut album Piper At The Gates of Dawn at the same time, in the same studio, as The Beatles recording Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. The studio album borrows its name from the title of chapter seven of Kenneth Grahame's 1908 novel The Wind in the Willows, which refers to the nature god Pan who plays his pan pipes at dawn. Find me in my field of grass, Mother Nature's son Swaying daises sing a lazy song beneath the sun. Piper (Latin) = Pepper (English) www.seedsofindia.com/item/Piper-betel-plant-Paan-Leaf-BACK-IN-STOCK-221
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Jul 8, 2022 14:42:51 GMT -5
There was no Faul until October 1966. Anything before Is either bad photographs or doctoring. Where and when is the picture on the right from? The one on the left is from the movie Help! Right?
|
|