|
Post by timmyb52 on Nov 8, 2018 16:37:45 GMT -5
I would also recommend the work of Jim Marrs in this field of Nazi survival and how they infiltrated business,banking and manufacturing. WOW GREAT BOOK! Once we see how obvious it is the NAZIS have goofed everything up why does everyone blame the Jews for everything? They usually give some lame explanation like "Hitler was a Jew"! If Hitler was a Jew why did he hate the Jews? Some people claim the Jewish Zionists (Khazars who are not Semetic peoples)colluded with Hitler to use natural born Jews as a political device in the Holocaust in order to get a new homeland. They claim that these Zionist Jews are converted Jews and not natural Semetic Jews of the line of David...spoken of in The Book of Revelations 3:9; "Behold, I give of the synagogue of Satan, of them that say they are Jews, and they are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee." It is also claimed these fake Jews of non-Davidic blood are in league with Antichrist and his fascist ideology in The End Times. That is the explanation as I understand it hotman.
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Nov 8, 2018 22:43:03 GMT -5
WOW GREAT BOOK! Once we see how obvious it is the NAZIS have goofed everything up why does everyone blame the Jews for everything? They usually give some lame explanation like "Hitler was a Jew"! If Hitler was a Jew why did he hate the Jews? Some people claim the Jewish Zionists (Khazars who are not Semetic peoples)colluded with Hitler to use natural born Jews as a political device in the Holocaust in order to get a new homeland. They claim that these Zionist Jews are converted Jews and not natural Semetic Jews of the line of David...spoken of in The Book of Revelations 3:9; "Behold, I give of the synagogue of Satan, of them that say they are Jews, and they are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee." It is also claimed these fake Jews of non-Davidic blood are in league with Antichrist and his fascist ideology in The End Times. That is the explanation as I understand it hotman. OK but you would think Hitler would LOVE the "fascist ideology of the end times"! That would be just his cup of tea!
|
|
|
Post by B on Nov 10, 2018 21:35:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Nov 10, 2018 22:48:20 GMT -5
Some people claim the Jewish Zionists (Khazars who are not Semetic peoples)colluded with Hitler to use natural born Jews as a political device in the Holocaust in order to get a new homeland. They claim that these Zionist Jews are converted Jews and not natural Semetic Jews of the line of David...spoken of in The Book of Revelations 3:9; "Behold, I give of the synagogue of Satan, of them that say they are Jews, and they are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee." It is also claimed these fake Jews of non-Davidic blood are in league with Antichrist and his fascist ideology in The End Times. That is the explanation as I understand it hotman. OK but you would think Hitler would LOVE the "fascist ideology of the end times"! That would be just his cup of tea! He did...in his own way (lol). Hitler did see himself as a messiah figure of the germanic peoples. His 1000 year reich was in line with Christs 1000 year millennial reign on earth at his second coming.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Nov 11, 2018 3:33:09 GMT -5
No joke, I was *just* about to post that. I wonder if there's a more in-depth interview with her wherein she might mention ears....
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Nov 11, 2018 17:11:38 GMT -5
OK but you would think Hitler would LOVE the "fascist ideology of the end times"! That would be just his cup of tea! He did...in his own way (lol). Hitler did see himself as a messiah figure of the germanic peoples. His 1000 year reich was in line with Christs 1000 year millennial reign on earth at his second coming. So Jesus was COMPETITION! Hitler lost! HA HA!
|
|
|
Post by lucy on Nov 11, 2018 22:31:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Nov 18, 2018 18:22:56 GMT -5
I definitely think Bill has intelligence connections, But I don't think the original lads were connected to any intelligence agencies until they were hijacked in 1966 with Paul's murder and Bill arrived on the scene. you're right, of course. however, there's 'nazis' dumping anti-beatle crap like this topic and the stupid comments under it on this site. they're very active
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Nov 20, 2018 4:55:11 GMT -5
You've got me pegged all wrong and I will take offense.
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Nov 21, 2018 6:58:04 GMT -5
I’m sorry just the title of this thread made me laugh out loud, is that weird ? (Of course it’s not)
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Nov 21, 2018 6:58:50 GMT -5
You've got me pegged all wrong and I will take offense. Hey I take offense to the word pegged I’m so offended
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Nov 21, 2018 7:00:56 GMT -5
Carter Page’sRUs, or are they?
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Dec 4, 2018 22:48:21 GMT -5
The CIA Master of Disguise from the Wired video did a Reddit AMA today. Not being a regular redditor, that I stumbled upon it as it was about to begin was dumb luck. However, she did not respond to my question about Paul wearing fake ears or the alteration of spy ears, in general.
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Dec 28, 2018 16:18:29 GMT -5
no, the beatles were not baddies, ffs. they were extraordinary anti-military musicians whose every public utterance was the polar opposite of uscia's and its main client, the military's missions, and, most assuredly the rhetoric given to justify those missions to the public
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Dec 29, 2018 23:57:49 GMT -5
no, the beatles were not baddies, ffs. they were extraordinary anti-military musicians whose every public utterance was the polar opposite of uscia's and its main client, the military's missions, and, most assuredly the rhetoric given to justify those missions to the public This reads like parody.
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jan 6, 2019 14:02:50 GMT -5
no, the beatles were not baddies, ffs. they were extraordinary anti-military musicians whose every public utterance was the polar opposite of uscia's and its main client, the military's missions, and, most assuredly the rhetoric given to justify those missions to the public This reads like parody. the truth often does in times of universal deceit
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Jan 7, 2019 17:52:09 GMT -5
The best description I can give for The Beatles, or any other members of the "counter-culture" when it comes to anti-war is controlled opposition.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Jan 8, 2019 2:31:11 GMT -5
The best description I can give for The Beatles, or any other members of the "counter-culture" when it comes to anti-war is controlled opposition. Exactly. The examples of such, in only the last twenty years, are too numerous to even begin listing. Did you see that documentary about the Breitbart stooge who "began" as a far-left "anarchist organizer" feeding and clothing people in the wake of Katrina in NOLA/Austin? He went on to set up a couple of kids for terrorist activities that he came up with and badgered them to do for months and months and months and finally they succumbed to the pressure. They got sent to the pokey for life. He winds up on the FBI and Breitbart's payroll while raking in 10s of thousands on the "alt right" speaking circuit. These people don't have politics (or even moral stances), they have business interests.
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Jan 8, 2019 14:09:41 GMT -5
The best description I can give for The Beatles, or any other members of the "counter-culture" when it comes to anti-war is controlled opposition. Exactly. The examples of such, in only the last twenty years, are too numerous to even begin listing. Did you see that documentary about the Breitbart stooge who "began" as a far-left "anarchist organizer" feeding and clothing people in the wake of Katrina in NOLA/Austin? He went on to set up a couple of kids for terrorist activities that he came up with and badgered them to do for months and months and months and finally they succumbed to the pressure. They got sent to the pokey for life. He winds up on the FBI and Breitbart's payroll while raking in 10s of thousands on the "alt right" speaking circuit. These people don't have politics (or even moral stances), they have business interests. Anything "alt-" is coming from central intelligence just as much as the mainstream. That includes music and comedy as well as politics.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Jan 9, 2019 1:15:57 GMT -5
It's an interesting way of delegitimizing any movement by branding it as extraneous.
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jan 9, 2019 2:55:48 GMT -5
The best description I can give for The Beatles, or any other members of the "counter-culture" when it comes to anti-war is controlled opposition. a not very nice or accurate 'description' as it arrives without a shred of evidence - if applied to the beatles before the replacement of mccartney. though we agree that it does apply post replacement (demonstrated by the ineffective 'anti-war' rhetoric and acts initiated by lennon and harrison post replacement). but, certainly billy is a grand example of extremely controlled, though hardly to be considered 'opposition'; as he recorded dreck in support of the 9/11 fraud and thus the contemptible invasion and occupation of provably 'non-involved in the plot' iraq. what we know about the decade of assassinations is that 4 well known and beloved liberal leaders (and countless others non-fatally injured in the struggles) opposed to the status quo took bullets to end true liberal opposition from those days forward mccartney was one of the most recognised moral forces among cultural figures of the time. his offer to pen the music for lane's 'rush to judgement' remembered and told by several able researchers, was turned down by lane because of lane's conviction it would hurt paul and the beatles professionally. paul was a constant and well spoken critic of bigotry and violent military aggression spilling all around at the time, and would have been a plum target for say pentagon planners looking not only to silence another opponent and leader, but to gain control of the most influential force speaking to youth at the time - one that had demonstrated a stranglehold on their minds, ears, and hearts; an influence the chiefs wanted as their very own. we, of course, mean the beatles, or what was left of the beatles after mccartney 'went missing'. unfortunately liberalism and moderates 'went missing' in large droves as well. now we have billy and lucchese associate trump holding court - and, your controlled opposition has no better examples than those two buggers
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Jan 9, 2019 22:14:09 GMT -5
Joseph's correct assumption that the majority of the members of this board would not need him to rehash the information supportive of his statement does not in any way indicate a lack of the existence of that supportive information. On the contrary, I see no evidence whatsoever of Joseph or anyone else in this thread agreeing with you. That a tactic turns out to be ineffective does not in any way negate the fact that, it was, indeed, a tactic employed in the aspiration of an objective. You've supplied zero evidence whatsoever of any of your assertions. According to whom? You? Bob Dylan was a moral voice. Paul McCartney was 'the cute one' in a boy band. OK and NO ONE knew about it at the time, other than Paul and Lane a a few of their associates. He was not considered a political voice because of his offer to do something the public had no clue about. A little hyperbolic wouldn't you admit? Oh? According to whom? Based upon what supportive documentation? Subjective, suppositional and unsubstantiated. The Beatles never existed...Paul McCartney is a role, not a human.
|
|